초록

용어보기논문에서 용어와 풀이말을 자동 추출한 결과로, 시범 서비스 중입니다. AI-Helper

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

From the end of the World War II to today, to Korean scholars, the issue on the division of the Korean Peninsula is one of the most academically important issues and practical applications. The issue is intertwined with all possibilities and limits on future paths of Koreans and reserves the concept...

From the end of the World War II to today, to Korean scholars, the issue on the division of the Korean Peninsula is one of the most academically important issues and practical applications. The issue is intertwined with all possibilities and limits on future paths of Koreans and reserves the concepts ranged from state building and national strategy to modernity and nationalism. The causes of two Koreas stem from due to both external and internal factors. The exogenous factors can be conceptualized as "coercive forces" such as strains between ideologies and conflicts between the US. and the USSR. The endogenous factors, for a source of separation, weight more on the left-right wing conflicts which rested on class conflicts in Korea than coercive forces. The division of the Korean Peninsula is, thus, considered as an outcome of exogenous factors relied upon the conflicts between capitalism and socialism as well as endogenous factors, i.e., the variation of nationalism under the Cold War as a source of conflicts among domestic people. Ideologies and values aiming upon separation rather union and the reckless party conflicts without compromise and understanding expedited the establishment of division of the Koreas. These inner conflicts as well as external ones rooted in ages ahead the Japanese Dominance in 1910-1945.

주제어