Alain Badiou makes four affirmations go against an ordinary philosophy, in Being and Event(the english version, 2013, author’s preface).
1. In terms of being, situations are nothing more than pure indifferent multiplicities. ‘If truths exist, they are indifferent to difference.’ 2. ‘The structur...
Alain Badiou makes four affirmations go against an ordinary philosophy, in Being and Event(the english version, 2013, author’s preface).
1. In terms of being, situations are nothing more than pure indifferent multiplicities. ‘If truths exist, they are indifferent to difference.’ 2. ‘The structure of situations does not, in itself, deliver any truths.’ If ontology exists, it is a situation which does not know time. In other words, being is indifferent to time. Badiou’s conception of the structured presentation is relative to double multiplicity; inconsistent and consistent. ‘A truth is solely constituted by rupturing with the order which supports it, never as an effect of that order.’ Badiou has named this type of rupture which opens up truths the event. It may be considered as the inconsistent multiplicity. By consequence, creation and time commence with dialectic of being and event. 3. ‘A subject is nothing other than an active fidelity to the event of truth.’ The ‘and’ of Being and Event is up to the subject[s]. [T]hey force conditions of any situation to make through generic parties which ought to be affirmed to everyone’s capacity for truth. In other words, the ‘and’ means the space of the subject[s] who make the world change. [T]hey unfold new structures of being and thus inscribe the event into being. 4. ‘The being of a truth, proving itself an exception of any preconstituted predicate of the situation in which that truth is deployed, is to be called generic.’ In consideration of that, Badiou’s settheoretical account sets forth the metaontology which is the thesis mathematics=ontology. The metaontology develops various specific truthprocedures(generic procedures) which arise from specific events.
The purpose of this study is to clarify the conception of the metaontology in accordance with Badiou’s thought. In Being and Event, ‘in the metaontological formulation the axiom says: the unpresentable is presented, as a subtractive term of the presentation of presentation.’ Badiou’s chief concern is to think through and beyond the dilemma(various anomalies and paradoxical entailments) of objective truth against humanly attainable knowledge within encyclopaedia of a situation. Cantor’s set theory had not been regarded as the valid theory. In particular, the mathematicians(within quasicomplete situation) in those days disagreed with Cantor who had set forth certainly how to count the infinite set. Cantor, however, had a remarkable achievement for transfinite numbers. In other words, Cantor suggested new mathematic’s rule of the infinite : , and so forth. Cantor, as Badiou describes, created the generic extension. Cantor believed that ‘there is a truth,’ and the belief in this truth commenced new form of a knowledge(from quasicomplete situation to new state of situation). To sum up, Cantor is a subject(operator of fidelity) who forces the unpresentable to be presented.
In conclusion, Badiou insists that a subject is not a priori, but the finite of the generic procedure, local effect of an evental fidelity, and a fragment of a truth procedure. That truth does unfold not in the standpoint of established knowledge, but something indiscernible parties within any situation. This study says that Badiou’s dialectic of generic extension’s effect is ── on metaontology which does not declare for philosophy itself, but unfolds in dialectic of mathematics and philosophy ── deployed in being and event. In the end, the event comes into being. It is time to subtract from sinking into subjection touching the price and try to meditate on metaontological presentation. No Price for any Truth.
Alain Badiou makes four affirmations go against an ordinary philosophy, in Being and Event(the english version, 2013, author’s preface).
1. In terms of being, situations are nothing more than pure indifferent multiplicities. ‘If truths exist, they are indifferent to difference.’ 2. ‘The structure of situations does not, in itself, deliver any truths.’ If ontology exists, it is a situation which does not know time. In other words, being is indifferent to time. Badiou’s conception of the structured presentation is relative to double multiplicity; inconsistent and consistent. ‘A truth is solely constituted by rupturing with the order which supports it, never as an effect of that order.’ Badiou has named this type of rupture which opens up truths the event. It may be considered as the inconsistent multiplicity. By consequence, creation and time commence with dialectic of being and event. 3. ‘A subject is nothing other than an active fidelity to the event of truth.’ The ‘and’ of Being and Event is up to the subject[s]. [T]hey force conditions of any situation to make through generic parties which ought to be affirmed to everyone’s capacity for truth. In other words, the ‘and’ means the space of the subject[s] who make the world change. [T]hey unfold new structures of being and thus inscribe the event into being. 4. ‘The being of a truth, proving itself an exception of any preconstituted predicate of the situation in which that truth is deployed, is to be called generic.’ In consideration of that, Badiou’s settheoretical account sets forth the metaontology which is the thesis mathematics=ontology. The metaontology develops various specific truthprocedures(generic procedures) which arise from specific events.
The purpose of this study is to clarify the conception of the metaontology in accordance with Badiou’s thought. In Being and Event, ‘in the metaontological formulation the axiom says: the unpresentable is presented, as a subtractive term of the presentation of presentation.’ Badiou’s chief concern is to think through and beyond the dilemma(various anomalies and paradoxical entailments) of objective truth against humanly attainable knowledge within encyclopaedia of a situation. Cantor’s set theory had not been regarded as the valid theory. In particular, the mathematicians(within quasicomplete situation) in those days disagreed with Cantor who had set forth certainly how to count the infinite set. Cantor, however, had a remarkable achievement for transfinite numbers. In other words, Cantor suggested new mathematic’s rule of the infinite : , and so forth. Cantor, as Badiou describes, created the generic extension. Cantor believed that ‘there is a truth,’ and the belief in this truth commenced new form of a knowledge(from quasicomplete situation to new state of situation). To sum up, Cantor is a subject(operator of fidelity) who forces the unpresentable to be presented.
In conclusion, Badiou insists that a subject is not a priori, but the finite of the generic procedure, local effect of an evental fidelity, and a fragment of a truth procedure. That truth does unfold not in the standpoint of established knowledge, but something indiscernible parties within any situation. This study says that Badiou’s dialectic of generic extension’s effect is ── on metaontology which does not declare for philosophy itself, but unfolds in dialectic of mathematics and philosophy ── deployed in being and event. In the end, the event comes into being. It is time to subtract from sinking into subjection touching the price and try to meditate on metaontological presentation. No Price for any Truth.
주제어
#Badiou, Alain 바디우 존재론 메타구조 존재와 사건
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.