대학생의 전공선택동기, 진로의사결정, 진로자기효능감이 대학생활만족도에 미치는 영향 Impact of Major Selection Motivation, Career Decision Making and Career Self-Efficacy on University Life Satisfaction in University Students원문보기
ABSTRACT Impact of Major Selection Motivation, Career Decision Making and Career Self-Efficacy on University Life Satisfaction in University Students Kim. Sukja Major in Counseling Psychology Graduate School, Catholic Kwangdong University Directed by Prof. Kim Heebae The purpose of this study was to examine the ...
ABSTRACT Impact of Major Selection Motivation, Career Decision Making and Career Self-Efficacy on University Life Satisfaction in University Students Kim. Sukja Major in Counseling Psychology Graduate School, Catholic Kwangdong University Directed by Prof. Kim Heebae The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of major selection motivation, career decision making and career self-efficacy on college life satisfaction in an effort to provide information on career guidance for college students. Three research questions were posed: 1. What are the differences in major selection motivation, career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction according to background variables? 2. What are the correlations among the sub-factors ->이하동일 of major selection motivation, career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction? 3. What influence do major selection motivation, career decision making and career self-efficacy exercise on college life satisfaction? The subjects in this study were 1,300 selected students in five four- year universities located in Gangwon Province, on whom a survey was conducted to address the research questions. The answer sheets from 1,184 respondents who were 703 male and 454 female students were analyzed. After the collected data were put in order, a statistical package SPSSWIN 18.0 was employed to make a statistical analysis. To find out the impact of background variables, t-test and F-test were carried out, and a correlation analysis was made. In addition, a multiple regression analysis was made to determine the influence of the variables. The findings of the study were as follows: First, regarding differences in major selection motivation, career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction according to background variables including gender, there were no gender differences in major selection motivation and career decision making. The male students were ahead of the female students in terms of future planning, one of the subfactors of career self-efficacy, and in overall college life satisfaction, one of the subfactors of college life satisfaction. Concerning differences according to academic year, the level of major selection motivation was higher among the sophomores, and the juniors were most excellent in career decision making and career self- efficacy and expressed the best satisfaction with their college lives. The seniors scored lower in every variable. As to differences according to track, the students who majored in art, P.E. or music and who majored in medicine or biotechnology scored higher in the four variables. In regard to differences according to academic standing, the students whose grade point average was above 3.5 scored higher in intrinsic motivation and rational decision-making level that were respectively one of the subfactors of major selection motivation and career decision making, and these students also scored higher in career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction. As for differences according to a factor of making them decide to enter the universities, the group of the students who made the decision on their own were ahead of the others in terms of intrinsic motivation and the level of goal setting that were respectively one of the subfactors of major selection motivation and career self-efficacy. In relation to differences according to the academic credential of parents, the students whose parents were better educated were better at rational decision making, one of the subfactors of career decision making, and had a better overall career self-efficacy. As to differences according to living standard, higher living standard exerted a more influence on every variable and most of the subfactors. Second, when the correlations among the subfactors of major selection motivation, career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction were analyzed, the correlation coefficients of intrinsic motivation, which was a subfactor of major selection motivation, with the subfactors of career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction ranged from .036 to .451. A dependent type that was a subfacor of career decision making had no significant correlation with intrinsic motivation(p>.05) and was positively correlated with the other subfactors(p<.001). The correlation coefficients of extrinsic motivation, which was a subfactor of major selection motivation, with career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction were between .060 and .329, which showed that they were significantly correlated. The correlation coefficients of rational type, which was a subfactor of career decision making, with career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction were between .098 and .417, which implied that they were significantly correlated. The correlation coefficients of intuitive type with career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction ranged from .141 to .272, and those of dependent type with career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction ranged from -.051 to .264. The correlation coefficients of goal setting, vocational information, problem solving and future planning, which were the subfactors of career self-efficacy, with overall college life, the quality of college education and administrative/welfare services, which were the subfactors of college life satisfaction, were between .136 and .670, which indicated that they were positively correlated(p<.001). There were weak correlations among major selection motivation, career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction(p<.001), and career self-efficacy had a weak correlation with college life satisfaction. Third, as for the impact of major selection motivation, career decision making and career self-efficacy on college life satisfaction, intrinsic motivation was most influential, followed by intrinsic motivation a
ABSTRACT Impact of Major Selection Motivation, Career Decision Making and Career Self-Efficacy on University Life Satisfaction in University Students Kim. Sukja Major in Counseling Psychology Graduate School, Catholic Kwangdong University Directed by Prof. Kim Heebae The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of major selection motivation, career decision making and career self-efficacy on college life satisfaction in an effort to provide information on career guidance for college students. Three research questions were posed: 1. What are the differences in major selection motivation, career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction according to background variables? 2. What are the correlations among the sub-factors ->이하동일 of major selection motivation, career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction? 3. What influence do major selection motivation, career decision making and career self-efficacy exercise on college life satisfaction? The subjects in this study were 1,300 selected students in five four- year universities located in Gangwon Province, on whom a survey was conducted to address the research questions. The answer sheets from 1,184 respondents who were 703 male and 454 female students were analyzed. After the collected data were put in order, a statistical package SPSS WIN 18.0 was employed to make a statistical analysis. To find out the impact of background variables, t-test and F-test were carried out, and a correlation analysis was made. In addition, a multiple regression analysis was made to determine the influence of the variables. The findings of the study were as follows: First, regarding differences in major selection motivation, career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction according to background variables including gender, there were no gender differences in major selection motivation and career decision making. The male students were ahead of the female students in terms of future planning, one of the subfactors of career self-efficacy, and in overall college life satisfaction, one of the subfactors of college life satisfaction. Concerning differences according to academic year, the level of major selection motivation was higher among the sophomores, and the juniors were most excellent in career decision making and career self- efficacy and expressed the best satisfaction with their college lives. The seniors scored lower in every variable. As to differences according to track, the students who majored in art, P.E. or music and who majored in medicine or biotechnology scored higher in the four variables. In regard to differences according to academic standing, the students whose grade point average was above 3.5 scored higher in intrinsic motivation and rational decision-making level that were respectively one of the subfactors of major selection motivation and career decision making, and these students also scored higher in career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction. As for differences according to a factor of making them decide to enter the universities, the group of the students who made the decision on their own were ahead of the others in terms of intrinsic motivation and the level of goal setting that were respectively one of the subfactors of major selection motivation and career self-efficacy. In relation to differences according to the academic credential of parents, the students whose parents were better educated were better at rational decision making, one of the subfactors of career decision making, and had a better overall career self-efficacy. As to differences according to living standard, higher living standard exerted a more influence on every variable and most of the subfactors. Second, when the correlations among the subfactors of major selection motivation, career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction were analyzed, the correlation coefficients of intrinsic motivation, which was a subfactor of major selection motivation, with the subfactors of career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction ranged from .036 to .451. A dependent type that was a subfacor of career decision making had no significant correlation with intrinsic motivation(p>.05) and was positively correlated with the other subfactors(p<.001). The correlation coefficients of extrinsic motivation, which was a subfactor of major selection motivation, with career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction were between .060 and .329, which showed that they were significantly correlated. The correlation coefficients of rational type, which was a subfactor of career decision making, with career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction were between .098 and .417, which implied that they were significantly correlated. The correlation coefficients of intuitive type with career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction ranged from .141 to .272, and those of dependent type with career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction ranged from -.051 to .264. The correlation coefficients of goal setting, vocational information, problem solving and future planning, which were the subfactors of career self-efficacy, with overall college life, the quality of college education and administrative/welfare services, which were the subfactors of college life satisfaction, were between .136 and .670, which indicated that they were positively correlated(p<.001). There were weak correlations among major selection motivation, career decision making, career self-efficacy and college life satisfaction(p<.001), and career self-efficacy had a weak correlation with college life satisfaction. Third, as for the impact of major selection motivation, career decision making and career self-efficacy on college life satisfaction, intrinsic motivation was most influential, followed by intrinsic motivation a
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.