다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
Educational researcher : a publication of the American Educational Research Association, v.36 no.5, 2007년, pp.268 - 278
Fuller, Bruce (Professor of education and public policy at the University of California, Berkeley, Tolman Hall 3659, Berkeley, CA 94720) , Wright, Joseph (. His new book is Standardized Childhood, published by Stanford University Press) , Gesicki, Kathryn (Recently graduated from Berkeley’s Graduate School of Public Policy. He works on education and housing policy from New York City) , Kang, Erin
AI-Helper
Many policymakers feel pressure to claim that No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is boosting student performance, as Congress reconsiders the federal government’s role in school reform. But how should politicians and activists gauge NCLB’s effects? The authors offer evidence on three barometers...
Student performance standards on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Affirmation and improvements Brown W 11 2000
President’s radio address Bush GW 2004
BushGWPresident Bush congratulates presidential scholars, discusses No Child Left Behind reauthorization2007Retrieved June 28, 2007, fromwww.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/06/20070625-7.html
Carnoy, Martin, Loeb, Susanna. Does External Accountability Affect Student Outcomes? A Cross-State Analysis. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, vol.24, no.4, 305-331.
Kentucky Instructional Results Information System: A technical review Catterall J 1998
Answering the question that matters most: Has student achievement increased since No Child Left Behind? Center for Education Policy 2007
Restructuring schools: The next generation of educational reform Cohen M 251 1990
Trends in educational achievement Congressional Budget Office 1986
DillonSEducation law gets first test in U.S. schoolsNew York Times2005October 20Retrieved fromwww.nytimes.com/2005/10/20/national/20exam.html?pagewanted=print
Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education Elmore R 65 1996
Is the No Child Left Behind Act working? The reliability of how states track achievement. (Working Paper No. 06-1) Fuller B 2006
Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Fuller B 2007
Assessment and accountability systems in 50 states: 1999-2000 (No. RR-046) Goertz M 2001
Improving student achievement: What state NAEP test scores tell us Grissmer D 2001
Primary progress, secondary challenge: A state-by-state look at student achievement patterns Hall D 2006
New York Times Hernandez R 23 2004
10.1037/e419732005-001
Uses and misuses of data in accountability testing Koretz D
The validity of gains in scores on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS) Koretz D 1998
Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Koretz D 1991
Tracking achievement gaps and assessing the impact of NCLB on the gaps Lee J 2006
Lee, Jaekyung, Wong, Kenneth K.. The Impact of Accountability on Racial and Socioeconomic Equity: Considering Both School Resources and Achievement Outcomes. American educational research journal, vol.41, no.4, 797-832.
LINN, ROBERT L.. Assessments and Accountability. Educational researcher : a publication of the American Educational Research Association, vol.29, no.2, 4-16.
The design and evaluation of educational assessment and accountability systems (UCLA Technical Report No. 539) Linn R 2001
You can’t get there from here (Research and Policy Notes) Linn R 2006
How well are American students learning? Loveless T 2003
Persistence and change: Standards-based reform in nine states Massell D 1997
Washington Post Mathews J A1 2006
National trends in reading/mathematics by average scale scores National Assessment of Educational Progress 2006
NAEP data explorer (customized data run) National Assessment of Educational Progress 2006
National Assessment of Educational ProgressThe nation’s report card (state test data time series)2006cRetrieved fromhttp://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/states/profile.asp
Digest of educational statistics, 2005 National Center for Education Statistics 2005
Education Week No small change: Targeting money toward student performance 84 2005
Statement in regard to the PACE study Paige R 2004
The nation’s report card: Mathematics 2005 (NCES No. 2006-453) Perie M 2005
The nation’s report card: Reading 2005 (NCES No. 2006-451) Perie M 2005
In search of excellence Peters T 1982
The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing Rhoten D 13 2003
Education Week Skinner R 77 2005
Standards-based reform: The next generation (manuscript) Smith M 2006
The politics of curriculum and testing: The 1990 yearbook of the politics of education association Smith M 233 1991
Introduction to first-year findings from the Implementing Standards-Based Accountability Project (working paper) Stecher B 2005
Making sense of test-based accountability in education Stetcher B 79 2002
Building instructional capacity in large urban districts Treisman U 2005
On further examination: Report of the advisory panel on the Scholastic Aptitude Test score decline Wirtz W 1977
Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Zilbert E 2006
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.