$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
안녕하세요!
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

델파이법을 활용한 종양분야 FDG PET의 경제성 평가 연구 우선순위 선정

Establishing research priorities of FDG PET in oncology indications using Delphi technique

Abstract

The rapid increase in PET devices and its utilization in Korea necessitates relevant health insurance policies based on scientific evidence, including economic evaluation of PET in clinical conditions. However, there is very little amount of evidence regarding PET, and the first step would be to establish research priorities to give a momentum for research and assure efficient use of research capacities. To this end, we conducted a two-round Delphi study, which produced stable consensus on about top 10 oncology indications for research, which included lymphoma staging, colorectal cancer recurrence/restaging, lung cancer staging, and other conditions. The results were largely consistent with current U.S. Medicare reimbursement indications and are expected to lead to relevant researches and evidence-based health policies on PET reimbursement and regulation.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 강영호. 우리나라 암 연구수준의 평가와 암 연구인력 훈련요구의 예측: 델파이법의 적용. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. 1998 
  2. 안형식, 김선민, 김선미, 김창엽, 신영수, 이순형. 전문의 대상 설문조사를 이용한 보건의료 기술평가 대상 시술의 우선 순위 선정. 보건행정학회지. 1997;7(2):46-64 
  3. 이명철. 제7장 양전자단층촬영(PET). 핵의학 제2판(고창순 편). 고려의학, 1997 
  4. 이성웅. Delphi 기술예측기법의 유용성에 관한 연구. 전북대학교 대학원 박사학위논문. 1987 
  5. Bayley EW, Richmond T, Noroian EL, Allen LR. A Delphi study on research priorities for trauma nursing. Am J Crit Care 1994;3(3):208-16 
  6. Bond S, Bond J. A Delphi survey of clinical nursing research priorities. J Advanced Nursing 1982;7:565-75 
  7. Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research. CARTA Newsletter. Issues 23. 2001.7 
  8. Czernin J, Phelps ME. Positron emission tomography scanning: current and future applications. Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:89-112 
  9. Dajani JS, Sincoff MZ, Talley WK. Stability and agreement criteria for the termination of Delphi studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 1979;13:83-90 
  10. Dalkey NC. Delphi (Report P-3704). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. 1967 
  11. Dietlein M, Weber K, Gandjour A, Moka D, Theissen P, Lauterbach KW, Schicha H. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: priority for a PET-based strategy after nodal-negative CT results. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2000;27(11):1598-609 
  12. Flynn K, Adams E. Positron Emission Tomography: descriptive analysis of experience with PET in VA and systematic reviews (FDG-PET as a diagnostic test for cancer and Alzheimer's disease). MDRC Technology Assessment Program. 1996 
  13. Gambhir SS et al. A Tabulated Summary of the FDG PET Literature. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2001;42:1-93. Supplement 
  14. Harrington JM. Research priorities in occupational medicine: a survey of United Kingdom medical opinion by the Delphi technique. Occup Environ Med 1994;51:289-94 
  15. Iavicoli S, Marinaccio A, Vonesch N, Ursini CL, Grandi C, Palmi S. Research priorities in occupational health in Italy. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58(5):325-9 
  16. Keppler JS. Federal regulations and reimbursement for PET. J Nucl Med Technol. 2001;29(4):173-9 
  17. Linstone HA, Turoff M. 1. Introduction. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications (Eds: Linstone HA, Turoff M). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1975 
  18. Oortwijn WJ, Vondeling H, van Barneveld T, van Vugt C, Bouter LM. Priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: principles and practice. Health Policy. 2002;62(3):221-42 
  19. Robert G, Milne R. A Delphi study to establish national cost-effectiveness research priorities for positron emission tomography. European Journal of Radiology 1999;30:54-60 
  20. Robert G, Milne R. Positron emission tomography: establishing priorities for health technology assessment. Health Technology Assessment 1999; Vol.3: No.16 
  21. Scott WJ, Shepherd J, Gambhir SS. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for staging non-small cell lung cancer: a decision analysis. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1998;66(6):1876-83; discussion 1883-5 
  22. Szczepura A, Kanjaanpaa. Chapter One. An Introduction to Health Technology. Assessment of health care technologies(Eds: Szczepura A, Kanjaanpaa). John Wiley & Sons. 1996 
  23. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare Coverage Database. National Coverage Determinations for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scans. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewncd.asp?ncd_id=50-36&ncd_version=3&show=all Accessed July 16, 2004 
  24. The NHS National Coordinating Center for HTA (NCCHTA). The Annual Report of the NHS National Coordinating Center for HTA. 1999 
  25. Valk PE, Pounds TR, Tesar RD, Hopkins DM, Haseman MK. Cost-effectiveness of PET imaging in clinical oncology. Nucl Med BioI. 1996;23(6):737-43 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (1)

  1. Kang, Myung-Kyung ; Shon, Kyung-Hee ; Lee, Gab-Nyea 2011. "Effects of a Program Using Video-Audio Media on Knowledge Level and Compliance of Sick Role for Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography" 한국간호교육학회지 = The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 17(1): 100~109 

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

DOI 인용 스타일