최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국가정관리학회지 = Journal of Korean Home Management Association, v.33 no.1, 2015년, pp.87 - 97
최슬민 (Department of Child Development & Family Studies, Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University) , 진미정 (Department of Child Development & Family Studies, Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University)
This study aims to examine how home child care allowance influences a mother's choice of child care type. To accomplish this goal, we surveyed 432 mothers who had at least one child under 5 years old. The data were analyzed by frequencies, percentages, means and binomial logistic regressions. The re...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
미취업모가 양육수당을 선택한다는 결과가 주목할만한 이유는? | 셋째, 미취업모가 양육수당을 선택한다는 결과는 특히 주목할 만하다. 그동안 양육정책은 출산휴가, 육아휴직과 같은 휴가정책이나 직장 내 보육시설의 확충과 같이 취업 모의 일·가정 양립 정책 중심으로 이루어져 왔다. 하지만 양육수당은 미취업모들도 양육 지원의 혜택을 받을 수 있도록 하였다. Ministry of Health & Welfare(2013)의 2012년 전국보육실태조사에 따르면 우리나라 영유아가구의 미취업모 비율은 59.7%로 반 이상을 차지하는데, 그들을 양육 지원 정책의 대상으로 흡수시켰다는 것은 큰 의미가 있다고 할 수 있다. | |
돌봄유형의 선택권이란 무엇인가? | 부모에게 선택권을 부여한다는 것은 부모가 자녀의 돌봄유형을 선택할 수 있도록 하는 것이다. 돌봄유형의 선택권이란 가정양육(부모의 양육과 도우미의 양육), 어린이집, 유치원 이용 등 다양한 돌봄유형 중 부모가 처해진 환경에서 가장 이상적이라고 생각하는 돌봄유형을 선택할 수 있는 권리를 의미한다. 양육수당 이전에는 보육시설의 가수요가 사회적 문제로 대두될 만큼 자녀의 돌봄유형이 시설보육으로 지나치게 집중된 점이 있었다. | |
양육지원정책으로서의 양육수당에 주목해야 하는 이유는? | . 양육지원정책으로서의 양육수당에 주목해야 하는 이유는 이 정책이 현금지원을 통해 정책 수혜자에게 돌봄유형의 선택권을 부여하기 때문이다. 부모에게 선택권을 부여한다는 것은 부모가 자녀의 돌봄유형을 선택할 수 있도록 하는 것이다. |
Arksey, H., & Kemp, P. (2008). Dimensions of choice : A narrative review of cash-for-care schemes(DHP 2250). York: University of York.
Baek, E., Han, S., & Kang, M. (2011). Study on utilization and preference type of child care support service for infants. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 16(4), 210-233.
Baek, S.-H., & Cho, S.-W. (2005). The determining factors of expenditure levels for daycare and education services for families with pre-school children. Korea Journal of Child Care and Education, 41, 429-455.
Blank, R. (2000). When can public policy makers rely on private markets? The effective provision of social services. The Economic Journal, 110(march), 34-49.
Blomqvist, P. (2004). The choice revolution: Privatization of Swedish welfare services in the 1990s. Social Policy & Administration, 38(2), 139-155.
Breda, J., Shoenmaekers, D., Landeghem, V. C., Claessens, D., & Geerts, J. (2006). When informal care becomes a paid job: the case of personal assistance budgets in Flanders. In G. Caroline & A. K. Peter (Eds.), Cash and care: Policy challenges in the welfare state (pp. 55-70). Bristol: Policy Press.
Brennan, D., Cass, B., Himmelweit, S., & Szebehely, M. (2012). Care, markets and migration in a globalising world: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(4), 355-362.
Choi, S. S., & Hong, K. Z. (2012). A study on factors influencing choice of child care type: Focusing on the care type in infanthood. Social Welfare Policy, 39(3), 29-57.
Eydal, G. B., & Rostgaard, T. (2011). Gender equality revisited-.changes in nordic child care policies in the 2000s. Social Policy & Administration, 45(2), 161-179.
Freedman, R. I., & Boyer, N. C. (1999). The power to choose: Supports for families caring for individuals with developmental disabilities. Health and Social Work, 25(1), 59-68.
Greener, I. (2008). Markets in the public sector: When do they work, and what do we do when they don't?. Policy and Politics, 36(1), 93-108.
Han, Y. M. (2010). A study on child care allowan- ces. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 31(2), 263-275.
Hiilamo, H., & Kangas, O. (2003). Trap for women or freedom to choose?. Paper session presented at the inaugural ESP Anet conference.
Hong, S. A. (2008). Child care support policies from gender perspective. Symposium conducted at KWDI 25h anniversary international symposium.
Hong, S. A. (2011). Study on gender effects of home child care allowance: A case study of Finland. Journal of Critical Social Welfare, 31, 85-119.
Hong, S.-A. (2005). Gender and welfare state restructuring : Focusing on french child care policy. The Women's Studies, 69, 139-173.
Kim, J. K. (2004). Factors that decide the job continuity of young mothers. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 42(3), 91-104.
Kim, J. K. (2005). Factors that affect the use and expenditure of households for childhood education and care centers. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 43(6), 47-60.
Kim, S. M., Lee, K. H., & Sung, J. M. (2000). A study on the relationship between the women's labor force participation and child care : The types and the costs of child care. Korean Journal of Labour Economics, 23(0), 219-239.
Korea Institute of Child Care and Education. (2010). Utilization and cost of child care support service by income level.
Korea Institute of Child Care and Education. (2011). Effects and improvement of child rearing support policies.
Kremer, M. (2002). The illusion of free choice: Ideals of care and child care policy in the Flemish and Dutch welfare states. In M. Sonya, & M. Rianne (Eds.), Child care policy at the crossroads: Gender and welfare state restructuring (pp. 113-142). New York: Routledge.
Lim, Y.-K. (2008). Parent's variables influencing child care center selection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
Ministry of Health & Welfare. (2013). 2012 National survey of child care.
Morel, N. (2006). Providing coverage against new social risks in bismarckian welfare states: The case of long-term care. In A. Klaus, & B. Giuliano (Eds.), The politics of post-industrial welfare states. (pp. 227-247). New York: Routledge.
OECD. (2014). OECD Family Data 2014. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/PF_1_3_Family_C ash_Benefits_Jul2013.pdf
OECD. (2015). Average annual wages. Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DatasetCodeA V_AN_WAGE
Song, D. Y. (2010). Stratification and gender in "free choice." Korean Journal of Family Social Work, 28(4), 347-378.
Song, D.-Y. (2009). Family policy and free choice in child care. Issues in Feminism, 9(2), 83-117.
The Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. (2005). Status of child care and cost of child care service.
Yoo, H. (2010). Free choice on the child care policies. Social Theory, 15, 297-329.
Yoon, H.-S. (2010). child care types and household characteristics. Social Science Research, 26(1), 1-25.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.