최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.34 no.4, 2014년, pp.335 - 347
Size/scale is a central idea in the science curriculum, providing explanations for various phenomena. However, few studies have been conducted to explore student understanding of this concept and to suggest instructional approaches in scientific contexts. In contrast, there have been more studies in...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
크기와 척도를 3가지 특정영역으로 나누면 어떻게 되는가? | 본 연구에 사용된 학생들의 “크기와 척도” 유형 개념 틀과 해당 학생들의 응답을 자세히 보면 학생들의 크기와 척도 개념이 아래 그림 5에 나타낸 것처럼 3가지 특정영역으로 나뉘는 것을 알 수 있다. 즉, 단순한 관찰이나 시-공간적 이미지에 의한 구분이나 계산법으로 물질의 크기를 표현하는 (1) 물질 영역(Object based dimension (PA & Ma): influenced by visual-spatial observation), 다음으로는 덧셈/뺄셈 혹은 곱셈/나눗셈의 산술적 계산을 거쳐 상대적 크기를 비교하는 (2) 산술연산영역(Math based dimension (Ao & Mr): applied arithmetic operation), 마지막으로는등 간격 척도를 먼저 도입하고 물질을 배치하여 상대적 비교를 하거나, 산술 혹은 함수 계산을 하는 (3) 체계영역(System based dimension (A c , M p10 , M l ): applied evenly spaced scale and arithmetic/ functional operation)으로 구분됨을 볼 수 있다. |
Adjiage, R., & Pluvinage, F. (2007). An experiment in teaching ratio and proportion. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 65, 149-175.
Akatugba, A. H., & Wallace, J. (1999). Sociocultural influences on physics students' use of proportional reasoning in a non-western country. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 305-320.
Akatugba, A. H., & Wallace, J. (2009). An integrative perspective on students' proportional reasoning in high school physics in a West African context. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1473-1493.
An, S. (2008). A survey on the proportional reasoning ability of fifth, sixth, and seventh graders. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 18(1), 103-121.
Angell, C., Kind, P. M., Henriksen, E. K., & Guttersrud, O. (2008). An empirical-mathematical modelling approach to upper secondary physics. Physics Education, 43(3), 256-264.
Bar. V. (1987). Comparison of the development of ratio concepts in two domains. Science Education, 71(4), 599-613.
Beland, A., & Mislevy, R. J. (1996). Probability-based inference in a domain of proportional reasoning tasks. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33(1), 3-27.
Ben-Chaim, D., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Benedetto, C., & Miller, J. (1998). Proportional reasoning among 7thgrade students with different curricular experiences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(3), 247-273.
Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), 189-201.
Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. Child Development, 79(4), 1016-1031.
Cheek, K. A. (2010). Why is geologic time troublesome knowledge? In J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp.117-129). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Clark, F., & Kamii, C. (1996). Identification of multiplicative thinking in children in grades 1-5. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(1), 41-51.
Dawkins, K. R., Dickerson, D. L., McKinney, S. E., & Butler, S. (2008). Teaching density to middle school students: Preservice science teachers' content knowledge and pedagogical practices. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, 82(1), 21-26.
De Lozano, S. R., & Cardenas, M. (2002). Some learning problems concerning the use of symbolic language in physics. Science Education, 11, 589-599.
Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. (Revised & Expanded Edition), New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Erickson, T. (2006). Stealing from physics: modeling with mathematical functions in data-rich contexts. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 25(1), 23-32.
Evans, K. L., Yaron, D., & Leinhardt, G. (2008). Learning stoichiometry: a comparison of text and multimedia formats. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(3), 208-218.
Fauvel, J. (1995). Revisiting the history of logarithms. Learn from the Masters, 39-48.
Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16 (1), 3-17.
Guckin, A. M., & Morrison, D. (1991). Math*Logo: A project to develop proportional reasoning in college freshmen. School Science and Mathematics, 91(2), 77-81.
Hart, K. M. Brown, M. L., Kuchemann, D. E., Kerslake, D., Ruddock, G., & McCartney, M. (1981). Children's understanding of mathematics: 11-16. London: John Murray.
Hart, K. M. (1988). Ratio and proportion. In J. Hiebert, & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp.198-219). Reston, VA: National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.
Hines, E., & McMahon, M. T. (2005). Interpreting middle school students' proportional reasoning strategies: Observations from preservice teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(2), 88-105.
Hodson, D. (1985). Philosophy of science, science and science education. Studies in Science Education, 12(1), 25-57.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Jang, M., & Park, M. (2006). A study on the multiplicative thinking of 2nd grade elementary students. Communications of Mathematical Education. Series E, 20(3), 443-467.
Jones, M. G., Taylor, A., & Broadwell, B. (2009). Concepts of scale held by students with visual impairment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(5), 506-519.
Jones, M. G., Taylor, A., Minogue, J., Broadwell, B., Wiebe, E., and Carter, G. (2006). Understanding scale: Powers of ten. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 191-202.
Kadosh, R., Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (2008). A synthetic walk on the mental number line: The size effect. Cognition, 106, 548-557.
Kamii, C., & Livingston, S. (1994). Young children continue to reinvent arithmetic, 3rdgrade. New York: Teachers College Press.
Kim, J., & Bang, J. (2013). An analysis on third graders' multiplicative thinking and proportional reasoning ability. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 23(1), 1-16.
Kohn, A. S. (1993). Preschoolers' reasoning about density: Will it float? Child Development, 64, 1637-1650.
Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity. 2009 -Revised national curriculum.
Lamon, S. J. (1993). Ratio and proportion: Connecting content and children's thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 41-61.
Lamon, S. J. (1994). Ratio and proportion: Cognitive foundations in unitizing and norming. In G. J. Harel, & J, Confrey (Eds.) The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 89-122). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Lesh, R., Post, R., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. M. Hiebert Behr (Ed.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93-118). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lindquist, M. (1989). Results from the fourth mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id16909
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D. C: National Academy Press.
Noelting, G. (1980). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept Part I-Differentiation of stages. Educational studies in Mathematics, 11(2), 217-253.
O'Brien, T., & Casey, S. (1983). Children learning multiplication. School Science and Mathematics. 83, 246-251
Oon, P. T., & Subramaniam, R. (2011). On the declining interest in physics among students-from the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 727-746.
Piaget, J. (1987). Possibility and necessity: The role of possibility in cognitive development. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers' and students' use of multi-modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1843-1866.
Redlich, O. (1970). Intensive and extensive properties. Journal of Chemical Education, 47(2), 154-156
Reys, R. E., Lindquist, M. M., Lambdin, D. V., & Smith, N. L. (2009). Helping children learn mathematics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Rizvi, N. F., & Lawson, M. J. (2007). Prospective teachers' knowledge: concept of division. International Education Journal, 8(2), 377-392.
Sanders, M., Kwon, H., Park, K., & Lee, H. (2011). Integrative STEM education: contemporary trends and issues. Secondary Education Research, 59(3), 729-762.
Sheppard, K. (2006). High school students' understanding of titrations and related acid-base phenomena. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(1), 32-45.
Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. (2003). The developmental of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14(3), 237-243.
Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Opfer, J. E. (2009). The logarithmic to linear shift: One learning sequence, many tasks, many time scales. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(3), 143-150.
Siemon, D., Breed, M., & Virgona, J. (2006). From additive to multiplicative thinking-The big challenge of the middle years. www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/teachingresources/maths/
Siemon, D., & Virgona, J. (2001). Road maps to numeracy-Reflections on the middle years numeracy research project. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, WA.
Sin, Y., & Han, S. (2011). A study of the elementary school teachers' perception in STEAM Education. Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 514-523.
Singer, J. A., & Resnick, L. B. (1992). Representations of proportional relationships: Are children part-part or part-whole reasoners? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(3), 231-246.
Smith, E., & Confrey, J. (1994). Multiplicative structures and the development of logarithms: What was lost by the invention of function? In G. J. Harel, & J, Confrey (Eds.) The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp333-364). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Smith, C., Maclin, D., Grosslight, L., & Davis, H. (1997). Teaching for understanding: a study of students' pre-instruction theories of matter and a comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching about matter and density. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3). 317-393.
Stevens, S., Sutherland, L., Schank, P., & Krajcik, J. (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science & engineering: A guidebook for secondary teachers. NSTA Press.
Streefland, L. (1984). Search for the roots of ratio: Some thoughts on the long term learning process (Towards... a theory). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(4), 327-348.
Swarat, S., Light, G., Park, E-J., & Drane, D. (2011). A typology of undergraduate students' conceptions of size and scale: Identifying and characterizing conceptual variation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 512-533.
Taber, K. S. (2006). Conceptual integration: a demarcation criterion for science education?. Physics Education, 41(4), 286-287.
Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp179-234). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Trend, R. (2000). Conceptions of geological time among primary teacher trainees, with reference to their engagement with geosciences, history, and science. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 539-555.
Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16,181-204.
Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Negishi, A., & Minogue, J. (2006). Conceptual boundaries and distances: Students' and experts' concepts of the scale of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 282-319.
Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., & Minogue, J. (2006). Accuracy of scale conceptions in science: Mental maneuverings across many orders of spatial magnitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 1061-1085.
Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. In R. Lesh, & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 127-174). New York: Academic Press.
Wagner, E. P. (2001). A study comparing the efficacy of a mole ratio flow chart to dimensional analysis for teaching reaction stoichiometry. School Science and Mathematics, 101(1), 10-22.
Weber, K. (2002). Developing students' understanding of exponents and logarithms. ERIC Documents, 471-763.
Zen, E.-A. (2001). What is deep time and why should anyone care? Journal of Geoscience Education, 49(1), 5-9.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.