초록 ▼

1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
❏ 산업단지 개발에 있어서 혁신환경과 생활환경의 중요성이 커지면서 다양한 산업단지 복합화 전략이 추진되고 있음
￮ 혁신역량 강화를 목적으로 하는 연구단지 및 도시첨단단지 개발, 산학융합지구 조성 사업
￮ 산업단지의 정주환경을 개선을 위한 미니복합타운, 행복산단 등
❏ 현재의 산업단지 복합화 관련 정책은 여러 한계도 드러냄
￮ 산업단지의 특성이나 지역특성을 고려하지 않고 균일하게 접근되고 있음
￮ 산업단지 복합화를 추진하는 경우에도 토지이용상의 기능 혼합에 그치고 개발 이후에

1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
❏ 산업단지 개발에 있어서 혁신환경과 생활환경의 중요성이 커지면서 다양한 산업단지 복합화 전략이 추진되고 있음
￮ 혁신역량 강화를 목적으로 하는 연구단지 및 도시첨단단지 개발, 산학융합지구 조성 사업
￮ 산업단지의 정주환경을 개선을 위한 미니복합타운, 행복산단 등
❏ 현재의 산업단지 복합화 관련 정책은 여러 한계도 드러냄
￮ 산업단지의 특성이나 지역특성을 고려하지 않고 균일하게 접근되고 있음
￮ 산업단지 복합화를 추진하는 경우에도 토지이용상의 기능 혼합에 그치고 개발 이후에 산업단지에 입주할 기업이나 종사자의 요구에 대한 체계적인 고려 미흡
❏ 본 연구는 산업단지의 지역적 특성을 고려하여 산업단지의 혁신기반 및 생활기반을 강화하는 복합화 방향을 모색하고, 복합화와 관련된 다양한 이해당사자의 요구를 합리적으로 조정하는 방안을 모색하고자함
￮ 첫째, 산업단지 혁신기반 및 생활기반의 개념을 정립하고 산업단지와 관련된 다양한 이해주체 관점에서 산업단지 복합화의 필요성을 검토
￮ 둘째, 우리나라 산업단지 복합화 관련 정책 동향을 검토하고 산업단지 복합화 특성을 분석
￮ 셋째, 산업단지 특성이나 산업단지 복합화 정도에 따른 산업단지 혁신기반 및 생활기반 여건을 분석하고, 기업․종사자들이 필요로 하는 혁신기반 및 생활기반 요소를 파악
￮ 넷째, 산업단지 혁신기반 및 생활기반 강화를 위한 복합화 추진 전략을 제시

Abstract ▼

Chapter 1. Introduction
Changing an economic structure towards the knowledge-based economy and the creative economy has led to vary the locational factor of enterprises and industries, which becomes such a major issue of the mixed-use of the industrial complexes. Increasing the importance of inno

Chapter 1. Introduction
Changing an economic structure towards the knowledge-based economy and the creative economy has led to vary the locational factor of enterprises and industries, which becomes such a major issue of the mixed-use of the industrial complexes. Increasing the importance of innovation and living environments on the development of industrial complexes, a policy attention for the mixed-use of industrial complexes would be expected to rise. Taking this into account, various policies, for strengthening the innovative competence and enhancing the living quality, have been measured.
Nonetheless, many limitations in the current policies related to the mixed-use of industrial complexes have been revealed. For instance, current mixed-use developments have been implemented without any consideration for locational characteristics of industrial complexes. During the developments for the mixed-use of the industrial complexes, it seemed to materialise only the functional-mixture in the land-use, without the systematic attentions to businesses and enterprises after the completion.
This research is to investigate the ways of mixed-use development to strengthen the innovative and living environments, regarding the local identities, and demands from various stakeholders on the developments of industrial complexes would be taken into account in a rational way.
To reach this objective, innovation and living environments would be defined and examined for its needs from the perspectives of many stakeholders, in the first place. Secondly, policy trends related to the mixed-use developments of industrial complexes would be studied and its specific features are analysed. Thirdly, conditions for innovative and living infrastructures are investigated, as well as factors which are needed for companies and occupations are figured out. Lastly, promoting strategies for the mixed-use developments of industrial complexes are suggested to strengthen the innovation and living infrastructure.
Chapter 2. Definition and composition of the mixed-use developments in industrial complexes
Mixed-use developments of industrial complexes could be categorized into three types; functional mixed-uses, compound of business sector and mixed-sites. In particular this research gives a priority to the functional mixed-uses among the three types. Functional mixed-uses mean to facilitate the industries with the diverse functions such as dwelling, culture and education into the industrial site.
In this research, innovation environments would be defined as the factors which have an effect on the innovation-capacity of firms in industrial complexes. Reviewing previous studies and regulations on the facility areas in the industrial complexes, innovation environment is classified into four facilities; educational facility, research & development institute, business and enterprise support facility, and commercial and convenient facility related to the business support.
Living infrastructure is associated with the comprehensive quality of place, including not only the objective and physical aspects but also the subjective satisfaction. Studying previous researches and regulations for the facility areas, facilities for the living environments in the industrial site are divided into four different types; residential facility, commercial and convenient facility, finance and shipping facility, public park and sports facility, cultural facility, welfare facility and health-care facility.
Chapter 3. Actual condition and policy trends for the mixed-use developments in industrial complexes
Analysing the data on the facility areas in the industrial complexes provided by Industrial Land Information System, actual conditions for functional mixed-uses in the industrial complexes are explored.
In particular, mixed-use development could be achieved on the conditions that are either the scale of industrial estates is larger or public sectors, such as LH(Korea Land and Housing corporation) or government-supported organisations are involved in the development procedures. Furthermore, developing the industrial complexes in metropolitan regions or major cities actively leads to take place the mixed-use. On the other hands, smaller-scale estates and developments in the small cities which have less than fifty-thousand population address the lower functional mixed-uses. And industrial developments implemented by private sectors or local governments deliver the lower mixed-use development.
Taking into account policy trends related to the mixed-use development in industrial complexes, only institutional basis were prepared before 2000s to let living and innovation infrastructures move into the industrial sites. Afterwards, the mixed-use development has actively been implemented to improve the conditions in the industrial complexes.
Chapter 4. Comparative studies; the innovation and living environments for the industrial complexes
Comparative studies are carried out to understand the factors for innovation and living infrastructure that employees working in industrial complexes demand. Furthermore, this would support to investigate the requirements for the innovation and living infrastructure in terms of the locational characteristics or mixed-use of industrial complexes.
Nine industrial complexes are selected for the comparative studies. Considering the scale, locational features and functional-mixture, these districts are divided into three types ; 1. the smaller-scale industrial complexes in towns, 2. the larger-scale, functionally mixed industrial complexes in the peripheral regions and 3. the huge-scale production-oriented industrial complexes. For the comparative studies, the surveys are conducted to 585 employees in these districts and interviews with the experts and the people in charge of the industrial developments. Additionally, the field investigations are carried out.
Followings are the results for the comparative studies of the innovation environments;
Firstly, enterprises would practically prefer to facilitate the business and commercial services which supports business activities rather than establishing education and research functions that has been traditionally emphasised as the innovation facilities in the industrial complexes
Secondly, facilities supporting the business and industry in the estates could not meet the requirements and demands. Although these are the most important facilities for the firms, it shows low utilization in the districts.
Thirdly, facilities for the innovation environments in two areas, the large-scale production oriented districts in towns and the larger-scale mixed use industrial complex in the peripheral regions, have a similarity. On the other hands, required facilities in the smaller-scale industrial districts in towns compare to the two other districts. For the smaller-scale industrial districts in towns, commercial and convenient facilities such as conference spaces, conventions centres, hotels are necessary for the business activities. Infrastructures assisted to the enterprises and industries are required for the innovation activities for the other districts.
Fourthly, support-facilities for the innovation activities that enterprises need would be changed, depending on the scales of businesses and types of occupations.
Lastly, Enterprises and its supported-facilities are able to cooperate if there is any technical and industrial relationship, even though the mixture of land-uses has externally been achieved.
Followings are the results for comparative studies of the living environments;
Firstly, residential functions are not facilitated practically for the occupations in the larger-scale industrial complexes in the peripheral regions in which the residential sites are intentionally designated to improve the living environments.
Secondly, the main reason that occupations are not yet willing to reside in the estates is the lack of accessibility to the convenient facilities as well as the educational facilities for their children.
Thirdly, occupations recognised convenient, financial, transport, health-care facilities as crucial facilities on the commercial sites, in despite of that parks and greens have been regarded as the crucial infrastructures to create the comfortable industrial environment.
Fourthly, cultural, welfare, health-care facilities are covered to the city as a whole, rather than only the industrial complexes.
Lastly, commercial and convenient facilities are the most desirable infrastructures for the large-scale industrial districts and production-oriented industrial districts in the town. However, financial and transport facilities such as the bank, post-office, delivery service, etc. are important for the smaller-scale industrial complexes.
Chapter 5. Strategies on strengthening innovation and living environments
The expansion of the innovation and living conditions would be taken into account these things below.
In the first place, the mixed-use development of industrial complexes would be considered from the view of its cities, urban regions and regional innovation system.
Secondly, providing the innovation and living environments should distinctively be promoted with reflecting the demands for the suppliers and users, within a framework of the location factors such as the distance to the towns.
Thirdly, when it comes to implement the innovation and living environments in the industrial complexes, user-oriented strategy, which comprehensively considers the enterprises, demands for occupations, frequency of use and task attributes of employees, are required rather than the provider-oriented approaches.
Fourthly, improving the accessibility to the industrial area and its surroundings leads to expand the service provision for urban territory. Meanwhile, it needs to examine the support measures that the public-sectors would lead to provide the minimum requirements.
Lastly, the promotion system should be prepared to assist and reinforce the relationship between the innovation and living environment and the requirements of enterprises in the entire procedure; planning, sale in sites, move in and production.
This research aims to address the policy measures regarding to improve the planning system, developing the method for mixed-use developments, maintaining the promoting system and establishing the institutional foundation to strengthen the innovation and living environments in the industrial complexes.
Three policy measures are required to improve the planning system;
Firstly, standards of innovation and livability that are required for designating the industrial complexes would be concreted and enhancing the compatibility between the industrial complex developments and urban development strategies with aggregating the local-industry development plan, industry-agglomeration and promotion plan.
Secondly, the site planning has to describe that the comparable or related industries would have a strong agglomeration. Furthermore, assisting the formation of industrial clusters would be introduced, voluntarily providing plots to the entrepreneurs and organisations which promote the collectivization.
Thirdly, innovation and living environments which are oriented to the users are led to reflect on the development plan by conducting the surveys of facility demands and usages in advance.
Next, three policy measures are demanded for developing the means of mixed-use developments;
In the first place, developing industrial-complex in the university fields is allowed with deregulating the obligations for the preferential application on a quasi-residential area in urban high-tech industrial complex, which is under the Industrial site and development act. As well as, expanding the sphere of tertiary industries that are able to reside would guide to create the small-scale industrial complex in the town.
A ‘Hub-Spoke’ strategy, secondly, intensively facilitating the advanced innovation and living environments into the strategic industrial-complexes and the fundamental ones into the other industrial-complexes, is implemented to establish the agglomeration mechanism of high-dimension service that the strategic industrial complex is oriented.
Thirdly, expanding the financial support program to the smaller industrial complex as well as allowing the physical distance, between the sites for the residential and its supported facilities and the sites for industrial facilities, lead to create the agglomeration for the smaller-scale residential districts and service-facility sites which may not be able to secure the innovation and living environments at a minimum.
Policy measures, strengthening the innovation and living environments, are introduced below to re-arrange the promotion system and establish the institutional foundation;
Firstly, services facilities which support the entrepreneurs (Techno-park) and the industrial promotion are allowed to accommodate into the sites for the industrial facilities that are provided by the developmental costs.
Secondly, site-providing standards for industrial supports, nursing, educational, health-care facilities are deregulated and this could give a priority to establish the essential infrastructures in the industrial complex.
Lastly, the promoting system to strengthen the innovation and living environments should be improved. For instance, private organisations, specialised in the field of enterprise-supports, are authorised to be in charge of the maintenance affairs which are usually handled by public administrations.

목차 Contents

• 표지 ... 1
• 발간사 ... 4
• 주요 내용 및 정책제안 ... 6
• 요약 ... 8
• 차례 ... 24
• 표 차례 ... 28
• 그림 차례 ... 32
• I. 서 론 ... 34
• 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 ... 36
• 1) 연구 배경 ... 36
• 2) 연구 목적 ... 37
• 2. 연구의 틀 ... 39
• 3. 연구의 범위 및 방법 ... 40
• 1) 연구의 범위 ... 40
• 2) 연구 방법 ... 40
• 4. 선행연구와의 차별성 ... 41
• 1) 선행연구 현황 ... 41
• 2) 선행연구와 본 연구와의 차별성 ... 42
• II. 산업단지 복합화 개념과 구성요소 ... 44
• 1. 산업단지 복합화의 개념과 필요성 ... 46
• 1) 산업단지 복합화의 개념 ... 46
• 2) 산업단지 내 혁신‧생활기반시설 복합화의 필요성 ... 50
• 2. 산업단지 혁신기반의 개념과 구성요소 ... 52
• 1) 혁신기반의 개념 ... 52
• 2) 혁신기반의 구성요소 ... 53
• 3) 산업단지 혁신기반의 구성요소 ... 56
• 3. 산업단지 생활기반의 개념과 구성요소 ... 58
• 1) 생활기반의 개념 ... 58
• 2) 산업단지의 생활기반 구성요소 ... 61
• III. 산업단지 복합화 실태와 정책동향 ... 66
• 1. 산업단지 용도 복합화 실태 ... 68
• 1) 분석 자료 ... 68
• 2) 산업단지 복합화 실태 ... 69
• 3) 산업단지 용도 복합화의 특성 ... 79
• 2. 산업단지 복합화 정책 동향 ... 80
• 1) 산업단지 복합화를 위한 제도적 기틀의 마련 ... 80
• 2) 산업단지 혁신기반시설의 정비 ... 86
• 3) 산업단지 생활기반시설의 정비 ... 90
• 4) 정책동향 분석결과 요약 ... 94
• Ⅳ. 산업단지 혁신기반 및 생활기반 분석 : 사례연구 ... 96
• 1. 사례연구 개요 ... 98
• 1) 사례연구의 목적 ... 98
• 2) 사례지역(산업단지) 선정 ... 99
• 3) 사례연구 조사방법 ... 109
• 2. 산업단지 혁신기반 분석 결과 ... 114
• 1) 산업단지 내 혁신활동 지원시설 현황 ... 114
• 2) 가장 필요한 혁신활동 지원시설 ... 119
• 3) 이용하는 혁신활동 지원시설의 위치 ... 124
• 4) 혁신활동 지원시설의 중요도․만족도 ... 130
• 5) 주로 이용하는 혁신활동 지원시설 위치별 산업단지 혁신활동 지원시설 만족도 ... 132
• 3. 산업단지 생활기반 분석 결과 ... 133
• 1) 산업단지 내 생활 지원시설 현황 ... 133
• 2) 산업단지 종사자의 주거 ... 134
• 3) 가장 필요한 생활기반 시설 ... 143
• 4) 주로 이용하는 생활환경 시설의 위치 ... 147
• 5) 생활환경 시설의 중요도․만족도 ... 153
• 6) 주로 이용하는 생활기반 시설의 위치와 만족도 ... 157
• 4. 분석결과 종합 및 시사점 ... 158
• 1) 혁신기반 분석결과 종합 및 시사점 ... 158
• 2) 생활기반 분석결과 종합 및 시사점 ... 159
• Ⅴ. 혁신‧생활기반 강화를 통한 산업단지 복합화 전략 ... 162
• 1. 산업단지 혁신․생활기반 강화의 기본 방향 ... 164
• 1) 도시권과 지역혁신체계를 고려한 산업단지 복합화의 추진 ... 165
• 2) 산업단지의 입지와 규모에 따른 차별화된 복합화 전략 마련 ... 167
• 3) 입주기업과 종사자의 특성을 고려한 복합화의 추진 ... 169
• 4) 주요 혁신‧생활기반시설의 설치에 대한 행‧재정적 지원확대 ... 170
• 5) 혁신‧생활기반 강화를 위한 추진체계 정비 ... 171
• 2. 산업단지 혁신․생활기반 강화를 위한 정책방안 ... 172
• 1) 계획체계 개선 ... 172
• 2) 복합화 수단의 개발 ... 178
• 3) 제도적 기반 구축 ... 185
• Ⅵ. 결론 및 향후 과제 ... 192
• 1. 연구의 결론 및 정책제언 ... 194
• 1) 주요 결론 ... 194
• 2) 정책제언 ... 196
• 2. 연구의 의의 및 향후 과제 ... 198
• 참고문헌 ... 200
• SUMMARY ... 208
• 부록 ... 216
• 끝페이지 ... 248