최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.34 no.2, 2014년, pp.79 - 92
The purpose of this study is to develop an inquiry-based argumentation task for use in science teachers' professional development by providing them with the substantial experience of argumentation. To do so, the study has developed an argumentation task by utilizing the experiment on the Charles' La...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
과학적 탐구는? | 과학적 탐구는 과학자가 수행하는 활동의 핵심으로서 과학교육에서 오랫동안 중요한 목표로 강조되어 왔다. 탐구에는 단순한 조작적 기능 뿐 아니라, 사고하고 지식을 합의하여 구성하는 과정이 모두 포함된다(NRC, 2000). | |
논변을 활용한 수업은 무엇으로 알려져 있는가? | 한편 전통적인 수업과 달리 논변을 활용한 수업에서는 교사가 조력자, 정교자, 멘토의 역할을 수행할 때 학습자의 논변 역량이 향상되는 것으로 알려져 있다(Driver et al., 2000; Park, 2010). | |
과학 수업에서 논변활동이 확산되기 위해서는 논변과 논변 수업에 대한 교사 전문성 신장을 위한 연수 프로그램이 개발될 필요가 있다고 본 이유는? | , 2009; Park, 2008). 그러나 학생들의 오개념에 대한 교사들의 우려가 수업을 구성하는데 어려움을 일으키고, 적합한 주제와 수업 구성 방법의 부족 등을 이유로 교사들은 과학적 탐구 활동을 기반으로 논변을 구성하기 보다는 생활 속 주제를 이용하여 논변 활동을 수업에 활용하고 있는 것으로 나타났다(Lee et al., 2009). |
Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Thomas, L., Seibert, D., & Tron, M. (2003). Online process scaffolding and students' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. A paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Bransky, J., Hadass, R., & Lubezky, A. (1992). Reasoning fallacies in preservice elementary school teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 10(1), 83-92.
Clark, D., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 45(3), 293-321.
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 3-28). New York, NY: Springer.
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Pereiro-Munaz, C. (2005). Argument construction and change while working on a real environment problem. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. De Jong, & H. Eijklhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 419-431). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Kelly, G. J., Drucker, S., & Chen, K. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessment with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 849-871.
Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (1999). Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: An evaluation. International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 431-446.
Kim, H., & Song, J. (2004). The exploration of open scientific inquiry model emphasizing students' argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(6), 1216-1234.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, H., Cho, H., & Sohn, J. (2009). The teachers' view on using argumentation in school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(6), 666-679.
Lee, S.-K., Lee, G., Choi, C. I., & Shin, M.-K. (2012). Analyzing coordination of theory and evidence presented in pre-service elementary teachers' science writing for inquiry activity. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(2), 201-209.
McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers' Pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K-12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936-972.
Millar, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public understanding of science, 7(3), 203-223.
National Research Council(NRC) (2000). Inquiry and the national standards in science education. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
Nersessian, N. (1995). Should physicists preach whet they practice? Science and Education, 4(3), 203-226.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
Park, J., Chang, B., Yoon, H., & Pak, S. J. (1993). Middle school student's evidence evaluation about light and shadow. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 13(2), 135-145.
Park, Y.-S. (2008). Analyzing science teachers' understanding about scientific argumentation in terms of scientific inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(3), 211-226.
Sadler, T. (2006). Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(4), 323-346.
Sampson, V., & Blanchard, M. R. (2012). Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1122-1148.
Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition & Instruction, 23(1), 23-55.
Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic supports for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345-372.
Shin, H.-S., & Kim, H.-J. (2011). The gifted students' view on argumentation and the aspects of the argumentation in problem-solving type experiment. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(4), 567-586.
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260.
Simon, S., & Johnson, S. (2008). Professional learning portfolios for argumentation in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(5), 669-688.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verheij, B. (2005). Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin's scheme. Argumentation, 19(3), 347-371.
Watson, J., Swain, J., & Mcrobbie, C. (2004). Students' discussions in practical scientific inquiries. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 25-45.
Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71-95.
Yoo, J., Kim, H. B., Cho, Y., Hwang, S., Park, J. Y., Ohno, E., Asakawa, K., Lee, D. W., & Lim, E. H. (2012). Design-based research for teacher professional development program on scientific argumentation. Paper presented at the World Conference on Physics Education.
Yun, S.-M., & Kim, H.-B. (2011). Development and application of the scientific inquiry task for small group argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(5), 694-708.
Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., Crawford, B., Friedrichsen, P., & Land, S. (2002). Scaffolding preservice teachers' evidence-based arguments during an investigation of natural selection. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 437-463.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.