최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기대한산업공학회지 = Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, v.39 no.4, 2013년, pp.298 - 312
배재호 (혜천대학교 물류유통경영과)
This paper compares efficiency results and performance targets for academic departments in a local private college using DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis). Because of an aging society, a smaller school-age population entering colleges, and enhanced accreditation standards by the government, colleges a...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
가중평균에 의한 성과측정 방법의 장단점은? | 일반적으로 성과측정에 가장 많이 사용되는 방법은 평가 항목의 점수를 각 항목에 부여된 가중치로 곱하는 가중평균 방식이라고 할 수 있다(Bae, 2009). 가중평균에 의한 성과측정 방법은 이해하기 쉽고 계산이 간단하다는 장점이 있지만 가중치 체계를 구축하기 어렵고 성과 점수가 가중치에 민감할 수 있다는 약점을 가지게 된다(Bae, 2009; Johnes, 1987, 1990). 가중평균 방식과 비견되는 대부분의 계량모형들은 평가지표들 사이의 주관적 가중치를 설정할 필요가 없다는 장점이 있는 반면, 일정한 함수를 가정해야 하는 제약이 존재하게 된다. | |
일반적으로 성과측정에 가장 많이 사용되는 방법은 | 일반적으로 성과측정에 가장 많이 사용되는 방법은 평가 항목의 점수를 각 항목에 부여된 가중치로 곱하는 가중평균 방식이라고 할 수 있다(Bae, 2009). 가중평균에 의한 성과측정 방법은 이해하기 쉽고 계산이 간단하다는 장점이 있지만 가중치 체계를 구축하기 어렵고 성과 점수가 가중치에 민감할 수 있다는 약점을 가지게 된다(Bae, 2009; Johnes, 1987, 1990). | |
대학과 같은 공공기관의 경우 성과를 구성하는 투입요소와 산출요소의 함수가 알려져 있지 않기 때문에, 주관적인 가중치 부여 방식이나 함수를 가정하는 계량모형 기반의 성과측정은 적절하지 못한다고 본 이유는? | 가중평균에 의한 성과측정 방법은 이해하기 쉽고 계산이 간단하다는 장점이 있지만 가중치 체계를 구축하기 어렵고 성과 점수가 가중치에 민감할 수 있다는 약점을 가지게 된다(Bae, 2009; Johnes, 1987, 1990). 가중평균 방식과 비견되는 대부분의 계량모형들은 평가지표들 사이의 주관적 가중치를 설정할 필요가 없다는 장점이 있는 반면, 일정한 함수를 가정해야 하는 제약이 존재하게 된다. 따라서 대학과 같은 공공기관의 경우 성과를 구성하는 투입요소와 산출요소의 함수가 알려져 있지 않기 때문에, 주관적인 가중치 부여 방식이나 함수를 가정하는 계량모형 기반의 성과측정은 적절하지 못하다. |
Abbott, M. and Doucouliagos, C. (2003), The efficiency of Australian universities : a data envelopment analysis, Economics of Education Review, 22(1), 89-97.
Agha, S. R., Kuhail, I., Nabi, N. A., Salem, M., and Ghanim, A. (2011), Assessment of academic departments efficiency using data envelopment analysis, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(2).
Ahn, T. S. et al. (1989), DEA and ratio efficiency analyses for public institutions of higher learning in texas, Greenwich, CT. : JAI Press.
Ahn, T. S., Cho, G.-J., and Park, T.-J. (1998), Efficiency Pattern and Its Inflence Factors in Korean University, Accounting Research, 23(2), 183-216.
Andersen, P. and Petersen, N. C. (1993), A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science, 39(10), 1261-1264.
Athanassopoulos, A. D. and Shale, E. (1997), Assessing the Comparative Efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in the UK by the Means of Data Envelopment Analysis, Education Economics, 5(2), 117-34.
Avkiran, N. K. (2001), Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian Universities through data envelopment analysis, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57-80.
Bae, J. H. (2009), A CEM Project Methodology and Vector-weighted Integration Model of KPIs, PhD. Dissertation, Suwon, S. Korea : Ajou University.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. (1984), Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment, Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Bogetoft, P. and Otto, L. (2010), Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. Springer.
Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R. G., and Thanassoulis, E. (1991), Applied data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 52(1), 1-15.
Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. (1985), Preface to topics in data envelopment analysis, Annals of Operations Research, 2(1), 59-94.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-44.
Choi, H. and Sohn, S. Y. (1999), Efficiency Comparision via DEA for Academic Departments in College of Engineering, Research of Engineering Education, 2(1), 29-38.
Choi, T. S., Kim, S. H., and Kim, H. K. (1999), Use of DEA for Evaluating Efficiency of Nonprofit Organizations : Evaluation of Efficiency for University Research, CNU Journal of Management and Economics, 11, 37-58.
Coelli, T. J. (1996), A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1 : A Data Envelopment Analysis(Computer) Program, Center for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis(CEPA) Working Papers, Retrieved(http://www.une.edu.au/econometrics/cepawp.htm).
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone, K. (2006), Data Envelopment Analysis : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-solver Software, 2nd ed. Boston : Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Johnes, G. (1987), Research Performance Indications in the University Sector, Higher Education Quarterly, 42(1), 54-71.
Johnes, G. (1990), Measures of Research Output : University Departments of Economics in the UK, 1984-1988, The Economic Journal, 100(401), 556-560.
Johnes, J. (1996), Performance assessment in higher education in Britain, European Journal of Operational Research, 89(1), 18-33.
KAVE (2012), Accreditation Handbook. edited by J. H. Ahn. Korean Council for University College Education, Retrieved(http://www.kave.or.kr/board/index.php?IdNo 5&keyword &keyfield &Category &in Type &page 0&SeqNo 128&tag read).
Kim, I. J., Lee, D. K., and Song, K. C. (2000), A Study of Measuring Effectivenss on Finacial Support for University : Focused on Data Envelopment Analysis, Seoul : Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development.
Kim, K. W. and Choi, H. J. (2005), A Study of Considerations in Applying DEA Method : Focused on Local Administration, Local Administration Research, 19(3), 213-424.
Kim, K. W., Lee, H. Y., and Park, H.-Y. (2004), Measuring Relative Efficiency of Local Government's Field Administration, Eup and Myun, by use of DEA/AHP Model, Local Government Research, 8(4), 299-317.
Korean Council for University College Education (2011), Education Indices of University College, 2010, edited by Yoon, Y. S., Lee, S. J., Yoon, C. K., Korean Council for University Colldege Education.
Kwak, Y. J. (1993), Trend Analysis of Efficiency Univeristy Library Using DEA, CNU Journal of Management and Economics, 9(1), 183-206.
Kwon, Y. H., Kim, S. Y., and Lee, N. J. (2010), A study on the Measurement of Efficiency in University's Operation Using DEA Model : Focused on the Comparative Method of the University in the Capital and the Local Area, Journal of Service Management, 11(1), 179-208.
Lee, H. B. and Lee, S. H. (2001), An Exploratory Study for the Evaluation of University Efficiency through Data Envelopment Analysis, Industry Economics Research, 14(2), 261-277.
Lee, S. Y. (2009), Management Efficiency Analysis of Private University Using DEA, Educational Administration Research, 27(2).
Lim, S. (2009), A Method for Selection of Input Output Factors in DEA, IE Interfaces, 22(1), 44-55.
Mo, S. W. (2006), An Efficiency Evaluation of Junior Colleges Using DEA Model, Industry Economics Research, 19(4), 1581-1595.
Na, M. J. and Kim, M. H. (2005), International Comparison of Efficiency for University Education using DEA, Educational Finance and Economy Research, 14(2).
R Core Team (2012), R : A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria : R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Retrieved(http://www.R-project.org/).
Sinuany-Stern, Z., Mehrez, A., and Barboy, A. (1994), Academic departments efficiency via DEA, Computers and Operations Research, 21(5), 543-556.
Tomkins, C. and Green, R. (1988), An Experiment in the Use of Data Envelopment Analysis for Evaluating the Efficiency of UK University Departments of Accounting, Higher Education Quarterly, 4(2), 147-64.
Wilson, P. W. (2010), FEAR : Frontier Efficiency Analysis with R., R package version 1.15.
Yoo, K. R. (2007), Formulation and Applicatioin of Envelopment Model in Data Envelopment Analysis for Performance Evaluation by the Theory of Duality, Journal of the Korea Association for Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 17(4), 57-86.
Youn, J. W. and Park, K. (2006), The Efficiency Analysis of Colleges Using DEA : Focused on the Case of University 'A', Productivity Review, 20(4), 19-39.
Yun, K. J. (2003), Using DEA to Measure the Public Sector Efficiency : A Review and Proposal, Research of Governmental Studies, 9(2), 7-31.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.