초록

□ 지역성평등지수 측정 및 추이 분석

□ 지역 성평등 수준 제고를 위한 정책 과제 도출

□ 지역성평등지수에 대한 대국민 인식 제고

(출처 : 프리즘)

Abstract ▼

The Regional Gender Equality Index(RGEI) is developed to analyze the level of gender equality of the region with four dimensions with 17 indexes of in 2011 and announced publicly in 2013. However, the composition of the Index in 2014 connects the construction of the Index with The National Gender Eq

The Regional Gender Equality Index(RGEI) is developed to analyze the level of gender equality of the region with four dimensions with 17 indexes of in 2011 and announced publicly in 2013. However, the composition of the Index in 2014 connects the construction of the Index with The National Gender Equality Index according to the Framework Act on Gender Equality which takes its effect from July 2015 and newly constructed in consideration of the regional features. The newly constructed index system is constructed with three dimensions with eight sectors and designed to measure the total twenty three indicators in group of two to four indicators by each field.
The calculation of index is done by standardizing of all indicators with sex ratio and calculating each dimension's score. The total index is calculated by using the each dimension's weight. If the indicator score is at complete inequality it becomes ‘0’, but if it's at complete equality it becomes ‘1’. As such, when the proportion of women is at 50% or more, it is regarded as the score has reached the complete equality status.
The result of the Regional Gender Equality Index in 2016 shows the level of gender equality by city and province is between the maximum of 76.6 to minimum of 70.0 The differentiation of the highest region with the lowest region is by 6.7p.
As results from 2015, Gangwon province, Daejeon city, Seoul Metropolitan city and Jeju Special Self-Governing province ranked as high level regions(Level-1) of gender equality. Among these regions, Gangwon province stayed in middle high level from 2011 to 2012 but entered high level in 2013 and stayed its place in 2015 as well. In cases of Daejeon city and Seoul Metropolitan city, they have been stayed high level since 2011. For Jeju Special Self-Governing province, it was classified in middle high from 2013 to 2014 but entered high level in 2015.
Gwangju city, Busan city, Jeollabuk province and Chungcheongbuk province ranked fifth to eighth in middle high level regions(Level-2). Busan city stayed high level region in 2014 but went down to middle high level region in 2015.
Jeollabuk province was in middle low rank in 2014 but placed in middle high region in 2015. Chungcheongbuk province ranked middle low level from 2011 to 2012 but entered middle high level in 2013.
Middle low level regions(Level-3) are regions ranked ninth to twelfth including Gyeonggi province, Gyeongsangnam province, Daegu city and Incheon city. Gyeonggi province was in high level region from 2011 to 2013 but went down to middle high region in 2014 and placed in middle low region in 2015. Daegu city has stayed in middle low level since 2012 and Incheon city was in middle high region in 2014 but entered middle low since 2015.
Low level regions(Level-4) of gender equality are regions ranked thirteenth to sixteenth including Gyeongsangbuk province, Ulsan city, Jeollanam province and Chungcheongnam province. Gyeongsangbuk province has ranked in low level since 2011 and Ulsan city has also stayed in low level region except for 2012. Jeollanam province and Chungcheongnam province has alse stayed in low level region except for 2011.
Lastly this research proposes improvement direction of gender equality to the region with gender inequality along with comparison of regional level of gender equality, and suggests management and utilization method of Regional Gender Equality Index in the future.

(출처 : Abstract 494p)

목차 Contents

• 표지 ... 1
• 연구요약 ... 4
• 목차 ... 28
• 표목차 ... 30
• 그림목차 ... 38
• 부표목차 ... 43
• Ⅰ. 서 론 ... 45
• 1. 연구목적 및 필요성 ... 46
• 2. 연구내용 및 방법 ... 47
• 가. 연구내용 ... 47
• 나. 연구방법 ... 48
• Ⅱ. 지역성평등지수의 개요 ... 50
• 1. 지역성평등지수의 지표체계 구성 ... 51
• 2. 지역성평등지수 산정방법 ... 57
• 3. 지역성평등지수의 특징 ... 67
• Ⅲ. 지역별 성평등 수준 진단 ... 69
• 1. 지역별 성평등 수준비교와 추이 ... 70
• 가. 지역별 성평등지수 수준과 변화 ... 70
• 나. 영역별 지역의 성평등 수준 현황과 특징 ... 73
• 2. 지역별 성평등 수준 분석 ... 82
• Ⅳ. 지역별 정책과제와 성평등지수의 관리방안 ... 218
• 1. 지역별 성평등 향상을 위한 정책과제 ... 219
• 가. 지역별 성평등 수준과 특징 ... 219
• 나. 지방자치단체별 성평등 현황과 정책과제 ... 224
• 2. 지역성평등지수와 지역양성평등정책 연계 ... 287
• 가. 지역성평등지수와 양성평등정책기본계획과의 연계 ... 287
• 나. 지역성평등지수 영역별 지방자치단체의 2016년 시행계획 사업 ... 293
• 3. 지역성평등지수의 관리와 활용 ... 318
• 참고문헌 ... 323
• 부록 ... 325
• 부록1. 지역성평등지수 구성 지표의 정의, 자료원 및 생산주기 ... 327
• 부록2. 지역성평등지수의 지표별 통계표 ... 330
• 부록3. 제1차 양성평등정책 기본계획 2016년 시행계획: 중앙행정기관 (여성가족부, 2016) ... 358
• 부록4. 제1차 양성평등정책 기본계획 2016년 시행계획: 지방자치단체 (여성가족부, 2016) ... 359
• Abstract ... 494
• 끝페이지 ... 497