최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국지구과학회지 = Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, v.32 no.1, 2011년, pp.124 - 139
이선경 (서울대학교 BK21 미래사회 과학교육연구사업단) , 신명경 (경인교육대학교 과학교육과) , 이규호 (한국지질자원연구원) , 최취임 (서울대학교 BK21 미래사회 과학교육연구사업단) , 백두성 (서대문자연사 박물관) , 정광훈 (국립과천과학관) , 유만선 (국립과천과학관) , 김선자 (국립과천과학관) , 손성근 (국립과천과학관) , 최현숙 (국립과천과학관) , 이강환 (국립과천과학관) , 이정구 (국립과천과학관)
This study was to explore epistemological features presented in texts of exhibit panels in the science museum located in Gyeonggi Province. Out-of-school or daily experiences allow more properly and potentially students to form informative science image, because the understandings of scientific epis...
김미경, 2008, 개방적 참탐구 활동에서 과학고등학교 학생들의 과학에 대한 인식론적 이해. 서울대학교 박사학위논문, 191 p.
김미경, 김희백, 2007, 학생들이 제시한 질문의 유형 분석을 통한 개방적 참탐구 활동의 인지적 추론 측면의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 27, 930-943.
김미경, 김희백, 2008, 개방적 참탐구 활동에서 학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 이해에 영향을 미치는 요인 탐색. 한국과학교육학회지, 28, 565-578.
박병기, 채선영, 2006, 사적 인식론의 재개념화 및 그 타당성 검토. 교육심리연구, 20, 829-854.
박은이, 홍훈기, 2010, 과학 영재를 대상으로 한 명시적 과학의 본성 프로그램의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 30, 249-260.
이선경, 유은정, 최종림, 김찬종, 한혜진, 신명경, 2010, 과학 및 과학 교수학습에 대한 과학교사의 인식론적 이해의 탐색. 한국과학교육학회지, 30, 218-233.
최준환, 남정희, 고문숙, 고미례, 2009, 과학사를 활용한 과학수업 적용을 통한 중학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 이해의 발달. 한국과학교육학회지, 29, 221-239.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., and Lederman, N.G., 1998, The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
Bell, R. and Lederman, N.G., 1996, Undergraduates’ understandings of the nature of science: Is any progress being made? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
Chinn, C.A. and Malhotra, B.A., 2002, Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218.
Havdala, R. and Ashkenazi, G., 2007, Coordination of theory and evidence: Effect of epistemological theories on students’ laboratory practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1134-1159.
Hofer, B.K., 2000, Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378-405.
Khishfe, R. and Abd-El-Khalick, F., 2002, The influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551-578.
Knorr Cetina, K., 1990, Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Havard University Press, USA, 299 p.
Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., and Ostman, L., 2006, Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers’ epistemological moves and students’ practical epistemology. Science Education, 90, 148-163.
Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., andSchwartz, R.S., 2002, Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS): Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521.
Long, M. and Steinke, J., 1996, The Thrill of Everyday Science: Images of Science and Scientist on Children’s Educational Science Programmes in the United States. Public Understanding of Science, 5, 101-119.
McComas, W.F., Clough, M.P., and Almazroa, H., 1998, The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In McComas, W. (ed.), The nature of science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Los Angeles, USA, 3-39.
McManus, P.M., 1989, Oh, Yes, They Do: How Museum Visitors Read Labels and Interact with Exihibi Texts. Curator: The Museum Journal, 32, 174-189.
National Research Council, 1996, National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 272 p.
Park, J., 2008, Discussion for linking the nature of science (NOS) with scientific inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28, 749-758.
Ramey-Gassert, L., Walberg, H.J.,III., and Walberg, H.J., 1994, Re-examining connections: Museums as science learning environments. Science Education, 78, 345-363.
Roth, W.-M., 1995, Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 297 p.
Ryder, J. and Leach, J., 1999, University science students’ experiences of investigative project work and their images of science. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 945-956.
Ryder, J., Leach, J., and Driver, R., 1999, Undergraduate science students’ images of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 201-219.
Sandoval, W.A., 2005, Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634-656.
Schwartz, R.S., Lederman, N.G., and Crawford, B.A., 2004, Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610-645.
Steinke, J., 2004, Science in cyberspace: Science and engineering web sites for girls. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 7-74.
Tsai, C.-C. and Liu, S.-Y., 2005, Developing a multidimensional instrument for assessing students’ epistemological views toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1621-1638.
Van Eijck, M., Hsu, P.-L., and Roth, W.-M., 2009, Translations of scientific practice to “students’ images of science”. Science Education, 93, 611-634.
Wellington, J., 1998, Practical work in science. In Wellington, J. (ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? Routledge, London, 3-15.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.