현재 로봇은 교육적 목적으로 학교에서 점차 많이 사용되고 있다. 특히 로봇활용교육의 확산과 더불어, 로봇활용교육의 장점은 학생들에게 창의력과 논리적 사고력을 향상시키는 것으로 알려져 있다. 비록 로봇이 학생들의 수업활동을 위해 매우 유용한 도구임에도 불구하고, 로봇활용교육을 위한 교수-학습모형은 많지 않은 실정이다. 본 논문의 목적은 로봇활용교육을 위한 교수-학습 모형을 개발하는 것이다. 본 논문에서 제안하는 교수-학습 모형은 구성주의 교육철학에 기반을 두어 고안되었고, 6단계(준비, 디자인, 조립, 시범작동, 평가 및 적용 및 확장)로 구성되었다. 본 논문에서 제안하는 모형은 다음과 같은 특징을 지니고 있다. 첫째, 제안하는 모형은 학생들의 창의성과 논리적 사고력을 향상시키기 위해서 디자인되었다. 학생들은 자기주도활동을 해야 하며, 자신의 아이디어에 기초하여 결과물을 제작해야 한다. 교사들은 필요한 경우 학생들을 중재해야 한다. 둘째, 학생들은 본 모형을 통해서 다양한 상호작용을 통해 학습에 참여할 수 있다. 본 모형에서 제공하는 상호작용은 학생-학생, 학생-교사 및 학생-전문가 상호작용을 제공한다. 본 모형은 협력학습을 통한 문제해결을 권장한다. 교사는 필요한 경우 학생들을 안내하고 학생들의 활동을 모두 주시해야 한다. 셋째, 제안 모형은 학생들에게 동기부여를 학습 활동초기에 제공한다. 마지막으로 본 모형에서는 학습 결과뿐만 아니라 학습 과정까지 투명하게 볼 수 있어 학생들의 수업단계도 쉽게 확인할 수 있다. 또한, 학습과정은 최종단계에서 검증할 수 있다.
현재 로봇은 교육적 목적으로 학교에서 점차 많이 사용되고 있다. 특히 로봇활용교육의 확산과 더불어, 로봇활용교육의 장점은 학생들에게 창의력과 논리적 사고력을 향상시키는 것으로 알려져 있다. 비록 로봇이 학생들의 수업활동을 위해 매우 유용한 도구임에도 불구하고, 로봇활용교육을 위한 교수-학습모형은 많지 않은 실정이다. 본 논문의 목적은 로봇활용교육을 위한 교수-학습 모형을 개발하는 것이다. 본 논문에서 제안하는 교수-학습 모형은 구성주의 교육철학에 기반을 두어 고안되었고, 6단계(준비, 디자인, 조립, 시범작동, 평가 및 적용 및 확장)로 구성되었다. 본 논문에서 제안하는 모형은 다음과 같은 특징을 지니고 있다. 첫째, 제안하는 모형은 학생들의 창의성과 논리적 사고력을 향상시키기 위해서 디자인되었다. 학생들은 자기주도활동을 해야 하며, 자신의 아이디어에 기초하여 결과물을 제작해야 한다. 교사들은 필요한 경우 학생들을 중재해야 한다. 둘째, 학생들은 본 모형을 통해서 다양한 상호작용을 통해 학습에 참여할 수 있다. 본 모형에서 제공하는 상호작용은 학생-학생, 학생-교사 및 학생-전문가 상호작용을 제공한다. 본 모형은 협력학습을 통한 문제해결을 권장한다. 교사는 필요한 경우 학생들을 안내하고 학생들의 활동을 모두 주시해야 한다. 셋째, 제안 모형은 학생들에게 동기부여를 학습 활동초기에 제공한다. 마지막으로 본 모형에서는 학습 결과뿐만 아니라 학습 과정까지 투명하게 볼 수 있어 학생들의 수업단계도 쉽게 확인할 수 있다. 또한, 학습과정은 최종단계에서 검증할 수 있다.
Currently robots are widely used in schools for educational purpose. With wide spread of robot-based education, it is known that major advantage of robot-based education is to enhance creativity and logical thinking of students. Although robots can be very useful tools for assisting students' study ...
Currently robots are widely used in schools for educational purpose. With wide spread of robot-based education, it is known that major advantage of robot-based education is to enhance creativity and logical thinking of students. Although robots can be very useful tools for assisting students' study activities, there have not been lots of teaching-learning models for robot-based education.In this paper, a teaching-learning model is presented for robot-based education. The proposed model is designed based on constructivism. The proposed model consists of 6 stages: preparation, design, assembling, demonstration run, evaluation, and application & extension. The proposed model has the following characteristics. First, the proposed model is designed to enhance creativity and logical thinking ability of learners. Learners are supposed to be involved in self-directed activities and required to provide results based on their own ideas. Teachers are supposed to mediate students only if necessary. Second, learners are encouraged to participate in activity via diverse interaction. The interaction in this model includes learner-to-learner interaction, learner-to-teacher interaction, and learner-to-expert interaction. The proposed model encourages learners to solve the problem with cooperating each other. Also, teachers are supposed to guide students if necessary and observe and monitor behavior of students all the time. Third, motivation is provided in the beginning stage of the instruction. Fourth, in the proposed model, both study results and study process are equally important. In the model, study process is reviewed at the final stage.
Currently robots are widely used in schools for educational purpose. With wide spread of robot-based education, it is known that major advantage of robot-based education is to enhance creativity and logical thinking of students. Although robots can be very useful tools for assisting students' study activities, there have not been lots of teaching-learning models for robot-based education.In this paper, a teaching-learning model is presented for robot-based education. The proposed model is designed based on constructivism. The proposed model consists of 6 stages: preparation, design, assembling, demonstration run, evaluation, and application & extension. The proposed model has the following characteristics. First, the proposed model is designed to enhance creativity and logical thinking ability of learners. Learners are supposed to be involved in self-directed activities and required to provide results based on their own ideas. Teachers are supposed to mediate students only if necessary. Second, learners are encouraged to participate in activity via diverse interaction. The interaction in this model includes learner-to-learner interaction, learner-to-teacher interaction, and learner-to-expert interaction. The proposed model encourages learners to solve the problem with cooperating each other. Also, teachers are supposed to guide students if necessary and observe and monitor behavior of students all the time. Third, motivation is provided in the beginning stage of the instruction. Fourth, in the proposed model, both study results and study process are equally important. In the model, study process is reviewed at the final stage.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
가설 설정
Fourth, gender difference must be considered. According to [15], male students like aggressive study contents while female students like cooperative contents.
제안 방법
The proposed model has the following characteristics. First, the proposed model is designed to enhance creativity and logical thinking of learners. Second, learners can participate in activities via diverse interaction through the proposed teaching-learning model.
First, the proposed model is designed to enhance creativity of learners. Learners are supposed to be involved in self-directed activities and required to provide results based on their own ideas.
이론/모형
A teaching model is introduced for STEAM activity. The model is designed based on PBL (Project-based Learning). The following table 3 shows the steps of the model.
The proposed model is based on constructivism. The basic principles of constructivism can be summarized as follow [13].
참고문헌 (16)
S. Kim, "An Exploratory Study on the Educational Robots for Enhancing Creativity", Research Report 2008-14, KERIS, 2008.
Y. Bae, "A Study on Robot-based Education Model for 5-day-class per Week", Journal of Education Curriculum and Evaluation, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 95-119, 2006.
http://www.roborobo.co.kr, 2015.
http://www.robotni.com, 2015.
http://www.kaimax.co.kr, 2015.
http://www.minirobot.co.kr, 2015.
http://www.cnrobot.co.kr, 2015.
http://www.mirobot.co.kr, 2015.
http://www.probo.co.kr, 2015.
R. Capraro, S. Slough, "Project-based Learning", Rotterdam, Sense Publishers, 2008.
J. Hur, D. Nam, S. Kwon, and T. Lee, "Design of the Convergence Study Program based Educational Robot", Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education, Putrajaya, Malaysia, pp. 693-697, 2010. http://www.icce2010.upm.edu.my/papers/c6/short%20paper/C6SP81.pdf
S. Jang, et al, "Development Guide of Teaching-Learning Process using Educational Robot", Research Report TL 2011-21, Korean Education and Research Information Service, 2011.
S. Lim, "Sourcebook of Teaching-Learning Lesson Plans for Robot-based Education", Research Report TL 2013-2-8, Korea Education and Research Information Service, 2013.
Y. Bae, "A Study of the Robot Programming Instructional Strategies Considered Gender Differences", Journal of Korea Computer Education, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 27-37. 2007.
B. H. Khan, Web-based Instruction, Educational Technology Publication, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1997.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.