$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

싸움도구를 사용하는 거친신체놀이에서 두 명의 유아들이 물리적 힘을 이해하는 과정
The Process of Understanding Force As Used among Two Young Children in Rough-and-Tumble Play When Using Combative Objects 원문보기

兒童學會誌 = Korean journal of child studies, v.35 no.5, 2014년, pp.63 - 82  

백은영 (숭의여자대학교 유아교육과)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purpose of this study is to elucidate how two young children understand force in rough-and-tumble play. For this purpose, a form of microanalysis(Forman, 2006) was used. They regarded black as the strongest color due to their daily experiences. They assumed that a structure made of black Lego-co...

주제어

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
거친신체놀이에 대한 교사들의 인식은 금지하거나 제한적으로 금지 또는 허용하는 경향이 있는데 교사들이 거친신체놀이를 금지하는 경우 유아들이 하는 행동은? 또한 시간, 공간의 제약이나 거친신체놀이에 대한 지식의 부족으로 놀이를 행하는 것이 어렵기도 했다(Ha, 2009). 그러나 교사들이 거친신체놀이를 금지하는 경우 유아들은 교사의 눈을 피해서 거친신체 놀이를 시도하거나 직접 몸으로 싸우기보다 다른 물건을 부딪치는 등 놀이의 형태를 바꾸어서 거친신체놀이를 지속하였다(Koh, 2009).
Jones이 묘사한 거친신체놀이의 유형은? 거친신체놀이란 장난을 목적으로 하는 유사 싸움, 쫓고 쫓기기 등을 일컫는데(Y. Kim, 2007; Lee, 2007; Lee, 1992, 1998; Lee & Yim, 1998; Wang & Lee, 2011), Jones(1976)는 거친신체놀이의 유형을 달리기, 쫒기, 도망가기, 씨름, 두발로 뛰어오르거나 뛰어 내리기, 어떤 도구를 갖고 서로 치기, 웃기 등 7가지 형태로 묘사한 바 있다. 최근 많은 연구들(Ha, 2009; Y.
거친신체놀이란? 거친신체놀이란 장난을 목적으로 하는 유사 싸움, 쫓고 쫓기기 등을 일컫는데(Y. Kim, 2007; Lee, 2007; Lee, 1992, 1998; Lee & Yim, 1998; Wang & Lee, 2011), Jones(1976)는 거친신체놀이의 유형을 달리기, 쫒기, 도망가기, 씨름, 두발로 뛰어오르거나 뛰어 내리기, 어떤 도구를 갖고 서로 치기, 웃기 등 7가지 형태로 묘사한 바 있다.
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (70)

  1. Baik, E. (2013). Possibility and limitations of the constructive play among four-year-old children: Focused on the meaning of 'Being Strong'. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea. 

  2. Barnes, D. (2008). Exploratory talk for learning. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in schools (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications. 

  3. Caillois, R. (1994). Play and human beings. Lee, S. (translation). Seoul: Moonye-Press. (Original published in 1967). 

  4. Cho, H., Kim, S., Kim, J., Kim, M., & Kim, N. (2014). Science education for young children (2nd ed.). Seoul: Hakjisa. 

  5. Choi, M., Hong, S., Jeon, A., Bae, E., & An, S. (2013). The relationship between young children's engagement in rough-and-tumble play during recess and their display of leadership. The Journal of Eco Early childhood Education, 12(2), 91-112. 

  6. Choi, M., Roh, E., Jeong, M., & Ju, B. (2013). The influence of reduction in aggression of young children and interpersonal problem solving ability between outdoor activity of rough and tumble play and general outdoor activity play. Journal of Future Early Childhood Education, 20(4), 21-44. 

  7. Chung, D. (1998). Research on art and area of 'represent the imaginary' to improve the teaching and learning. Journal of Elementary Education, 12, 309-345. 

  8. Corsaro, W. A. (1992). Interpretive reproduction in children's peer cultures. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 160-177. 

  9. Cutnell, J. D., & Johnson, K. W. (2014). Introduction to physics. (9th ed.). A compilation committee of physical science textbook. (translation). Paju: Cheongmoongak. (Original published in 2012). 

  10. Forman, G. (2006). Constructive play. In D. P. Fromberg & D. Bergen (Eds.), Play from birth to twelve: Contexts, perspectives, and meanings (2nd ed., pp. 103-109). New York: Routledge. 

  11. Forman, G., & Landry, C. (1999). Research on early science education. In L. R. Williams (Series Ed.) & C. Seefeldt (Ed.), The early childhood curriculum: A review of current research (3rd ed., pp. 133-158). New York: Teachers College Press. 

  12. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricular. New York: Teachers College Press. 

  13. Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego: Academic Press. 

  14. Ha, H. (2009). A study of teachers' perceptions toward preschool boys' rough and tumble play and peer play behaviors. Unpublished master's thesis, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea. 

  15. Han, Y. (2010). Science education for young children. Seoul: Changjisa. 

  16. Hanson, N. R. (1995). Patterns of discovery. Song, J., & Cho, K. (translation). Seoul: Minumsa. (Original published in 1958). 

  17. Humphreys, A. P., & Smith, P. K. (1987). Rough and tumble, friendship, and dominance in school children: Evidence for continuity and change with age. Child Development, 58, 201-212. 

  18. Hyun, E. (2008). Teachable moments: Reconceptualizing curricula understandings. Son, Y., Kim, N., Nam, M., Jung, H., Lee, K., & Son, W. (translation). Goyang: Seohyunsa. (Original published in 2006). 

  19. Jeon, S. (2011). A comparison between fathermother perceptions of young children's rough-and-tumble play. Unpublished master's thesis, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea. 

  20. Jewett, J. W., & Serway, R. A. (2013). Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics. (8th ed.). A compilation committee of physical science textbook. (translation). Seoul: Cengage Learning Korea Ltd. (Original published in 2010). 

  21. Jo, H. (1994). Science concepts easy to understand wrong. Seoul: Jeonpagwahaksa. 

  22. Johnson, J. E., Christie, J. F., & Yawkey, T. D. (1999). Play and early childhood development. New York: Longman. 

  23. Jones, N. B. (1976). Rough-and-tumble play among nursery school children. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp. 352-363). New York: Basic Books. 

  24. Kim, K. (2002). Children's change in scientific concepts and attitude during science activities based on the spontaneous inquiry. Unpublished master's thesis, Chungang University, Seoul, Korea. 

  25. Kim, K., & Na, K. (2013). An analysis of teacher and children co-constructing understanding through explanation during free choice activities. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 33(1), 191-214. 

  26. Kim, S. (2007). A study on the analysis of scientific misconception in early young children. Korea Journal of Child Care and Education, 48, 59-83. 

  27. Kim, S. (2008). Development on the constructive teaching model for young children's scientific conceptual change. Korea Journal of Child Care and Education, 52, 1-19. 

  28. Kim, S. (2013). Constructive early science education. Goyang: Seohyunsa. 

  29. Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2002). Reflecting on scientific thinking as goal of early science education. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 22(2), 247-269. 

  30. Kim, Y. (2007). The relationship between children's rough-and-tumble play and social competence. Unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. 

  31. Koh, B. (2003). Power: Research of power. Seoul: Sowha. 

  32. Koh, Y. (2009). An investigation on the aspects, factors and the meaning of children's rough and tumble play. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea. 

  33. Koh, Y., & Ohm, J. (2010). An investigation into the aspects and factors at work in children's rough and tumble play. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 31(4), 75-90. 

  34. Koh, Y., & Ohm, J. (2014). The importance of teacher interactions with children during rough-and-tumble play. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 34(1), 59-89. 

  35. Kwak, H. (2002). Childhood science teaching for conceptual change from the constructivist perspectives. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 6(1), 87-109. 

  36. Kwon, J., Kim, B., Kang, N., Choi, B., Kim, H., Paik, S., et al. (2012). Science education. Paju: Kyoyookbook Press. 

  37. Kwon, J., Kim, B., Woo, C., Chung, W., Chung, J., & Choi, B. (1998). The theory of science education. Paju: Kyoyookbook Press. 

  38. Kwon, Y., Jeong, J., Shin, D., Lee, J., Lee, I., & Byun, J. (2011). The creation and evaluation of science knowledge. Seoul: Hakjisa. 

  39. Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company. 

  40. Lee, J. (2007). The relationship between boys' and girls' rough-and-tumble play and peer competence. Unpublished master's thesis, Duksung Women's University, Seoul, Korea. 

  41. Lee, K. (2006). Kindergarten teachers' perceptions on science education. Journal of Science Education, 19, 205-220. 

  42. Lee, K. (2013). The directions and tasks of early childhood science education. The Journal of Education, 33(1), 161-189. 

  43. Lee, S. (1992). A qualitative study on children's playgrounds and play behaviors. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 14(1), 109-132. 

  44. Lee, S. (1998). Rough-and-tumble play and social competence in preschool children. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 19(1), 131-140. 

  45. Lee, S. (2010). Early childhood teachers' recognition on value and behavioral characteristics of rough and tumble play. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National Open University, Seoul, Korea. 

  46. Lee, S., & Yim, M. (1998). The research of rough-and-tumble play: Focus on outdoor play among six-old-year children. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 36(3), 255-279. 

  47. Lee, W. (2010). Changes and meaning of physical play from supporting process of early childhood rough and tumble play. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 15(1), 413-436. 

  48. Lee, Y. (2009). Young children's rough and tumble play about the perceptions of parents and teachers. Unpublished master's thesis, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea. 

  49. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. 

  50. Moon, S. (2008). A study on rough and tumble play of kindergarten teachers. Unpublished master's thesis, Silla University, Pusan, Korea. 

  51. Ninjago (2014. 06. 04 withdraw) [http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%A0% 88%EA%B3%A0] 

  52. Oh, M. (2011a). Early childhood classroom discourse as a cognitive activity on the social plane. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 16(3), 129-156. 

  53. Oh, M. (2011b). A teacher's strategies for supporting children's co-construction of theories in 'science talk'. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 16(4), 1-32. 

  54. Ohm, J. (2002). The effect of the structure of play materials on young children's intersubjectivity in social dramatic play. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 22(3), 195-215. 

  55. Park, C., & Lee, K. (2006). Discussion about educational continuity of national science education curricula in kindergarten and elementary school. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 10(3), 149-172. 

  56. Pellegrini, A. (1988). Elementary-school children's rough and tumble play and social competence. Development Psychology, 24, 802-806. 

  57. Pellegrini, A. (1989). Elementary-school children's rough and tumble play. Early Children Research Quarterly, 4, 245-260. 

  58. Pellegrini, A. D., & Boyd, B. (1993). The role of play in early childhood development and education: Issues in definition and function. In S. Spodek (Ed.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (pp. 105-121). New York: Macmillan. 

  59. Ryu, J., & Kwon, S. (2005). The knowledge sharing process on a collaborative problem solving task with a concept map. Journal of Educational Technology, 21(2), 29-60. 

  60. Schwartz, S., & Copeland, S. (2013). Connecting emergent curriculum and standards in the early childhood classroom. Park, E., Shin, E., Kim, H., & Lee, J. (translation). Seoul: Hakjisa. (Original published in 2010). 

  61. Shawn, M. G., Russell, H. Y., & Bruce, K. B. (2000). The psychology of learning science. Gwon, S., & Im, C. (translation). Seoul: Sigmapress. (Original published in 1991). 

  62. Song, J. (2003). Constructivist science education and the map of students' physics misconceptions. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series A: The Mathematical Education, 42(2), 87-109. 

  63. Song, J., Kim, I., Kim, Y., Kwon, S., Oh, W., & Park, J. (2005). Learners' physical misconception maps. Seoul: Cengage Learning Korea Ltd. 

  64. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 

  65. Suh, D., & Ryu, W. (2006). New introduction to physics (6th ed.). Seoul: Hanbit Intellectual Property Center. 

  66. Suh, J., & Ohm, J. (2013). Kindergarten teachers' perceptions of rough and tumble play and the teaching strategies toward that play. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 17(3), 201-224. 

  67. Vygotsky, L. (2014). Children's imaginary and creativity. Committe on Vygotsky's work. (translation). Seoul: Salimter. (Original published in 1930). 

  68. Wang, H., & Lee, K. (2011). Teachers' recognition on preschool children's rough and tumble play. Journal of Physical Education & Sports Science, 27, 11-23. 

  69. Woo, J. (2003). A study on teachers' cognition of young children's rough-and-tumble play and its patterns. Unpublished master's thesis, Chungang University, Seoul, Korea. 

  70. Woodard, C., & Davitt, R. (1999). Physical science in early childhood. Cho, E., Ha, S., & Choi, I. (translation). Seoul: Changjisa. (Original published in 1987). 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

BRONZE

출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로