본 연구는 우리나라 경제 및 사회구조에 중대한 변화를 야기한 IMF(1997) 이후의 빈곤층의 증가, 그리고 그동안 소홀하게 인식되어온 빈곤여성의 복지향상 문제가 새로운 사회문제로 부각됨에 따라, 이들 빈곤여성 중 심리.정서적 지지가 크게 필요한 자활근로여성을 위한 역량강화 향상 프로그램을 개발하고 그 효과성을 검증하고자 하였다.
OO시 O구 지역에 거주하는 여성 중 자활근로에 참가하는 국민기초생활보장 수급권자를 대상으로 하여 양적․질적연구를 병행하여 실시하였다. 연구대상자는 실험집단과 통제집단으로 구성하였고, 검증은 개인심리적 측면과 사회적측면으로 나누어 하였다. 개인심리적측면은 자기효능감, 자아정체성을, 사회적 측면에서는 대처기제능력, 사회적 문제해결능력의 효과성을 검증하였다.
연구결과, 자활근로여성의 역량강화를 위해 개발된 본 프로그램은 자기효능감, 자아정체감, 대처기제능력, 사회적 문제해결능력의 증진 및 향상에 유의미하고 효과적인 사회복지실천적 개입 프로그램으로 입증되었다.
본 연구에서 도출된 실험적․통계적․경험적 자료는 우리 실정에 적합한 자활근로여성을 위한 역량강화 프로그램의 적용에 좋은 자료가 될 것으로 기대한다.
본 연구는 우리나라 경제 및 사회구조에 중대한 변화를 야기한 IMF(1997) 이후의 빈곤층의 증가, 그리고 그동안 소홀하게 인식되어온 빈곤여성의 복지향상 문제가 새로운 사회문제로 부각됨에 따라, 이들 빈곤여성 중 심리.정서적 지지가 크게 필요한 자활근로여성을 위한 역량강화 향상 프로그램을 개발하고 그 효과성을 검증하고자 하였다.
OO시 O구 지역에 거주하는 여성 중 자활근로에 참가하는 국민기초생활보장 수급권자를 대상으로 하여 양적․질적연구를 병행하여 실시하였다. 연구대상자는 실험집단과 통제집단으로 구성하였고, 검증은 개인심리적 측면과 사회적측면으로 나누어 하였다. 개인심리적측면은 자기효능감, 자아정체성을, 사회적 측면에서는 대처기제능력, 사회적 문제해결능력의 효과성을 검증하였다.
연구결과, 자활근로여성의 역량강화를 위해 개발된 본 프로그램은 자기효능감, 자아정체감, 대처기제능력, 사회적 문제해결능력의 증진 및 향상에 유의미하고 효과적인 사회복지실천적 개입 프로그램으로 입증되었다.
본 연구에서 도출된 실험적․통계적․경험적 자료는 우리 실정에 적합한 자활근로여성을 위한 역량강화 프로그램의 적용에 좋은 자료가 될 것으로 기대한다.
I developed the ability inspiration oriented group social work program for self-sustaining working women and analyzed its effectiveness quantitatively and qualitatively. First of all, to analyze the effectiveness of the program, I divided the dependent variables into self-efficiency, self-identity, ...
I developed the ability inspiration oriented group social work program for self-sustaining working women and analyzed its effectiveness quantitatively and qualitatively. First of all, to analyze the effectiveness of the program, I divided the dependent variables into self-efficiency, self-identity, ability to cope with and the ability of social problem solving. And then, I applied the group social work program developed in this study, and analyzed whether the differences between experimental group and controlled group show a meaningful result statistically. To do this, I used t-verification and Man-Whitney verification method for the verification on hypothesis 1 and hypothesis 2. And then, with a quantitative analysis like this, at the same time, I analyzed the process of ability inspiration in the group and used the method of quantitative and qualitative analysis describing the process of access activity for resource. Furthermore, I analyzed the term evaluation through a evaluation questionnaire based on the 3 question items; meaningfulness, evaluation on self and degree of contentment. The conclusion based on the results of this study is as follows. The two hypotheses developed in this study are maintained from the results of verification on these hypotheses. First, from the verification on hypothesis 1 (a group adopted ability inspiration oriented group interruption will show a much better progress in self-efficiency than a group not adopted the group interruption), experimental group showed average point of 10.86 in the latter test compared with the former test, but controlled group showed average point of 7.13. This means the meaningful difference is in self-efficiency scale point. (The more the point is, the higher a level of self-efficiency is.) Second, from the verification on hypothesis 2 (a group adopted ability inspiration oriented group interruption will show a more meaningful progress in self-identity than a group not adopted the group interruption), experimental group showed average point of 10.14 in the latter test compared with the former test, but controlled group showed average point of 4.25. This means the meaningful difference is in self-efficiency scale point. (The more the point is, the higher a level of self-efficiency is.) Third, from the verification on hypothesis 3(a group adopted ability inspiration oriented group interruption will show a more meaningful progress in the ability to cope with than a group not adopted the group interruption), experimental group showed average point of 12.29 in the latter test compared with the former test, but controlled group showed average point of 2.25. This means the meaningful difference is in group consciousness scale. (The more the point is, the stronger the ability to cope with is.) Fourth, from the verification on hypothesis 4 (a group adopted ability inspiration oriented group interruption will show a more meaningful progress in the ability of social problem solving than a group not adopted the group interruption), experimental group showed average point of 9.14 in the latter test compared with the former test, but controlled group showed average point of 3.88. This means the meaningful difference is in the ability of the social problem solving. (The more the point is, the higher a level of social problem solving is.) The result of the verification on these hypotheses suggests that experimental group showed a meaningful progress in the 4 dependent variables derived from the ability inspiration oriented social work practice.
I developed the ability inspiration oriented group social work program for self-sustaining working women and analyzed its effectiveness quantitatively and qualitatively. First of all, to analyze the effectiveness of the program, I divided the dependent variables into self-efficiency, self-identity, ability to cope with and the ability of social problem solving. And then, I applied the group social work program developed in this study, and analyzed whether the differences between experimental group and controlled group show a meaningful result statistically. To do this, I used t-verification and Man-Whitney verification method for the verification on hypothesis 1 and hypothesis 2. And then, with a quantitative analysis like this, at the same time, I analyzed the process of ability inspiration in the group and used the method of quantitative and qualitative analysis describing the process of access activity for resource. Furthermore, I analyzed the term evaluation through a evaluation questionnaire based on the 3 question items; meaningfulness, evaluation on self and degree of contentment. The conclusion based on the results of this study is as follows. The two hypotheses developed in this study are maintained from the results of verification on these hypotheses. First, from the verification on hypothesis 1 (a group adopted ability inspiration oriented group interruption will show a much better progress in self-efficiency than a group not adopted the group interruption), experimental group showed average point of 10.86 in the latter test compared with the former test, but controlled group showed average point of 7.13. This means the meaningful difference is in self-efficiency scale point. (The more the point is, the higher a level of self-efficiency is.) Second, from the verification on hypothesis 2 (a group adopted ability inspiration oriented group interruption will show a more meaningful progress in self-identity than a group not adopted the group interruption), experimental group showed average point of 10.14 in the latter test compared with the former test, but controlled group showed average point of 4.25. This means the meaningful difference is in self-efficiency scale point. (The more the point is, the higher a level of self-efficiency is.) Third, from the verification on hypothesis 3(a group adopted ability inspiration oriented group interruption will show a more meaningful progress in the ability to cope with than a group not adopted the group interruption), experimental group showed average point of 12.29 in the latter test compared with the former test, but controlled group showed average point of 2.25. This means the meaningful difference is in group consciousness scale. (The more the point is, the stronger the ability to cope with is.) Fourth, from the verification on hypothesis 4 (a group adopted ability inspiration oriented group interruption will show a more meaningful progress in the ability of social problem solving than a group not adopted the group interruption), experimental group showed average point of 9.14 in the latter test compared with the former test, but controlled group showed average point of 3.88. This means the meaningful difference is in the ability of the social problem solving. (The more the point is, the higher a level of social problem solving is.) The result of the verification on these hypotheses suggests that experimental group showed a meaningful progress in the 4 dependent variables derived from the ability inspiration oriented social work practice.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.