[논문]중학교 과학 소화순환호흡배설 단원 수업 후 학생들의 시스템적 사고와 교사의 반성적 사고 분석

김동렬

doi:10.13000/jfmse.2014.26.2.401

[국내논문] 중학교 과학 소화순환호흡배설 단원 수업 후 학생들의 시스템적 사고와 교사의 반성적 사고 분석
An Analysis of Students' Systemic Thinking and Teachers' Reflective Thinking after the Lesson of Digestion, Circulation, Respiration and Excretion of Middle School Science 원문보기

水産海洋敎育硏究 = Journal of fisheries and marine sciences education, v.26 no.2 = no.68, 2014년, pp.401 - 420

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

This study aims to analyze middle school students' systemic thinking to express organic relations between different organ systems about the movement of food and air and teachers' reflective thinking about science teaching through their reflective journals after the lesson of digestion, circulation, respiration and excretion. Firstly, when investigating the moving route of hamburger eaten inside the body, students expressed the names, locations and forms of organs in the digestive system more than those in the circulatory system or the excretory system. When investigating the moving route of a painkiller taken inside the body, students seemed to have more difficulty in expressing the related organ systems than when investigating the moving route of other things, and they mostly drew pictures of organs in the digestive system as done for the moving route of hamburger. However, when investigating the moving route of water drunk inside the body, students mostly described organs in the digestive system but drew more pictures of organs in the excretory system, than when investigating the moving route of other things. When investigating the moving route of air inhaled inside the body, students mostly drew pictures of organs in the respiratory system, but the rate of their drawing pictures of circulatory organs was low. Secondly, this study analyzed one of the teachers' reflective journals, named Mr. Park. According to his journal, students showed different levels of understanding of organ names, depending on their degrees of familiarity with each organ, and in regard to the locations of organs, science teachers mostly aim to achieve learning objectives so much that they often forget to instruct the locations of organs in fact. As for the forms of organs, science teachers mostly spend so much time explaining the functions of organs that they often forget to describe the exact form of each organ.

주제어

질의응답

핵심어	질문	논문에서 추출한 답변
	학생들이 과학 교과과정을 통해 얻고자 하는 것은 무엇인가?	과학 교과과정은 관찰하기, 분류하기, 측정하기, 가설설정, 그리고 실험하기와 같은 학생들의 과학탐구기능들을 향상시키는데 주로 목표를 두고 있으며 과학에 대한 긍정적 태도와 함께 과학적 소양을 기르는데 중점을 두고 있다(Ormanci & Oren, 2011). 이런 맥락에서 과학 교과과정을 통해 학생들은 자신이 획득한 지식을 사용하여 직면한 문제를 해결하고 비판적으로 생각하고, 과학 현상을 탐구하고 자신의 환경을 이해하고자 한다. Gunes and Gunes(2005)에 의하면 한 개인이 자기 자신과 자신의 환경을 이해하기 위해서는 모든 생물과 생물들의 환경을 통합적으로 살펴보는 생물학적 주제들에 관하여 배울 필요가 있다.
	과학 교과과정의 주요 목표는 무엇인가?	과학 교과과정은 관찰하기, 분류하기, 측정하기, 가설설정, 그리고 실험하기와 같은 학생들의 과학탐구기능들을 향상시키는데 주로 목표를 두고 있으며 과학에 대한 긍정적 태도와 함께 과학적 소양을 기르는데 중점을 두고 있다(Ormanci & Oren, 2011). 이런 맥락에서 과학 교과과정을 통해 학생들은 자신이 획득한 지식을 사용하여 직면한 문제를 해결하고 비판적으로 생각하고, 과학 현상을 탐구하고 자신의 환경을 이해하고자 한다.
	‘우리 몸의 구조’ 단원이 자기 자신에 대해 배우는데 도움을 주는 핵심 생물학 주제인 이유는 무엇인가?	특히, ‘우리 몸의 구조’ 단원은 개인들이 자기 자신에 대해 배우는데 도움을 주는 핵심적인 생물학주제들 중의 하나이다. Demirci-Guler(2008)는 과학 교과과정 중 가장 중요한 단원중 하나는 인간의 삶과 밀접한 관련이 있는 우리 몸의 구조 단원이며 교사들과 학생들이 과학교육과정의 한 단원으로서 우리 몸 안의 계통들에 관한 지식을 가지는 것은 중요하다고 보았다.

참고문헌 (36)

Ahn, Bu-Geum(2002). A study of the reflective thinking through teacher-training program for early childhood teachers' science education, based on the constructivism, The Journal of Korea Early Childhood Education, 9(2), 87-114.
Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O. & Orion, N.(2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518-560.

상세보기
Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O. & Orpaz, T.(2010). The 'Life at the poles' study unit: Developing junior high school students' ability to recognize the relations between earth systems, Research in Science Education, 40(4), 525-549.

상세보기
Boersma, K..Waarlo, A. J. & Klaassen, K.(2011). The feasibility of systems thinking in biology education, Journal of Biological Education, 45(4), 190-197.

상세보기
Campbell, N. A. & Reece, J. B.(2003). Biology. San Francisco, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Carvalho, G. S. & Clement P.(2007). Relationships between Digestive, Circulatory and Urinary Systems in Portuguese Primary Textbooks, Science Education International, 18(1), 15-24.
Carvalho, G. S..Silva, R..Lima, N..Coquet, E. & Clement, P.(2004). Portuguese primary school children's conceptions about digestion: identification of learning obstacles, International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1111-1130.

상세보기
Cerrah-Ozsevgec, L.(2007). What do Turkish students at different ages know about their internal body parts both visually and verbally?, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 31-44.
Cha, Jeong-Ho..Choi, Won-Soo. & Noh, Tae-Hee. (2009). Analysis of pre-service science teachers' web-based reflective journals written during teaching practicum, Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 133-141.
Clement, P.(2003). Situated conceptions and obstacles: the example of digestion and excretion, In D. Psillos.P. Kariotoglou.V. Tselfes.E. Hatzikraniotis G..Fasspooupoulos, & M. Kallery (Eds.) Science education research in a knowledge-based society, (89-98). Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic.
Demirci-Guler, M. P.(2008). The opinion of preservice teachers' what the most important subject is which should be learned in science and technology lessons, Ahi Evran University Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 9(1), 113-121.
Dewey, J.(1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinkimg to the Sanchez, M, G.(1999). Science teachers views and practices in planning for teaching Osborne, J..Black, P..Wadsworth, P. and Meadows, J.(1994). The Earth in Space (Primary SPACE Project Research Report), Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Enochson, P. G. & Redfors, A.(2012). Students' ideas about the human body and their ability to transfer knowledge between related scenarios, European Journal of Health and Biology Education, 1(1&2), 3-29.
Gunes, M. H. & Gunes, T.(2005). Difficulties and their reasons in learning biology concepts in primary school students, Gazi University Kirsehir Faculty of Education, 6(2), 169-175.
Hogan, K.(2000). Assessing students' systems reasoning in ecology, Journal of Biological Education, 35(1), 22-28.

상세보기
Kim, Dong-Ryeul(2011). Effects of storytelling-based science class on middle school students' understanding of the structures and functions of a human body, Biology Education, 39(1), 18-30.
Knippels, M. C.(2002). Coping with the abstract and complex nature of genetics in biology education. The yo-yo learning and teaching strategy. Utrecht, The Netherlands: CD- $\beta$ Press.
Korkmaz, H.(2004). Alternative assessment approaches in science and technology education, Ankara: Yeryuzu Publishing.
Kwon, Yong-Ju.Kim, Won-Jeong.Lee, Hyon-Yong.Byun, Jung-Ho & Lee, Il-Sun(2011). Analysis of biology teachers' systems thinking about ecosystem, Biology Education, 39(4), 529-543.
Lee, Hyo-Nyong.Kwon, Yong-Ju.Oh, Hee-Jin & Lee, Hyun-Dong(2011). Development and application of the educational program to increase high school students' systems thinking skills -focus on global warming-, Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 32(7), 784-797.

원문보기 상세보기
Martinez-Losada, C. & Garrido, M.(2011). What do Children Aged Four to Seven Know about the Digestive System and the Respiratory System of the Human Being and of Other Animals?, International Journal of Science Education, 33(15), 2095-2122.

상세보기
Mathai S. & Ramadas J.(2009). Visuals and Visualisation of Human Body Systems, International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 439-458.

상세보기
MOEST(Ministry of Education, Science and Technology) (2008). Science curriculum for Middle school. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
MOEST(Ministry of Education, Science and Technology)(2011). Science curriculum. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Moon, Byoung-Chan.Jeong, Jin-Woo.Kyung, Jai-Bok.Koh, Yeong-Koo.Youn, Seok-Tai.Kim, Hai-Gyoung & Oh, Kang-Ho(2004). Related conceptions to earth system and applying of systems thinking about carbon cycle of the preservice teachers, Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 28(8), 684-696.
Ormanci, U. & Oren, F. S.(2011). An Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers' Drawings about the Digestive System in terms of Their Gender, Grade Levels, and Opinions about the Method and Subject, International Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), 1-22.
Osborne, J..Black, P..Wadsworth, P. & Meadows, J.(1994). The Earth in Space (Primary SPACE Project Research Report), Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Park. S.Kim, J.Chung, D. Shin, H.Jung, J.Hur, S.Hong, D.Kim, C.Im, Y.Lee, H.Yoon, S.Lee, E.Chun, S.Choi, B.Kim, M.& Oh, S.(2012). Middle school science 2, Seoul: Kyohaksa
Riess, W. & Mischo, C.(2010). Promoting Systems Thinking through Biology Lessons, International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 705-725.

상세보기
Reiss, M. J. & Tunnicliffe, S. D.(2001). Students' understandings of human organs and organ systems, Research in Science Education, 31(3), 383-399.

상세보기
Reiss, M. J..Tunnicliffe, S. D..Moller Andersen, A. M..Bartoszeck, A..Carvalho, G. S..Chen, S.-Y..Jarman, R..Jonsson, S..Manokore, V..Marchenko, N..Mulemwa, J..Novikova, T..Otuka, J..Teppa, S. & Van Rooy, W.(2002). An international study of young people's drawings of what is inside themselves, Journal of Biological Education, 36(2), 58-64.

상세보기
Rowlands, M.(2004). What do children think happens to the food they eat?. Journal of Biological Education, 38(4), 167-171.

상세보기
Schoborn, K. J. & Boeholtz, S.(2009). Knowledge transfer in biology and translation across external representations: Experts views and challenges for learning, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 931-955.

상세보기
Surbeck, E.(1991). Assessing Reflective Responses in Journals, Educational Leadership, 48(6), 25-28.
Teixeira, F. M.(2000). What happens to the food we eat? Children's conceptions of the structure and function of the digestive system, International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 507-520.

상세보기
Tunnicliffe, S. D.(2004). Where does the drink go?. Primary Science Review, 85(1), 8-10.

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

질의응답

참고문헌 (36)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

질의응답

참고문헌 (36)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

김동렬 (24)

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트