• 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"
쳇봇 이모티콘
ScienceON 챗봇입니다.
궁금한 것은 저에게 물어봐주세요.

논문 상세정보

회전 방지용 Post Screw 시스템의 임플랜트 지대나사풀림 방지효과에 관한 연구



Statement of problem: The most commonly reported problem associated with dental implant restoration is the loosening of the screws. Purpose: This study compared the efficacy of an implant system incorporating an anti-rotational locking sleeve(Anti-Rotating Inner Post Screw System(ARIPS-system)) with other, traditional implant systems as a means of minimizing vibration loosening. Materials and methods: Three implant systems were examined; the conventional external hex type, the ARIPS-system, and the internal taper type implant system 30 specimens(10 samples per group)were fabricated and each abutment screw was secured to the implant future with 32Ncm of torque force and loosening torque was measured using a Torque Gauge. The procedure was repeated 3 times, recording initial loosening torque each time. The re-tightened abutment screw was subjected to a cyclic load having a maximum forte of 200N and minimum of 20N at 2Hz over a period of 12,600 cycles. after which the loosening torque was measured. Measured values were calaulated for statistical analysis. Analysis of measured value was performed by 3 methods: (i) as a percentage average of the initial 3 loosening-torque values(initial loosening value) to the tightening torque of 32Ncm, (ii) as a percentage of the loosening torque value after a load of 200N(experimental value) to the initial loosening value, and (iii) as a percentage of the experimental value to the 32Ncm of tightening torque. The analyses shows the amount of initial loosening at the screw, loosening by repetitive load and the the final loosening value. Results: The results of this study were as follows (1) Percentage of initial loosening value to tightening-torque was increased in order of external hex, ARIPS-system and internal taper and all values between each groups showed statistical significance (p<0.05). (2) Percentage of experimental value to initial loosening value was increased in order of external hex, ARIPS-system and internal taper. Value of internal taper showed significant difference with those of external hex and ARIPS-system (p<0.05). (3) Percentage of experimental value to tightening torque was increased in order of external hex, ARIPS-system and internal taper and all values between each groups showed statistical significance (p<0.05). Conclusion: The results of the analysis of the final loosening level value, which are closely correlated to clinical use, show that the ARIPS-system can be a useful means of minimizing abutment screw loosening when compared to the external hex type system. Although further clinical studies need to be made, the ARIPS-system should be considered to maximize the long-term success of the implant prosthesis.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Binon PP. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:149-60 
  2. Binon PP. Implants and components: Entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;5:76-94 
  3. Lee WJ, Lim JH, Cho IH. Stress of dental implant abutment screw by the tightening torque. J Korean Acad of Prosthodont 1998;36(5):720-37 
  4. Lim JB, Yim SH, Cho IH. The effect of screw hole sealing method on abutment screw loosening in dental implant. J Korean Acad of Prosthodont 1997;35(4):767-77 
  5. Cho SM, Lim JH, Cho IH. A study on geometric comparison of four interchangeable implant prosthetic retaining screw and measurement of looseningtorque. J Korean Acad of Prosthodont 1998;36(3):468-80 
  6. Balshi TJ, Hernandez RE, Pryszlak MC, Rangert B. A comparative study of one implant versus two replacing a single molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:372-8 
  7. Bickford JH. An introduction to the design and behavior of bolted joints. New York Marcel Dekker Inc. 1981. p. 248-76 
  8. Rangert BO, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7 
  9. Korioth TWP, Cardoso AC, Versluis A. Effect of washers on reverse torque displacement of dental implant gold retaining screws. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:312-6 
  10. Binon PP. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a technique to prevent screw loosening. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:430-2 
  11. Artzi Z, Dreiangel A. Securing the abutment post screw in a single implant prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:432-3 
  12. Oh SW, Yang JH, Lee SH, Han JS. Influence of implant-abutment interface design, implant diameter and prosthetic table width on strength of implant-abutment interface:Three-dimensional finite element analysis 2003;41(4):393-400 
  13. Edmund C, Fred A. Preventing loosening of implant abutment screws. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:566-9 
  14. Richter EJ. In vivo vertical forces on implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:99-108 
  15. Schwarz M. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:156-8 
  16. Kim JM, Han JS, Lee SH, Yang JH, Lee JB, Kim YS. A study of screw loosening after dynamic continous fatigue test of several abutment screw 2003;41(4) :519-30 
  17. Mcglumphy E. Keeping implant screws tight. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:628-31 
  18. Kang YM, Lim JH, Cho IH. A study on the abutment screw loosening of dental implant. J Korean Acad of Prosthodont 1996;34(1):1-14 
  19. Huh MH. SPSS and statistical analysis. Kyohak-Sa. 1995. p. 220 
  20. Jemt T, Linden B, Lekholm U. Failures and complication in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Branemark implants: From prosthetic treatment to first annual check up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:40-3 
  21. Aboyoussef H, Weiner S, Ehrenberg D. Effect of an antirotation resistance form on screw loosening for single implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:450-5 
  22. Weiss EI, Kozak D, Gross MD. Effect of repeated closures on opening torque values in seven abutment-implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:194-9 
  23. Lazza RJ. Criteria for implant selection: surgical and prosthetic consideration. Pract Perio Aesthet Dent 1994;6:55-62 
  24. Cho IH. Biomechanical analysis of implant prosthodontic restorations. J Kor Dent Assoc 1993;31:438-43 
  25. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Sadler JP, Makay ML. Comparison of screw loosening, rotation, and deflection among three implant designs. J Prosthodont 1995;74:270-8 
  26. Binon P, Brunski J, Gulbransen H. The role of screws in Implants system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:48 
  27. Kor Acad Oral Maxillofac Implants. Illustrations of implant terminology. Narae Publ. Co. 2003. p. 279-309 
  28. Kemppainen P, Eskola S, Ylipaavalniemi P. A comparative prospective clinical study of two single-tooth implants: A preliminary report of 102 implants. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:382-7 
  29. Wicks RA, de Rijk WG, Windler AS. An evaluation of fit in osseointegrated implant components using torque/turn analysis. J Prosthodont 1994;3:206-10 
  30. Ahn JS, Lim JH, Cho IH. On screw loosening of various implant system. Collected papers of Dankook University 2001. p. 1-28 
  31. Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D, Henry PJ, Krogh PH Jr, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:29-36 
  32. Ha JI, Jeong HY, Kim YL, Cho HW. The effects of fabrication of gold cylinder and abutment on the fitness and preloading of the prosthesis. J Korean Acad of Prosthodont 2003;41(4):451-465 

이 논문을 인용한 문헌 (0)

  1. 이 논문을 인용한 문헌 없음


원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :
  • KCI :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

상세조회 0건 원문조회 0건

이 논문과 연관된 기능

DOI 인용 스타일