다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
Foods, v.10 no.1, 2021년, pp.24 -
Tso, Rachel (Clinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute for Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 117599, Singapore) , Lim, Amanda JiaYing (rachel_tso@sifbi.a-star.edu.sg (R.T.)) , Forde, Ciarán G. (Amanda_Lim@sifbi.a-star.edu.sg (A.J.L.))
AI-Helper
Alternative proteins are receiving increased global attention. This burgeoning interest in plants (especially plant-based meat alternatives), insects, algae, and cultured meat has been attributed to their reported health benefits, lower environmental impact and improved animal welfare compared to co...
1. Mintel Plant-Based Push: UK Sales of Meat-Free Foods Shoot Up 40% between 2014–2019 Available online: https://www.mintel.com/press-centre/food-and-drink/plant-based-push-uk-sales-of-meat-free-foods-shoot-up-40-between-2014-19#:~:text=According%20to%20Mintel%20research%2C%20the,%25%20among%20all%20under%2D45s (accessed on 13 October 2020)
2. The Business Times Impossible Foods launches plant-based sausage product in HK The Business Times 11 9 2020 Available online: https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/consumer/impossible-foods-launches-plant-based-sausage-product-in-hk (accessed on 13 October 2020)
3. Bashi Z. McCullough R. Ong L. Ramirez M. Alternative proteins: The Race for Market Share Is on Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/agriculture/our-insights/alternative-proteins-the-race-for-market-share-is-on (accessed on 28 September 2020)
4. Henchion M. Hayes M. Mullen A.M. Fenelon M. Tiwari B. Future Protein Supply and Demand: Strategies and Factors Influencing a Sustainable Equilibrium Foods 2017 6 53 10.3390/foods6070053
5. United Nations World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division New York, NY, USA 2019
6. Attwood S. Hajat C. How will the COVID-19 pandemic shape the future of meat consumption? Public Health Nutr. 2020 1 5 10.1017/S136898002000316X
7. Terazono E. Meyer G. Pandemic accelerates shift to meat substitutes The Financial Times 27 4 2020 Available online: https://www.ft.com/content/0127984a-6def-4040-9bca-002b6ffd4e0a (accessed on 15 October 2020)
8. Monaco E. How meat eaters, not vegans, are driving the plant-based foods boom, according to industry experts Business Insider 21 9 2020 Available online: https://www.businessinsider.com/plant-based-meats-flexitarians-vegetarians-vegans-market-revolution-2020-9 (accessed on 15 October 2020)
9. Lucas A. An unintended consequence of meatless burger boom: Vegans’ lives got easier CNBC 26 10 2019 Available online: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/26/an-unintended-consequence-of-meatless-burger-boom-vegans-lives-got-easier.html (accessed on 15 October 2020)
10. Hartmann C. Siegrist M. Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017 61 11 25 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.12.006
11. Lang M. Consumer acceptance of blending plant-based ingredients into traditional meat-based foods: Evidence from the meat-mushroom blend Food Qual. Prefer. 2020 79 103758 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103758
12. Henchion M. McCarthy M. Resconi V.C. Troy D. Meat consumption: Trends and quality matters Meat Sci. 2014 98 561 568 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.007 25060586
13. Bryant C. Szejda K. Parekh N. Desphande V. Tse B. A Survey of Consumer Perceptions of Plant-Based and Clean Meat in the USA, India, and China Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2019 3 11 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00011
14. Delgado C.L. Rising Consumption of Meat and Milk in Developing Countries Has Created a New Food Revolution J. Nutr. 2003 133 3907S 3910S 10.1093/jn/133.11.3907S 14672289
15. Popkin B.M. Adair L.S. Ng S.W. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries Nutr. Rev. 2012 70 3 21 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00456.x 22221213
16. Slade P. If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers Appetite 2018 125 428 437 10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030 29501683
17. Hoek A.C. Luning P.A. Weijzen P. Engels W. Kok F.J. De Graaf C. Replacement of meat by meat substitutes. A survey on person-and product-related factors in consumer acceptance Appetite 2011 56 662 673 10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.001 21315123
18. Vanhonacker F. Van Loo E.J. Gellynck X. Verbeke W. Flemish consumer attitudes towards more sustainable food choices Appetite 2013 62 7 16 10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.003 23195711
19. Tao J. Li Y.O. Edible insects as a means to address global malnutrition and food insecurity issues Food Qual. Saf. 2018 2 17 26 10.1093/fqsafe/fyy001
20. Mutungi C. Irungu F.G. Nduko J. Mutua F. Affognon H. Nakimbugwe D. Ekesi S. Fiaboe K.K.M. Postharvest processes of edible insects in Africa: A review of processing methods, and the implications for nutrition, safety and new products development Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019 59 276 298 10.1080/10408398.2017.1365330 28853909
21. Orkusz A. Wolaska W. Harasym J. Piwowar A. Kapelko M. Consumers’ Attitudes Facing Entomophagy: Polish Case Perspectives Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 17 2427 10.3390/ijerph17072427 32252454
22. Wells M.L. Potin P. Craigie J.S. Raven J.A. Merchant S.S. Helliwell K.E. Smith A.G. Camire M.E. Brawley S.H. Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: Revisiting our understanding J. Appl. Phycol. 2017 29 949 982 10.1007/s10811-016-0974-5 28458464
23. Fortune Business Insights Commercial Seaweed Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis, By Type (Red Seaweed, Brown Seaweed, & Green Seaweed), Form (Flakes, Powder, & Liquid), End-uses (Food & Beverages, Agricultural Fertilizers, Animal Feed Additives, Pharmaceuticals, and Cosmetics & Personal Care), and Regional Forecast, 2020–2027; Fortune Business Insights 9 2020 160 Available online: https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/commercial-seaweed-market-100077 (accessed on 14 October 2020)
24. Misurcova L. Chemical Composition of Seaweeds Handbook of Marine Macroalgae Kim S.-K. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Chichester, West Sussex, UK 2011 171 192
25. Fountain H. Engineering the $325,000 In Vitro Burger The New York Times 12 5 2013 Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/science/engineering-the-325000-in-vitro-burger.html (accessed on 15 October 2020)
26. Verbeke W. Marcu A. Rutsaert P. Gaspar R. Seibt B. Fletcher D. Barnett J. ‘Would you eat cultured meat?’: Consumers’ reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom Meat Sci. 2015 102 49 58 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013 25541372
27. Kumar S. Meat Analogs “Plant based alternatives to meat products: Their production technology and applications” Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016 10.1080/10408398.2016.1196162
28. Cotas J. Leandro A. Pacheco D. Gonçalves A.M.M. Pereira L. A Comprehensive Review of the Nutraceutical and Therapeutic Applications of Red Seaweeds (Rhodophyta) Life 2020 10 19 10.3390/life10030019
29. Köster E.P. Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective Food Qual. Prefer. 2009 20 70 82 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.11.002
30. Tuorila H. Hartmann C. Consumer responses to novel and unfamiliar foods Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2020 33 1 8 10.1016/j.cofs.2019.09.004
31. Michel F. Hartmann C. Siegrist M. Consumers’ associations, perceptions and acceptance of meat and plant-based meat alternatives Food Qual. Prefer. 2020 87 104063 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104063
32. Motoki K. Ishikawa S.-I. Spence C. Velasco C. Contextual acceptance of insect-based foods Food Qual. Prefer. 2020 103982 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103982
33. Van Loo E.J. Hoefkens C. Verbeke W. Healthy, sustainable and plant-based eating: Perceived (mis)match and involvement-based consumer segments as targets for future policy Food Policy 2017 69 46 57 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.03.001
34. Sanchez-Sabate R. Sabaté J. Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Sonsumption: A Systematic Review Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019 16 1220 10.3390/ijerph16071220 30959755
35. Clonan A. Wilson P. Swift J.A. Leibovici D.G. Holdsworth M. Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: Impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability Public Health Nutr. 2015 18 2446 2456 10.1017/S1368980015000567 25766000
36. Clark J.E. Taste and flavour: Their importance in food choice and acceptance Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1998 57 639 643 10.1079/PNS19980093 10096128
37. Willett W. Rockström J. Loken B. Springmann M. Lang T. Vermeulen S. Garnett T. Tilman D. Declerck F. Wood A. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems Lancet 2019 393 447 492 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4 30660336
38. Bouvard V. Loomis D. Guyton K.Z. Grosse Y. Ghissassi F.E. Benbrahim-Tallaa L. Guha N. Mattock H. Straif K. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat Lancet Oncol. 2015 16 1599 1600 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00444-1 26514947
39. Leroy F. Cofnas N. Should dietary guidelines recommend low red meat intake? Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020 60 2763 2772 10.1080/10408398.2019.1657063 31486336
40. MarketsandMarkets Plant-based Meat Market by Source (Soy, Wheat, Pea, Quinoa, Oats, Beans, Nuts), Product (Burger Patties, Sausages, Strips & Nuggets, Meatballs), Type (Pork, Beef, Chicken, Fish), Process, and Region—Global Forecast to 2025 FB 7110 MarketsandMarkets 5 2019 Available online: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/plant-based-meat-market-44922705.html (accessed on 29 September 2020)
41. Ensaff H. Coan S. Sahota P. Braybrook D. Akter H. McLeod H. Adolescents’ Food Choice and the Place of Plant-Based Foods Nutrients 2015 7 4619 4637 10.3390/nu7064619 26066012
42. Sogari G. Bogueva D. Marinova D. Australian Consumers’ Response to Insects as Food Agriculture 2019 9 108 10.3390/agriculture9050108
43. Guasch-Ferré M. Satija A. Blondin S.A. Janiszewski M. Emlen E. O’Connor L.E. Campbell W.W. Hu F.B. Willett W.C. Stampfer M.J. Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Red Meat Consumption in Comparison With Various Comparison Diets on Cardiovascular Risk Factors Circulation 2019 139 1828 1845 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035225 30958719
44. Zheng Y. Li Y. Satija A. Pan A. Sotos-Prieto M. Rimm E. Willett W.C. Hu F.B. Association of changes in red meat consumption with total and cause specific mortality among US women and men: Two prospective cohort studies BMJ 2019 365 l2110 10.1136/bmj.l2110 31189526
45. Poortvliet P.M. van der Pas L. Mulder B.C. Fogliano V. Healthy, but Disgusting: An Investigation into Consumers’ Willingness to Try Insect Meat J. Econ. Entomol. 2019 112 1005 1010 10.1093/jee/toz043 30834937
46. Musundire R. Zvidzai C.J. Chidewe C. Samende B.K. Manditsera F.A. Nutrient and anti-nutrient composition of Henicus whellani (Orthoptera: Stenopelmatidae), an edible ground cricket, in south-eastern Zimbabwe Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2014 34 223 231 10.1017/S1742758414000484
47. Cherry P. O’Hara C. Magee P.J. McSorley E.M. Allsopp P.J. Risks and benefits of consuming edible seaweeds Nutr. Rev. 2019 77 307 329 10.1093/nutrit/nuy066 30840077
48. Venkatraman K.L. Mehta A. Health Benefits and Pharmacological Effects of Porphyra Species Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2019 74 10 17 10.1007/s11130-018-0707-9 30543042
49. Food and Agriculture Organization Food Energy—Methods of Analysis and Conversion Factors. REPORT of a Technical Workshop Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, Italy 2003
50. Darmon N. Darmon M. Maillot M. Drewnowski A. A Nutrient Density Standard for Vegetables and Fruits: Nutrients per Calorie and Nutrients per Unit Cost J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2005 105 1881 1887 10.1016/j.jada.2005.09.005 16321593
51. Fulgoni V.L. III Keast D.R. Drewnowski A. Development and Validation of the Nutrient-Rich Foods Index: A Tool to Measure Nutritional Quality of Foods J. Nutr. 2009 139 1549 1554 10.3945/jn.108.101360 19549759
52. United States Department of Agriculture FoodData Central United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Beltsville, MD, USA 2019
53. Health Promotion Board Energy & Nutrient Composition of Food 2011 ed. Health Promotion Board Singapore 2011
54. Osimani A. Milanovi V. Cardinali F. Roncolini A. Garofalo C. Clementi F. Pasquini M. Mozzon M. Foligni R. Raffaelli N. Bread enriched with cricket powder (Acheta domesticus): A technological, microbiological and nutritional evaluation Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018 48 150 163 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.06.007
55. Impossible Foods What Are The Nutrition Facts? Available online: https://faq.impossiblefoods.com/hc/en-us/articles/360018939274-What-are-the-nutrition-facts- (accessed on 16 September 2020)
56. Bugfoundation Germany’s First Insect Burger Available online: https://www.bugfoundation.com/our-burger.html (accessed on 17 September 2020)
57. ADM The Plant-Based Protein Market Is Changing What it Takes to Succeed Available online: https://www.foodnavigator.com/News/Promotional-Features/The-plant-based-protein-market-is-changing-what-it-takes-to-succeed?source=3&utm_source=newsletter_daily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=15-Sep-2020 (accessed on 16 September 2020)
58. The Good Food Institute Plant-Based Market Overview Available online: https://www.gfi.org/marketresearch (accessed on 29 September 2020)
59. McCrickerd K. Tang C.S. Forde C.G. The independent and combined impact of front-of-pack labelling and sensory quality on calorie estimations and portion selection of commercial food products Food Qual. Prefer. 2020 79 103766 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103766
60. McCrickerd K. Tay P.P.S. Tang C.S. Forde C.G. Using Sensory Cues to Optimise the Satiety Value of a Reduced-Calorie Product Labelled ‘Healthier Choice’ Nutrients 2019 12 107 10.3390/nu12010107 31905979
61. World Health Organization Obesity and Overweight Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed on 16 November 2020)
62. Bao W. Rong Y. Rong S. Liu L. Dietary iron intake, body iron stores, and the risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Med. 2012 10 119 10.1186/1741-7015-10-119 23046549
63. McClements D.J. Newman E. McClements I.F. Plant-based Milks: A Review of the Science Underpinning Their Design, Fabrication, and Performance Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019 18 2047 2067 10.1111/1541-4337.12505 33336952
64. JUST Egg JUST Egg|Made from Plants Available online: https://www.ju.st/en-us/products/consumer/egg/egg (accessed on 1 October 2020)
65. Itkonen S.T. Päivärinta E. Pellinen T. Viitakangas H. Risteli J. Erkkola M. Lamberg-Allardt C. Pajari A.-M. Partial Replacement of Animal Proteins with Plant Proteins for 12 Weeks Accelerates Bone Turnover Among Healthy Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial J. Nutr. 2020 10.1093/jn/nxaa264
66. Crimarco A. Springfield S. Petlura C. Streaty T. Cunanan K. Lee J. Fielding-Singh P. Carter M.M. Topf M.A. Wastyk H.C. A randomized crossover trial on the effect of plant-based compared with animal-based meat on trimethylamine-N-oxide and cardiovascular disease risk factors in generally healthy adults: Study with Appetizing Plantfood—Meat Eating Alternative Trial (SWAP-MEAT) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020 112 1188 1199 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa203 32780794
67. Elzerman J.E. Van Boekel M.A. Luning P.A. Exploring meat substitutes: Consumer experiences and contextual factors Br. Food J. 2013 10.1108/00070701311331490
68. Moskin J. How Do the New Plant-Based Burgers Stack Up? We Taste-Tested Them The New York Times 22 10 2019 Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/22/dining/veggie-burger-taste-test.html (accessed on 23 November 2020)
69. Fellet M. A fresh take on fake meat Can Scientists Deliver a Meatless Burger that Tastes Good and Will not Harm the Planet? ACS Publications Washington, DC, USA 2015 10.1021/acscentsci.5b00307
70. Schouteten J.J. De Steur H. De Pelsmaeker S. Lagast S. Juvinal J.G. De Bourdeaudhuij I. Verbeke W. Gellynck X. Emotional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant-and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions Food Qual. Prefer. 2016 52 27 31 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.011
71. Bryant C. Barnett J. Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic review Meat Sci. 2018 143 8 17 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.008 29684844
72. Castro M. Chambers E. Consumer Avoidance of Insect Containing Foods: Primary Emotions, Perceptions and Sensory Characteristics Driving Consumers Considerations Foods 2019 8 351 10.3390/foods8080351
73. Megido R.C. Gierts C. Blecker C. Brostaux Y. Haubruge É. Alabi T. Francis F. Consumer acceptance of insect-based alternative meat products in Western countries Food Qual. Prefer. 2016 52 237 243 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.05.004
74. MacArtain P. Gill C.I.R. Brooks M. Campbell R. Rowland I.R. Nutritional value of edible seaweeds Nutr. Rev. 2007 65 535 543 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.tb00278.x 18236692
75. Parniakov O. Toepfl S. Barba F.J. Granato D. Zamuz S. Galvez F. Lorenzo J.M. Impact of the soy protein replacement by legumes and algae based proteins on the quality of chicken rotti J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018 55 2552 2559 10.1007/s13197-018-3175-1 30042571
76. Fiorentini M. Kinchla A.J. Nolden A.A. Role of Sensory Evaluation in Consumer Acceptance of Plant-Based Meat Analogs and Meat Extenders: A Scoping Review Foods 2020 9 1334 10.3390/foods9091334
77. Asgar M.A. Fazilah A. Huda N. Bhat R. Karim A.A. Nonmeat protein alternatives as meat extenders and meat analogs Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010 9 513 529 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00124.x 33467834
78. Sha L. Xiong Y.L. Plant protein-based alternatives of reconstructed meat: Science, technology, and challenges Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020 102 51 61 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.05.022
79. Scholliers J. Steen L. Fraeye I. Partial replacement of meat by superworm ( Zophobas morio larvae) in cooked sausages: Effect of heating temperature and insect: Meat ratio on structure and physical stability Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020 66 102535 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102535
80. Keefe L.M. #FakeMeat: How big a deal will animal meat analogs ultimately be? Anim. Front. 2018 8 10.1093/af/vfy011
81. Lafarga T. Effect of microalgal biomass incorporation into foods: Nutritional and sensorial attributes of the end products Algal Res. 2019 41 101566 10.1016/j.algal.2019.101566
82. Michalak I. Chojnacka K. Seaweeds as a component of the human diet Algae Biomass: Characteristics and Applications Springer Cham, Switzerland 2018 57 71
83. Grahl S. Strack M. Mensching A. Mörlein D. Alternative protein sources in Western diets: Food product development and consumer acceptance of spirulina-filled pasta Food Qual. Prefer. 2020 84 103933 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103933
84. Grahl S. Palanisamy M. Strack M. Meier-Dinkel L. Toepfl S. Mörlein D. Towards more sustainable meat alternatives: How technical parameters affect the sensory properties of extrusion products derived from soy and algae J. Clean. Prod. 2018 198 962 971 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.041
85. Zamuz S. Purriños L. Galvez F. Zdolec N. Muchenje V. Barba F.J. Lorenzo J.M. Influence of the addition of different origin sources of protein on meat products sensory acceptance J. Food Process. Preserv. 2019 43 e13940 10.1111/jfpp.13940
86. Chiang J.H. Hardacre A.K. Parker M.E. Effects of Maillard-reacted beef bone hydrolysate on the physicochemical properties of extruded meat alternatives J. Food Sci. 2020 85 10.1111/1750-3841.14960 32037584
87. Lee S.J. Moon T.W. Lee J. Increases of 2-furanmethanol and maltol in Korean red ginseng during explosive puffing process J. Food Sci. 2010 75 C147 C151 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01461.x 20492218
88. Weinrich R. Opportunities for the Adoption of Health-Based Sustainable Dietary Patterns: A Review on Consumer Research of Meat Substitutes Sustainability 2019 11 4028 10.3390/su11154028
89. Hartmann C. Siegrist M. Insects as food: Perception and acceptance. Findings from current research Ernahr. Umsch. 2017 64 44 50 10.4455/eu.2017.010
90. Siegrist M. Hartmann C. Perceived naturalness, disgust, trust and food neophobia as predictors of cultured meat acceptance in ten countries Appetite 2020 155 104814 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104814 32783971
91. International Food Information Council Consumer Survey on Plant Alternatives to Meat Shows That Nutrition Facts Are More Influential Than the Ingredients List Food Insight Washington, DC, USA 2020
92. Mullee A. Vermeire L. Vanaelst B. Mullie P. Deriemaeker P. Leenaert T. De Henauw S. Dunne A. Gunter M.J. Clarys P. Vegetarianism and meat consumption: A comparison of attitudes and beliefs between vegetarian, semi-vegetarian, and omnivorous subjects in Belgium Appetite 2017 114 299 305 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.052 28392424
93. Popper N. Behold the Beefless ‘Impossible Whopper’ The New York Times 1 4 2019 Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/01/technology/burger-king-impossible-whopper.html (accessed on 28 September 2020)
94. Hwang J. You J. Moon J. Jeong J. Factors Affecting Consumers’ Alternative Meats Buying Intentions: Plant-Based Meat Alternative and Cultured Meat Sustainability 2020 12 5662 10.3390/su12145662
95. Pliner P. Pelchat M. Grabski M. Reduction of neophobia in humans by exposure to novel foods Appetite 1993 20 111 123 10.1006/appe.1993.1013 8507067
96. Paradise L. Jordan B. From Rainbow Everything to Cake on a Stick, These are the Food Trends that Lived and Died in the 2010s Insider 1 1 2020 Available online: https://www.insider.com/5-food-trends-that-lived-and-died-this-decade-2019-12 (accessed on 23 November 2020)
97. Sidman J. Chronicling the Death of Fro-Yo Washington City Paper 22 1 2015 Available online: https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/333656/chronicling-the-death-of-fro-yo/ (accessed on 23 November 2020)
98. Root A. Beyond Meat and the Limits of a Tesla Strategy at the Grocery Store Barron’s 3 6 2019 Available online: https://www.barrons.com/articles/beyond-meat-price-comparison-51559339044 (accessed on 15 October 2020)
99. Specht L. Why Plant-Based Meat Will Ultimately Be Less Expensive Than Conventional Meat Available online: https://www.gfi.org/plant-based-meat-will-be-less-expensive (accessed on 11 November 2020)
100. Santo R.E. Kim B.F. Goldman S.E. Dutkiewicz J. Biehl E.M.B. Bloem M.W. Neff R.A. Nachman K.E. Considering plant-based meat substitutes and cell-based meats: A public health and food systems perspective Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020 4 134 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00134
101. Reinicke C. Beyond Meat Costs More than Traditional Meat, but Data Show Consumers Are Willing to Pay the Premium Price—For Now (BYND) Markets Insider 11 7 2019 Available online: https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/beyond-meat-sales-are-high-but-so-is-price-2019-7-1028346898 (accessed on 4 October 2020)
102. Haws K.L. Reczek R.W. Sample K.L. Healthy Diets Make Empty Wallets: The Healthy= Expensive Intuition J. Consum. Res. 2017 43 992 1007 10.1093/jcr/ucw078
103. Kornher L. Schellhorn M. Vetter S. Disgusting or Innovative-Consumer Willingness to Pay for Insect Based Burger Patties in Germany Sustainability 2019 11 1878 10.3390/su11071878
104. Wilks M. Phillips C.J. Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States PLoS ONE 2017 12 e0171904 10.1371/journal.pone.0171904 28207878
105. Rolland N.C.M. Markus C.R. Post M.J. The effect of information content on acceptance of cultured meat in a tasting context PLoS ONE 2020 15 e0231176 10.1371/journal.pone.0231176 32298291
106. Pyett S. de Vet E. Trindade L.M. van Zanten H. Fresco L.O. Chickpeas, Crickets and Chlorella: Our Future Proteins Wageningen University & Research Wageningen, The Netherlands 2019
107. Westhoek H. Rood T. van den Berg M. Janse J. Nijdam D. Reudink M. Stehfest E. The Protein Puzzle: The Consumption and Production of Meat, Dairy and Fish in the European Union PBL Netherlands Environmental Agency (Hague) The Hague, The Netherlands 2011
108. United States Department of Agriculture Livestock & Meat Domestic Data United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Washington, DC, USA 2020
109. Roser M. Ritchie H. Food Supply Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/food-supply (accessed on 12 November 2020)
110. McMichael A.J. Powles J.W. Butler C.D. Uauy R. Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health Lancet 2007 370 1253 1263 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61256-2 17868818
111. Gerber P.J. Steinfeld H. Henderson B. Mottet A. Opio C. Dijkman J. Falcucci A. Tempio G. Tackling Climate Change through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Rome, Italy 2013
112. Food and Agriculture Organization Livestock and Landscapes Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/ar591e/ar591e.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2020)
113. Poore J. Nemecek T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers Science 2018 360 987 992 10.1126/science.aaq0216 29853680
114. Neville M. Tarrega A. Hewson L. Foster T. Consumer-orientated development of hybrid beef burger and sausage analogues Food Sci. Nutr. 2017 5 852 864 10.1002/fsn3.466 28748073
115. Springmann M. Clark M. Mason-D’Croz D. Wiebe K. Bodirsky B.L. Lassaletta L. De Vries W. Vermeulen S.J. Herrero M. Carlson K.M. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits Nature 2018 562 519 525 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0 30305731
116. Gibney M.J. Food Technology and Plant-Based Diets J. Nutr. 2020 10.1093/jn/nxaa301
117. Drewnowski A. Rehm C.D. Martin A. Verger E.O. Voinnesson M. Imbert P. Energy and nutrient density of foods in relation to their carbon footprint Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015 101 184 191 10.3945/ajcn.114.092486 25527762
118. Pimentel D. Pimentel M. Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003 78 660S 663S 10.1093/ajcn/78.3.660S 12936963
119. McClements D.J. Future foods: Is it possible to design a healthier and more sustainable food supply? Nutr. Bull. 2020 45 341 354 10.1111/nbu.12457
120. Heller M.C. Keoleian G.A. Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger Life Cycle Assessment: A Detailed Comparison between a Plant-Based and an Animal-Based Protein Source CSS18-10 Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI, USA 2018
121. The Economist Plant-based meat could create a radically different food chain The Economist 12 10 2019 Available online: https://www.economist.com/international/2019/10/12/plant-based-meat-could-create-a-radically-different-food-chain (accessed on 11 November 2020)
122. Smetana S. Palanisamy M. Mathys A. Heinz V. Sustainability of insect use for feed and food: Life Cycle Assessment perspective J. Clean. Prod. 2016 137 741 751 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.148
123. Grant C.A. Hicks A.L. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Milk and Plant-Based Alternatives Environ. Eng. Sci. 2018 35 1235 1247 10.1089/ees.2018.0233
124. Loveday S. Plant protein ingredients with food functionality potential Nutr. Bull. 2020 45 321 327 10.1111/nbu.12450
125. Cole M. Miele M. Hines P. Zokaei K. Evans B. Beale J. Animal foods and climate change: Shadowing eating practices Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2009 33 162 167 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00751.x
126. De Boer J. Schösler H. Boersema J.J. Climate change and meat eating: An inconvenient couple? J. Environ. Psychol. 2013 33 1 8 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.09.001
127. Lea E.J. Crawford D. Worsley A. Public views of the benefits and barriers to the consumption of a plant-based diet Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006 60 828 837 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602387 16452915
128. Van Dam Y.K. van Trijp H.C.M. Relevant or determinant: Importance in certified sustainable food consumption Food Qual. Prefer. 2013 30 93 101 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.05.001
129. Borenstein S. Study: Fix to food climate problem doesn’t require veganism Associated Press News 6 11 2020 Available online: https://apnews.com/article/food-climate-problem-does-not-veganism-ed1ae1cd85cca04d1e4442909ef13fdc (accessed on 11 November 2020)
130. Wynes S. Nicholas K.A. The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions Environ. Res. Lett. 2017 12 074024 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541
131. Leroy F. Animal Source Foods in Ethical, Sustainable & Healthy Diets Available online: https://aleph-2020.blogspot.com/2019/06/greenhouse-gas-emissions.html (accessed on 17 December 2020)
132. Gössling S. Humpe A. The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change Glob. Environ. Chang. 2020 65 102194 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102194
133. Gössling S. Celebrities, air travel, and social norms Ann. Tour. Res. 2019 79 102775 10.1016/j.annals.2019.102775
134. Lenzen M. Sun Y.-Y. Faturay F. Ting Y.-P. Geschke A. Malik A. The carbon footprint of global tourism Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018 8 522 528 10.1038/s41558-018-0141-x
135. Nijdam D. Rood T. Westhoek H. The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes Food Policy 2012 37 760 770 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.08.002
136. Finnigan T. Food 2030. Life Cycle Analysis and the Role of Quorn Foods within the New Fundamentals of Food Policy Summary Document 1 2010 Available online: https://docplayer.net/21090260-Food-2030-life-cycle-analysis-and-the-role-of-quorn-foods-within-the-new-fundamentals-of-food-policy-summary-document-tja-finnigan-jan-2010.html (accessed on 11 November 2020)
137. Souza Filho P.F. Andersson D. Ferreira J.A. Taherzadeh M.J. Mycoprotein: Environmental impact and health aspects World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019 35 147 10.1007/s11274-019-2723-9 31549247
138. Mattick C.S. Landis A.E. Allenby B.R. Genovese N.J. Anticipatory life cycle analysis of in vitro biomass cultivation for cultured meat production in the United States Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015 49 11941 11949 10.1021/acs.est.5b01614 26383898
139. De Backer C.J.S. Hudders L. Meat morals: Relationship between meat consumption consumer attitudes towards human and animal welfare and moral behavior Meat Sci. 2015 99 68 74 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.08.011 25282670
140. Hagmann D. Siegrist M. Hartmann C. Meat avoidance: Motives, alternative proteins and diet quality in a sample of Swiss consumers Public Health Nutr. 2019 22 2448 2459 10.1017/S1368980019001277 31159899
141. Bryant C.J. We can’t keep meating like this: Attitudes towards vegetarian and vegan diets in the United Kingdom Sustainability 2019 11 6844 10.3390/su11236844
142. Hopkins P.D. Dacey A. Vegetarian Meat: Could Technology Save Animals and Satisfy Meat Eaters? J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2008 21 579 596 10.1007/s10806-008-9110-0
143. Schröder M.J.A. McEachern M.G. Consumer value conflicts surrounding ethical food purchase decisions: A focus on animal welfare Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2004 28 168 177 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2003.00357.x
144. Lin-Schilstra L. Fischer A.R.H. Consumer Moral Dilemma in the Choice of Animal-Friendly Meat Products Sustainability 2020 12 4844 10.3390/su12124844
145. National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine Innovations in the Food System: Exploring the Future of Food: Proceedings of a Workshop—In Brief The National Academies Press Washington, DC, USA 2019
146. Wiebe M.G. Myco-protein from Fusarium venenatum : A well-established product for human consumption Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002 58 421 427 10.1007/s00253-002-0931-x 11954786
147. World Health Organization Food Safety Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/food-safety (accessed on 4 October 2020)
148. Saeed T. Dagga F.A. Saraf M. Analysis of Residual Pesticides Present in Edible Locusts Captured in Kuwait Arab. Gulf J. Sci. Res. 1993 11 1 5
149. Green K. Broome L. Heinze D. Johnston S. Long distance transport of arsenic by migrating Bogon Moth from agricultural lowlands to mountain ecosystem Vic. Nat. 2001 118 112 116
150. Banjo A.D. Lawal O.A. Fasunwon B.T. Alimi G.O. Alkali and Heavy Metal Contaminants of Some Selected Edible Arthropods in South Western Nigeria Am.-Eurasian J. Toxicol. Sci. 2010 2 25 29
151. Chai J.Y. Shin E.H. Lee S.H. Rim H.J. Foodborne Intestinal Flukes in Southeast Asia Korean J. Parasitol. 2009 47 S69 S102 10.3347/kjp.2009.47.S.S69 19885337
152. Testa M. Stillo M. Maffei G. Andriolo V. Gardois P. Zotti C.M. Ugly but tasty: A systematic review of possible human and animal health risks related to entomophagy Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017 57 3747 3759 10.1080/10408398.2016.1162766 27008043
153. Castro M. Chambers IV E. Willingness to eat an insect based product and impact on brand equity: A global perspective J. Sens. Stud. 2019 34 e12486 10.1111/joss.12486
154. Desideri D. Cantaluppi C. Ceccotto F. Meli M.A. Roselli C. Feduzi L. Essential and toxic elements in seaweeds for human consumption J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2016 79 112 122 10.1080/15287394.2015.1113598 26817952
155. Hwang Y.O. Park S.G. Park G.Y. Choi S.M. Kim M.Y. Total arsenic, mercury, lead, and cadmium contents in edible dried seaweed in Korea Food Addit. Contam. Part B 2010 3 7 13 10.1080/19440040903532079
156. Van Huis A. Van Itterbeeck J. Klunder H. Mertens E. Halloran A. Muir G. Vantomme P. Edible Insects: Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, Italy 2013 201
157. Van der Spiegel M. Noordam M.Y. van der Fels-Klerx H.J. Safety of Novel Protein Sources (Insects, Microalgae, Seaweed, Duckweed, and Rapeseed) and Legislative Aspects for Their Application in Food and Feed Production Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013 12 662 678 10.1111/1541-4337.12032 33412718
158. European Institute of Innovation & Technology EIT Food TrustTracker Available online: https://www.eitfood.eu/projects/eit-food-trusttracker (accessed on 18 September 2020)
159. Lu Z.X. He J.F. Zhang Y.C. Bing D.J. Composition, physicochemical properties of pea protein and its application in functional foods Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020 60 2593 2605 10.1080/10408398.2019.1651248 31429319
160. National Institutes of Health Soy Available online: https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/soy#:~:text=Except%20for%20people%20with%20soy,as%20stomach%20pain%20and%20diarrhea (accessed on 23 November 2020)
161. Bianchi F. Aveyard P. Astbury N.M. Cook B. Cartwright E. Jebb S.A. Replacing meat with alternative plant-based products (RE-MAPs): Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a behavioural intervention to reduce meat consumption BMJ Open 2019 9 e027016 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027016
162. Tong T.Y.N. Appleby P.N. Armstrong M.E.G. Fensom G.K. Knuppel A. Papier K. Perez-Cornago A. Travis R.C. Key T.J. Vegetarian and vegan diets and risks of total and site-specific fractures: Results from the prospective EPIC-Oxford study BMC Med. 2020 18 353 10.1186/s12916-020-01815-3 33222682
163. Taylor J. Ahmed I.A.M. Al-Juhaimi F.Y. Bekhit A.E.-D.A. Consumers’ Perceptions and Sensory Properties of Beef Patty Analogues Foods 2020 9 63 10.3390/foods9010063
164. Castro M. Chambers IV E. Carbonell-Barrachina A. Noguera-Artiaga L. Vidal-Quintanar R. Burgos-Hernandez A. Consumer acceptability in the USA, Mexico, and Spain of chocolate chip cookies made with partial insect powder replacement J. Food Sci. 2020 85 1621 1628 10.1111/1750-3841.15175 32460354
165. Hendrie G.A. Baird D. Ridoutt B. Hadjikakou M. Noakes M. Overconsumption of Energy and Excessive Discretionary Food Intake Inflates Dietary Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Australia Nutrients 2016 8 690 10.3390/nu8110690
166. Masset G. Vieux F. Verger E.O. Soler L.G. Touazi D. Darmon N. Reducing energy intake and energy density for a sustainable diet: A study based on self-selected diets in French adults Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014 99 1460 1469 10.3945/ajcn.113.077958 24695893
167. Miles S. Ueland Ø. Frewer L.J. Public attitudes towards genetically-modified food Br. Food J. 2005 107 246 262 10.1108/00070700510589521
168. Meijer G.W. Lähteenmäki L. Stadler R.H. Weiss J. Issues surrounding consumer trust and acceptance of existing and emerging food processing technologies Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020 1 19 10.1080/10408398.2020.1718597 32003225
169. Bryant C. Barnett J. What’s in a name? Consumer perceptions of in vitro meat under different names Appetite 2019 137 104 113 10.1016/j.appet.2019.02.021 30840874
170. Possidónio C. Prada M. Graça J. Piazza J. Consumer perceptions of conventional and alternative protein sources: A mixed-methods approach with meal and product framing Appetite 2020 156 104860 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104860 32916208
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.