[논문]POCoM (Practical On-site Cooperation Model) 확장을 위한 교사 연수 프로그램의 개발과 적용

정진수; 박종원; 박종석; 김영민; 박영신

doi:10.14697/jkase.2014.34.3.0261

POCoM (Practical On-site Cooperation Model) 확장을 위한 교사 연수 프로그램의 개발과 적용
Developing and Applying In-Service Program for Spreading the Practical On-site Cooperation Model (POCoM) 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.34 no.3, 2014년, pp.261 - 272

정진수 (대구대학교) , 박종원 (전남대학교) , 박종석 (경북대학교) , 김영민 (부산대학교) , 박영신 (조선대학교)

초록
AI-Helper

본 연구에서는 과학수업의 실질적 개선을 위한 연구자-교사 협력모델(POCoM: Practical On-site Cooperation Model)을 확산시키기 위해 교사 연수 프로그램을 개발하고 적용하여 그 결과를 평가하였다. 연수프로그램은 다음 3가지 특성을 가지고 개발되었다 : (1) 실제 수업녹화 내용을 연수의 주요 소재로 활용한다, (2) 연구자와 교사, 교사와 교사간 활발한 의사소통과 의견교환을 강조한다, (3) 활동중심으로 진행한다. 9시간에 걸친 연수에는 17명의 교사가 자발적으로 참여하였다. 연수과정에서 교사들이 실시한 분석결과에 대해 분석 일치도를 구해 본 결과, KTOP(Korean Teaching Observation Protocol)을 이용하여 과학수업을 분석할 수 있는 교사 전문성이 향상된 것으로 나타났고, 교사들이 과학수업의 개선정도도 판단할 수 있음을 알 수 있었다. 설문지를 통해서는 다양한 측면에서 연수에 대한 긍정적 응답을 얻을 수 있었다. 또 연수 중 교사활동에 대한 관찰을 통해, 교사가 제기한 질문, 교사가 어려워하는 점, 교사가 제안한 개선의견 등을 분석하였고, 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 보다 좋은 연수가 되기 위해 고려할 측면들을 정리한 목록을 제안하였다. 이 목록이 앞으로 보다 효과적이고 의미있는 연수의 계획과 실행에 활용되기를 기대한다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

In this study, to disseminate the Practical On-site Cooperation Model (POCoM) for practical improvement of science teaching and learning through cooperation between researcher and teacher, an in-service program has been developed, applied and evaluated. The in-service program emphasizes the following three aspects; (1) video-recording of actual science teaching has been used as a primary resource, (2) communication between teacher and researcher and among teachers have been emphasized, (3) activities have been mainly included. The in-service program has been implemented for nine hours, and 17 science teachers have been recruited as volunteers. The result shows that, by checking the agreements between raters, we found that teachers' expertise in analyzing the science class using the Korean Teaching Observation Protocol (KTOP) has improved, and we have confirmed that teachers are able to judge whether the science class has improved or not. Through the questionnaire, various highly positive responses could be obtained from teachers. And through the observation of teachers' activities during the in-service program, teachers' questions, their difficulties in doing activities, and their comments for improving the program has also been analyzed. Finally, based on the results, a list of recommendations for a more effective in-service program have been suggested. It is expected that this list can be utilized for more effective and meaningful design and implementation of in-service course.

주제어

질의응답

핵심어	질문	논문에서 추출한 답변
	POCoM의 적용을 위해서는 어떠한 것이 필요한가?	POCoM의 적용을 위해서는 실제 과학수업을 관찰하면서 어떤 측면을 개선해야 하는지를 분석할 수 있는 분석도구가 필요하다. 이에 Park et al.
	POCoM가 제작된 이유는 무엇인가?	이에 과학교육분야에서 이러한 이론과 실제의 괴리를 줄이기 위해 POCoM(Practical On-site Cooperation Model)이라는 모델을 개발하여 연구자와 교사가 협력하여 학교 현장에서 실제 수업을 관찰하고 수업을 개선하기 위한 노력을 시행하여 긍정적인 효과를 얻은 바 있다 (Park et al., 2014b).
	KTOP에서의 반례와 예는 어떠한 역할을 하는가?	여기에서 ‘반례’는 수업이 개선된 필요가 있다고 분석된 사례이고, ‘예’는 개선된 수업의 사례로 이해할 수 있다. 따라서 반례와 예는 교사들이 수업의 어느 측면이 개선될 필요가 있는지 분석하는데, 그리고 그러한 부분이 어떻게 개선될 수 있는지를 이해하는데 도움을 주는 역할을 한다.

참고문헌 (52)

Biesta, G. (2007). Why "what works" won't work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1-22.

상세보기
Boyle, B., While, D., & Boyle, T. (2004). A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? The Curriculum Journal, 15(1), 45-68.

상세보기
Brown, P., Freidrichsen, P., & Abell, S. (2013). The development of prospective secondary biology teachers PCK. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 133-155.

상세보기
Capobianco, B. M., & Feldman, A. (2010). Repositioning teacher action research in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 909-915.

상세보기
Carroll, D. (2005). Learning through interactive talk: A school-based mentor teacher study group as a context for professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 457-473.

상세보기
Chan, C. K. K., & Pang, M. F. (2006). Teacher collaboration in learning communities. Teaching Education, 17(1), 1-5.

상세보기
Chin, R., & Benne, K. D. (1969). General strategies for change in human systems. In W. G. Bennis, K. D. Benne & R. Chin, (Eds.), The planning of change: Readings in applied behavioral science (2nd ed.). (pp. 32-59). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Choi, C. I., Cho, M-J., & Yeo, S-I. (2012). Analysis on teachers; perception of questioning and teaching practices in elementary science class. Journal of the Korean Society of Elementary Science Education, 31(1), 57-70.
Chou, C-I. (2010). Investigating the effects of incorporating collaborative action research into an in-service teacher training program. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2728-2734.

상세보기
Cicchetti, D. V., & Feinstein, A. R. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 551-558.

상세보기
De Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: A permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction, 10, 249-266.

상세보기
Desimore, L. M. (2011). A Primer on effective professional development. The Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 68-71.
Dunbar, K. (2001). What scientific thinking reveals about the nature of cognition. In K. D. Crowley, C. D. Schunn & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for Science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gerber, B. L., Marek, E. A., & Martin, E. P. (2011). Designing research-based professional development for elementary school science and mathematics. Education Research International, 2011, 1-8.

상세보기
Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 750-784.
Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23-34.

상세보기
Han, J., Sim, J-h., Ryu, S-C., Ihm, H., Choi, J. H., Shin, Y-J., Son, J-w., Hong, J-E., & Hwang, B. (2008). New in-service education program on science experiments to develop professionality of science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(7), 768-778.

원문보기 상세보기
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15.

상세보기
Kearns, D. M., Fuchs, D., McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, L. S., Yen, L., Meyers, C., Stein, M., Compton, D., Berends, M., & Smith, T. M. (2010). Factors contributing to teachers' sustained use of kindergarten peer-assisted learning strategies. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3, 315-342.

상세보기
Kim, S. Y. (2012). Effects of simulated instruction activities through a constructivists lens on preservice biology teachers' epistemological belief, science teaching efficacy belief and teaching motivation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1157-1168.
Kimble, L. L., Yager, R. E., & Yager, S. O. (2006). Success of a professional-development model in assisting teachers to change their teaching to match the more emphasis conditions urged in the national science education standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 309-322.

상세보기
Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels. J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4-17.

상세보기
Kundel, H. L., & Polansky, M. (2003). Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology, 228, 303-308.

상세보기
Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development. In F. Stevens (Ed.), Innovating and evaluating science education: NSF evaluation forums, 1992-94 (pp. 67-78). USA: NSF, Division of Research. Evaluation and Dissemination.
Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.

상세보기
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Loughran, J., Mitchell, I., & Mitchell, J. (2003). Attempting to document teachers' professional knowledge. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(6), 853-873.

상세보기
Nielsen, B.L. (2012). Science teachers' meaning-making when involved in a school-based professional development project. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 621-649.

상세보기
Ostemeier, C., Prenzel, M., & Duit, D. (2012). Improving science and mathematics instruction: The SINUS project as an example for reform as teacher professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 303-327.
Park, C. Y., Seo, H-A., & Kim, S. N. (2001). A study on the improvement of administrative and financial support system for Korea science teachers in-service training programs comparison to Israel. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 18(2), 29-52.
Park, J., Kim, B-K., Choi, J., & Jee, K. (2010). Development and application of workshop type of enriched in-service program for teaching scientific creativity. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(8), 1017-1030.
Park, J., Park, J., Kim, Y., Jeong, J-S., & Park, Y-S. (2014a). Korean science teachers' perceptions and actual usage of educational theories/teaching strategies in their science teaching. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Park, J., Park., J., Kim., Y., Jeong, J-S., & Park, Y-S. (2014b). Development and application of Practical On-site Cooperation Model(POCoM) for improving science teaching in secondary schools. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Park, J., Park, Y-S., Kim, Y., Park, J., & Jeong, J-S. (2014). The development of the Korean Teaching Observation Protocol(KTOP) for improving science teaching and learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(2), 259-275.
Putman, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking has to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
Radford, D. L. (1998). Transferring theory into practice: A model for professional development for science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 73-88.

상세보기
Rogers, M. P., Abell, S., Lannin, J., Wang, C-Y., Musikul, K., Barker, D., & Dingman, S. (2007). Effective professional development in science and mathematics education: Teachers' and facilitators' views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(3), 507-532.

상세보기
Roth, K. J. (2007). Science teachers as researchers. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1205-1207.
Russell, T., McPherson, S., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Coherence and collaboration in teacher education reform. Canadian Journal of Education, 26(1), 37-55.

상세보기
Schraw, G., & Patall, E. A. (2013). Using principles of evidence-based practice to improve prescriptive recommendations. Educational Psychology Review, 25, 345-351.

상세보기
Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163-183.

상세보기
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Perspective on evidence-based research in education: what works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5-14.

상세보기
Smith, W. S., McLaughlin, E., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1998). Effect on primary level students of inservice teacher education in an informal science setting. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(2), 123-142.

상세보기
Smylie, M. A. (1989). Teachers' views of the effectiveness of sources of learning to teach. The Elementary School Journal, 89(5), 543-558.

상세보기
Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963-980.

상세보기
Tobin, G. R., Crissman, S., Doubler, S., Gallagher, H., Goldstein, G., Lacy, S., Togers, C. B., Schwartz, J., & Wagoner, P. (2011). Teaching teachers about energy: Lessons from an inquiry-based workshop for K-8 teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(5), 631-639.
Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa static. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360-366.
Westheimer, J. (2008). Learning among colleagues: teacher community and the shared enterprise of education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feimen-Nemser & K. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 756-783). Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
Yeo, S. H., Kang, S. J., & Shim, G. C. (2003). Investigation on the realities and teachers' perception of secondary school science in-service education. Journal of the Korean Society of Biology Education, 31(4), 339-346.
Zeichner, K. (2006). Reflections of a university-based teacher educator on the future of college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 326-340.

상세보기
Zeichner, K.M., & Tabachnick, B.R. (1981). Are the effects of university teacher education 'washed out' by school experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 12(3), 7-11.
Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., Koehler, M. J., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of video for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 454-462.

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

LOADING...

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증