본 연구는 급격히 변화하는 도서관 환경 속에서 이루어지고 있는 주제 접근 방식의 다양성을 살펴보고 국립중앙도서관의 주제명표목에 관한 분석과 평가를 통해 주제 접근의 미래에 관해 제시하였다. 먼저 주제 접근의 현황과 문제점을 살펴보고 대표적인 주제명 표목인 미의회도서관 주제명표목의 장점과 단점을 바탕으로 주제명 표목의 검색 효율성을 증진하는 방법에 관해 다루었다. 소셜북마킹, 폭소노미, 태깅, 패싯 적용, 저자부여 키워드, 시소러스, 분류표, 자동완성기능 부여로 주제 접근성을 높일 수 있는 방법으로 제안하였고 국립중앙도서관의 주제명 표목의 현황과 향후 주제 접근 활용성을 높이기 위한 방안을 제시하였다.
본 연구는 급격히 변화하는 도서관 환경 속에서 이루어지고 있는 주제 접근 방식의 다양성을 살펴보고 국립중앙도서관의 주제명표목에 관한 분석과 평가를 통해 주제 접근의 미래에 관해 제시하였다. 먼저 주제 접근의 현황과 문제점을 살펴보고 대표적인 주제명 표목인 미의회도서관 주제명표목의 장점과 단점을 바탕으로 주제명 표목의 검색 효율성을 증진하는 방법에 관해 다루었다. 소셜북마킹, 폭소노미, 태깅, 패싯 적용, 저자부여 키워드, 시소러스, 분류표, 자동완성기능 부여로 주제 접근성을 높일 수 있는 방법으로 제안하였고 국립중앙도서관의 주제명 표목의 현황과 향후 주제 접근 활용성을 높이기 위한 방안을 제시하였다.
The purposes of this study are to examine the various methods of subject access in the rapidly changing environment and to suggest the future of subject access in National Library of Korea (NLK). First of all, current status and problems of Library of Congress Subject Headings List as an representat...
The purposes of this study are to examine the various methods of subject access in the rapidly changing environment and to suggest the future of subject access in National Library of Korea (NLK). First of all, current status and problems of Library of Congress Subject Headings List as an representative subject headings in the world and the ways of improving effectiveness of subject retrieval were dealt with. As the ways of improving subject access, social bookmarking, folksonomy, tagging, facet applications, automatic assignment of keyword, thesauri, classification system, and auto-assigned search box were suggested. Finally, current status of NLK subject headings and the ways of improving for utilization of the subject headings as subject access were provided.
The purposes of this study are to examine the various methods of subject access in the rapidly changing environment and to suggest the future of subject access in National Library of Korea (NLK). First of all, current status and problems of Library of Congress Subject Headings List as an representative subject headings in the world and the ways of improving effectiveness of subject retrieval were dealt with. As the ways of improving subject access, social bookmarking, folksonomy, tagging, facet applications, automatic assignment of keyword, thesauri, classification system, and auto-assigned search box were suggested. Finally, current status of NLK subject headings and the ways of improving for utilization of the subject headings as subject access were provided.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
제안 방법
And then one of the method, subject headings were selected and the National Library of Korea Subject Headings (NLKSH) were focused and analyzed. Finally, needs of subject headings of National Library of Korea (NLK) were suggested for subject access for the future.
The purposes of this study were to find various ways of subject access in the 21st century and to concentrate one of the ways - subject headings as one of the best strategies for subject searching. To accomplish those purposes, literature review on various methods of subject access and the comparison among them were carried.
Survey questionnaires by 32 librarians in Biblio-graphical Division were carried to find problems of using NLKSH in August 22nd, 2013. The questionnaires were as follows: general information (age, sex, major duties, and professional experiences), assigning of NLKSH, using of NLKSH system, usefulness of NLKSH manuals and the quality control of NLKSH.
성능/효과
Fourth, simple but core relationships among subject headings should be controlled well after deleting never used relationships in NLKSH. Ninety seven possible relationship exist to input, but most relationships were RT, BT, NT, KEN, ENG, KDC, DDC, USE, and UF.
3%). Their inconvenience of the NLKSH system were overall process of using system (40.6%), retrieval methods and conditions for subject headings (25%), and the final results of searching subject headings (9.4%). Most librarians thought the manual of NLKSH was better than nothing (31.
참고문헌 (21)
ALCTS/SAC/Subcommittee. 1999. "Subject Data in the Metadata Record: Recommendations and Rationale" A Report from the ALCTS/CCS/SAC/Subcommittee on Metadata and Subject Analysis. July 1999. [cited 2014.10.10]. .
Anderson, James and Melissa Hoffmann. 2006. "A Fully Faceted Syntax for Library of Congress Subject Headings." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 43(1): 7-38.
Beall, Jeffrey. 2007. "Search Fatigue." American Libraries, 38(3): 46-50.
Cataloging Policy and Support Office. 2007. LCSH: Pre vs Post Coordination and Related Issues. [cited 2014.10.10]. .
Chan, L. M. 2009. "Social Bookmarking and Subject Indexing." Paper Presented at the Satellite Pre-conference, IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, Florence, Italy. [cited 2014.10.10]. .
Chan, Lois Mai and Edward T. O'Neil. 2010. FAST: Faceted Application of Subject Terminology. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Engelson, Leslie. 2013. "Correlations between Title Keywords and LCSH Terms and Their Implication for Fast-Track Cataloging." Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 51: 697-727.
Gorman, Michael. 2004. "Authority Control in the Context of Bibliographic Control in the Electronic Environment." Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 38(2004): 11-22.
Gross, Tina and Arlene G. Taylor. 2005. "What Have We Got to Lose?: The Effect of Controlled Vocabulary on Keyword Searching Results." College & Research Libraries, 66(3): 212-230.
Hearst, M. and E. Stoica. 2009. NLP Support for Faceted Navigation in Scholarly Collections. [cited 2014.10.10]. .
Papadakis, L., K. Konstantinos, R. Marvopodi, and M. Stefanidakis. 2009. "Subject-based Information Retrieval within Digital Libraries Employing LCSHs." D-Lib Magazine, 15(9/10). [cited 2014.10.10]. .
Quintarelli, Emanuele. 2005. "Folksonomies: Power to the People." Paper Presented at the ISKO UniMIB Meeting, Milan, Italy, June 24. [cited 2014.10.10]. .
Rosenfeld, L. 2005. Folksonomies?: How about metadata ecologies? [cited 2014.10.10]. .
Taylor, Arlene G. and Daniel N. Joudrey. 2009. The Organization of Information (3rd ed). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Trant, J. 2009. "Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework." Journal of Digital Information, 10(1): 1-44.
Voss, Jakob. 2007. "Tagging, Folksonomy & Co - Renaissance of Manual Indexing?" In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium for Information Science. Cologne, Germany. May 30-June 1, 2007. [cited 2014.10.10]. .
Yi, Kwan and Lois Mai Chan. 2010. "Revising the Syntactical and Structural Analysis of Library of Congress Subject Headings for the Digital Environment." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(4): 677-687.
백지원, 정연경. 2014. 국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표 검색 시스템 개선 방안에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(1): 31-51.(Baek, Jiwon and Yeon-Kyoung Chung. 2014. "A Study on Improving Access & Retrieval System of the National Library of Korea Subject Headings." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(1): 31-51.)
최윤경, 정연경. 2014. 국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표의 고품질화 방안에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 48(1): 75-95.(Choi, Yoon Kyung and Yeon-Kyoung Chung. 2014. "A Study on Improvements for High Quality in National Library of Korea Subject Headings List." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48(1): 75-95.)
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.