최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기Journal of Korean academy of nursing = 대한간호학회지, v.45 no.6, 2015년, pp.802 - 811
김은아 (호남대학교 간호학과) , 최소은 (국립목포대학교 간호학과)
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test and validate a model to predict living and brain death organ donation intention in nursing students. The conceptual model was based on the theory planned behavior. Methods: Quota sampling methodology was used to recruit 921 nursing students from all ove...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
우리나라의 장기이식 수술은 어떻게 변화되어 가고 있는가? | 우리나라의 장기이식 수술은 1945년 각막이식을 시작으로 꾸준히 발전되어 장기부전 환자의 보편적인 치료의 한 형태로 자리 잡아 가고 있다[1]. 우리나라는 2000년 2월부터 ‘장기 등 이식에 관한 법률’이 마련되어 시행되고 있으며, 이 법률에 따르면 장기기증의 유형은 생존 시 기증, 뇌사 시 기증, 사후 기증으로 구분되어 있고[2], 장기이식을 위해서는 사람들의 자발적인 기증이 필요하며 본인이 직접 기증 등록을 신청해야 한다. | |
장기기증 유형은 어떻게 나뉘는가? | 앞에서 언급했듯이 장기기증 유형은 생존 시, 뇌사 시, 사후 장기기증으로 세 가지가 있으나 국립장기이식관리센터(KONOS)에 의하면 2013년 전체 기증자 중 생존 시 장기기증자는 79.5%, 뇌사 시 장기기증자는 17. | |
뇌사 장기기증자가 실제 기증으로 이어지게 하기 위해 중요한 것은? | 생존 시 장기기증은 기증자 자신의 선택이 중요하지만 뇌사 장기기증은 기증자가 등록을 했다고 하더라도 실제 기증을 위해서는 가족의 동의가 꼭 필요하다. 특히, 뇌사 장기기증 증가를 위해서는 잠재 뇌사자를 조기에 파악하여 장기기증을 권유하고 기증으로까지 이어지도록 하는 것이 중요한데, 이를 위해서는 뇌사자를 직접 간호하는 간호사의 역할이 매우 중요하다. 이처럼 생존 시 장기기증과 뇌사 시 장기기증은 기증절차가 다르므로 장기기증 의도에 영향을 미치는 변인은 차이가 있을 수 있다. |
Kim D. A study on the factors affecting people's attitude toward organ donation. Health and Social Welfare Review. 2003;12:96-135.
Cha DP. Factors affecting the college students' intentions to resister and discuss the decision of organ donation with their family in situations of living, brain death, and heart death: Using an extended theory of planned behavior. Advertising Research. 2010;87:7-40.
Korean Network for Organ Sharing. Annual report of the transplant 2013 [Internet]. Seoul: Author; 2014 [cited 2015 January 20]. Available from: https://www.konos.go.kr/konosis/common/bizlogic.jsp.
You HR. A study on knowledge and attitude of intensive care unit nurses regarding brain dead organ transplantation [master's thesis]. Seoul: Sungkyungkwan University; 2004.
Lee JA, Kim SY. The knowledge and attitude of medical students towards the organ donation. The Journal of the Korean Society for Transplantation. 2008;22(1):120-129.
Shon YH, Cho CM. Public's attitude to organ transplants and factors influencing attitudes. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2002;9(2):279-287.
Kim M, Joo SJ, Choi JH, Kim KS, Yoo M, Kim HJ. Knowledge, attitude, and will for organ donation of nursing students and non-nursing students toward the brain death organ donation. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics. 2012;15(2):231-243.
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):179-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Kim HI, Cha H. The effect of social capital and interpersonal communication on the posthumous organ donation intentions: Application and expansion of the theory of planned behavior. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies. 2010;54(6):173-198.
Bresnahan M, Lee SY, Smith SW, Shearman S, Nebashi R, Park CY, et al. A theory of planned behavior study of college students' intention to register as organ donors in Japan, Korea, and the United States. Health Communication. 2007;21(3):201-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10410230701307436
Feeley TH. College students' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding organ donation: An integrated review of the literature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2007;37(2):243-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2007.00159.x
Hyde MK, White KM. To be a donor or not to be? Applying an extended theory of planned behavior to predict posthumous organ donation intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2009; 39(4):880-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00464.x
Hyde MK, Knowles SR, White KM. Donating blood and organs: Using an extended theory of planned behavior perspective to identify similarities and differences in individual motivations to donate. Health Education Research. 2013;28(6):1092-1104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/her/cyt078
Stephenson MT, Morgan SE, Roberts-Perez SD, Harrison T, Afifi W, Long SD. The role of religiosity, religious norms, subjective norms, and bodily integrity in signing an organ donor card. Health Communication. 2008;23(5):436-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10410230802342119
Hyde MK, White KM. Disclosing donation decisions: The role of organ donor prototypes in an extended theory of planned behaviour. Health Education Research. 2009;24(6):1080-1092. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/her/cyp028
Horton RL, Horton PJ. A model of willingness to become a potential organ donor. Social Science and Medicine. 1991;33(9):1037-1051.
Siegel JT, Alvaro EM, Lac A, Crano WD, Dominick A. Intentions of becoming a living organ donor among Hispanics: A theory-based approach exploring differences between living and nonliving organ donation. Journal of Health Communication. 2008;13(1):80-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10810730701807142
Kopfman JE, Smith SW. Understanding the audiences of a health communication campaign: A discriminant analysis of potential organ donors based on intent to donate. Journal of Applied Communication Research. 1996;24(1):33-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909889609365438
Morgan S, Miller J. Communicating about gifts of life: The effect of knowledge, attitudes, and altruism on behavior and behavioral intentions regarding organ donation. Journal of Applied Communication Research. 2002;30(2):163-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909880216580
Bae HS, Kang S. The influence of viewing an entertainment-education program on cornea donation intention: A test of the theory of planned behavior. Health Communication. 2008;23(1):87-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10410230701808038
Morgan S, Miller J, Arasaratnam L. Signing cards, saving lives: An evaluation of the worksite organ donation promotion project. Communication Monographs. 2002;69(3):253-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750216540
Mitchell RJ. Path analysis: Pollination. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J, editors. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 211-231.
Ajzen I. TPB questionnaire construction: Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst; 2001 [cited 2013 July 30]. Available from: http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf.
Kim YH. A study on the knowledge and attitude of civil servants at city, county, ward offices and health centers engaged in organ transplant registration upon organ donation and transplantation [master's thesis]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2010.
Giles M, McClenahan C, Cairns E, Mallet J. An application of the theory of planned behaviour to blood donation: The importance of self-efficacy. Health Education Research. 2004;19(4):380-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg063
Bae HS. A prediction model for the effects of emotion and issue involvement on entertainment-education viewers' intention to register as cornea donors. Journal of Broadcasting Research. 2006; 62:273-301.
Radecki CM, Jaccard J. Psychological aspects of organ donation: A critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions. Health Psychology. 1997;16(2):183-195.
Sander SL, Miller BK. Public knowledge and attitudes regarding organ and tissue donation: An analysis of the northwest Ohio community. Patient Education and Counseling. 2005;58(2):154-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.003
Brug J, van Vugt M, van den Borne B, Brouwers A, van Hooff H. Predictors of willingness to register as an organ donor among dutch adolescents. Psychology & Health. 2000;15(3):357-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870440008401998
Browne C, Desmond DM. Intention to consent to living organ donation: An exploratory study. Psychology Health & Medicine. 2008;13(5):605-609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13548500701842958
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.