초록 ▼

제1장 | 서 론
□ 1980년대 이후 지속적인 R&D 투입과 성과(특허, 논문 등)의 양적성장에도 불구하고 기술무역수지 적자 악화 등에서 보는 바와 같이 성과를 활용한 경제적 가치창출에는 한계를 보임
◦ 활용이 저조한 여러 이유 중 우선 시장에서 필요로 하는 수준의 기술이 창출되지 못한 것을 고려할 수 있음
- 또한 성과의 활용을 위한 유기적이고 효율적인 메커니즘 조성도 부족했음

□ 국내 기술사업화 시장 활성화를 위한 기업 및 관련 조직, 그리고 정부의 역할을 재조명하고 새로운 모델 제시가 필요함

제1장 | 서 론
□ 1980년대 이후 지속적인 R&D 투입과 성과(특허, 논문 등)의 양적성장에도 불구하고 기술무역수지 적자 악화 등에서 보는 바와 같이 성과를 활용한 경제적 가치창출에는 한계를 보임
◦ 활용이 저조한 여러 이유 중 우선 시장에서 필요로 하는 수준의 기술이 창출되지 못한 것을 고려할 수 있음
- 또한 성과의 활용을 위한 유기적이고 효율적인 메커니즘 조성도 부족했음

□ 국내 기술사업화 시장 활성화를 위한 기업 및 관련 조직, 그리고 정부의 역할을 재조명하고 새로운 모델 제시가 필요함
◦ 기술 시장을 구성하는 주체별 사업화 성공요인을 분석하기 위한 정성적․정량적 평가가 필요함

□ 연구범위
◦ 기술사업화 촉진을 위한 기술시장 활성화 방안 수립을 위해 기술시장을 구성하는 주체별 사업화 성공요인을 분석함
- 기술사업화에 대한 다양한 정의가 존재하는 것처럼 성공요인에도 기술분야, 기술수준, 사업화 주체 등에 따라 다양한 요인이 존재할 수 있음
- 성공요인 분석은 우선 기업 외적 환경에서‘기술사업화 전문조직’과‘기술사업화 자본’의 특성 및 역할을 분석함
- 다음으로 기술사업화 수행 기업의 내부 환경을 설계하고 분석함
◦ 전체 연구의 틀은 [그림 1]에서 보는 바와 같이, 기술사업화 관련 현황 조사분석, 기술사업화 패러다임 설계 및 분석, 현장조사 등을 통해 정책적 시사점을 도출함

□ 연구구성
◦ 연구의 전반부에서는 기술사업화 개요를 서술하고 후반부에서는 환경 분석을 통해 기술시장 활성화 방안을 모색하고자 함

(출처 : 요약 6p)

Abstract ▼

Since 1980s the Korean government has increased R&D investment and as a result the technological outputs (patents, publications) also has increased rapidly. But in spite of such growth, Korea still has weaknesses in creating economic value through commercial use of such outputs and this is shown for

Since 1980s the Korean government has increased R&D investment and as a result the technological outputs (patents, publications) also has increased rapidly. But in spite of such growth, Korea still has weaknesses in creating economic value through commercial use of such outputs and this is shown for example in the trade deficits of technologies. The reason for this weakness lies first of all in outputs themselves that the market does not demand. But the lack of mechanism that facilitate transfer and commercailization of technology is also a main reason.

In a innovation-driven economy, we need a virtuous circle of technology commercialization that help firms and the economy grow. In this research report, we analyses players, programs and circumstance of transfer and commercialization of technology. We investigate the role of relavant players such as the government and firms and analyse factors of individual players that influence successes or failures of the technology commercialization.

In chapter 2 we investigate government programs that facilitate technology commercialization in terms of budget and responsible agencies. In chapter 3, we analyse the external and internal circumstances of technology commercialization and for each of them, we try to investigate from quantitive and qualititive aspects.

The main external circumstances of technology commercializations are organization and financing and we analyse them in chapter 4. Here under the organization we refer to those public institutes that execute the technology commercialization by themselves or give services that facilitate the commercialization process. Under financing we refer to the programs that supply money to the seed and early stage venture business using technology commercialization.

The public policy that focuses on transfer and commercialization of technology began in the 2000s, while the government had concentrated on R&D investment in the previous periods. This means that the policy that promotes technology commercialization is not yet well-developed. The government budget for technology commercialization is also very insufficient, just 1% of the total R&D budget in 2008.

And furthermore most of the limited budget is used to management and evaluation of public R&D programs and as a result the budget for additional development necessary for technology is even more insufficient.

There are many ways of technology commercialization from public R&D institutes and universities. A primary way is licencing. But direct commercialization, by establishing new spin-off enterprises with the help of TLO(Technology Licensing Office), is also an important way of technology commercialization.

TLOs are the main facilitators of technology commercialization of public research institutes and universities but their performances are still poor. First of all, they should strengthen its managerial independence and also increase staffs and personel if they want to become meaningful organizations. And if a TLO gets a certain level of structural development, it is necessary to transform TLO into a business unit with a high-powerd compensation system which will encourage personel. Also deregulation policies and fiscal support that promote Techno-Holdings companies in pubulic research instiutes and universities are necessary.

Firms in different growth stages need different forms of financing. Venture business in seed and startup stages involve high risks and therefore they usually are not able to attract private investors. Even venture capital funds will not invest in such highly risky business.

Firms in growth stage and later stages, however, are able to get equity and mezzanine investment. The Korean government, in assisting the technology commercialization efforts of SMEs and venture business, provides R&D grant to firms in growth and later stages that can attract equity or mezzanine investment by venture capitals and banks. In contrast to the growth and later stages, however, almost all of the public programs that were designed to help technology companies in seed and startup stage to attract commercial investors have failed. One major reason of the failure is apparently in the separated business between venture capital companies and the technology business accelerator.

In advanced countries, in US for example, the work procedures of early stage venture capital are closely linked with those of technology business accelerators and in some cases the one and same organization plays the roles of venture capital and business accelerator at the same time. This is because, in financing seed and startup companies fund manager often have to, together with the founding CEO of seed and startup companies, play the role of co-founders. In this regard public policies are necessary that promote strategic and organizational links between technology business accelerators and venture capital funds, especially those funds that invest in patented technologies.

In chapter 5, we analyse the internal circumstance of technology commercialization in terms of sources, organization, market, and policy. Our analysis of these 4 factors are composed of OLS analysis on relavant data base as well as AHP analysis on expert survey.

The results of our analyses show that the resources factors are the most important in the success of technology commercialization. The market factors and the organizational factors follow the them. The policy factors have no significant impact on it and we can interprete this with the argument that the government support is not provided to the areas that the market demands. This result also suggests that the government support must be focused on the areas that firms really demand such as R&D grants for additional development for commercialization.

(출처 : SUMMARY 182p)

목차 Contents

• 표지 ... 1
• 발간사 ... 4
• 요약 ... 6
• 목차 ... 18
• 표목차 ... 20
• 그림목차 ... 22
• 제1장 서론 ... 24
• 제1절 연구의 목적 및 필요성 ... 24
• 제2절 연구 범위 및 구성 ... 25
• 제2장 기술사업화 성공 패러다임 ... 29
• 제1절 기술사업화 정의 및 패러다임 ... 29
• 제2절 기술사업화 활성화 배경 및 필요성 ... 31
• 제3절 기술사업화 활성화 제한 요인 ... 35
• 제4절 기존문헌 연구 ... 36
• 제5절 기술사업화 촉진 해외사례 ... 41
• 제3장 기술사업화 현황분석 ... 59
• 제1절 기술사업화 지원 사업 ... 59
• 제2절 기술사업화 정책 ... 66
• 제3절 공공연구기관의 기술사업화 ... 70
• 제4절 기술사업화금융 ... 72
• 제4장 기술사업화 촉진을 위한 기업외적요인: 조직과 금융 ... 80
• 제1절 공공연구기관 기술사업화 조직 ... 80
• 제2절 기술사업화금융 ... 94
• 제5장 기술사업화 촉진을 위한 기업내적환경요인 ... 122
• 제1절 환경요인 분석 개요 ... 122
• 제2절 사업화 환경 성공요인 분석 ... 125
• 제6장 정책적 제언 ... 140
• 제1절 기술사업화 전문조직 활성화 ... 140
• 제2절 기술사업화금융 활성화 ... 143
• 제3절 기업의 기술사업화 내부 역량 강화 ... 144
• 참고문헌 ... 146
• 부록1. 산업기술개발사업 성과 ... 150
• 부록2. 분석개요 ... 174
• 부록3. 대학의 기술이전 ... 178
• SUMMARY ... 182
• CONTENTS ... 186
• 끝페이지 ... 192