$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

테크놀로지 활용 수학 수업의 분석을 위한 도구로서의 PICRAT 모델
The PICRAT model as a tool for analysis of mathematics classes using technology 원문보기

韓國學校數學會論文集 = Journal of the Korean school mathematics society, v.27 no.1, 2024년, pp.71 - 89  

이지연 (공주여자고등학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

테크놀로지를 활용한 교수·학습이 강조됨에 따라 테크놀로지의 통합을 설명하기 위한 여러 가지 모델이 제안되었으며, 특히 TPACK을 중심으로 테크놀로지 활용에 관한 연구가 활발히 진행되었다. 그러나 TPACK은 교사의 지식에만 초점을 두었기 때문에 실제 수업에서 테크놀로지가 어떤 양상으로 활용되고 있는지, 학생은 테크놀로지를 통해 어떤 경험을 하는지를 분석하는 데 한계를 가진다. 본 연구에서는 테크놀로지를 활용한 수학 수업을 분석하기 위한 렌즈로서, '학생과 테크놀로지와의 관계'와 '교사의 수업 관행'에 초점을 둔 PICRAT 모델(Kimmons, Graham, & West, 2020)을 소개하고, 모델을 통한 수학 수업 설계의 분석 사례를 살펴봄으로써 PICRAT 모델의 적용 가능성과 수학교육 및 교사 교육에의 시사점을 탐색하고자 하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

As teaching and learning using technology has been emphasized, several models have been proposed to explain the integration of technology, and research on technology use has been actively conducted, especially focusing on TPACK. However, by focusing on only the teacher's knowledge, TPACK has limitat...

주제어

#PICRAT 모델   #테크놀로지   #수학 수업 분석   #교사 교육  

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Kang, H., Ko, E., Kim, T., Cho, W., Lee, K., & Lee, D.？(2011). Mathematics teachers' perspectives on competencies for good teaching and perspective teacher education.？School Mathematics, 13(4), 633-649. 

  2. Ministry of Education (2022). Mathematics curriculum (# 2022-33 supplement 8). Ministry of Education. 

  3. Ministry of Education (2020.5.). Comprehensive plan for mathematics education. Ministry of Education Curriculum Policy Director. 

  4. Kim, Y., Kwon, O., & Oh, H. (2014). Development of the classification criteria for technology teacher education.？Korean Society Of Educational Technology, 30(1), 105-131. 

  5. Byun, Y., & Kim, S. (2020). Analysis on self-study of high school mathematics teachers using technology.？School Mathematics, 22(2), 373-394. 

  6. Lee, D., & Whang, Woo. (2018). A study on TPACK of mathematics？teachers : Focusing on recognitions and educational needs of TPACK. The Mathematical Education, 57(1), 1-36. 

  7. Rim, H. (2009). Study on the effectiveness of team project to improve TPACK of preservice？mathematics teachers. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 19(4), 545-564. 

  8. Rim, H., Jeon, Y., Lee, B., &？Lee, J. (2023). Design statistics classes with CODAP. Seoul: Kyungmoon. 

  9. Jang,？K. (2017). Pre-service secondary mathematics teacher education program for technology integrated curriculum:？The present and tasks. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 27(1), 137-156. 

  10. Asim, S., Ellis, J., Slykhuis, D., & Trumble, J. (2022). Three domains for technology integration in science teacher？education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 22(4), 664-684. 

  11. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation？and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119-142. 

    상세보기

  12. Florida Center for Instructional Technology (2019). The technology integration matrix. Retrieved February 17, 2024,？from https://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/matrix/ 

  13. Geraniou, E., & Misfeldt, M. (2023). The mathematical competencies framework and digital technologies. In Mathematical？competencies in the digital era (pp. 39-60). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 

  14. Geraniou, E., & Jankvist, U. T. (2019). Towards a definition of "mathematical digital competency". Educational Studies？in Mathematics, 102(1), 29-45. 

    상세보기

  15. Geraniou, E., Jankvist, U. T., Elicer, R., Tamborg, A. L., & Misfeldt, M. (2022). On mathematical digital competency？for teaching: The case of an expert teacher. Mathematics Education in the Digital Age-MEDA3, 3, 161-168. 

  16. Goyer, A. (2023). Supporting pre-service elementary teachers' early algebraic thinking with technology through lesson？planning and TPACK. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada. 

  17. Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition？(SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60, 433-441. 

    상세보기

  18. Heberer Jr, D. H. (2021). Teacher perceptions & practice of technology integration before and after PICRAT matrix？professional development intervention. Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University. 

  19. Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (2004). The compensatory effectiveness of the Quicktionary Reading Pen II on the？reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of special education Technology, 20(1), 31-40. 

    상세보기

  20. Hughes, J., Thomas, R., & Scharber, C. (2006). Assessing technology integration: The RAT-replacement, amplification,？and transformation-framework. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference？(pp. 1616-1620). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 

  21. Kimmons, R. (2018a). K-12 technology frameworks. RE West, foundations of learning and instructional design technology:？The past, present, and future of learning and instructional design technology. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/k12_tech_frameworks 

  22. Kimmons, R. (2018b). Technology integration: Effectively integrating technology in educational settings. In A. OttenbreitLeftwich, & R. Kimmons (Ed.), The K-12 educational technology handbook. Tech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/k12handbook/technology_integration 

  23. Kimmons, R., Draper, D., & Backman, J. (2022). PICRAT: The PICRAT technology integration model. EdTechnica: The？Open Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. https://dx.doi.org/10.59668/371.5895 

    crossref

  24. Kimmons, R., Graham, C. R., & West, R. E. (2020). The PICRAT model for technology integration in teacher preparation.？Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 176-198. 

  25. Koehler, M. (2012). What is TPACK? Retrieved February 17, 2024, from http://www.tpack.org/ 

  26. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development？of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152. 

    상세보기

  27. Ligas, M. R. (2002). Evaluation of Broward county alliance of quality schools project. Journal of Education for Students？Placed at Risk, 7(2), 117-139. 

    상세보기

  28. McCulloch, A. W., & Lovett, J. N. (2023). Exploring math with technology: Practices for secondary math teachers. London:？Taylor & Francis. 

  29. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher？knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. 

  30. Pizzo, J., Svrcek, N. S., Colantonio-Yurko, K., Kelley, A., Miller, H. C., & Coppola, N. (2023). Using PICRAT to develop？digital graphic organizers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 96(6), 189-199. 

    상세보기

  31. Puentedura, R. R. (2012). Transforming learning through technology: Goals and models. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2012/12/12/TransformingLearningThroughTechnologyGoalsAndModels.pdf 

  32. Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR: First steps. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/11/13/SAMR_FirstSteps.pdf 

  33. Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing？reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 620-627. 

    상세보기

  34. Shotlekov, I. (2021). Technology integration evaluation and critical self-reflection using the Picrat model in the math？and it Classrooms In Proceedings of the thirty ninth spring conference of the union of Bulgarian Mathematicians？Albena. 

  35. Wang, L. (2023). Adoption of the PICRAT model to guide the integration of innovative technologies in the teaching？of a linguistics course. Sustainability, 15(5), 3886. 

    상세보기

  36. Xin, J. F., & Rieth, H. (2001). Video-assisted vocabulary instruction for elementary school students with learning？disabilities. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2001(1), 87-103. 

관련 콘텐츠

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로