본 연구의 분석을 위한 방법론으로는 마이클 포터의 가치시스템(Value system)을 적용하였다. 이를 통해서 시장의 요구에 대응하기 위한 R&D 및 정책의 우선순위와 품목별 경쟁력 향상 방안에 관한 시사점을 도출하였다. 본 연구의 범위는 쌀, 감자, 밀, 콩, 건고추, 배추, 딸기, 토마토, 배, 포도, 사과, 매실, 감귤, 참다래, 돈육, 한우 등의 투입부문, 생산부문, 유통부문, 소비부문을 총망라하여 현황 및 문제점을 분석하였다. 또한 이를 통해 정책적 시사점 및 R&D 부문의 시사점을 도출하였다.
Abstract▼
It is not easy to solve the problems about Korean agricultural products, because a problem may be correlated with another. so, if we want to diagnose or analyze Korean agricultural products' situation, it is necessary to study it in view of linkages. It is clear that there are linkages between the r
It is not easy to solve the problems about Korean agricultural products, because a problem may be correlated with another. so, if we want to diagnose or analyze Korean agricultural products' situation, it is necessary to study it in view of linkages. It is clear that there are linkages between the related industries in Korean agricultural products. but there has been few diagnosis or analysis about these in Korea. The objective of this study is to find R&D and political implications about agricultural products with using M. Porter's value system. The range of agricultural products in this study is rice, potato, wheat, soybean, red pepper, Chinese cabbage, strawberry, tomato, pear, grape, apple, Japanese apricot, tangerine, kiwi fruit, pig, and Hanwoo(Korean native cattle). For this, we set up the objective of whole system instead of firm's margin and we change the primary activities and support activities instead of firm's case. because this study aims at finding core problem and making counterproposal at country level, not at firm's level. This allowed us the stereoscopic viewpoint to find the inherent problems and the synergies between them, so we could easily find the core problem related the value system. Therefore we could reduce the number of problems and solutions with using the M. Porter's value system. and we could make counterproposal about agricultural R&D and policy at country level.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.