It is expected that South Korea's aging trends will accelerate as it has already entered into
the Era of Aging Since the year 2000 and will continue to move into progressive periods
towards the year 2026. Excessive aging will bolster various Diseases including Alzheimer's
disease, paralysis from str...
It is expected that South Korea's aging trends will accelerate as it has already entered into
the Era of Aging Since the year 2000 and will continue to move into progressive periods
towards the year 2026. Excessive aging will bolster various Diseases including Alzheimer's
disease, paralysis from strokes and chronic illnesses. Moreover, it could require long-term
health care plans for those who no longer could perform daily tasks and it could eventually
become a serious social problem. Governmental actions are demanded for active recuperative
health care changes.
These welfare programs are no longer individual problems but social conditions
demanding governmental resolution. Confronted with the social epidemic, long term health
care insurance policy has been activated as of July 1, 2008.
With the breakout of a increase in the elderly population, right now they occupy around
500 million, accounting for 11% of the total population. As aging progresses rapidly, long
term health care responsibility will fall upon families as an economic burden. Furthermore,
health caring and nursing care are becoming social threats as nuclear family structures
diffuse and more women are entering the workforce. It is important that Congress step into
nursing supplementation that is issue. Furthermore, this epidemic has caused excessive
costs for middle and low classes who are restricted to use cost-free welfare facilities.
This disadvantage has aroused media attention and the increase in elderly Medicare costs
has negatively affected the finances of citizens. Most developed countries have faced this
problem and consequently have adopted various long term welfare protection systems for
the elderly. Especially, Germany and Japan have both introduced long term care insurance and these government examples carry implications for us to consider. From this kind of
perspective, this research paper will apply policy frames from Gilbert and Specht based
on examples from Germany, Japan and Korea and compare and analyze hidden problems
in regards to payouts, outsourcing, supply channeling, and focal point. The study will
continue upon its improvement ares for the elderly long term care insurance.
The results are as follows: First, the common similarity factors adopting this long term
care insurance turn out to be aging, limitations in family self care, deficiency in current
systems and elderly care finances( including state policies). There is a parallel between
Germany and Japan that have adopted this Kind of insurance system just for the elderly
society. However, Korea has approached this long term elderly care system in an effectively
rational and systematic way by supporting resources. If we are to just look at the qualities
of elderly care, Korea is actually better than other countries.
Second, there have been some discrepancies between Germany, Japan, and Korea. The
former countries have matched obligational liabilities and benefits while Korea has not.
Also, Germany has provided benefits to all the citizens, while Japan and Korea have
restricted to certain classes and portioned out its benefits.
Third, payout rates and forms for injury vary between countries. Germany recognizes
cash, reparation and compound pays and insists reparation and sectional pays. In Japan's
case, the principle is on reparation and accepts a cash basis in exceptional cases.
Fourth, in the ways of payment, Germany consists of 100% of insurance, Japan portions
out between 50% insurance and 50% public expense while Korea divides rates into 80%
insurance pay and 20% sponsored by government.
Fifth, in the ways of service channeling, Germany manages supply via long term funding,
Korea through National Health Insurance, and Japan does via state and local systems.
Professional service is established as a corporate institution in Japan by educating social
workers. The class/training hours are longer than field work. The particular structure is
comprised of facilities services of social workers, sectional services of workers and elderly
care managing both facilities. The standards vary in a distinctive way for the elderly care
certifying process. Germany establishes standards at the Federal level, while Korea
embraces national testing system by satisfying required hours. It has been granted by
passing certified tests since August 2010. Based our research results, the problems arising
from the Korean long term care insurance system were proved to be the burden of
responsibility, compatibility for pensionable benefits, expansion and establishment of payrate
systems by dynamic demands, reducement and simplifying procedures for evaluation
systems and enhancement of service standardization for long term benefits and various
stabilization efforts for her financial system adoption. The next item comparatively
analyzes policies among those three countries: Germany, Japan and Korea. In Germany's case, all the citizens are considered to be beneficiaries based on fundamental principles
instituted by society in general. On the other hand, Japan and Korea opt to limit benefits
by classes and underlying causes.
Additional sections refer to the payrate system. In German's case, they treat combined
pay methods for cash and repatriation, but Japan and Korea distinctively acknowledge only
cash payouts. In financing, Germany sponsors 1.5% of insurance rates charges work rates
for facilities protection. There is no compensation received via taxing due to restricted
funding. In supports, it is necessary for Germany to tax more to support its funding
system. For funding components, Japan and Korea consist of insurance payouts for the
insured, co pays from public and users. For the service channeling, Germany and Korea
have problems for the quality downgrading.
In reality, there is a labor, competency along with the inadequate surrounding with low
payments. As a result, turnover rates are high.
For the imp
It is expected that South Korea's aging trends will accelerate as it has already entered into
the Era of Aging Since the year 2000 and will continue to move into progressive periods
towards the year 2026. Excessive aging will bolster various Diseases including Alzheimer's
disease, paralysis from strokes and chronic illnesses. Moreover, it could require long-term
health care plans for those who no longer could perform daily tasks and it could eventually
become a serious social problem. Governmental actions are demanded for active recuperative
health care changes.
These welfare programs are no longer individual problems but social conditions
demanding governmental resolution. Confronted with the social epidemic, long term health
care insurance policy has been activated as of July 1, 2008.
With the breakout of a increase in the elderly population, right now they occupy around
500 million, accounting for 11% of the total population. As aging progresses rapidly, long
term health care responsibility will fall upon families as an economic burden. Furthermore,
health caring and nursing care are becoming social threats as nuclear family structures
diffuse and more women are entering the workforce. It is important that Congress step into
nursing supplementation that is issue. Furthermore, this epidemic has caused excessive
costs for middle and low classes who are restricted to use cost-free welfare facilities.
This disadvantage has aroused media attention and the increase in elderly Medicare costs
has negatively affected the finances of citizens. Most developed countries have faced this
problem and consequently have adopted various long term welfare protection systems for
the elderly. Especially, Germany and Japan have both introduced long term care insurance and these government examples carry implications for us to consider. From this kind of
perspective, this research paper will apply policy frames from Gilbert and Specht based
on examples from Germany, Japan and Korea and compare and analyze hidden problems
in regards to payouts, outsourcing, supply channeling, and focal point. The study will
continue upon its improvement ares for the elderly long term care insurance.
The results are as follows: First, the common similarity factors adopting this long term
care insurance turn out to be aging, limitations in family self care, deficiency in current
systems and elderly care finances( including state policies). There is a parallel between
Germany and Japan that have adopted this Kind of insurance system just for the elderly
society. However, Korea has approached this long term elderly care system in an effectively
rational and systematic way by supporting resources. If we are to just look at the qualities
of elderly care, Korea is actually better than other countries.
Second, there have been some discrepancies between Germany, Japan, and Korea. The
former countries have matched obligational liabilities and benefits while Korea has not.
Also, Germany has provided benefits to all the citizens, while Japan and Korea have
restricted to certain classes and portioned out its benefits.
Third, payout rates and forms for injury vary between countries. Germany recognizes
cash, reparation and compound pays and insists reparation and sectional pays. In Japan's
case, the principle is on reparation and accepts a cash basis in exceptional cases.
Fourth, in the ways of payment, Germany consists of 100% of insurance, Japan portions
out between 50% insurance and 50% public expense while Korea divides rates into 80%
insurance pay and 20% sponsored by government.
Fifth, in the ways of service channeling, Germany manages supply via long term funding,
Korea through National Health Insurance, and Japan does via state and local systems.
Professional service is established as a corporate institution in Japan by educating social
workers. The class/training hours are longer than field work. The particular structure is
comprised of facilities services of social workers, sectional services of workers and elderly
care managing both facilities. The standards vary in a distinctive way for the elderly care
certifying process. Germany establishes standards at the Federal level, while Korea
embraces national testing system by satisfying required hours. It has been granted by
passing certified tests since August 2010. Based our research results, the problems arising
from the Korean long term care insurance system were proved to be the burden of
responsibility, compatibility for pensionable benefits, expansion and establishment of payrate
systems by dynamic demands, reducement and simplifying procedures for evaluation
systems and enhancement of service standardization for long term benefits and various
stabilization efforts for her financial system adoption. The next item comparatively
analyzes policies among those three countries: Germany, Japan and Korea. In Germany's case, all the citizens are considered to be beneficiaries based on fundamental principles
instituted by society in general. On the other hand, Japan and Korea opt to limit benefits
by classes and underlying causes.
Additional sections refer to the payrate system. In German's case, they treat combined
pay methods for cash and repatriation, but Japan and Korea distinctively acknowledge only
cash payouts. In financing, Germany sponsors 1.5% of insurance rates charges work rates
for facilities protection. There is no compensation received via taxing due to restricted
funding. In supports, it is necessary for Germany to tax more to support its funding
system. For funding components, Japan and Korea consist of insurance payouts for the
insured, co pays from public and users. For the service channeling, Germany and Korea
have problems for the quality downgrading.
In reality, there is a labor, competency along with the inadequate surrounding with low
payments. As a result, turnover rates are high.
For the imp
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.