다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
Frontiers of nursing, v.6 no.4, 2019년, pp.249 - 259
Aungsuroch, Yupin (Faculty of Nursing and Medical Technology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh, Dong Nai 70000, Vietnam) , Nhu, Xuan Ha Thi (Faculty of Nursing and Medical Technology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh, Dong Nai 70000, Vietnam) , Linh, Tran Thuy Khanh (Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok10330, Thailand) , Polsook, Rapin (Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok10330, Thailand) , Navicharern, Rungrawee (Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok10330, Thailand) , Gunawan, Joko
AbstractObjectiveThere is no single study that has examined nursing research priorities in Vietnam. This study aimed to gain consensus from experts on the nursing research priorities in Vietnam.MethodsA three-round modified Delphi study was used in this study. A focus group discussion among experts was conducted in round I to identify the nursing research priorities (n=23). Data in round I were analyzed using content analysis. In round II, participants were invited to rate the importance of each nursing priority topic in a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, which had a 74% (n=17) response rate. In round III, the questionnaire was returned to the experts (n=17) until consensus was reached. Data from round II and round III were analyzed to produce mean score and final rank.ResultsThe top 12 research priority lists were identified, which included subthemes and areas of possible investigations. All priorities were classified into three groups in the rank order, namely: (i) nursing management and leadership, which included (1) nursing care quality, (2) management and leadership of nurse managers, (3) nursing image, (4) professional nurse competency, and (5) human resource management; (ii) nursing education, which included (1) knowledge-specific domain, (2) the linkage between education and practice, and (3) nurse teacher workforce; and (iii) nursing service, which included (1) adult nursing concern, (2) patient safety, (3) public health nursing concern, and (4) quality of life of patients and nurses.ConclusionsConsensus among experts was achiever, and the findings are considered as the basis of resources to the most essential research needs in Vietnam.
Aungsuroch Y. Enhancing Nursing Service and Nursing Education in ASEAN. Thailand: Chulalongkorn University; 2016.
National Nursing & Nursing Education Taskforce. Priorities for Nursing and Midwifery Research in Australia. Australia: Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council; 2006.
10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02083.x Bäck-Pettersson S, Hermansson E, Sernert N, Björkelund C. Research priorities in nursing-a Delphi study among Swedish nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17:2221-2231.10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02083.x18710377
10.1097/NUR.0000000000000317 Thompson CJ. Research priorities for nursing education: application to clinical nurse specialist education. Clin Nurse Spec. 2017;31:285-288.10.1097/NUR.000000000000031728806235
10.1016/j.pedn.2014.01.003 Brenner M, Hilliard C, Regan G, et al. Research priorities for children’s nursing in Ireland: a Delphi study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2014;29:301-308.10.1016/j.pedn.2014.01.003
Dowding DW, Currie LM, Lawton R, et al. International priorities for research in nursing informatics for patient care. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:372-376.23920579
10.3389/fpubh.2018.00146 Kang S, Ho TTT, Nguyen TAP. Capacity development in an undergraduate nursing program in Vietnam. Front Public Health. 2018;6:146.10.3389/fpubh.2018.00146
10.1108/QAE-11-2016-0075 Nguyen HC, Evers C, Marshall S. Accreditation of Viet Nam’s higher education: achievements and challenges after a dozen years of development. Qual Assur Educ. 2017;25:475-488.10.1108/QAE-11-2016-0075
Phuong HLT, Simon JHE. Nursing education in Vietnam. Ann Bull Niigata Coll Nurs Educ Persp. 2016;5:2-9.
Phuong HT. Nursing service in Viet Nam. In: Aungsuroch Y, ed. Enhancing Nursing Service and Nursing Education in ASEAN. Thailand: Chulalongkorn University; 2016.
10.4172/2167-1168.1000368 Ha DT, Nuntaboot K. How nurses in hospital in Vietnam learn to improve their own nursing competency: an ethnographic study. J Nurs Care. 2016;5:368.
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:1008-1015.11095242
10.1111/jnu.12280 Sun C, Dohrn J, Oweis A, et al. Delphi survey of clinical nursing and midwifery research priorities in the Eastern Mediterranean region. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017;49:223-235.10.1111/jnu.1228028178398
Wilhelm WJ. Alchemy of the oracle: the Delphi technique. Delta Pi Epsilon. 2001;43:6-26.
10.1186/1471-2288-5-37 Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:37.1632116110.1186/1471-2288-5-37
10.1177/1049732305276687 Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277-1288.10.1177/104973230527668716204405
Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. California: Sage; 2004.
10.1046/j.1365-2532.20.s1.4.x Kirkwood M, Wales A, Wilson A. A Delphi study to determine nursing research priorities in the North Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust and the corresponding evidence base. Health Info Libr J. 2003;20:53-58.1275743610.1046/j.1365-2532.20.s1.4.x
10.1016/j.nedt.2013.11.002 Twigg D, Attree M. Patient safety: committing to learn and acting to improve. Nurse Educ Today. 2014;34:159-161.2426874410.1016/j.nedt.2013.11.002
10.7748/nr2007.10.15.1.78.c6057 Taylor S, Allen D. Visions of evidence-based nursing practice. Nurs Res (through 2013). 2007;15:78.
Gunawan J. The Innovation of Nursing Care Delivery Model: A Hybrid Model. Thailand: Faculty of Nursing Chulalongkorn University; 2015.
10.1097/NUR.0000000000000085 Scruth EA. Quality nursing documentation in the medical record. Clin Nurse Spec. 2014;28:312-314.10.1097/NUR.0000000000000085
10.1108/IJQSS-02-2014-0017 Siverbo K, Eriksson H, Raharjo H, et al. Attitudes toward quality improvement among healthcare professionals: lessons from a hospital-wide quality initiative. Int J Qual Serv Sci. 2014;6:203-212.
Finkelman A. Professional Nursing Concepts: Competencies for Quality Leadership. Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2017.
10.5172/conu.2013.45.1.33 Katsikitis M, McAllister M, Sharman R, Raith L, Faithfull-Byrne A, Priaulx R. Continuing professional development in nursing in Australia: current awareness, practice and future directions. Contemp Nurse. 2013;45:33-45.2409922410.5172/conu.2013.45.1.33
Hamouzadeh P, Moradkhani B, Sadeghifar J. Factors affecting on job motivation from the managers point of view in teaching hospitals affiliated to Urmia University of Medical Sciences in 2009. J Urmia Nurs Mid Fac. 2011;9: 15-22.
10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.009 Rushforth HE. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): review of literature and implications for nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2007; 27:481-490.10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.00917070622
10.1111/jan.12503 Heslop L, Lu S. Nursing-sensitive indicators: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70:2469-2482.2511338810.1111/jan.12503
10.1093/heapro/dax059 Murdoch-Flowers J, Tremblay M-C, Hovey R, et al. Understanding how Indigenous culturally-based interventions can improve participants’ health in Canada. Health Prom Int. 2019;34(1): 154-165.10.1093/heapro/dax059
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.