방사선과 학생의 임상실습 만족도에 관한 조사연구 목적은 임상실습을 더욱 효율적으로 시행하기 위해 기초조사 자료를 제공하는데 있다. 수도권에 소재한 대학에 재학 중인 방사선과 학생 227명을 조사 대상으로 2004년 1월부터 2월까지 임상실습 만족에 관한 항목을 8개 항목으로 나누어 설문조사하여 SPSS/PC+ 통계프로그램으로 분석하였다. 1. 설문조사 8개 항목의 평균점수는 3.64이고, 임상실습 내용에 대한 만족도는 4.00, 임상실습 분야별 만족도는 3.64, 임상실습시간에 대한 만족도는 3.69, 임상실습 후 만족도는 3.88, 임상실습 후 대인관계에 대한 만족도는 3.72, 임상실습평가에 대한 만족도는 3.21, 임상실습지도에 대한 만족도는 3.37, 임상실습 환경에 대한 만족도는 3.57로 나타났다. 2. 임상실습 시기는 대부분 3학년 1학기, 3학년 여름방학 또는 3학년 2학기에 시행하고 있으며, 학생들의 의견은 3학년 1학기 또는 2학년 겨울방학을 선호한 것으로 나타나 대학의 교과과정에 따라 차이가 있을 수 있기에 합리적인 임상실습 시기를 선택해야겠다. 3. 실습평가에 있어서 보다 객관적이고 타당성 있는 평가기준과 폭넓게 활용할 수 있는 표준화된 실습교재 개발이 시급히 필요하며, 대학교수는 병원횟수를 좀 더 늘려 학생들의 임상실습에 관심을 가져야겠다.
방사선과 학생의 임상실습 만족도에 관한 조사연구 목적은 임상실습을 더욱 효율적으로 시행하기 위해 기초조사 자료를 제공하는데 있다. 수도권에 소재한 대학에 재학 중인 방사선과 학생 227명을 조사 대상으로 2004년 1월부터 2월까지 임상실습 만족에 관한 항목을 8개 항목으로 나누어 설문조사하여 SPSS/PC+ 통계프로그램으로 분석하였다. 1. 설문조사 8개 항목의 평균점수는 3.64이고, 임상실습 내용에 대한 만족도는 4.00, 임상실습 분야별 만족도는 3.64, 임상실습시간에 대한 만족도는 3.69, 임상실습 후 만족도는 3.88, 임상실습 후 대인관계에 대한 만족도는 3.72, 임상실습평가에 대한 만족도는 3.21, 임상실습지도에 대한 만족도는 3.37, 임상실습 환경에 대한 만족도는 3.57로 나타났다. 2. 임상실습 시기는 대부분 3학년 1학기, 3학년 여름방학 또는 3학년 2학기에 시행하고 있으며, 학생들의 의견은 3학년 1학기 또는 2학년 겨울방학을 선호한 것으로 나타나 대학의 교과과정에 따라 차이가 있을 수 있기에 합리적인 임상실습 시기를 선택해야겠다. 3. 실습평가에 있어서 보다 객관적이고 타당성 있는 평가기준과 폭넓게 활용할 수 있는 표준화된 실습교재 개발이 시급히 필요하며, 대학교수는 병원횟수를 좀 더 늘려 학생들의 임상실습에 관심을 가져야겠다.
The objective of this study is to find out the factors affecting the satisfaction of the students at the department of radiotechnology of health college for their clinical practice and provide the basic data necessary for the better planning of the curriculum for the clinical practice. The questions...
The objective of this study is to find out the factors affecting the satisfaction of the students at the department of radiotechnology of health college for their clinical practice and provide the basic data necessary for the better planning of the curriculum for the clinical practice. The questions were distributed to and collected from 227 junior college students in Seoul and Kyeonggido from January to february, 2004. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS/PC+. The general characteristics of students and the current clinical practice conditions were presented in real numbers and percentages. The responding scores for the degree of satisfaction vary from 1 to 5, where is the worst score and 5 the best. The degree of satisfaction for clinical practice was presented as the average score and the standard deviation for each item shown. 1.The degree of satisfaction for the clinical practice was assessed in total eight aspects. and the overall average score was $3.64^{\circ}$. The degree of satisfaction for practice period was scored 3.69, which was higher than the average. Environmental aspect was scored 3.57, suggesting relatively low satisfaction. The degree of satisfaction for parts, evaluation method of clinical practice, education, practice contents, achievement after clinical practice, and personal relationship in practice were presented 3.64, 3.21, 3.37, 4.00, 3.88, and 3.72 respectively. The degree of evaluation method of clinical practice was the lowest among them. 2. The students favored the clinical practice course offered in the second semester of their third year and a total of 8 weeks for the period. 3. The major complaints of the students during the clinical practice were simple works, insufficient rest place and conflict with practice teachers. As mentioned above, the degree of satisfaction for the achievement after clinical practice and item necessary for clinical practice showed relatively high scores. It turns out that the students think of their clinical practice as very positive in answering the questionnaire.
The objective of this study is to find out the factors affecting the satisfaction of the students at the department of radiotechnology of health college for their clinical practice and provide the basic data necessary for the better planning of the curriculum for the clinical practice. The questions were distributed to and collected from 227 junior college students in Seoul and Kyeonggido from January to february, 2004. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS/PC+. The general characteristics of students and the current clinical practice conditions were presented in real numbers and percentages. The responding scores for the degree of satisfaction vary from 1 to 5, where is the worst score and 5 the best. The degree of satisfaction for clinical practice was presented as the average score and the standard deviation for each item shown. 1.The degree of satisfaction for the clinical practice was assessed in total eight aspects. and the overall average score was $3.64^{\circ}$. The degree of satisfaction for practice period was scored 3.69, which was higher than the average. Environmental aspect was scored 3.57, suggesting relatively low satisfaction. The degree of satisfaction for parts, evaluation method of clinical practice, education, practice contents, achievement after clinical practice, and personal relationship in practice were presented 3.64, 3.21, 3.37, 4.00, 3.88, and 3.72 respectively. The degree of evaluation method of clinical practice was the lowest among them. 2. The students favored the clinical practice course offered in the second semester of their third year and a total of 8 weeks for the period. 3. The major complaints of the students during the clinical practice were simple works, insufficient rest place and conflict with practice teachers. As mentioned above, the degree of satisfaction for the achievement after clinical practice and item necessary for clinical practice showed relatively high scores. It turns out that the students think of their clinical practice as very positive in answering the questionnaire.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.