경상남도 울산군 삼남면에 거주하는 894명의 60세 이상 노인인구를 대상으로 제요인별 고혈압의 상명상태 및 관리양상을 비교 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 조사된 노인 894명중 고혈압 유병률 27.5%였으며 남자에서는 26.0%, 여자에서는 28.6%로 나타났다. 2. 남자에서 제요인별 고혈압 유병률은 연령, 고혈압 가족력, 음주유무, 식염섭취량이 통계적으로 유의하였다. 3. 여자에서 제요인별 고혈압 유병률은 식염 섭취량 및 비만도가 통계적으로 유의하였다. 4. 고혈압의 진단동기에 관한 설문조사에서 증상이 있어 직접 진찰을 받아 전달 받은 경우 및 정기 신체검진에 진단 받은 경우는 각각 25.0%, 9.1%에 불과했고 나머지 65.9%는 다른 질병으로 병원에 갔다가 우연히 발견한 경우였다. 5. 과거 고혈압에 대한 치료 받은 경험율은 사회경제수준이 중류층 이상에서 통계적으로 유의하게 높았으며 제요인별 치료장소는 전반적으로 과반수 이상이 병원을 선호하였으나 통계적 유의성을 인정할 수 없었다. 6. 고혈압에 대한 치료를 받지 않는 이유 및 치료중단 이유를 면접조사한 결과 각각 일상생활에 지장이 없기 때문이라고 응답한 경우가 45.5%, 지리적 여건이 완만치 못하기 때문이라고 응답한 경우가 47.6%로 가장 높았다. 7. 제요인별 고혈압에 대한 예방행동유무는 통계적으로 유의하지 않았다. 8. 제요인별 향후 치료유무에서는 연령, 사회 경제수준, 고혈압가족적이 통계적으로 유의하였고 향후 치료장소는 전반적으로 병원을 선호하는 경향이 뚜렷하였으나 제요인별 향후치료장소는 통계적으로 유의하지는 않았다. 9. 고혈압에 대한 치료를 받지 않을 것이라고 응답한 이유중 가장 높은 빈도를 차지하는 것은 46.8%로 일상생활에 지장이 없기 때문이라고 응답한 경우였다. 10. 제요인별 향후 예방행동유무는 연령, 교육수준, 사회경제수준, 고혈압 가족력이 통계적으로 유의하였다.
경상남도 울산군 삼남면에 거주하는 894명의 60세 이상 노인인구를 대상으로 제요인별 고혈압의 상명상태 및 관리양상을 비교 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 조사된 노인 894명중 고혈압 유병률 27.5%였으며 남자에서는 26.0%, 여자에서는 28.6%로 나타났다. 2. 남자에서 제요인별 고혈압 유병률은 연령, 고혈압 가족력, 음주유무, 식염섭취량이 통계적으로 유의하였다. 3. 여자에서 제요인별 고혈압 유병률은 식염 섭취량 및 비만도가 통계적으로 유의하였다. 4. 고혈압의 진단동기에 관한 설문조사에서 증상이 있어 직접 진찰을 받아 전달 받은 경우 및 정기 신체검진에 진단 받은 경우는 각각 25.0%, 9.1%에 불과했고 나머지 65.9%는 다른 질병으로 병원에 갔다가 우연히 발견한 경우였다. 5. 과거 고혈압에 대한 치료 받은 경험율은 사회경제수준이 중류층 이상에서 통계적으로 유의하게 높았으며 제요인별 치료장소는 전반적으로 과반수 이상이 병원을 선호하였으나 통계적 유의성을 인정할 수 없었다. 6. 고혈압에 대한 치료를 받지 않는 이유 및 치료중단 이유를 면접조사한 결과 각각 일상생활에 지장이 없기 때문이라고 응답한 경우가 45.5%, 지리적 여건이 완만치 못하기 때문이라고 응답한 경우가 47.6%로 가장 높았다. 7. 제요인별 고혈압에 대한 예방행동유무는 통계적으로 유의하지 않았다. 8. 제요인별 향후 치료유무에서는 연령, 사회 경제수준, 고혈압가족적이 통계적으로 유의하였고 향후 치료장소는 전반적으로 병원을 선호하는 경향이 뚜렷하였으나 제요인별 향후치료장소는 통계적으로 유의하지는 않았다. 9. 고혈압에 대한 치료를 받지 않을 것이라고 응답한 이유중 가장 높은 빈도를 차지하는 것은 46.8%로 일상생활에 지장이 없기 때문이라고 응답한 경우였다. 10. 제요인별 향후 예방행동유무는 연령, 교육수준, 사회경제수준, 고혈압 가족력이 통계적으로 유의하였다.
The survey has for its object to detect prevalence rate of hypertension in target population, to find out the risk factor to hypertension, to detect the hypertensive patients cared pattern and therefore, to consider a effective counter plan for the long term about hypertension. The study, population...
The survey has for its object to detect prevalence rate of hypertension in target population, to find out the risk factor to hypertension, to detect the hypertensive patients cared pattern and therefore, to consider a effective counter plan for the long term about hypertension. The study, population of this survey was 894 out of 1013 target population from Feb. 1 1994 to March 31 1994 in Kyougsang-namdo Ulsan-gun Samnam-myoun. For these two month, check of blood pressure and direct measurement of height and weight was carried out by mass screening and home visiting and had an interview about risk factors for hypertension and cared pattern by questionnaire. The results of survey were as follows : 1. The prevalence rate of 894 study, population was 27.5% and 26.0% in man and 28.6% in women. 2. In male, the prevalence rate for age group, family history of hypertension, drinking, salt intake by risk factors were significant statistically. 3. In female, the prevalence rate for salt intake, body mass index by risk factors were significant statistically. 4. Motivation which was diagnosed as hypertension was that be examined for subjective symptoms of hypertension and routine check for health was only 25.0%, 9.1% and visiting to the hospital for other diseases, detect hypertension by chance was 65.9%. 5. The experience of treatment in prevalent cases was significant statistically in middle class of SES. And the place of treatment by risk factors could not be significant statistically in spite of the majority selected hospital generally. 6. The reasons of non-compliance in prevalent cases was restricting daily activities for its 45.5% most high and the interruption of treatment in prevalent cases was far from hospital geographically for its 47.6% most high 7. The preventive behavior about hypertensive by risk factors or general characteristics wasn't significant statistically. 8. Being treated or not in the near future about age group, SES, family history of the hypertension was significant statistically. And with regard to the place of treatment in the near future, in spite of the majority selected hospital generally, it wasn't significant statistically. 9. The reasons of non-compliance in incidence cases was restricting daily activities for its 46.8% most high. 10. The preventive behavior in the near future about age group, education level, SES, family history of hypertension was significant statistically.
The survey has for its object to detect prevalence rate of hypertension in target population, to find out the risk factor to hypertension, to detect the hypertensive patients cared pattern and therefore, to consider a effective counter plan for the long term about hypertension. The study, population of this survey was 894 out of 1013 target population from Feb. 1 1994 to March 31 1994 in Kyougsang-namdo Ulsan-gun Samnam-myoun. For these two month, check of blood pressure and direct measurement of height and weight was carried out by mass screening and home visiting and had an interview about risk factors for hypertension and cared pattern by questionnaire. The results of survey were as follows : 1. The prevalence rate of 894 study, population was 27.5% and 26.0% in man and 28.6% in women. 2. In male, the prevalence rate for age group, family history of hypertension, drinking, salt intake by risk factors were significant statistically. 3. In female, the prevalence rate for salt intake, body mass index by risk factors were significant statistically. 4. Motivation which was diagnosed as hypertension was that be examined for subjective symptoms of hypertension and routine check for health was only 25.0%, 9.1% and visiting to the hospital for other diseases, detect hypertension by chance was 65.9%. 5. The experience of treatment in prevalent cases was significant statistically in middle class of SES. And the place of treatment by risk factors could not be significant statistically in spite of the majority selected hospital generally. 6. The reasons of non-compliance in prevalent cases was restricting daily activities for its 45.5% most high and the interruption of treatment in prevalent cases was far from hospital geographically for its 47.6% most high 7. The preventive behavior about hypertensive by risk factors or general characteristics wasn't significant statistically. 8. Being treated or not in the near future about age group, SES, family history of the hypertension was significant statistically. And with regard to the place of treatment in the near future, in spite of the majority selected hospital generally, it wasn't significant statistically. 9. The reasons of non-compliance in incidence cases was restricting daily activities for its 46.8% most high. 10. The preventive behavior in the near future about age group, education level, SES, family history of hypertension was significant statistically.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.