[논문]World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on use of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals

Aidara-Kane, Awa; Angulo, Frederick J.; Conly, John M.; Minato, Yuki; Silbergeld, Ellen K.; McEwen, Scott A.; Collignon, Peter J.

doi:10.1186/s13756-017-0294-9

World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on use of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals 원문보기

Antimicrobial resistance & infection control, v.7 no.1, 2018년, pp.7 -

Aidara-Kane, Awa (Department of Food Safety and Zoonoses (NMH) , Angulo, Frederick J. (Division of Global Health Protection, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS D-63, Atlanta, GA 30033 USA) , Conly, John M. (Departments of Medicine, Microbiology, Immunology & Infectious Diseases, and Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Synder Institute for Chronic Diseases and O’Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada) , Minato, Yuki (Department of Food Safety and Zoonoses (NMH) , Silbergeld, Ellen K. (Department of Environmental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA) , McEwen, Scott A. (Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, N1G 2W1 Canada) , Collignon, Peter J. (Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia and)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

BackgroundAntimicrobial use in food-producing animals selects for antimicrobial resistance that can be transmitted to humans via food or other transmission routes. The World Health Organization (WHO) in 2005 ranked the medical importance of antimicrobials used in humans. In late 2017, to preserve the effectiveness of medically important antimicrobials for humans, WHO released guidelines on use of antimicrobials in food-producing animals that incorporated the latest WHO rankings.MethodsWHO commissioned systematic reviews and literature reviews, and convened a Guideline Development Group (GDG) of external experts free of unacceptable conflicts-of-interest. The GDG assessed the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and formulated recommendations using a structured evidence-to-decision approach that considered the balance of benefits and harms, feasibility, resource implications, and impact on equity. The resulting guidelines were peer-reviewed by an independent External Review Group and approved by the WHO Guidelines Review Committee.ResultsThese guidelines recommend reductions in the overall use of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals, including complete restriction of use of antimicrobials for growth promotion and for disease prevention (i.e., in healthy animals considered at risk of infection). These guidelines also recommend that antimicrobials identified as critically important for humans not be used in food-producing animals for treatment or disease control unless susceptibility testing demonstrates the drug to be the only treatment option.ConclusionsTo preserve the effectiveness of medically important antimicrobials, veterinarians, farmers, regulatory agencies, and all other stakeholders are urged to adopt these recommendations and work towards implementation of these guidelines.

주제어

참고문헌 (28)

1. Eloit M, Graziano da Silva J, Chan M. Super bugs: Why we need action now. Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-monique-eloit/post_13193_b_11992538.html . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
2. WHO Global Strategy for Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance. World Health Organization, 2001. http://www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/publications/WHO_Global_Strategy.htm/en/ . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
3. Molbak K Human health consequences of antimicrobial rug-resistant salmonella and other foodborne pathogens Clin Infect Dis 2005 4 1613 1620
4. WHO Antimicrobial Resistance Global report on surveillance 2014
5. Levy SB Marshall B Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses Nat Med 2014 10 S122 S129 10.1038/nm1145

상세보기
6. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: Final report and recommendations. The review on antimicrobial resistance chaired by Jim O’Neill. May 2016. https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160525_Final%20paper_with%20cover.pdf . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
7. Resolution WHA 68-7 (Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance) of the sixty-eighth World Health Assembly, Geneva, Switzerland, 26 May, 2015. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA68/A68_R7-en.pdf?ua=1 . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
8. Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. World Health Organization. http://www.wpro.who.int/entity/drug_resistance/resources/global_action_plan_eng.pdf . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
9. Resolution 4/2015 (Antimicrobial Resistance) of thirty-ninth session of the Conference of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Rome, Italy, 6-13 June 2015. http://www.fao.org/3/a-mo153e.pdf . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
10. Resolution 26 (Combating Antimicrobial Resistance and Promoting the Prudent Use of Antimicrobial Agents in Animals) of the World Assembly of Delegates of the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). Paris, France, 26 May, 2015. http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Our_scientific_expertise/docs/pdf/AMR/A_RESO_AMR_2015.pdf . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
11. Codex texts on foodborne antimicrobial resistance. Codex Alimentarius, 2015. http://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/7209750e-2c7a-4694-a0fe-8d7f0050acae/ . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
12. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), World Animal Health Organization (OIE); World Health Organization (WHO). Joint FAO/OIE/WHO Expert Workshop on Non-Human Antimicrobial Usage and Antimicrobial Resistance: Scientific assessment. Geneva, Switzerland, 1-5 December 2003. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/amr-management/en/ . Accessed 26 Oc 2017.
13. Angulo FJ Nargund VN Chiller TC Evidence of an association between use of antimicrobial agents in food animals and antimicrobial resistance among bacteria isolated from humans and the human health consequences of such resistance J Vet Med Series B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2004 51 8-9 374 379 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00789.x

상세보기
14. Critically important antibacterial agents for human medicine for risk management strategies of non-human use. World Health Organization, 2005. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/antibacterial-agent/en/ . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
15. Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine: Ranking of medically important antimicrobials for risk management of antimicrobial resistance due to non-human use. World Health Organization. Fifth revision, 2016. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/antimicrobials-fifth/en/ . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
16. WHO Handbook for Guideline Development. Second Edition. World Health Organization, 2012. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js22083en/ . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
17. Schunemann HBJ, Brozek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. GRADE handbook for grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. The GRADE Working Group. http://www.guidelinedevelopment.org/handbook/ . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
18. Tang KL, Caffrey NP, Nobrega DB, et al. Restriction in the use of antibiotics in food-producing animals and its associations with antibiotic resistance in food-producing animals and humans ？ a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Planetary Health In press.
19. Webb HE Angulo FJ Granier SA Scott HM Loneragan GH Illustrative examples of probable transfer of resistance determinants from food animals to humans: Streptothricins, glycopeptides, and coliston F1000Research 2017 6 1805 10.12688/f1000research.12777.1 29188021

상세보기
20. Swann MM Report of the joint committee on the use of antibiotics in animal husbandry and veterinary medicine (Swann report) 1969 London Her Majesty’s Stationery Office
21. The Medical Impact of the Use of Antimicrobial in Food-producing animals: Report of a WHO Meeting. Berlin, Germany. October 13-17, 1997. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/64439/1/WHO_EMC_ZOO_97.4.pdf . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
22. WHO Global Principles for the Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance in Animals Intended for Food: Report of a WHO Consultation with the participation of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Office International des Epizooties. Geneva, Switzerland. June 5-9, 2000 http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/68931/1/WHO_CDS_CSR_APH_2000.4.pdf . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
23. Impacts of Antimicrobial Growth Promoter Termination in Denmark: The WHO international review panel’s evaluation of the termination of the use of antimicrobial growth promoters in Denmark. Foulum, Denmark. November 6-9, 2002. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/68357/1/WHO_CDS_CPE_ZFK_2003.1.pdf . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
24. Mevius D Heederik D Reduction of antibiotic use in animals: “lets go Dutch” J fur Verbraucherschultz und Lebensmittelsicherheit 2014 9 177 181 10.1007/s00003-014-0874-z

상세보기
25. McDonald’s Global Vision for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Food-producing animals. http://corporate.mcdonalds.com/content/dam/AboutMcDonalds/2.0/pdfs/sustainability/McDonalds-Global-Vision-for-Antimicrobial-Stewardship-in-Food.pdf . Accessed 26 Oct 2017.
26. Norris SL Bero L GRADE methods for guideline development: time to evolve? Annuals Intern Med 2016 165 810 811 10.7326/M16-1254

상세보기
27. Vandenberg LN Agerstrand BA A proposed framework for the systematic review and integrated assessment (SYRINA) of endocrine disrupting chemicals Environ Health 2016 15 74 10.1186/s12940-016-0156-6 27412149

상세보기
28. Norris SL Ford N Improving the quality of WHO guidelines over the last decade: progress and challenges Lancet 2017 5 e855 e856 28807174

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on use of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (28)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

연관된 기능

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트