$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Sequential Assessment in Contests among Common Freshwater Goby, Rhinogobius brunneus(Pisces, Gobiidae) 원문보기

Korean journal of biological sciences, v.5 no.4, 2001년, pp.313 - 317  

Suk, Ho-Young (School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University) ,  Choe, Jae-C. (School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The sequential assessment model describes a fight between two conspecific as an ongoing statistical sampling process, which makes it possible to predict fight length or repetition number of a behavioral element depending on relative RHP (resource holding potential: e.g. weight or fighting ability). ...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

대상 데이터

  • The study was conducted from late April to late May, 1999-2000 in the laboratory at Seoul National University of Korea. A total of 108 males (54 pairs) were used in this experiment. They were collected using push-net from Gapyong Stream (North Han River; Gapyong-eup, Gyonggi-do, Republic of Korea; 37°55'N, 127°37'E).
  • The study was conducted from late April to late May, 1999-2000 in the laboratory at Seoul National University of Korea. A total of 108 males (54 pairs) were used in this experiment.
  • A total of 108 males (54 pairs) were used in this experiment. They were collected using push-net from Gapyong Stream (North Han River; Gapyong-eup, Gyonggi-do, Republic of Korea; 37°55'N, 127°37'E). We kept them in stock aquaria (그 180L).
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Barlow GW, Rogers W, and Fraley N (1986) Do midas cichlids win through prowess or daring? It depends. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19: 1-8 

  2. Beacham JL (1988) The relative importance of body size and aggressive experience as determinants of dominance in pumkinseed sunfish, Lepomis gibbosus. Anim Behav 36: 621-623 

  3. Beaugrand J, Goulet C, and Payette D (1991) Outcome of dyadic conflict in male green swordtail fish, Xyphophorus helleri effects of body size and prior dominance. Anim Behav 41: 417-424 

  4. Brick O (1999) A test of the sequential assessment game: the effect of increased cost of sampling. Behav Ecol 10: 726-732 

  5. Chellapa S and Huntingford FA (1989) Depletion of energy reserves during reproductive aggression in male three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. J Fish Biol 35: 315-316 

  6. Choe JC (1994) Sexual selection and mating system in Zorotypus gurneyi Choe (Insecta: Zoraptera). II. Determinants and dynamics of dominance. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34: 233-237 

  7. Clutton-Brock TH and Albon SD (1979) The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest avertisement. Behaviour 69: 145-170 

  8. Dow M, Ewing AW, and Sutherland J (1976) Studies on the behaviour of cyprinodont fish. III. The temporal patterning of aggression in Aphyosemion Striatum. Behaviour 59: 252-268 

  9. Dugatkin LA and Biederman L (1991) Balancing asymmetries in resource holding power and resource value in the pumkinseed sunfish. Anim Behav 42: 691-692 

  10. Dugatkin LA and FitGerald GJ (1997) Sexual selection. in: Godin J-GJ (ed) Behavioural Ecology of Teleost Fishes, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 292-311 

  11. Dugatkin LA and Ohlsen S (1990) Contrasting asymmetries in value expectation and resource holding power: effects on attack behavior and dominance in the pumkinseed sunfish(Lepomis gibbosus). Anim Behav 39: 802-804 

  12. Englund G and Olsson TI (1990) Fighting and assessment in the net-spinning caddis Iarva Arctopsyche ladogensis: a test of the sequential assessment game. Anim Behav 39: 55-62 

  13. Enquist M and Jakobsson S (1986) Decision making and assessment in the fighting behavior of Nannacara anomala(Cichlidae, Pisces) Ethology 72: 143-153 

  14. Enquist M and Leimar O (1983) Evolution of fighting behaviour:decision rules and assessment of relative strength. J Theor Biol 102: 387-410 

  15. Enquist M and Leimar O (1987) Evolution of fighting behavior: the effect of variation in resource value. J Theor Biol 127: 187-205 

  16. Enquist M, Leimar O, Ljundberg T, Mallner Y, and Segerdahl N (1990) A test of the sequential assessment game: fighting in the cichlid fish Nanacara anomala. Anim Behav 40: 1-14 

  17. Figler NH and Einhorn DM (1983) The territorial prior residence effect in convict cichlids (Cichlisoma nigrofasciatum Gunther). Temporal aspects of establishment and retention, and proximate mechanism. Behaviour 85: 157-181 

  18. Frank D and Ribowski A (1989) Escalating fights for rank-order position between male swordtails (Xyphophorus helleri): effects of prior rank-order experience and information transfer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24: 133-143 

  19. Hack MA (1997) Assessment strategies in the contests of male crickets. Acheta domesticus(L.). Anim Behav 53: 733-742 

  20. Holder JL, Barlow GW, and Francis RC (1991) Differences in aggressiveness in the midas cichlid fish (Cichlisoma citrinellum) in relation to sex, reproductive state and the individual. Ethology 67: 787-797 

  21. Huntingford FA and Turner AK (1987) Animal Conflicts and Fighting Behaviour. Chapman & Hall, London 

  22. Jakobsson S, Radester T, and Jrvi T (1979) On the fighting behaviour of Nannacara anomala (Pisces, Cichlidae) males. Z Tierpsychol 49: 210-220 

  23. Katoh M and Nishda N (1994) Biochemical and egg size evolution of freshwater fishes in the Rhinogobius brunneus complex (Pisces, Gobiidae) in Okinawa, Japan. Biol J Linn Soc 51: 325-335 

  24. Kawanabe H and Mizuno N (1989) Freshwater Fishes of Japan. Yama-Kei, Tokyo 

  25. Keeley ER and Grant JWA (1993a) Visual information, resource value, and sequential assessment in convict cichlid(Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum) contests. Behav Ecol 4: 345-349 

  26. Keeley ER and Grant JWA (1993b) Asymmetires in the expected value of food do not predict the outcome of contests between convict cichlids. Anim Behav 45: 1035-1037 

  27. Koops MA and Grant JWA (1993) Weight asymmetry and sequential assessment in convict cichlid contests. Can J Zool 71: 475-479 

  28. Leimar O (1988) Evolutionary Analysis of Animal Fighting. Ph. D. dissertation, Stockholm University, Stockholm 

  29. Leimar O, Austad SN and Enquist M (1991) A test of the sequential assessment game: fighting in the bowl and doily spider Frontinella pyamitela. Evolution 45: 862-874 

  30. Maynard Smith J and Parker GA (1976) The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim Behav 24: 159-175 

  31. Mizuno N (1976) Studies on a freshwater fish, Rhinogobius brunneus (Pisces, Gobiidae). III. Distribution of four colour types in Shikoku and Kyusyu Islands. Physiol Ecol Jpn 17: 373-381 

  32. Mosler HJ (1985) Making the decision to continue the fight or to flee. An analysis of contests between male Haplochromis burtoni (Pisces). Behaviour 92: 129-145 

  33. Neat FC, Tayler AC, and Huntingford FA (1988a) Proximate costs of fighting in male cichlid fish: the role of injuries and energy metabolism. Anim Behav 55: 875-882 

  34. Neat FC, Huntingford FA, and Beveridge MMC (1998b) Fighting and assessment in male cichlid fish: the effects of asymmetries in gonadal state and body size. Anim Behav 55: 883-891 

  35. Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47: 223-243 

  36. Riechert SE (1998) Game theory and animal contests In: Dugatkin LA and Reeve HK (eds), Game Theory and Animal Behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 64-93 

  37. Thornhill R and Sauer P (1992) Genetic sire effects on the fighting ability of sons and daughters and mating success of sons in a scorpionfly. Anim Behav 43: 255-264 

  38. Turner GF and Huntingford FA (1986) A problem for game theory analysis: assessment and intention in male mouthbrooder contests. Anim Behav 34: 961-970 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

BRONZE

출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로