목적: 본 연구는 치과의료기관에 종사하는 치과위생사의 디지털 방사선 안전관 리 실태를 파악하고 요인을 규명하며, 교육요구에 대한 견해를 분석하여 치과위생사는 물론 환자들의 방사선 노출을 최소화하고 치과위생사의 방사선 안전관리 행위 실천향상을 위한 교육프로그램 개발의 기초자료를 제공하고자 시도된 조사연구이다. 방법: 서울, 경기 지역에 소재한 132개 치과의원, 17개 치과병원의 현재 치과의 료기관에서 근무하고 있는 치과위생사 315명을 대상으로 하였고, 자료수집기간은 2013년 3월 26일부터 4월 11일까지 구조화된 설문지로 실시하였다. ...
목적: 본 연구는 치과의료기관에 종사하는 치과위생사의 디지털 방사선 안전관 리 실태를 파악하고 요인을 규명하며, 교육요구에 대한 견해를 분석하여 치과위생사는 물론 환자들의 방사선 노출을 최소화하고 치과위생사의 방사선 안전관리 행위 실천향상을 위한 교육프로그램 개발의 기초자료를 제공하고자 시도된 조사연구이다. 방법: 서울, 경기 지역에 소재한 132개 치과의원, 17개 치과병원의 현재 치과의 료기관에서 근무하고 있는 치과위생사 315명을 대상으로 하였고, 자료수집기간은 2013년 3월 26일부터 4월 11일까지 구조화된 설문지로 실시하였다. 자료 분석은 SPSS window 18.0을 이용하여 빈도 및 백분율, 평균 및 표준 편차, 다중회귀분석, 상관분석, 카이스퀘어 검정을 시행하였다. 결과: 첫째, 디지털 방사선 안전관리에 대한 지식은 14점 만점에 평균이 8.48점 이었으며, 인식은 75점 만점에 평균이 66.86점, 행태는 75점 만점에 평균이 46.18점으로 방사선 안전관리에 대한 인지는 하고 있으나 실천하지 못하고 있다는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 지식에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석한 결과, 방사선 안전관리 프로토콜이 비치되어 있을수록 지식이 높아지는 것으로 나타났으며 인식에 영향을 미치는 요인으로 기혼자 일수록, 프로토콜이 비치되어 있을수록 방사선 안전관리에 대한 인식이 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 행태에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석한 결과, 치과의원 일수록 행태가 낮아지며, 프로토콜이 비치되어 있을수록, 방사선 안전관리 교육경험이 있을수록 행태가 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 방사선 안전관리 행태에 대한 방어 실태로 개인피폭선량계의 착용률이 12.4%에 불과하였으며, 착용하지 않는 이유로 개인피폭선량계가 없어서 75.1%로 나타났고, 방어용구를 착용하지 않는 이유로 습관화되지 않아서가 40.3%, 업무량이 많아 너무 바빠서가 37.5% 로 나타났다. 넷째, 디지털 방사선 안전관리에 대한 지식, 인식, 행태와의 관련성은 지식, 인식수준이 높을수록 행태가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 다섯째, 방사선 안전관리 교육여부와 요구로는 교육경험이 없는 경우 87.0%, 교육을 받지 못한 이유로는 교육의 기회가 없어서(74.5%)라고 응답하였다. 교육의 필요성은 94.0%, 교육을 참여하겠다고 91.1%로 나타났다. 희망하는 교육 시기는 봄 54.6%, 희망 요일은 주중이 44.8%로 가장 높게 조사되었다. 교육방법으로 시청각교재를 활용한 강의 48.3%, 희망하는 교육연자는 방사선사가 74.6%로 가장 선호하였고, 강화되어야 할 우선교육은 병원자체교육(49.5%)으로 나타났다. 결론: 치과위생사의 방사선 안전관리 대한 인식은 하고 있으나 실천으로 행해지지 못하고 있는 것으로 나타나 방사선 안전관리 규칙 법령을 강화하여, 근무환경개선과 방사선 안전관리의 행위 실천 향상을 위한 치과위생사의 교육요구에 따른 교육 프로그램 개발이 필요하다.
목적: 본 연구는 치과의료기관에 종사하는 치과위생사의 디지털 방사선 안전관 리 실태를 파악하고 요인을 규명하며, 교육요구에 대한 견해를 분석하여 치과위생사는 물론 환자들의 방사선 노출을 최소화하고 치과위생사의 방사선 안전관리 행위 실천향상을 위한 교육프로그램 개발의 기초자료를 제공하고자 시도된 조사연구이다. 방법: 서울, 경기 지역에 소재한 132개 치과의원, 17개 치과병원의 현재 치과의 료기관에서 근무하고 있는 치과위생사 315명을 대상으로 하였고, 자료수집기간은 2013년 3월 26일부터 4월 11일까지 구조화된 설문지로 실시하였다. 자료 분석은 SPSS window 18.0을 이용하여 빈도 및 백분율, 평균 및 표준 편차, 다중회귀분석, 상관분석, 카이스퀘어 검정을 시행하였다. 결과: 첫째, 디지털 방사선 안전관리에 대한 지식은 14점 만점에 평균이 8.48점 이었으며, 인식은 75점 만점에 평균이 66.86점, 행태는 75점 만점에 평균이 46.18점으로 방사선 안전관리에 대한 인지는 하고 있으나 실천하지 못하고 있다는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 지식에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석한 결과, 방사선 안전관리 프로토콜이 비치되어 있을수록 지식이 높아지는 것으로 나타났으며 인식에 영향을 미치는 요인으로 기혼자 일수록, 프로토콜이 비치되어 있을수록 방사선 안전관리에 대한 인식이 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 행태에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석한 결과, 치과의원 일수록 행태가 낮아지며, 프로토콜이 비치되어 있을수록, 방사선 안전관리 교육경험이 있을수록 행태가 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 방사선 안전관리 행태에 대한 방어 실태로 개인피폭선량계의 착용률이 12.4%에 불과하였으며, 착용하지 않는 이유로 개인피폭선량계가 없어서 75.1%로 나타났고, 방어용구를 착용하지 않는 이유로 습관화되지 않아서가 40.3%, 업무량이 많아 너무 바빠서가 37.5% 로 나타났다. 넷째, 디지털 방사선 안전관리에 대한 지식, 인식, 행태와의 관련성은 지식, 인식수준이 높을수록 행태가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 다섯째, 방사선 안전관리 교육여부와 요구로는 교육경험이 없는 경우 87.0%, 교육을 받지 못한 이유로는 교육의 기회가 없어서(74.5%)라고 응답하였다. 교육의 필요성은 94.0%, 교육을 참여하겠다고 91.1%로 나타났다. 희망하는 교육 시기는 봄 54.6%, 희망 요일은 주중이 44.8%로 가장 높게 조사되었다. 교육방법으로 시청각교재를 활용한 강의 48.3%, 희망하는 교육연자는 방사선사가 74.6%로 가장 선호하였고, 강화되어야 할 우선교육은 병원자체교육(49.5%)으로 나타났다. 결론: 치과위생사의 방사선 안전관리 대한 인식은 하고 있으나 실천으로 행해지지 못하고 있는 것으로 나타나 방사선 안전관리 규칙 법령을 강화하여, 근무환경개선과 방사선 안전관리의 행위 실천 향상을 위한 치과위생사의 교육요구에 따른 교육 프로그램 개발이 필요하다.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to minimize dental hygienists' and patients' exposure to radiation and provide basic data for developing educational programs designed for improvement in dental hygienists' putting into practice radiation safety management behaviors, by grasping the actual state...
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to minimize dental hygienists' and patients' exposure to radiation and provide basic data for developing educational programs designed for improvement in dental hygienists' putting into practice radiation safety management behaviors, by grasping the actual state of digital radiation safety management for dental hygienists who work at dental medical institutions, investigating factors that have effects on their knowledge, perception, and behavior, and analyzing their opinions about educational needs. Methods: The subjects were 315 dental hygienists who currently worked at dental medical institutions including 132 dental clinic and 17 dental hospitals located at the Seoul and Gyeonggi districts. The data was collected from March 26, 2013 to April 11, 2013, using a structured questionnaire. As for data analysis, frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation were calculated, and the multiple regression analysis, the correlation analysis, and the chi-square test were conducted, using SPSS window 18.0. Results: First, the mean for digital radiation safety knowledge scored 8.48 on a 14-point scale, and the mean for perceptions scored 66.86 and the mean for behaviors 46.18 on a 75-point scale, respectively; and thus it was found that they perceived radiation safety management, but failed to practice it. Second, as a result of analyzing factors that had effects on knowledge, it was found that knowledge was higher in case the radiation safety management protocol was prepared; and as for factors that had effects on perceptions, it was found that perceptions on radiation safety management were higher in the case of the married and in case the protocol was prepared. As a result of analyzing factors that had effects on behaviors, it was found that behaviors were lower in the case of dental clinics; and that behaviors were higher in case the protocol was prepared and that education in radiation safety management was experienced. Third, as for the actual state of radiation protection behaviors in radiation safety management, the rate of wearing a personal exposure dosimeter was mere 12.4%. The reason for not wearing it was found to be 'Having no personal dosimeter' of 75.1%; and the reasons for not wearing protective devices were found to be 'Not getting accustomed to them' of 40.3%, followed by 'Too busy because of a heavy workload' of 37.5%. Fourth, as for the relationships of knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors on digital radiation safety management, it was found that the higher the level of knowledge and perceptions, the higher the behaviors. Fifth, as for whether educated in radiation safety management or not, and educational needs, 87.0% responded that they had no experience of education; and as for the reason for failing to be educated, 74.5% responded with 'Having no opportunity for education.' 94.0% responded that the education was necessary, and 91.1% responded that they would participate in the education. The survey showed that their favorite period of education was spring (54.6%), and that their favorite day of the week was a weekday (44.8%). As for the method of education, 48.3 % favored most a lecture using audio-visual aids; and as for their desired lecturer in education, 74.6 % favored most the radiological technologist. In addition, priority education that should be reinforced was found to be 'hospital's own education' (49.5%). Conclusion: It was found that dental hygienists had the perceptions on radiation safety management, but failed to put them into practice. And thus, it is deemed that rules and regulations on radiation safety management should be reinforced, that work environment should be improved, and that educational programs satisfying dental hygienists' educational needs should be developed so as to improve their practicing radiation safety management behaviors.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to minimize dental hygienists' and patients' exposure to radiation and provide basic data for developing educational programs designed for improvement in dental hygienists' putting into practice radiation safety management behaviors, by grasping the actual state of digital radiation safety management for dental hygienists who work at dental medical institutions, investigating factors that have effects on their knowledge, perception, and behavior, and analyzing their opinions about educational needs. Methods: The subjects were 315 dental hygienists who currently worked at dental medical institutions including 132 dental clinic and 17 dental hospitals located at the Seoul and Gyeonggi districts. The data was collected from March 26, 2013 to April 11, 2013, using a structured questionnaire. As for data analysis, frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation were calculated, and the multiple regression analysis, the correlation analysis, and the chi-square test were conducted, using SPSS window 18.0. Results: First, the mean for digital radiation safety knowledge scored 8.48 on a 14-point scale, and the mean for perceptions scored 66.86 and the mean for behaviors 46.18 on a 75-point scale, respectively; and thus it was found that they perceived radiation safety management, but failed to practice it. Second, as a result of analyzing factors that had effects on knowledge, it was found that knowledge was higher in case the radiation safety management protocol was prepared; and as for factors that had effects on perceptions, it was found that perceptions on radiation safety management were higher in the case of the married and in case the protocol was prepared. As a result of analyzing factors that had effects on behaviors, it was found that behaviors were lower in the case of dental clinics; and that behaviors were higher in case the protocol was prepared and that education in radiation safety management was experienced. Third, as for the actual state of radiation protection behaviors in radiation safety management, the rate of wearing a personal exposure dosimeter was mere 12.4%. The reason for not wearing it was found to be 'Having no personal dosimeter' of 75.1%; and the reasons for not wearing protective devices were found to be 'Not getting accustomed to them' of 40.3%, followed by 'Too busy because of a heavy workload' of 37.5%. Fourth, as for the relationships of knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors on digital radiation safety management, it was found that the higher the level of knowledge and perceptions, the higher the behaviors. Fifth, as for whether educated in radiation safety management or not, and educational needs, 87.0% responded that they had no experience of education; and as for the reason for failing to be educated, 74.5% responded with 'Having no opportunity for education.' 94.0% responded that the education was necessary, and 91.1% responded that they would participate in the education. The survey showed that their favorite period of education was spring (54.6%), and that their favorite day of the week was a weekday (44.8%). As for the method of education, 48.3 % favored most a lecture using audio-visual aids; and as for their desired lecturer in education, 74.6 % favored most the radiological technologist. In addition, priority education that should be reinforced was found to be 'hospital's own education' (49.5%). Conclusion: It was found that dental hygienists had the perceptions on radiation safety management, but failed to put them into practice. And thus, it is deemed that rules and regulations on radiation safety management should be reinforced, that work environment should be improved, and that educational programs satisfying dental hygienists' educational needs should be developed so as to improve their practicing radiation safety management behaviors.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.