최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기Journal of dentistry, v.43 no.9, 2015년, pp.1043 - 1050
Moraschini, V. , Fai, C.K. , Alto, R.M. , dos Santos, G.O.
Objectives: The aim of the present review was to evaluate by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis the hypothesis of no difference in failure rates between amalgam and composite resin posterior restorations. Data: Randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and prospective and ...
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Qvist 48 305 1990 10.3109/00016359009033621 Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark
Swedish Dental Journal Sjogren 26 59 2002 Survival time of class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment
Pediatric Dentistry Fuks 24 448 2002 The use of amalgam in pediatric dentistry
Journal of Dentistry Lynch 42 377 2014 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.009 Guidance on posterior resin composites: Academy of Operative Dentistry - European Section
Zochbauer 2011 Number of dental restorations worldwide
Journal of Dental Research Davidson 63 1396 1984 10.1177/00220345840630121101 The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress
Operative Dentistry Manhart 29 481 2004 Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry Heintze 14 407 2012 Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Mjor 55 58 1997 10.3109/00016359709091943 The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice
Operative Dentistry Wilson 27 423 2002 A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results
Journal of American Dental Association Bernardo 138 775 2007 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265 Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial
4 2006 Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]
Annals of Internal Medicine Moher 151 264 2009 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
Wells 2000 The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysis
Quintessence International Johnson 23 705 1992 Clinical performance of posterior composite resin restorations
Journal of Dentistry Mjor 21 338 1993 10.1016/0300-5712(93)90006-C Five-year study of Class II restorations in permanent teeth using amalgam, glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cerment and resin-based composite materials
Journal of Dentistry Collins 26 311 1998 10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00019-5 A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings
Quintessence International Mair 29 483 1998 Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams
Quintessence International Levin 38 511 2007 Cross-sectional radiographic survey of amalgam and resin-based composite posterior restorations
Biometrics Landis 33 159 1977 10.2307/2529310 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
American Journal of Epidemiology Shrier 166 1203 2007 10.1093/aje/kwm189 Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles
Periodontology Pihlstrom 59 14 2000 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00439.x Randomized controlled trials: what are they and who needs them?
Journal of Dental Research Letzel 76 1787 1997 10.1177/00220345970760111101 The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials
Clinical Oral Investigations Roulet 1 40 1997 10.1007/s007840050007 Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam - results up to 6 years
Evidence-Based Dentistry Hurst 15 50 2014 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401026 Amalgam or composite fillings - which material lasts longer?
Journal of Dentistry Burke 29 317 2001 10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00022-7 Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry Forss 13 158 2003 10.1046/j.1365-263X.2003.00453.x The post-amalgam era: a selection of materials and their longevity in the primary and young permanent dentitions
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Grossman 76 239 1996 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90165-1 Effect of restorative materials and in vitro carious challenge on amalgam margin quality
BMC Medicine Schulz 8 1 2010 10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.