$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Comparative effects of knowledge-based antecedents in different realms of CMMI-based software process improvement success

Computer standards & interfaces, v.81, 2022년, pp.103599 -   

Chen, Chung-Yang (Department of Information Management, National Central University) ,  Lee, Jung-Chieh (International Business and Management Research Center, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Abstract Software process improvement (SPI) is a knowledge- and learning-intensive activity that is critical in software development. The literature reveals several major knowledge-based antecedents, namely, exploration, exploitation, absorptive capacity (AC) and knowledge sharing (KS), that are sh...

주제어

참고문헌 (117)

  1. J. Med. Imaging Health Inform. Iqbal 10 2393 2020 10.1166/jmihi.2020.3187 Software process improvement implementation issues in small and medium enterprises that develop healthcare applications 

  2. Inf. Technol. People Lee 30 47 2017 10.1108/ITP-09-2013-0171 The moderating effects of organisational culture on the relationship between absorptive capacity and software process improvement success 

  3. J. Softw. Evol. Process Biró 31 e2146 2019 10.1002/smr.2146 Advances in system, software and service process improvement and innovation 

  4. J. Softw. Evol. Process Georgiadou 32 e2304 2020 10.1002/smr.2304 The sociocultural dimension of the software process improvement manifesto: pilot validation by experts 

  5. Comput. Stand. Interfaces Sharma 66 2019 10.1016/j.csi.2019.04.009 Building a hierarchical structure model of enablers that affect the software process improvement in software SMEs-A mixed method approach 

  6. J. Syst. Softw. Vasconcellos 123 45 2017 10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.030 Approaches to strategic alignment of software process improvement: a systematic literature review 

  7. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. Dyba 31 410 2005 10.1109/TSE.2005.53 An empirical investigation of the key factors for success in software process improvement 

  8. Inf. Technol. Manag. Lee 19 21 2018 10.1007/s10799-016-0272-6 Impact of absorptive capability on software process improvement and firm performance 

  9. Inf. Syst. Res. Slaughter 17 301 2006 10.1287/isre.1060.0098 The effectiveness of knowledge transfer portfolios in software process improvement: a field study 

  10. Comput. Hum. Behav. Lee 54 462 2016 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.030 Examining the impacts of organizational culture and top management support of knowledge sharing on the success of software process improvement 

  11. Int. J. Syst. Serv. Oriented Eng. O'Connor 4 39 2014 10.4018/ijssoe.2014010103 Understanding the role of knowledge management in software development 

  12. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. Ravichandran 50 270 2003 10.1109/TEM.2003.817278 Structural analysis of the impact of knowledge creation and knowledge embedding on software process capability 

  13. J. Softw. Evol. Process Poth 31 e1986 2019 10.1002/smr.1986 Lean and agile software process improvement in traditional and agile environments 

  14. Empir. Softw. Eng. Dyba 5 357 2000 10.1023/A:1009800404137 An instrument for measuring the key factors of success in software process improvement 

  15. J. Syst. Softw. Fontana 102 88 2015 10.1016/j.jss.2014.12.032 Progressive outcomes: a framework for maturing in agile software development 

  16. J. Knowl. Manag. Mathiassen 7 63 2003 10.1108/13673270310477298 Managing knowledge in a software organization 

  17. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. Temizkan 32 116 2015 10.1080/07421222.2015.1029382 Exploitation and exploration networks in open source software development: an artifact-level analysis 

  18. Inf. Syst. Res. Vidgen 20 355 2009 10.1287/isre.1090.0237 Coevolving systems and the organization of agile software development 

  19. Strateg. Manag. J. Girod 38 1121 2017 10.1002/smj.2543 Reconfiguration, restructuring and firm performance: dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism 

  20. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. Santoro 68 378 2021 10.1109/TEM.2019.2907874 Do knowledge management and dynamic capabilities affect ambidextrous entrepreneurial intensity and firms’ performance? 

  21. Inf. Dev. Lee 35 6 2019 10.1177/0266666917724194 Exploring the determinants of software process improvement success: a dynamic capability view 

  22. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. Lee 27 70 2019 10.4018/JGIM.2019100104 The moderator of innovation culture and the mediator of realized absorptive capacity in enhancing organizations' absorptive capacity for SPI success 

  23. Acad. Manag. Rev. Zahra 27 185 2002 10.2307/4134351 Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension 

  24. Inf. Manag. Ghobadi 52 82 2015 10.1016/j.im.2014.10.008 What drives knowledge sharing in software development teams: a literature review and classification framework 

  25. Inf. Softw. Technol. Ryan 55 1614 2013 10.1016/j.infsof.2013.02.013 Acquiring and sharing tacit knowledge in software development teams: an empirical study 

  26. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. Storey 43 185 2017 10.1109/TSE.2016.2584053 How social and communication channels shape and challenge a participatory culture in software development 

  27. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. Lee 2020 10.1108/JEIM-03-2019-0084 An integrated model of the knowledge antecedents for exploring software process improvement success 

  28. CMMI Institute, A guide to scrum and CMMI®: improving agile performance with CMMI. https://cmmiinstitute.com/resourcefiles/public/marketing/document/a-guide-to-scrum-and-cmmi®-improving-agile-perfor, 2016 (accessed 20 July 2018). 

  29. Software Engineering Institute, Improving Processes for Developing Better Products and Services. Technical Report, CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033, ESCTR- 2010-033, Software Engineering Process Management Program, Hanscom, MA, 2010. 

  30. J. Softw. Evol. Process Garzás 25 1325 2013 10.1002/smr.1605 A case study of software process improvement with CMMI-DEV and Scrum in Spanish companies 

  31. J. Syst. Softw. Pino 83 1662 2010 10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.077 Using Scrum to guide the execution of software process improvement in small organizations 

  32. Inf. Softw. Technol. Silva 58 20 2015 10.1016/j.infsof.2014.09.012 Using CMMI together with agile software development: a systematic review 

  33. Inf. Softw. Technol. Torrecilla-Salinas 71 92 2016 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.11.002 Agile, web engineering and capability maturity model integration: a systematic literature review 

  34. J.F. Hair, G.T.M. Hult, C.M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 2017. 

  35. J. Syst. Softw. Fitzgerald 123 176 2017 10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.063 Continuous software engineering: a roadmap and agenda 

  36. IEEE Access Farooq 9 10426 2021 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3049904 Blockchain-based software process improvement (BBSPI): an approach for SMEs to perform process improvement 

  37. J. Softw. Evol. Process Singh 32 e2261 2020 10.1002/smr.2261 Measuring the maturity of Indian small and medium enterprises for unofficial readiness for capability maturity model integration-based software process improvement 

  38. J. Inf. Sci. Chugh 46 258 2020 10.1177/0165551519833610 Effect of knowledge management on software product experience with mediating effect of perceived software process improvement: an empirical study for Indian software industry 

  39. Comput. Stand. Interfaces Uskarcı 52 25 2017 10.1016/j.csi.2017.01.008 Do staged maturity models result in organization-wide continuous process improvement? Insight from employees 

  40. Inf. Softw. Technol. Sulayman 56 807 2014 10.1016/j.infsof.2014.02.006 Towards a theoretical framework of SPI success factors for small and medium web companies 

  41. J. Syst. Softw. Winter 83 2059 2010 10.1016/j.jss.2010.04.066 SPI success factors within product usability evaluation 

  42. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. Clarke 41 1169 2015 10.1109/TSE.2015.2467388 Exploring the relationship between software process adaptive capability and organisational performance 

  43. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. Cheng 2021 Examining the effect of absorptive capacity in information system development project team in Taiwan 

  44. Inf. Organ. Teigland 24 25 2014 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.01.001 Balancing on a tightrope: managing the boundaries of a firm-sponsored OSS community and its impact on innovation and absorptive capacity 

  45. MIS Q Roberts 36 625 2012 10.2307/41703470 Absorptive capacity and information systems research: review, synthesis, and directions for future research 

  46. Strateg. Manag. J. Choi 39 356 2018 10.1002/smj.2677 Repeating a familiar pattern in a new way: the effect of exploitation and exploration on knowledge leverage behaviors in technology acquisitions 

  47. Organ. Sci. March 2 71 1991 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning 

  48. Res. Policy Koryak 47 413 2018 10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.003 Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: exploration and exploitation 

  49. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change Ali 165 2021 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120527 Imitation or innovation: to what extent do exploitative learning and exploratory learning foster imitation strategy and innovation strategy for sustained competitive advantage? 

  50. Asian Bus. Manag. Wang 2020 Binary effects of exploratory and exploitative learning on opportunity identification: the different moderations of environmental munificence and entrepreneurial commitment 

  51. J. Appl. Psychol. Huang 99 816 2014 10.1037/a0036911 Expertise dissimilarity and creativity: the contingent roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing 

  52. MIS Q. Kudaravalli 41 43 2017 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.03 A configural approach to coordinating expertise in software development teams 

  53. MIS Q. Bock 29 87 2005 10.2307/25148669 Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate 

  54. Acad. Manag. J. Katila 45 1183 2002 10.2307/3069433 Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction 

  55. Adm. Sci. Q. Cohen 35 128 1990 10.2307/2393553 Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation 

  56. Strateg. Manag. J. Chatterji 35 1427 2014 10.1002/smj.2168 Using users: when does external knowledge enhance corporate product innovation? 

  57. MIS Q. Trantopoulos 41 287 2017 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.15 External knowledge and information technology: implications for process innovation performance 

  58. IEEE Access Anwar 7 71286 2019 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912657 Investigation of knowledge sharing behavior in global software development organizations using social cognitive theory 

  59. Long Range Plan. Nonaka 33 5 2000 10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6 SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation 

  60. Chaos Solit. Fractals Zhang 131 2020 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109518 Promoting knowledge sharing in the workplace: punishment v. reward 

  61. Int. J. Proj. Manag. Imam 2021 10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.02.006 Shared leadership and project success: the roles of knowledge sharing, cohesion and trust in the team 

  62. Cooper 2014 Business Research Methods, twelfth ed 

  63. CMMI Institute, CMMI adoption trends: 2018-year end update. https://cmmiinstitute.com/resource-files/public/cmmi-adoption-trends-2018-year-end-update, 2019 (accessed 25 May 2021). 

  64. CMMI Institute, CMMI adoption trends: 2019 mid year update. https://cmmiinstitute.com/resource-files/public/cmmi-adoption-trends-2019-mid-year-update, 2019 (accessed 25 May 2021). 

  65. Inf. Manag. Akgün 45 221 2008 10.1016/j.im.2008.02.004 New product development team intelligence: antecedents and consequences 

  66. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. Akgün 29 432 2012 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00916.x The role of organizational emotional memory on declarative and procedural memory and firm innovativeness 

  67. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Akgün 34 37 2014 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.09.007 Team learning in IT implementation projects: antecedents and consequences 

  68. Acad. Manag. J. Kumar 36 1633 1993 10.2307/256824 Conducting interorganizational research using key informants 

  69. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. Nederhof 15 263 1985 10.1002/ejsp.2420150303 Methods of coping with social desirability bias: a review 

  70. Inf. Syst. J. Srivastava 25 355 2015 10.1111/isj.12067 Technostress creators and job outcomes: theorising the moderating influence of personality traits 

  71. Hum. Relat. Baruch 52 421 1999 10.1177/001872679905200401 Response rate in academic studies-a comparative analysis 

  72. J. Mark. Res. Armstrong 14 396 1977 10.1177/002224377701400320 Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys 

  73. Decis. Sci. Narayanan 2021 The effects of lean implementation on hospital financial performance 

  74. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change Ghouri 165 2021 An empirical study of real-time information-receiving using industry 4.0 technologies in downstream operations 

  75. Br. J. Manag. Schriber 2021 Retaliation effectiveness and acquisition performance: the influence of managerial decisions and industry context 

  76. Olsen 103 2004 Developments in Sociology: An Annual Review Triangulation in social research: qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed 

  77. Blaikie 2007 Approaches to Social Enquiry 

  78. Bryman 2006 Social Research Methods 

  79. Dyba 95 2003 Managing Software Engineering Knowledge A dynamic model of software engineering knowledge creation 

  80. Inf. Syst. Res. Pavlou 17 198 2006 10.1287/isre.1060.0094 From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: the case of new product development 

  81. Creat. Innov. Manag. Açıkgöz 25 445 2016 10.1111/caim.12173 Individual creativity and team climate in software development projects: the mediating role of team decision processes 

  82. J. Syst. Softw. Ciancarini 157 2019 10.1016/j.jss.2019.110401 Cooperative thinking: analyzing a new framework for software engineering education 

  83. J. Syst. Softw. Lee 164 2020 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110545 The effect of transactive memory systems on process tailoring in software projects: the moderating role of task conflict and shared temporal cognitions 

  84. Inf. Softw. Technol. Romero 63 31 2015 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.004 Measures of process harmonization 

  85. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. Henseler 116 2 2016 10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382 Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines 

  86. Eur. J. Mark. Hair 53 566 2019 10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0665 Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares 

  87. Inf. Syst. J. Lee 31 120 2021 10.1111/isj.12303 The effect of process tailoring on software project performance: the role of team absorptive capacity and its knowledge-based enablers 

  88. C. Ringle, S. Wende, A. Will, SmartPLS Software 3.2.3. http://www.smartpls.de, 2015 (accessed 5 May 2018). 

  89. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. Henseler 43 115 2015 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling 

  90. Comput. Stand. Interfaces Chang 70 2020 10.1016/j.csi.2020.103422 The trust model of enterprise purchasing for B2B e-marketplaces 

  91. J. Bus. Res. Welsh 88 481 2018 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.015 Determinants of women entrepreneurs' firm performance in a hostile environment 

  92. Harman 1967 Modern Factor Analysis 

  93. Chin 655 2010 Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications How to write up and report PLS analyses 

  94. Cohen 1988 Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 

  95. J. Oper. Manag. Peng 30 467 2012 10.1016/j.jom.2012.06.002 Using partial least squares in operations management research: a practical guideline and summary of past research 

  96. J. Bus. Res. Ajamieh 69 4667 2016 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.056 IT infrastructure and competitive aggressiveness in explaining and predicting performance 

  97. Online Inf. Rev. Lee 2021 Investigation of the relationships among educational application (APP) quality, computer anxiety and student engagement 

  98. Acad. Manag. Rev. Denison 21 619 1996 10.2307/258997 Whatisthe difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars 

  99. IET Softw Khan 10 125 2016 10.1049/iet-sen.2015.0038 Systematic review of success factors and barriers for software process improvement in global software development 

  100. Montoni 175 2007 Software Process Improvement A methodology for identifying critical success factors that influence software process improvement initiatives: an application in the Brazilian software industry 

  101. J. Softw. Evol. Process Niazi 27 700 2015 10.1002/smr.1704 A comparative study of software process improvement implementation success factors 

  102. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. Niazi 11 193 2006 10.1002/spip.261 Critical success factors for software process improvement implementation: an empirical study 

  103. J. Syst. Softw. Rainer 62 71 2002 10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00122-4 Key success factors for implementing software process improvement: a maturity-based analysis 

  104. Inf. Softw. Technol. Sulayman 54 479 2012 10.1016/j.infsof.2011.12.007 Software process improvement success factors for small and medium web companies: a qualitative study 

  105. J. Syst. Softw. Wilson 59 135 2001 10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00057-7 A framework for evaluation and prediction of software process improvement success 

  106. Appl. Soft Comput. Khan 83 2019 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105648 Fuzzy AHP based prioritization and taxonomy of software process improvement success factors in global software development 

  107. Acad. Manag. Rev. Benner 40 497 2015 10.5465/amr.2015.0042 Reflections on the 2013 decade award-“exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited” ten years later 

  108. Strateg. Manag. J. Håkonsson 37 985 2016 10.1002/smj.2380 Exploration versus exploitation: emotions and performance as antecedents and consequences of team decisions 

  109. Organ. Sci. Luger 29 449 2018 10.1287/orsc.2017.1189 Dynamic balancing of exploration and exploitation: the contingent benefits of ambidexterity 

  110. Inf. Softw. Technol. García 53 834 2011 10.1016/j.infsof.2011.03.002 Design guidelines for software processes knowledge repository development 

  111. Inf. Sci. Huang 233 183 2013 10.1016/j.ins.2012.12.052 Creating process-agents incrementally by mining process asset library 

  112. J. Oper. Manag. Ramasesh 32 190 2014 10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.003 A conceptual framework for tackling knowable unknown unknowns in project management 

  113. Small Group Res. Yan 52 3 2020 10.1177/1046496420967764 Communication in transactive memory systems: a review and multidimensional network perspective 

  114. Strateg. Entrep. J. Kollmann 14 683 2020 10.1002/sej.1365 How management teams foster the transactive memory system-entrepreneurial orientation link: a domino effect model of positive team processes 

  115. Front. Psychol. Zhang 11 2020 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571840 Multi-level effects of humble leadership on employees' work well-being: the roles of psychological safety and error management climate 

  116. J. Appl. Psychol. Koopmann 101 940 2016 10.1037/apl0000097 Nonlinear effects of team tenure on team psychological safety climate and climate strength: implications for average team member performance 

  117. J. Softw. Evol. Process Schweigert 26 513 2013 10.1002/smr.1617 Agile maturity model: analysing agile maturity characteristics from the SPICE perspective 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로