$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

서식처 적합성 지수(HSI)를 활용한 맹꽁이 서식처 복원 위치 선정
Site Selection of Narrow-mouth Frog(Kaloula borealis) Habitat Restoration Using Habitat Suitability Index 원문보기

環境復元綠化 = Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, v.18 no.2, 2015년, pp.33 - 44  

심윤진 (넥서스환경디자인연구원(주)) ,  조동길 (넥서스환경디자인연구원(주)) ,  홍진표 (넥서스환경디자인연구원(주)) ,  김덕호 (넥서스환경디자인연구원(주)) ,  박용수 (국립생태원) ,  성현찬 (단국대학교 녹지조경학과)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study was performed to propose the site selection plan for the restoration of the target Narrow-mouth Frog(Kaloula borealis) habitat, and has developed the AHP model to select the optimal site for narrow-mouth frog habitat restoration on the basis of the narrow-mouth frog Habitat Suitability In...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

  • 따라서, 본 연구는 맹꽁이의 HSI를 활용하여 맹꽁이 서식처 복원 위치 선정 방안 제시를 목적으로 하며, 이를 통해 향후 맹꽁이 서식처 복원 연구의 기초 자료를 제공하고자 한다.
  • 본 연구는 맹꽁이 서식처 복원 대상지의 위치 선정 방안을 제시하기 위하여 맹꽁이의 HSI를 활용하고 AHP 분석기법을 통하여 평가항목에 대한 가중치를 산출하여, 최종적으로 맹꽁이 서식처 복원 최적 위치 선정 배점 기준표를 제시하였다. 평가영역 및 평가항목의 가중치 산정 결과 기존 맹꽁이의 서식처에 대한 연구 결과와 유사하게 나타났다.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Adams, L. W. 1994. Urban wildlife habitats: a landscape perspective. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 

  2. Bae SW. 2013. A Study of Planning Indicators for the Creation of Environment-friendly External Space in Apartment House Regeneration Projects. Ph.D dissertation, Graduate School of Dankook University. (in Korean with English summary) 

  3. Cho DG. 2011. Ecological restoration planning and designing. Seoul: NEXUS Environmental design centre. (in Korean) 

  4. Davidson, C..H. B. Shafer and M. R. Jennings. 2002. Spatial tests of the pesticide drift, habitat destruction, UV-B, and climate-change hypotheses for California amphibian declines. Conservation Biology 16: 1588-1601. 

  5. Denbow, T. J..D. Klements and D. W. Rothman. 1996. Report 379: Guidelines for the Development of Wetland Replacement Areas. Washington, D. C: National Academy Press. 

  6. Gardner, T. 2001. Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon in conservation biology. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 24.2: 25-44. 

  7. Heyer, W. R..M. A. Donnelly.R. W. McDiarmid. L. A. C. Hayek and M. S. Foster. 1994. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: Standard methods for amphibians. Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 1-15. 

  8. Hong JP.Lee JW.Choi OH.Son JD.Cho DG and Ahn TM. 2014. A Study on Land Acquisiton Priority for Establishing Riparian Buffer Zones in Korea. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 17(4): 29-41. (in Korean with English summary) 

  9. Hwang YS. 2000. Study in the ecology of the Korean narrow-mouthed frog(Kaloula borealis). MA dissertation, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education. (in Korean with English summary) 

  10. Kim DK.Park YW and Lee SM. 2007. Assessment of tourism resource development by the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Focusing on the Planning Process. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 21(4): 5-18. (in Korean with English summary) 

  11. Kim BC. 2006. A Priority Analysis on Corporate Social Contribution Programs Through Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP), ADVERTISING RESEARCH 71: 131-151. (in Korean) 

  12. Kim SK. 2009. Habitat Suitability Assessment for the Reintroduction of Oriental White Stork (Ciconia boyciana): A GIS-based Multi-Criteria Evaluation Approach. Ph.D dissertation, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education. (in Korean with English summary) 

  13. Korea Development Institute(KDI). 2000. A Study on Multi-Criteria Analysis for Pre-feasibility Study. (in Korean) 

  14. Korea Development Institute(KDI). 2008. A Study on General Guidelines for Pre-feasibility Study (5th Edition). (in Korean) 

  15. Korea Research Foundation(KRF). 2007. A Study on the Development Direction of Academic Research Support Programs using AHP: Centered on the Basic Research Support of Science and Engineering. Korea Research Foundation Report (Policy Research-2007-005-Academic Policy). (in Korean) 

  16. Ko SB. 2012. Ecological Study of Kaloula borealis on Jeju Island. Ph.D dissertation, Graduate School of Jeju National University. (in Korean with English summary) 

  17. Ko SB.Ko YM and Oh HS. 2011a. Distribution of Spawning Site of Kaolula borealis in Jeju Island. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 25(6): 846-852. (in Korean with English summary) 

  18. Ko SB.Lee JH and Oh HS. 2011b. Age Structure Analysis of Kaolula borealis. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 25(6): 861-866. (in Korean with English summary) 

  19. Ko SB.Chang MH.Yang KS and Oh HS. 2012a. Feeding Habitats of the Kaloula borealis during the Breeding Season. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 26(3): 333-341. (in Korean with English summary) 

  20. Ko SB.Chang MH.Song JY and Oh HS. 2012b. Meteorological Factors Influencing Breeding Biology of Kaloula borealis. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 26(6): 876-883. (in Korean with English summary) 

  21. Koo BH.Jung JY and Park MO. 2011. Developing the Ecological Performance Standard for Replaced Wetlands by Analyzing Reference Wetlands. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 14(1): 11-22. (in Korean with English summary) 

  22. Lee CH. 2000. Group Decision Theory. Seoul: Sejong publishers. (in Korean) 

  23. Lee EJ. 2003. A Program Evaluation of the Environment Education in Practical Experience using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). MA dissertation, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University. (in Korean with English summary) 

  24. Lee KH. 2011. Study on the selection of reuse options for decommissioned NPP site using AHP. MA dissertation, Seoul National University. (in Korean with English summary) 

  25. National Institute of Biological Resources(NIBR). 2011. Red Data Book of Endangered Amphibians and Reptiles in Korea. pp. 22-27. (in Korean) 

  26. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw. pp. 3-35. 

  27. Saaty, T. L. 2001. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process(2nd ed.). Pittsburgh: RWS Publications. p. 84. 

  28. SER(Society for Ecological Restoration, Science and Policy Working Group). 2004. The SER Primer on Ecological Restoration. 

  29. Shim YJ. 2004. A study on the site selection of wetland replacement using Korean redfrog (Runa amurensis coreana Okada) habitat suitability index: focusing on Pangyo residential development site. MA dissertation, Seoul National University. (in Korean with English summary) 

  30. Shim YJ.Cho DG.Park S.Lee DJ.Seo YH. Kim SH.Kim DH.Ko SB.Cha JY and Sung HC. 2014. Development of Habitat Suitability Index for Habitat Restoration of Narrow-mouth Frog(Kaloula borealis). Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 17(2): 109-123. (in Korean with English summary) 

  31. Song JY.Chung KH.M. Matsui.Oh HS and W. Zhao. 2006. Distinct specific status of the Korean brown frog, Rana amurensis coreana (Amphibia: Ranidae). Zoological science 23(2): 219-224. 

  32. Suh JH and Yang HS. 2004. A Study on Framing Techniques of Landscape Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process: The Assessment on the Landscape Control Points. Journal of Korean institute of landscape architecture 32(4): 94-104. (in Korean with English summary) 

  33. Urbanska, K. M..N. R. Webb and P. J. Edwards. 1997. Restoration ecology and sustainable development. New York: Cambridge University Press. 

  34. Vitt, L. J..J. P. Caldwell.H. M. Wilbur and D. C. Smith. 1990. Amphibians as harbingers of decay. BioScience 40: 418. 

  35. Wake, D. B. and V. T. Vredenburg. 2008. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences of United States America 105: 11466-11473. 

  36. While, M. R..K. R. Lips.C. M. Pringle.S. S. Kilhara.R. J. Bixby.R. Brenes, S. Connelly. J. C. Colon-Gaud.M. Hunter-Brown.A. D. Huryn.C. Montgomery and S. Peterson. 2006. The effects of amphibian population declines on the structure and function of Neotropical stream ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 27-34. 

  37. Wyman R. L. 1990. What's happening to the amphibians? Conservation Biology. 4: 350-352. 

  38. Yang SY.Kim JB.Min MS.Suh JH and Kang YJ. 2001. Monograph of Korean Amphibia. Seoul: Academy press. (in Korean) 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로