$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

구성주의와 과학교육
Science Education: Constructivist Perspectives 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.22 no.4, 2002년, pp.820 - 836  

조희형 (강원대학교) ,  최경희 (이화여자대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

이 연구는 구성주의의 특성과 그것을 적용한 방법에 관한 문헌을 조사 분석하고, 그 결과가 과학교육의 여러 측면 또는 우리 나라 과학교육이 나아갈 방향에 던져주는 시사점을 모색하고자 수행하였다. 구성주의의 특성은 그 의미와 주장, 이론적 배경과 종류, 그에 관한 비판으로 나누어 기술하였으며, 과학교육의 측면 또는 앞으로 나아갈 방향을 그 목적, 과학 학습이론과 그 모형, 과학 교수-학습 방법, 과학 교육 과정과 평가로 나누어 논의하였다. 과학철학으로서의 구성주의에 따르면, 과학과 그 지식은 사회적 특성을 지니며, 그 성과에는 반드시 가치관이나 집단 이익이 관련되어 있다. 그러므로 과학교육의 궁극적인 목적은 의사결정력의 함양에 두어야 하며, 이런 목적을 달성할 수 있는 교육과정은 학습경험과 주제가 통합된 과제 중심으로 개발하는 것이 바람직하다. 심리학으로서의 구성주의에 따르면, 학습이 이루어지는 과정은 사회적 과정이다. 이런 학습의 전략으로는 협동 학습과 역할놀이가 효과적이며, 그 모형으로는 개념의 분화와 교환에 목적을 둔 순환학습 모형과 그것을 세분화한 5E 모형이 적절하다. 또한 구성주의는 수행평가와 창의력 검사에 이론적 배경을 제시한다. 구성주의에 따른 과학교육 평가의 주안점은 과학지식 및 탐구능력의 상황에 대한 적절성에 있다. 그런 평가는 현재 우리나라 과학교육 현장에서 중요시하는 수행평가와 창의력 검사 방법과 일치한다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Constructivism has had a great influence on science education over the last two decades. The purpose of this article is twofold: First, to describe the characteristics of constructivism and, second, to suggest an ideal forms of science education in Korea as implied in constructivism. A review of the...

주제어

#constructivism   #science education   #science teaching/learning   #performance assessment  

참고문헌 (98)

  1. 권성기, 임청환(2000). 구성주의적 과학학습심리학. 서울: 시그마프레스 

  2. 김종문 외 13인(1998). 구성주의 교육학. 서울: 교육과학사 

  3. 박수경(1999). 구성주의적 과학수업이 대기압 개념 획득과 학습동기에 미치는 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(2), 217-228 

    원문보기 상세보기

  4. 임청환 외(1999). 초등과학교육: 구성주의적 접근. 서울: 시그마프레스 

  5. 정경미, 김영민(1999). 구성주의 이론에 따른 코스웨어 적용이 초등학교 학생들의 과학 지식, 탐구능력 및 태도에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(1), 8-18 

  6. 조희형(1988). 과학교육과정 및 과학 교수/학습의 이론적 배경과 미래의 과학 교육에 대한 시사점. 한국과학교육학회지, 8(2), 33-41 

    원문보기 상세보기

  7. 조희형, 최경희(2000). 과학 교수-학습과 수행평가. 서울: 교육과학사 

  8. 조희형, 최경희(2001). 과학교육총론. 교육과학사 

  9. 최경희, 조희형(2000). 과학의 윤리적 특성에 대한 교수-학습 모형과 전략. 생명윤리, 1(1). 123-43 

  10. 한혜령, 이선경, 김희백(1999). 구성주의 관점에 의한 공통과학 교과서의 분석. 한국생물교육학회지, 27(3), 222-32 

  11. Abruscato, J.(2000). Teaching children science: A discovery approach, 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon 

  12. Alsop, S., & Hicks, K.(2001). Teaching science: A handbook for primary & secondary school teachers. London: Kogan Page 

  13. Appleton, K.(1997). Analysis and description of students' learning during science classes using a constructivist-based model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(3), 303-318 

    상세보기 crossref

  14. Arends, R. I.(1998). Learning to teach. 4th ed. Boston: McGraw Hill 

  15. Baker, D. R., & Piburn, M. D.(1997). Constructing science in middle and secondary school classrooms. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon 

  16. Bentley, M. L.(1998). Constructivism as a referent for reforming science education In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison(eds.). Constructivism and education Cambridge University Press 

  17. Bentley, M., Ebert, C., & Ebert, II, E. S.(2000). The natural investigator: A constructivist approach to teaching elementary and middle school science Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning 

  18. Bettencourt, A.(1993). The construction of knowledge: A radical constructivist view In K. Tobin (ed.). The practice of constructivism in science education Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 

  19. Biological Science Curriculum Study (BSCS)(1997). Biology: A human approach. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing 

  20. Bodner, G. M.(1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education. 63(10), 873-8 

    상세보기 crossref

  21. Bredo, E.(2000). Reconsidering social constructivism: The relevance of George Herbert Mead's interactionism. In D. C. Phillips. Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 

  22. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G.(1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 

  23. Bybee, R. W.(1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann 

  24. Cain, S. E.(2002). Sciencing, 4th ed. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill 

  25. Carin, A. A.(1997). Teaching science through discovery, 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill 

  26. Chiappetta, E. L., Koballa, T. R., & Collette, A. T.(1998). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools, 4th ed. Upper saddle River, New Jewrsey: Merrill 

  27. Cobern, W. W.(1993). Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science. In K. Tobin (ed.). The practice of constructivism in science education. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 

  28. Cromer, A.(1997). Connected knowledge: Science, Philosophy, and education. New York: Oxford University Press 

  29. Davis, N. T., McCarty, B. Jo., Shaw, K. L.. & Sidani-Tabbaa, A.(1993). Transition from objectivism to constructivism in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 15(6), 627-36 

    상세보기 crossref

  30. Driver, R.(1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481-490 

    상세보기 crossref

  31. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P.(1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12 

  32. Driver, R., & Oldham, V.(1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science, Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122 

    상세보기 crossref

  33. Duit, R.(1995). The constructivist view: A fashionable and fruitful paradigm for science education research and practice. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (eds.). Constructivism is education. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 

  34. Ernest, P.(1995). The one and the many. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (eds.). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 

  35. Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (eds.)(1994). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: The Falmer Press 

  36. Fleury, S. C.(1998). Social studies, trivial constructivism, and the politics of social knowledge. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (eds.). Constructivism and education. Cambridge University Press 

  37. Fosnot, C. T. (ed.)(1996). Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press 

  38. Gale, J.(1995). Preface, In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (eds.). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 

  39. Garrison, J.(1998). Toward a pragmatic social constructivism. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (eds.). Constructivism and education. Cambridge University Press 

  40. Golinski, J.(1998). Making natural knowledge: constructivism and the history of science. Cambridge University Press 

  41. Good, R.(1993). The many forms of constructivism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(9), 1015 

    상세보기 crossref

  42. Gredler, M. E.(2001). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill 

  43. Gunstone, R. F.(2000). Constructivism and learning research in science education. In D. C. Phillips. Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 

  44. Harding, P., & Hare, W.(2000). Portraying science accurately in classrooms: emphasizing open-mindedness rather than relativism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 225-36 

    상세보기 crossref

  45. Harlen, W. (2000). Teaching, learning & assessing science 5-12, 3rd ed. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd 

  46. Hess, D. J.(1997). Science studies: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press 

  47. Hodson, D., & Hodson, J.(1998). From constructivism to social constructivism: A Vygotskian perspective on teaching and learning science. School Science Review, 79(298), 33-41 

  48. Howe, K. R., & Berv, J.(2000). Constructing constructivism, epistemological and pedagogical. In D. C. Phillips. Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 

  49. Hung, E.(1997). The nature of science: Problems and perspectives. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company 

  50. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G.(1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill 

  51. Kelly, G. J. (1997). Research traditions in comparative context: A philosophical challenge to radical constructivism. Science Education, 81(3), 355-75 

    상세보기 crossref

  52. Kukla, A.(2000). Social constructivism and the philosophy of science. London: Routledge 

  53. Larochelle, M. & Bednarz, N.(1998). Constructivism and education: Beyond epistemological correctness. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison(eds.). Constructivism and education. Cambridge University Press 

  54. Larochelle, M., Bednarz, N., & Garrison, J.(eds.)(1998). Constructivism and education Cambridge University Press 

  55. Linn, M. C., & Burbules, N. C.(1993). Construction of knowledge and group learning. In K. Tobin (ed.). The practice of constructivism in science education. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 

  56. Lorsbach, A. & Tobin, K.(2002). Constructivism as referent for science Teaching. Home Page : http: //www.exploratorium.edu/ IFI/resources/research/constructivism.html 

  57. Magoon, A. J.(1977). Constructivist approaches in educational research. Review of Educational Research. 47(4), 651-693 

    상세보기 crossref

  58. Marlowe, B. A., & Page, M. L.(1998). Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc. 

  59. Marshall, H. H.(1998). Teaching educational psychology: Learner-centerd and constructivist perspectives. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (eds.) (1998). How students learn: reforming schools through learner-centered education. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 

  60. Martin, R., Sexton, C., & Gerlovich, J.(2002). Teaching science for all children, 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon 

  61. Matthews, M. R.(1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge 

  62. Matthews, M. R.(2000). Appraising constructivism in science and mathematics education. In D. C. Phillips. Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 

  63. McCarty, L, P., & Schwandt, T. A.(2000). Seductive illusions: von Glasersfeld and Gergen on epistemology and education. In D. C. Phillips. Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 

  64. McComas, W. F. (ed.)(2000). The nature of science in science education rationales and strategies. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers 

  65. McInerney, D. M.(1994). Educational psychology: Constructing learning. New York: Prentice Hall 

  66. Miller, R., Leach, J., & Osborne, J. (eds.) (2000). Improving science education: The contribution of research. Buckingham: Open University Press 

  67. National Research Council (NRC)(1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 

  68. Noddings, N.(1995). Philosophy of education. Oxford: Westview Press 

  69. Oldfather, P., West, J., White, J., & Wilmarth, J.(1999). Learning through children's eyes: Social constructivism and the desire to learn. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 

  70. O'Loughlin, M.(1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 791-820 

    상세보기 crossref

  71. Osborne, J. F.(1996). Beyond constructivism. Science Education, 80(1), 53-82 

    상세보기 crossref

  72. Pepin, Y.(1993). Practical knowledge and school knowledge: A constructivist representation of education. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (eds.). Constructivism and education. Cambridge University Press 

  73. Phillips, D. C. (ed.)(2000). An opinionated account of the constructivist landscape. In D. C. Phillips. Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 

  74. Reiss, M. J. & Straughan, R.(1996). Improving nature and ethics of genetic engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 

  75. Resnik, D. B.(1998). The ethics of science: An introduction. London: Routledge 

  76. Ross, K., Lakin, L., & Callaghan, P.(2000). Teaching secondary science: Constructing meaning and developing understanding. London: David Fulton Publishers 

  77. Roth, W. M.(1993). Construction sites: Science labs and classrooms, In K. Tobin (ed.). The practice of constructivism in science education. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 

  78. Roth, W. M,(1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and teaming in open-inquiry science laboratories. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers 

  79. Segerstrale, U. (ed.) (2002). Beyond the science wars: The missing discourse about science and society. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press 

  80. Shamos, M. H.(1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press 

  81. Siebert, E. D., Capiro, M. W., & Lyda, C. M.(eds.) (1997). Methods of effective teaching and course management for university and college science teachers. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company 

  82. Slezak, P.(2000). A critique of radical social constructivism. In D. C. Phillips. Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 

  83. Solomon, J.(1994). The rise and fall of constructivism. Studies in Science Education, 23, 1-19 

  84. Solomon, J.(2000). The changing perspectives of constructivism: Science wars and children's creativity. In D. C. Phillips. Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 

  85. Staver, J, R.(1998). Constructivism: Sound theory for explicating the practice of science and science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 501-520 

    상세보기 crossref

  86. Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. (eds.) (1995). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 

  87. Tobin, K., & Tippins, D.(1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (ed.). The practice of constructivism in science education. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 

  88. Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., & Fraser, B. J.(eds.) (1996). Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics. New York: Teachers College Press 

  89. Trowbridge, L. W., Bybee, R. W., & Powell, J. C.(2000). Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill 

  90. von Glasersfeld, E.(1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (ed.). The practice of constructivism in science education. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaurn Associates, Publishers 

  91. von Glasersfeld, E.(1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (eds.). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 

  92. von Glasersfeld, E.(1996). Introduction: Aspects of constructivism. In C. T. Fosnot (ed.) Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press 

  93. von Glasersfeld, E.(1998). Why constructivism must be radical. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (eds.). Constructivism and education. Cambridge University Press 

  94. Wellington, J.(2000). Teaching and learning secondary science: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: Routeldge 

  95. Wheatley, G. H.(1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9-21 

    상세보기 crossref

  96. Wood, T.(1995). From alternative epistemologies to practice in education: Rethinking what it means to teach and learn. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (eds.). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 

  97. Yager, R. E.(2000). The constructivist learning model. The Science Teacher, 67(1), 44-5 

    상세보기

  98. Ziman, J.(1980). Teaching and learning about science and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로