초록 ▼

6. 결론
□ 기초·원천 연구의 경제파급효과 계량분석 결과와 시사점
○ 1980년대에 들어서면서 R&D 투자스톡에 대한 총요소생산성 탄력성이 대폭 증대함
□ 기초․원천 연구의 경제파급효과 사례분석 결과와 시사점
○ 테라급나노소재개발단은 프론티어사업의 취지에 따라 신진기술의 변화추이를 상시 모니터링하고 SWOT 분석과 기술격차분석을 통해 기술변화에 대처한 것으로 분석됨
○ 세계최초 40나노 32기가 낸드플래시 핵심기반기술 이전
○ 직접경제효과와 순부가가치 중대효과 그리고 간접경제효과 기술경쟁력 강화 효

6. 결론
□ 기초·원천 연구의 경제파급효과 계량분석 결과와 시사점
○ 1980년대에 들어서면서 R&D 투자스톡에 대한 총요소생산성 탄력성이 대폭 증대함
□ 기초․원천 연구의 경제파급효과 사례분석 결과와 시사점
○ 테라급나노소재개발단은 프론티어사업의 취지에 따라 신진기술의 변화추이를 상시 모니터링하고 SWOT 분석과 기술격차분석을 통해 기술변화에 대처한 것으로 분석됨
○ 세계최초 40나노 32기가 낸드플래시 핵심기반기술 이전
○ 직접경제효과와 순부가가치 중대효과 그리고 간접경제효과 기술경쟁력 강화 효과, 국제네트워크 구축 효과, 환경 등 사회적 효과로 다양하게 나타남
○ 조사분석에 있어서 기초연구의 사업화 성과는 수입대체 효과, 기업의 매출 확대 등 상당한 파급효과 예상
○ 기초연구 투자 확대는 선진국으로 도약하기 위한 국가 전략임
○ 기존 추격형 연구개발 단계에서 벗어나 창조형 연구개발단계로 진입하는데 중요한 주춧돌이자 선진국으로 도약하기위한 원동력임을 인식

Abstract ▼

The study is to review the paths and methods of economic impact of basic studies by assessing the size of economic impact of the studies with quantitative estimation and case studies to assess the effect of basic studies on macro economic growth. For case studies, Tera-level Nano Device Development

The study is to review the paths and methods of economic impact of basic studies by assessing the size of economic impact of the studies with quantitative estimation and case studies to assess the effect of basic studies on macro economic growth. For case studies, Tera-level Nano Device Development Project and Indigenous Plants Utilization Technology Development Project were chosen for detailed review. Until the 70’s, the rate of contribution of R&D investment in economic growth remained at 13.9%. accounting for 1.4% out of 10.2% of total growth but entering the 80’s, total factor productivity flexibility of R&D investment stock began to surge significantly. Since the 80’s, R&D contribution to total growth has been at high level of 34.2% in the 80’s, 25.5% on the 90’s and 25.5% in the 2000’s. In the 2000’s it was reported that R&D investment stock accounted for 1.2% out of the total growth rate of 4.6%. During the entire period (1972-2012), out of 7.2% in total annual average growth, capital stock accounts for 2.8%, labor input 1.6%, and TFP 2.8% and among them, contribution of R&D investment is reported to be 1.8%. Overall, R&D investment accounted for approximately 1/4 of total growth for the entire period, showing significant contribution rate. The sum of actual amount of basic study expense for the period (1983-2012) amounted to KRW 80 trillion 422 billion 400 million and during the same period, amount of added value in GDP initiated by the expense of basic studies was KRW 28 trillion 293 billion 700 million, generating 35.18% profit in GDP growth against investment into basic R&D investment. The case study showed that the frontier projects generated diverse benefits including direct economic benefits (technology transfer and infrastructure build-up, etc.), increase in net added value, indirect economic benefits (production facilitation and induced employment effect, etc.), strengthening of technology competitiveness, establishment of global network (international joint researches, MOU signing, etc.) and social effects including environmental impacts.