최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기디지털융복합연구 = Journal of digital convergence, v.13 no.4, 2015년, pp.357 - 368
People observe lots of events around the environment and we can easily recognize the nature of an event from the resulting optic flow. The questions are how do people recognize events and what is the information in the optic flow that enables observers to recognize events. Motor theorists claim that...
B. Nery, and R. Ventura, A dynamical systems approach to online event segmentation in cognitive robotics, Paladyn, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 18-24, 2011.
C. A. Kurby, and J. M. Zacks, Segmentation in the perception and memory of events, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 72-79, 2008.
J. M. Zacks, N. K. Speer, K. M. Swallow, T. S. Braver, and J. R. Reynolds, Event perception: A mind-brain perspective, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 133, No. 2, pp. 273-293, 2007.
N. Stepp, and M. T. Turvey, On strong anticipation, Cognitive Systems Research, Vol. 11, pp. 148-164, 2010.
G. P. Bingham, Dynamics and the problem of visual event recognition. In R. Port, & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as Motion: Dynamics, Behavior and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., pp. 403-448, 1995.
S. Runeson, On the visual perception of dynamic events. Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala, 1977.
S. Runeson, and G. Frykholm, Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. J. of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 112, pp. 585-615, 1983.
R. M. Alexander, The Human Machine. NY: Columbia University Press, 1992
C. A. Fowler, An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. J. of Phonetics, Vol. 14, pp. 3-28, 1986.
C. A. Fowler, Real objects of speech perception: A commentary on Diehl and Kluender. Ecological Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 145-160, 1989.
W. H. Warren, and R. E. Shaw, "Events and encounters as units of analysis for ecological psychology", In W. H. Warren & R. E. Shaw (Eds.), Persistence and Change, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 1-27, 1985.
G. Johansson, Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 14, pp. 201-211. 1973.
W. M. Mace, Johansson's approach to visual event perception - Gibson's perspective. In W. H. Warren & R. E. Shaw (Eds.), Persistence and Change, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 55-65, 1985.
G. Johansson, On theories for visual space perception. A letter to Gibson. Scandinavian Journal of Psychophysics, Vol. 11, pp. 67-74. 1970.
J. J. Gibson, On theories for visual space perception. A letter to Johansson. Scandinavian Journal of Psychophysics, Vol. 11, pp. 75-79. 1970.
J. J. Gibson, The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1979.
G. Johansson, About visual event perception. In W. H. Warren & R. E. Shaw (Eds.), Persistence and Change. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 29-54, 1985.
J. J. Gibson, A theory of direct visual perception. In J. Royce & W. Rozeboom (Eds.), The Psychology of Knowing, New York and London: Gordonand Breach. pp. 215-227, 1972.
A. M. Liberman and I. G. Mattingly, The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, Vol. 21, pp. 1-36. 1985.
P. Eimas, E. R. Siqueland, P. Jusczyk, and J. Vigorito, Speech perception in infants. Science, Vol. 171, pp. 303-306. 1971.
R. L. Diehl, and M. A. Walsh, An auditory basis for the stimulus-length effect in the perception of stops and glides. J. of Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 85, pp. 2154-2164, 1989.
D. B. Pisoni, T. D. Carrell, and S. J. Gans, Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes in speech and nonspeech signals. Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 34, pp. 314-322. 1983.
C. A. Fowler, Sound-producing sources as object s of perception: Rate normalization and nonspeech perception. J. of Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 88, pp. 1236-1249, 1990.
C. A. Fowler, and B. Galantucci, The relation of speech perception and speech production. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception, Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 633-652, 2005.
P. Viviani, and N. Stucchi, Motor-perceptual interactions. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in Motor Behavior II, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., pp. 229-248, 1992.
T. Beardworth, and T. Bukner, The ability to recognize one self from a video recording of one's movement without seeing one's body. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Vol. 18, pp. 19-22, 1981.
J. E. Cutting, Coding theory adapted to gait perception. J. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 7, pp. 71-87, 1981.
A. Jacobs, and J. Pinto, Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. J. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 30, pp. 822-835, 2004.
A. Jacobs, and M. Shiffrar, Walking perception by walking observers. J. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 31, pp. 157-169, 2005
F. Loula, S. Prasad, K. Harber, and M. Shiffrar, Recognizing people from their movement. J. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 31, pp. 210-220, 2005.
G. Johansson, Studies on visual perception of locomotion. Perception, Vol. 6, pp. 365-376, 1977.
J. A. Stevens, P. Fonlupt, M. Shiffrar, and J. Decety, New aspects of motion perception: selective neural encoding of apparent human movements. NeuroReport, Vol. 11, pp. 109-115, 2000.
G. P. Bingham, and E. A. Wickelgren, Events and actions as dynamically molded spatiotemporal objects: A critique of the motor theory of biological motion perception. In T. F., Shipley & J. M. Zacks (Eds.), Understanding events: From perception to action, . Oxford University Press, Inc., pp. 255-286, 2008.
W. H. Warren, E. E. Kim, and R. Husney, The way the ball bounces: visual and auditory perception of elasticity and control of the bounce pass. Perception, Vol. 16, pp. 309-336, 1987.
M. Latash, Control of Human Movement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Press., 1993.
G. Knoblich, and W. Prinz, Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing. J. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 27, pp. 456-465, 2001.
J. T. Todd, Perception of gait. J. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 9, pp. 31-42, 1983.
G. P. Bingham, Dynamical systems and event perception: A working paper, Part II. Perceiving Acting Workshop Review, Vol. 2, pp. 4-7, 1987.
G. P. Bingham, L. D. Rosenblum, and R. C. Schmidt, Dynamics and the orientation of kinematic forms in visual event recognition. J. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 21, pp. 1473-1493, 1995.
M. M. Muchisky, and G. P. Bingham, Trajectory forms as a source of information about events. Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 64, pp. 15-31, 2002.
C. R. Twardy, and G. P. Bingham,. Causation, causal perception, and conservation laws. Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 64, pp. 956-968, 2002.
D. Jokisch, and N. F. Troje, Biological motion as a cue for the perception of size. Journal of Vision, Vol. 3, pp. 252-264, 2003.
D. S. McConnell, M. M. Muchisky, and G. P. Bingham, The use of time and trajectory forms as visual information about spatial scale in events. Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 670, pp. 1175-1187, 1998.
E. A. Wickelgren, and G. P. Bingham, Infant sensitivity to trajectory forms. J. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 27, pp. 942-952, 2001.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.