초록

AI-Helper

이 글은 한반도 통일모델을 모색해 보는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 독일과 베트남 및 예멘의 통일 모델은 한반도에 적용하는데 있어 나름대로의 문제가 있었고, 한반도 통일모델이 갖추어야 할 국제적 차원, 한반도 차원, 국내적 차원의 조건에 비추어 볼 때 한반도는 새로운 통일모델이 필요하다.

4대 강국에 의해 분할 점령되어있던 오스트리아가 통일과 독립을 얻기 위한 수단으로 중립화를 택한 전략은 특수한 지정학적 위치에 있는 한반도에 시사하는 점이 많다. 중립화통일론은 그 동안 별로 주목받지 못했고 비판의 대상이 되어온 경향이 있지만, 21세기 국제정치 전망과 대내외적 조건을 고려할 때 한반도 통일모델로서 새롭게 평가될 필요가 있다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The purpose of this paper is to search for a model for Korean unification. The German, Vietnamese, and Yemeni models are not suitable to Korean unification in view of the international, inter-Korean, and domestic conditions. Therefore we need other models, including the neutralization approach like ...

The purpose of this paper is to search for a model for Korean unification. The German, Vietnamese, and Yemeni models are not suitable to Korean unification in view of the international, inter-Korean, and domestic conditions. Therefore we need other models, including the neutralization approach like the case of Austria. The neutralized unification of Austria was made possible by the adept diplomacy of its leadership. Austrian political leaders maintained unity and succeeded in acquiring Austrian independence and unification on condition that Austria becomes a country of permanent neutrality in 1955. In Korea the concept of permanent neutrality has been intermittently argued, but has not attracted serious concern since late 19th century. After the collapse of the Cold War, however, Austrian model of permanent neutrality seems to be a good example for Korean unification considering the geo-strategic importance of the Korean peninsula and the prospect of the 21st century international politics. The concepts of permanent neutrality or “de facto neutrality” need to be newly illuminated and seriously discussed.

주제어