$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Is vehicle automation enough to prevent crashes? Role of traffic operations in automated driving environments for traffic safety

Accident analysis and prevention, v.104, 2017년, pp.115 - 124  

Jeong, Eunbi (Korea Railroad Research Institute, Transport Systems Research Team, 176 Railroad Museum Road, Uiwang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 16105, Republic of Korea) ,  Oh, Cheol (Hanyang University Erica Campus, Department of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea) ,  Lee, Seolyoung (Graduated Student Researcher, Hanyang University Erica Campus, Department of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Abstract Automated driving systems (ADSs) are expected to prevent traffic accidents caused by driver carelessness on freeways. There is no doubt regarding this safety benefit if all vehicles in the transportation system were equipped with ADSs; however, it is implausible to expect that ADSs will re...

주제어

참고문헌 (24)

  1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) 2011 A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 

  2. Administration NHTSA, 2013. Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. Washington, DC 1-14, http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/Automated_Vehicles_Policy.pdf . 

  3. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Arnaout 4 699 2011 Towards reducing traffic congestion using cooperative adaptive cruise control on a freeway with a ramp 

  4. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board Bachmann 2237 31 2011 10.3141/2237-04 Improved time-to-collision definition for simulating traffic conflicts on truck-only infrastructure 

  5. Transp. Res. Record: J. Transp. Res. Board Brockfeld 1876 62 2004 10.3141/1876-07 Calibration and validation of microscopic traffic flow models 

  6. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. Darbha 7 329 1999 10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00024-8 Intelligent cruise control systems and traffic flow stability 

  7. Gen 2000 Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Optimization 

  8. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. Hoedemaeker 1 95 1998 10.1016/S1369-8478(98)00008-4 Behavioural adaptation to driving with an adaptive cruise control (ACC) 

  9. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board Jeong 2424 11 2014 10.3141/2424-02 Safety impacts of intervehicle warning information systems for moving hazards in connected vehicle environments 

  10. Kyo Woo Sa, ISBN. Jin 89 225 2002 Genetic algorithms and their applications 

  11. Accid. Anal. Prev. Minderhoud 33 89 2001 10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00019-1 Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment 

  12. Control Eng. Pract. Moon 17 442 2009 10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.09.006 Design, tuning, and evaluation of a full-range adaptive cruise control system with collision avoidance 

  13. Accid. Anal. Prev. Oh 42 1888 2010 10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.009 Estimation of rear-end crash potential using vehicle trajectory data 

  14. Accid. Anal. Prev. Oh 38 295 2006 10.1016/j.aap.2005.09.009 A method for identifying rear-end collision risks using inductive loop detectors 

  15. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board Pueboobpaphan 2189 89 2011 10.3141/2189-10 Driver and vehicle characteristics and platoon and traffic flow stability 

  16. Schaffer 51-60 1989 1989 A study of control parameters affecting online performance of genetic algorithms for function optimization 

  17. Intell. Transp. Syst. (ITSC) 2010 13th Int. IEEE Conf Schakel 759 2010 Effects of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic flow stability 

  18. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board Shladover 2324 63 2012 10.3141/2324-08 Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow 

  19. Proc. 2000 Am. Control Conf. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334) 3 Shrivastava 275 2000 Traffic flow stability induced by constant time headway policy for adaptive cruise control (ACC) vehicles 

  20. J. Korean Soc. Transp. Song 29 17 2011 Agent-based speed management strategy for freeway traffic safety (Methodology and evaluation) 

  21. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. Van Arem 7 429 2006 10.1109/TITS.2006.884615 The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics 

  22. Transportation Research Board 91 St Annual Meeting Van Noort 2012 EuroFOT safety impact assessment method and results 

  23. Wasserman 1993 Advanced Methods in Neural Computing 

  24. Accid. Anal. Prev. Weng 77 51 2015 10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.002 In-depth analysis of drivers’ merging behavior and rear-end crash risks in work zone merging areas 

LOADING...

관련 콘텐츠

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로