초록

용어보기논문에서 용어와 풀이말을 자동 추출한 결과로, 시범 서비스 중입니다. AI-Helper

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Regarding media trust as a complicated and macroscopic one, this study argues that industrial and journalistic approaches are not enough to provide full explanation to the problem of media trust. This study, therefore, argues that the recent crisis of media trust in Korean society should be understo...

Regarding media trust as a complicated and macroscopic one, this study argues that industrial and journalistic approaches are not enough to provide full explanation to the problem of media trust. This study, therefore, argues that the recent crisis of media trust in Korean society should be understood in the context of the retardation of democracy. By paying attention to the concepts of the "right" of liberalism and the "good" of communitarianism as well as the public sphere of Habermas, this study tries to find a normative model for Korean media to make some improvement in terms of media trust. The idea of the "right" media tells us about "how" media do their roles for democracy, while that of the "good" media suggests about "what" media do: that is, the "right" media puts more importance on procedural justice in the formation and practice of the democratic public sphere rather than the performance of public virtue for the society, while the "good" media focuses on the latter. This study gives the primacy to the "right" media model as it sees Korean media are heavily value-oriented in their history. The thing Korean media are short of is not the value itself to pursue but the elaborate procedure and sophisticated check system as institution to make various voices presented and debated in the public sphere. The idea of the "right" media model is especially essential when the government/political power is hardly "non-partisan" or "neutral."

주제어