$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] 국제학업성취도평가(PISA)의 수학 소양의 정의 및 평가틀의 변화를 통해 살펴본 수학교육의 방향
Exploring the direction of mathematics education in Korea based on the changes of definitions of mathematical literacy and frameworks in PISA

韓國學校數學會論文集 = Journal of the Korean school mathematics society, v.27 no.1, 2024년, pp.91 - 105  

최인선 (한국교육과정평가원)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구에서는 PISA OECD가 발간한 PISA 관련 자료를 토대로 PISA 평가의 근간이 되는 수학 소양과 이에 따른 평가틀이 어떻게 변화해 왔는지를 살펴보았다. 수학 소양의 정의가 PISA 주기에 따라 어떻게 변화하였는지 왜 변화하였는지를 PISA 결과보고서를 토대로 살펴보고, 이에 따라 수학 평가틀이 어떻게 변화하였는지를 주기별로 정리하였다. 이후 PISA 수학 소양의 의미와 평가틀의 변화가 우리나라 수학교육에 주는 시사점을 도출하였다. 도출된 시사점을 바탕으로 우리나라 수학교육에서 미래 시민으로 필요한 수학 내용 영역이 무엇인지, 수학적 개념을 어떻게 지도해야 하는지에 무게를 두고 우리나라의 수학교육이 나아가야 할 방향을 제언하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Drawing on PISA data published by the PISA OECD, this study examines how the mathematical literacy and frameworks underpinning PISA assessments have evolved over time. Through PISA results reports from PISA 2000 to PISA 2022, this study examines how and why the definition of mathematical literacy ha...

Keyword

#국제학업성취도평가   #수학 소양   #수학 평가틀  

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2008). 2007 revised high？school curriculum commentary: Mathematics (Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development Notice？No. 2007-79). Ministry of Education, Science and Technology Publication Registration No. 11-1341000-000530-14.？ 

  2. Ministry of Education (1997). Explanation？of the 7th high school curriculum: Mathematics (Ministry of Education Notice No. 1997-15). Ministry of Education.？ 

  3. Ministry of Education (2021).？2022 revised curriculum overview highlights(draft). Ministry of Education press release (2021. 11. 24.).？ 

  4. Ministry of Education (2022).？2022 basic education statistics survey results announced. Ministry of Education press release (2022. 8. 30.).？ 

  5. Ministry of Education (2023). Results of the OECD programme for international student assessment (PISA 2022)？announced. Ministry of Education press release (2023. 12. 5.).？ 

  6. Ku. J. O., Kim, S. S., Rim, H. M., Park, H. Y., & Han. J. A. (2015).？Programme for International Student Assessment(PISA 2015) main survey technical report. Korea Institute for？Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report RRE 2015-6-2.？ 

  7. Kim, K. H., Si, K. J., Kim, M. Y., Ok, H. J., Rim, H. M., & Kim, S.？H. (2010). The programme for international students assessment(PISA 2009) results. Korea Institute for Curriculum？and Evaluation research report RRE 2010-4-2.？ 

  8. Kim, S. K., Kim, M. H., Kim. I. S., Lee, S. Y., & Bak. H. S. (2023). The Programme？for International Students Assessment(PISA 2022) results. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research？Report RRE 2023-10.？ 

  9. Kim, J. H. (2020). Analyzing the gap between intention and reality of the OECD PISA: Focusing？on the effects of power on curriculum reform. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(2), 5-26.？ 

  10. Kim, H. K., Song, M. H., Choi, I. Y., & Jong, I. W.？(2020). Characteristics of low-achievers in computer-based mathematics assessment: Evidence from PISA 2018.？School Mathematics, 22(3), 791-809.？ 

  11. Na, G.？S. (2005). A profile of mathematical literacy on Korean students in PISA 2003. The Journal of Educational Research？in Mathematics, 15(2), 147-176.？ 

  12. Park, K.,？Lee, H., Park, S., Kang, E., Kim, S., Lim, H., Kim, S. Chang, H., Kang, T., Kwon, J., Kim, M., Bang, J., Lee,？H., Lim, M., Lee, M., Kim, H., Yun, S., Lee, K., Lee, K., Jo, H., Kwon, Y., Kwon, O., Shin, D., Kang, H., Kim,？J., Do, J., Park, J., Seo, B., An, H., Oh, T., Lee, K., Lee, K., Lee, M., Lee, S., Lee, E., Lee, J., Jeon, T., Choi,？J., Hwang, S., Park, M., Kim, H., Kang, S., & Yeo, M. (2015). A development of a draft for the 2015 revised？mathematics Curriculum II. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity Research Reprot？BD15120005.？ 

  13. Song, M. Y., Rim, H. M., Choi, H. J., Park. H. Y., & Son, S. K. (2013). OECD？programme for international students assessment : Analyzing PISA 2012 results. Korea Institute for Curriculum？and Evaluation Research Report RRE 2013-6-1.？ 

  14. Shin, I., Hwang, H., Kim, D., Lee, D., Song, M., Shin, H., Chang, H., Kim,？S., Ko, H., Kim, S., Lee, H., Bang, S., Park, H., Lee, J., Kim, Y., Do, J., Kim, H., Jeon, C., Choi, H., Ko, M.,？Hwang, H., Son, B., Oh, E., & Song, H. (2011). A study of the mathematics curriculum according to the 2009？revised curriculum. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.？ 

  15. Lee, M. Kwak, Y. S., Min, K. S., Chae, S. H., Na,？G. S., & Park, K. M. (2004). OECD/PISA 2003 assessment framework and sample items - Mathematical, scientific,？and problem solving literacy domain-. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation research report ORM？2004-25-1.？ 

  16. Lee, I. W.？(2020). A study on characteristics of reading achievement of Korean students in PISA 2018 results. The Korean Language and Literature, 86, 123-156.？ 

  17. Rim, H. M. (2012).？PISA 2012 computer-based problem solving assessment framework and published items. Studies in Mathematical？Education, 2, 61-66.？ 

  18. Rim, H. M.？(2013). The trends and what's new in the OECD PISA and its items. Journal of Research in Curriculum &？Instruction, 17(4), 971-990.？ 

  19. Rim,？H. M. (2016). International comparative analysis on East Asian top level countries' mathematics achievements？in PISA 2012 results. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 19(4), 441-457.？ 

  20. Cho, S. M. (2020).？Investigation of PISA 2022 mathematics framework and illustrative examples. Journal of the Korean School？Mathematics Society, 23(3), 299-321.？ 

  21. Cho, S. M., & Koo, N. W. (2020). An analysis of characteristics of Korean students' mathematics？achievement in comparison with the high-ranking countries in PISA 2015. Journal of Research in Curriculum &？Instruction, 24(3), 262-272.？ 

  22. Cho, S. M., Koo, N. W., Kim, H. J., Lee, S. Y., & Lee, I. W.？(2019). OECD Programme for international student assessment: establishing a foundation of PISA 2021 field trial.？Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation research report ORM 2019-120.？ 

  23. Cho, S. M., Kim, H. J., Lee, S. Y., Koo, N. W., & Lee, I. W. (2018). Programme？for international student assessment(PISA 2018) main survey technical report. Korea Institute for Curriculum and？Evaluation Research Report ORM 2018-87.？ 

  24. Cho, J. M., Dong, H. K., Ok, H. J., Rim, H. M., & Jung, H. K. (2012).？Programme for international student assessment(PISA 2012) main survey technical report. Korea Institute for？Curriculum and Evaluation research report RRE 2012-3-1.？ 

  25. Choi,？S. H., Ro, K. H., & Park, K. M. (2001). PISA 2000 initial report: A mathematical literacy profile of Korean students.？Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report RRE 2001-9-3.？ 

  26. Choi, I. S., Kim, M. H., Kim. S. J.,？Kim, H. J., & Lee, S. Y. (2021a). Relation analysis of cognitive achievement and context variables about PISA 2018？top-performing countries. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report RRE 2021-4.？ 

  27. Choi, I. S., Kim, M. H., Kim. S. J., Kim, H. J., & Lee, S. Y. (2021b). Programme？for international student assessment(PISA 2022) field test technical report. Korea Institute for Curriculum and？Evaluation Research Material ORM 2021-126.？ 

  28. Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. D. Reidel Publishing Company. 

  29. OECD (1999a). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33693997.pdf？ 

  30. OECD (1999b). The PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33692793.pdf？ 

  31. OECD (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework - Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and？skills. OECD publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33694881.pdf？ 

  32. OECD (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world - First results from PISA 2003. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/34002216.pdf？ 

  33. OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: Changes in student performance since 2000 (VolumeV). OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091580-en？ 

    crossref

  34. OECD (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States, strong performers and successful reformers in education. OECD？Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en？ 

    crossref

  35. OECD (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial？literacy. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en？ 

    crossref

  36. OECD (2018a). PISA 2022 integrated design. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PISA-2022-Integrated-Design.pdf？ 

  37. OECD (2018b). PISA 2022 mathematics framework (draft). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/sitedocument/PISA-2021-mathematics-framework.pdf？ 

  38. OECD (2019a). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en？ 

    crossref

  39. OECD (2019b). PISA 2018 Results: What students know and can do (Vol. 1). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5f07c754-en.pdf?expires1666602989&idid&accnameguest&checksum89FAB0DE9544DDA2EF2963C5297F3AA0？ 

  40. OECD (2020). PISA 2022 technical standards. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PISA-2022-Technical-Standards.pdf？ 

  41. OECD (2023). PISA 2022 technical report. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/pisa2022technicalreport/ 

  42. Stacey, K., & Wiliam, D. (2012). Technology and assessment in mathematics. In M. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel,？J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 27). New York,？NY: Springer International Handbooks of Education, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_23？ 

    crossref

  43. World Economic Forum [WEF] (2016). Annual report 2015-2016. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Annual_Report_2015-2016.pdf？ 

  44. World Economic Forum [WEF] (2022). Annual report 2021-2022. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Annual_Report_2021_22.pdf？ 

  45. Yamamoto, K., Shin, H. J., & Khorramdel, L. (2018). Multistage adaptive testing design in international large-scale？assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(4), 16-27.？ 

저자의 다른 논문 :

활용도 분석정보

상세보기
다운로드
내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

관련 콘텐츠

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로