[논문]컨조인트 분석을 이용한 학교아침급식 운영 속성 및 수준의 중요도 분석

이필순; 이민아; 양일선; 차성미

doi:10.7318/kjfc.2007.22.5.621

컨조인트 분석을 이용한 학교아침급식 운영 속성 및 수준의 중요도 분석
Assessing Relative Importance of Operational Factors for School Breakfast Program using Conjoint Analysis 원문보기

韓國食生活文化學會誌 = Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture, v.22 no.5, 2007년, pp.621 - 632

이필순 (연세대학교 식품영양학과) , 이민아 (한국식품연구원) , 양일선 (연세대학교 식품영양학과) , 차성미 (한국식품연구원)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The purposes of this study were as follows. First is to compare the importance of operational factors to determine types of school breakfast program, and second is to do the preference analysis of operation-related people depending on the attributes and levels of the operation of school breakfast program. The questionnaires developed for this study were distributed to 134 school dietitians, 114 school foodservice officials at the educational board, 68 staff members of foodservice contractors and 493 parents. Statistical data analyses were performed using SPSS/WIN 12.0 for descriptive statistics and conjoint analysis. The conjoint design was applied to evaluate the hypothetical foodservice types. According to the analysis on the attributes and levels of the school breakfast operation, the relative importance of each attribute was as followsprice (36.30%), menu (29.60%), foodservice staff (22.54%), serving type (11.55%) to school dietitians, price (34.99%), menu (28.15%), foodservice staff (23.52%), serving type (13.35%) to school foodservice officials at the educational board, menu (30.55%), price (30.24%), foodservice staff (28.75%), serving type (10.47%) to staff members of foodservice contractors and price (36.34%), menu (29.73%), foodservice staff (21.01%), serving type (12.92%) to parents. The results of the conjoint analysis indicated that the school dietitians and school foodservice officials at the educational board preferred the school breakfast operation program with 3 traditional menus and 2 convenience menus per 5 day, $1{\sim}3$ foodservice staff, with a price range of $1501{\sim}2000won$, and tray serving. Staff members of foodservice contractors preferred the school breakfast operation program with 3 traditional menus and 2 convenience menus per 5 day, $1{\sim}3$ foodservice staff, with a price range of $2501{\sim}3000won$, and tray serving. Parents preferred the school breakfast operation with 5 traditional menus per 5 day, $6{\sim}7$ foodservice staff, with a price range of $2501{\sim}3000won$, and tray serving. About a half of school dietitians considered that elementary schools were appropriate for the suggested school breakfast operation program. But, 68.2% of school foodservice officials at the educational board, 69.1% of staff members of foodservice contractors, and 38.1% of parents considered high schools to be the suitable model. Therefore, it indicated the need to recognize the different opinions among breakfast operation-related people and take these factors into consideration in developing the school breakfast program.

주제어

참고문헌 (31)

Akin J, Guilkey D, Popkin B. 1983. The school lunch program and nutrient intake: A switching regression analysis. American Agricultural Economics Association, 65(3): 477-485

상세보기
Cho GJ. 2004. The research study on the food habits according to obesity index of primary school children in busan. Korean J. Food Culture, 19(1): 106-117

원문보기 상세보기
Choe JS, Chun HK, Chung GJ, Nam HJ. 2003. Relations between the dietary habit and academic achievement, subjective health judgement, Physical Status of High School Students. Journal, 32(4): 627-635

원문보기 상세보기
Erskine RS. 1992. Factors affecting participation in the national school lunch and school breakfast programs. School Food Service Research Review, 16(2): 91-100
Gleason PM. 1995. Participation in the national school lunch program and the school breakfast program. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 61(suppl): 213S-220S

상세보기
Goldberg SM, Green PE, Wind Y. 1984. Conjoint analysis of price premiums for hotel amenities. Journal of Business, 57(1): S111-S132

상세보기
Green PE, Srinivasan V. 1990. Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 54(4): 3-19

상세보기
Gregoire MB, Nettles MF. 1994. Is it time for computer-assisted decision making to improve the quality of food and nutrition services. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 94: 1371-1374

상세보기
Hwang JH, Sneed J. 2007. Developing a performance criteria model for school foodservice. Journal of Hospitality Research, 31(1): 111-129

상세보기
Joo EJ, Park ES. 1998. Effect of sex and obese index on breakfast and snack intake in elementary school students. Korean J. Food Culture, 13(5): 487-496
Keyser DL, Vaden AG, Dayton AD. 1983. Factors affecting participation in child nutrition programs. School Food Service Research Review, 7(1): 29-37
Kim KJ, Park KY. 2006. Research on efficient operation of university foodservice through conjoint analysis. The Korean Journal of Culinary Research, 12(4): 33-45
Kim MH, Lee KA. 2003. A Comparison of the perceptions of children and their mothers of the effects of school lunch programs on children's dietary behaviors. J. Koreans Soc. Food Sci. Nutr, 32(4): 636-644

원문보기 상세보기
Kim SH. 1999. Children's growth and school performance in relation to breakfast. Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association, 5(2): 215-224
Lee BS, Yang IS. 2006. An Exploratory study for identifying factors related to breakfast in elementary, middle and high school students. Korean J. Community Nutrition, 11(1): 25-38
Lee HY. 2005. Identifying relative importance of foodservice attributes to design a new university foodservice operation. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr, 34(7): 1028-1034

원문보기 상세보기
Lee JE, Jung IK. 2005. The perception of parents on the eating habits and nutritional education of their elementary school children. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 43(7): 67-77
Lee MA, Lee PS, Lee YH, Yang IS. 2006. Needs assessment of school breakfast program and identifying operational attributes : A qualitative approach. Proceeding of 2006 International Symposium and Annual Meeting of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition. Gyeongju. pp 372
Maurer KM. 1984. The national evaluation of school nutrition programs: factors affecting student participation. Am J Clin Nutr, 40: 425-447

상세보기
Meyers AF, Sampson AE, Weitzman M, Rogers BL, Kayne H. 1989. school breakfast program and school performance. Am J Dis Child, 143(1): 1234-1239

상세보기
Meyer MK & Conklin MT. 1998. Variables affecting high school students' perceptions of school foodservice. J Am Diet Assoc, 98(12): 1424-1428, 1431

상세보기
Morgan KJ, Zabik ME, Leveille G. 1981. The role of breakfast in nutrient intake of 5-12 year old children. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 34: 1418-1427

상세보기
National Food Service Management Institute. 2005. The university of mississippi. Focus Group Discussions with Elementary School Foodservice Directors, Teachers, and Parents Regarding the School Breakfast Program
Nicklas TA, O' Neil CE, Berenson GS. 1998. Nutrient contribution of breakfast, secular trends, and the role of ready-to-eat cereals: A review of data from the bogalusa heart study. Am J Clin Nutr, 67(suppl): 757s-763s

상세보기
Park SJ, Kim AJ. 2000. A retrospective study on the status of obesity and eating and weight control behaviors of elementary school children in inchon. Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association, 6(1): 44-52
Sampson AE, Myers A, Rogers BL, Weitzman M. 1991. School breakfast program participation and parental attitudes. Journal of Nutrition Education, 23(3): 110-115

상세보기
Singleton N, Rhoads DS. 1982. Meal and snacking patterns of students. J Sch Health, 529-534
Spears MC, Gregoire M. 2004. Foodservice organizations: A managerial and systems approach(5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
USDA. 2006. Nutrition program facts food and nutrition service. The School Breakfast Program
Woo MK, Hyun TS, Lee SY, Mo SM. 1986. A study of ecology in food focused on breakfast of students and adults with professional occupations in the urban areas. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 24(3): 103-118
Yang IS. 1997. Enhancing the school foodservice management through national school breakfast program. Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association, 3(2): 223-238

저자의 다른 논문 :

LOADING...

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

컨조인트 분석을 이용한 학교아침급식 운영 속성 및 수준의 중요도 분석
Assessing Relative Importance of Operational Factors for School Breakfast Program using Conjoint Analysis 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (31)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

연구과제 타임라인

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

컨조인트 분석을 이용한 학교아침급식 운영 속성 및 수준의 중요도 분석 Assessing Relative Importance of Operational Factors for School Breakfast Program using Conjoint Analysis 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (31)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

이필순 (1) 이민아 (34) 양일선 (185)

연구과제 타임라인

전체(0) 논문(0) 특허(0) 보고서(0)

전체(0) 논문(0) 특허(0) 보고서(0)

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

컨조인트 분석을 이용한 학교아침급식 운영 속성 및 수준의 중요도 분석
Assessing Relative Importance of Operational Factors for School Breakfast Program using Conjoint Analysis 원문보기