최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기대한지리학회지 = Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, v.45 no.4 = no.139, 2010년, pp.461 - 477
Recent environmental issues such as genetically modified organisms, the loss of biodiversity, climate change, and nuclear waste cannot be reduced to a matter of science or society and explained through nature-society dualist approaches because of their complexity and heterogeneity. This paper examin...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
생명공학은 국가 균형발전의 측면에서 어떻게 활용되고 있는가? | 1990년대부터 세계 경제에서의 국가경쟁력 증대, 지식산업 사회로의 진입이라는 담론을 통해 생명공학(BT 산업)은 정보통신(IT 산업)과 함께 제 2대 과학 산업으로 자리매김 되면서 정부의 집중적인 관심과 투자의 대상이 되었다(The Ministry of Science and Technology, 2004). 또한 생명공학은 최근 국가 균형발전의 측면에서 바이오 클러스터 조성사업 등 지역발전 전략으로도 활용되고 있다(Kim, S.-J. | |
생명공학에 전략적인 투자가 국내에서 이루어진 배경은 무엇인가? | 국내에서도 세계화에 따른 무한경쟁이라는 경제체제 하에서 세계 생명공학의 급속한 발달과 특허를 통한 상업화의 잠재성을 인식하고 생명공학에 전략적인 투자를 해왔다. 1990년대부터 세계 경제에서의 국가경쟁력 증대, 지식산업 사회로의 진입이라는 담론을 통해 생명공학(BT 산업)은 정보통신(IT 산업)과 함께 제 2대 과학 산업으로 자리매김 되면서 정부의 집중적인 관심과 투자의 대상이 되었다(The Ministry of Science and Technology, 2004). | |
과학기술의 발전을 전폭적으로 지지하는 사회적 합의가 과거와는 다르게 1990년대 이후 어떻게 바뀌었는가? | 따라서 과학기술 쪽에서는 보수 진보 등 다양한 세력들의 대립과 갈등 없이 과학기술의 발전을 전폭적으로 지지하는 사회적 합의를 이뤄왔다. 이런 사회적 합의는 우리 경제가 아직 과학기술에 크게 의존하지 않고 정치 민주화가 전혀 이루어지지 않았던 시대에는 별다른 도전에 직면하지 않았지만, 1990년대 이후 한국의 경제가 기술 경쟁력을 핵심적 바탕으로 하는 발전단계에 도달하고 그동안 산업화 과정에서 누적되었던 환경문제가 민주화의 진전으로 시민사회에서 중요한 이슈로 제기되면서, 이러한 과학기술에 대한 사회적 합의도 도전받게 되었다(Kim, H.-S. |
Blaikei, P., 1985, The Political Economy of Soil Erosion in Developing Countries, Longman, London.
Blaikei, P. and Brookfeild, H., 1987, Land Degradation and Society, Methuen, New York and London.
Bloor, D., 1996, Idealism and the sociology of scientific knowledge, Social Studies of Science, 26, 839-856.
Braun, B., 2006, Towards a new earth and a new humanity: Nature, ontology, politics, in Harvey, D. (ed.), A Critical Reader, Blackwell, Oxford, 191-222.
Bridge, G., McManus, P., and Marsden, T., 2003, The next new thing? Biotechnology and its discontents, Geoforum, 34(2), 165-174.
Callon, M., 1989, La Science et Ses Reseaux: Genese et Circulation des Faits Scientifiques, La Decouverte, Paris [Callon, M.(translation), 1989, Science and its networks: Genesis and circulation of scientific facts, The Discovery, Paris].
Castree, N., 1995, The nature of produced nature: Materiality and knowledge construction in Marxism, Antipode, 27(1), 12-48.
Castree, N., 2002, False antitheses? Marxism, nature and Actor-Networks, Antipode, 34(1), 111-146.
Cockburn, A. and Ridgeway, J., 1979, Political Ecology, New York Times Book Company, NY.
Collins, H., 1981, Stages in the empirical program of relativism, Social Studies of Science, 11, 3-10.
ETC group, 1998, Seed industry consolidation: Who owns whom? ETC group. http://www. etcgroup.org
Goodman, M., 2001, Ontology matters: The relational materiality of nature and agro-food studies, Sociologia Ruralis, 41, 182-200.
Haraway, D. J., 1997, Modest_Witness@Second_ Millennium.FemaleMan_ Meets_OncoMouse, Routledge, New York.
Harvey, D., 1996, Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference, Blackwell, Cambridge.
Hong, S., 2005, A study into the interactions and interfaces between the history of science and STS, The Journal of the Korean History of Science Society, 27(2), 131-153 (in Korean).
Kang, Y. G., Kim, B. S., and Han, J. G., 2006, Silence and Enthusiasm: The Seven Years' Diary of Hwang Scandal, Humanitas Publishing, Seoul (강양구.김병수.한재각, 2006, 침묵과 열광: 황우석 사태 7년의 기록, 후마니타스, 서울).
Kim, H.-S., 2006a, Two ways of technoscience development, The Hankyoreh Newspaper (in Korean).
Kim, H.-S., 2006b, Key Issues in Sociology of Science, Moonji Publishing, Seoul (김환석, 2006, 과학사 회학의 쟁점들, 문학과지성사, 서울).
Kim, H.-S., 2006c, The causes and social meanings of Hwang scandal, Economy and Society, 71, 237- 255 (in Korean).
Kim, H.-S., 2009, Two cultures, science studies, and relational ontology, Culture/Science, 57, 40-60 (in Korean).
Kim, J.-Y., 2006, Science as multiple social phenomena and Hwang woo Suk as a techno-scientific alliance, Critical Review of History, 74, 82-113 (in Korean).
Kim, K. M., 1994, What is sociology of scientific knowledge?, Scientific Thought, 10, 132-154 (in Korean).
Kim, K. M., 2004, Scientific Knowledge and Social Theory, Hangilsa Publishing, Seoul (김경만, 2004, 과학지식과 사회이론, 한길사, 서울).
Kim, S.-J., 2006, The production of eco-environmental space and its hybridity: The Case of Cheonggyecheon, Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 9(2), 113-124 (in Korean).
Kloppenburg, J., 2004, First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology, 2nd Edition, The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
Kuhn, T., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Kwon, J.-W., 2005, Lecture Note for Geogrpahical Thoughts, Hanul, Seoul (권정화, 2005, 지리사상사 강의노트, 한울아카데미, 서울).
Latour, B., 1993, We Have Never Been Modern, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S., 1979, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Latour, B., 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Latour, B., 1988, The Pasteurization of France, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Latour, B., 1999, Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London.
Lee, Y. H., 2002, The politics of technology control: The case of biotechnology, Economy and Society, 55, 194-218 (in Korean).
Marsh, G. P., 1898, The Earth as Modified by Human Action, Charles Scribner's Sons, NY.
Martin, G. J. and James, E. W., 1972, All Possible Worlds: A History of Geographical Idea, Odyssey Press.
Peet, R. and Watts, M., 1996, Liberation ecology: Development, sustainability, and environment in an age of market triumphalism, in Peet, R. and Watts, M. (eds.), Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movement, Routledge, New York and London, 1-45.
Pickering, A., 1992, From science as knowledge to science as practice, in Pickering, A. (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1-28.
Porter, P., 1999, Cultural ecology, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, London.
Robbins, P., 2004, Political Ecology: A Criticial Introduction, Blackwell Publishing, Malden.
Schmidt, A., 1971, The Concept of Nature in Marx, NLB, London.
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S., 1986, Leviathan and the Air- Pump, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Smith, N., 1996, The production of nature, in Robertson, G., Mash, M., and Tickneretal, L. (eds.), Futurenatural, Routledge, London and New York, 35-54.
Smith, N., 1998, Nature at the Millenium: Production and re-enchantment, in Braun, B. and Castree, N. (eds.), Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium, Routledge, London & New York, 271-285.
Suppe, F., 1974, The Structure of Scientific Theories, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Swyngedouw, E., 1999, Modernity and hybridity: Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890-1930, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3), 443-465.
The Ministry of Science and Technology, 2004, National R&D Program, The Ministry of Science and Technology, Seoul (과학기술부, 2004, 국가 R&D 프로그램 계획, 과학기술부).
Turner, B. L. II, 1999, Nature-Society in Geography, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, London.
Watt, M., 1983, Silent Violence: Food, Famine and Peasantry in Northern Nigeria, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Whatmore, S., 2002, Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces, Sage Publications, London.
Wolf, E., 1972, Ownership and political ecology, Anthropological Quarterly, 45, 201-205.
Yoon, J. R., 1994, 'New' sociology of science: Possibility and limit of sociology of scientific knowledge, Socience and Philosoy, 5, Tongnamoo (in Korean).
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.