$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Exploring Secondary Science Teacher Preparation Program and Suggesting its Development Direction: A Case of USA and Korea 원문보기

한국지구과학회지 = Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, v.38 no.5, 2017년, pp.378 - 392  

Park, Young-Shin (Department of Earth Science Education, Chosun University) ,  Lee, Ki-Young (Science Education Division, Kangwon National University) ,  Morrell, Patricia D. (School of Education, University of Portland) ,  Schepige, Adele (School of Education, Western Oregon University)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Teacher quality is a topic of international concern, as it impacts student learning and teacher preparation. This study compared the undergraduate secondary science teacher preparation programs from two universities in Korea with those of Oregon, USA. We examined the programs' structural curricular ...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

  • The purpose of the research was to explore secondary science teachers’ preparation program to reveal its characteristics, on which to suggest its development direction for teachers’ expertise.
  • It focused broadly on items such as courses and degrees needed for licensure, entrance requirements into such programs, caliber of preservice teachers as compared to other candidates in other fields, as well as looking at the current teaching professionals to determine their level of qualifications and what number is teaching outside of their content area. The study stressed the importance internationally of teacher quality and the need for all students to be taught by qualified professionals. In contrast, this study was designed to take a deeper examination of the undergraduate secondary science teacher preparation programs of two different countries: Korea and the United States, specifically Oregon to provide concrete evidences showing how they look and how much they differ in their strengths and weakness.
  • This study is a preliminary work. It has many limitations including a small sample size, a focus only on published program (not looking at enacted curriculum, which is a limitation in the examination of conceptual coherence).
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Abell, S.K., 2006, Challenges and opportunities for field experiences in elementary science teacher preparation. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practices (pp. 73-90). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum in association with the Association for Science Teacher Education. 

  2. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 2013, NCTQ review of nation's education schools deceives, misinforms public. Retrieved from http://aacte.org/newsroom/press-releases/nctq-review-of-nations-educationschools-deceives-misinforms-public.html 

  3. Borko, H. and Mayfield, V., 1995, The roles of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11(5), 501-518. 

  4. Cannon, J.R. and Scharmann, L.C, 1996, Influence of a cooperative early field experience on preservice elementary teachers' science self-efficacy. Science Teacher Education, 80(4), 419-436. 

  5. Carlsen, W.S., 1999, Domains of teacher knowledge. In: Gess-Newsome, J. and N. G. Lederman, (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge. The construct and its implications for science education. (pp 133-146). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

  6. Danielson, C., 2002, Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. 

  7. Darling-Hammond, L., 2000, Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1-44. 

  8. David, F., LeeAnn, M., Joseph, K., & Brian, R., 2015, Assessing the Role of Curriculum Coherence in Student Learning About Energy. Journal of research in science teaching, 52(10), 1408-1425. 

  9. Feiman-Nemser, S., 1990, Teacher preparation: Structural and conceptual analysis. In W. R. Houston, M. Haberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 212-233). New York, NY: Macmillan. 

  10. Feiman-Nemser, S., 2001, From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055. 

  11. Gess-Newsome, J., 1999, Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman. (Eds). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. The construct and its implications for science education. (pp. 3-20). The Netherlands Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

  12. Greenberg, J., McKee, A., and Walsh, K., 2013, NCTQ teacher prep review executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.nctq.org/dmsView/Teacher_Prep_Review_executive_summary 

  13. Grossman, P.L., 1990, The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York. NY: Teachers College Press. 

  14. Hammerness, K., 2006, From coherence in theory to coherence in practice. Teachers College Record, 108(7), 1241-1265. 

  15. Ingersoll, R., 2007, A comparative study of teacher preparation and qualifications in six nations; Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/sites/default/files/researchreport/823_sixnationsfinal.pdf 

  16. Jeong, J.S., Park, J., Park. J., Kim, Y., and Park, Y.S., 2014, Developing and applying in-service program for spreading the Practical On-site Cooperation Model (POCoM). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(3), 257-268. 

  17. Jose, M., 2003, The structural coherence of students' conceptions in mechanics and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 25(5), 539-561. 

  18. Kwak, Y., 2002, Impacts and tasks of teacher education programs revealed by preservice teachers: students' intact belief. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 23(4), 309-324. 

  19. Kwak, Y., 2009, The professional development of beginning secondary science teachers. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 30(3), 354-365. 

  20. Lee, K., 2009, An analysis of earth science teachers' topicspecific pedagogical content knowledge: A case of preservice and in-service teachers. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 30(3), 330-343. 

  21. Lee, K., 2013, An analysis of the association between subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for science teachers: The case of earth science teachers' lesson on atmospheric pressure. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(6), 1219-1236. 

  22. Lee, K., Maeng, S., Park, Y.S., Lee, J.A., and Oh, H., 2014, A case study of middle school science teachers' topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge on the unit of stars and universe. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(4), 393-406. 

  23. Loveless, T., 2013, The 2013 Brown Center report on American education: How well are American students learning? Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings, 3(2), 1-36. 

  24. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J. and Borko, H., 1999, Nature, sources, and development of PCK. In Gess-Newsome J. & Lederman N. G.(Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge. The construct and its implications for science education. (pp 95-132). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

  25. Micha, H., Marcel, J., Hans, De., & Kerst, Th, 2015, Promoting Conceptual Coherence Within Context-Based Biology Education, Science Education, 99(5), 958-985. 

  26. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future., 1996, What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York, NY: 

  27. Author, 2013, Unit standards. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/Standards/UnitStandards/UnitStandardsinEffect2008/tabid/476/Default.aspx 

  28. National Math+Science Initiative. (n.d.). The STEM Crisis. Retrieved from www.nms.org/Education/TheSTEMCrisis.aspx 

  29. Otsuji, H., Oh, P., Lin, C., Mui, W.S., and Lu, Y.L., 2016, Primary school science teacher training in East-Asia: In the continuous reforming for the quality assurance. In Lin, H-S., Gilber, J.K., & Lien, C-J (Eds.), Science education research and practices in East Asia. (pp 245-272).Taiwan: Higher Education Publishing Co. Ltd. 

  30. Park, Y.S., 2008, Preserive teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning science through field experience. Journal of the Society of the International Gifted in Science, 2(1), 53-69. 

  31. Park, Y.S., 2010, Secondary beginning teachers' view of scientific inquiry: With the view of Hands-on, Mindson, and Hearts-on. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 31(7), 798-812. 

  32. Park, Y.S., 2014, Innovation in science teacher education in South Korea. In Yin, C-Y & Wang, R-J (Eds.), Advances in research on teaching: Innovations in science teacher education in the Asia Pacific. (pp. 81-104). United Kingdom: Emerald Publishers. 

  33. Park, J., Kim, Y., Park, Y.S., Park, J., and Jeong, J.S., 2015, Development and application of the practical onsite cooperation model (POCoM) for improving science teaching in secondary school. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 45-63. 

  34. Roehrig. G.H. and Luft, J.A., 2008, Exploring the first year of teaching in secondary science classrooms, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD. 

  35. Shulman, L.S., 1986, Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. 

  36. Shulman, L.S., 1987, Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. 

  37. Simmons, P.E., Emory, A., Carter, T., Coker, T., Finnegan, B., Crockett, D., Richardson, L., Yager, R., Crave, J., Tillotson, J., Brunkhorst, H., Twiest, M., Hossain, K., Gallagher, J., Duggan-Haas, D., Parker, J., Cajas, F., Alashannag, Q., McGlamery, S., Krockover, J., Adams, P., Spector, B., LaPorta, T., James, B., Rearden, K., and Labuda, K., 1999, Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 930-954. 

  38. Tairab, H., 2008, A study of science teachers' perceptions of their educational preparation. Journal of Faculty of Education, 25, 1-24. 

  39. Tatto, M., 1996, Examining values and beliefs about teaching diverse students: Understanding the challenges for teacher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 155-180. 

  40. Wang, L., Cheung, D., Chiu, M.H., Ogawa, M., and Park, Y.S., 2016, Preservice education of high school science teachers. In Lin, H-S., Gilber, J.K., & Lien, C-J (Eds.), Science education research and practices in East Asia. (pp. 273-302). Taiwan: Higher Education Publishing Co. Ltd. 

  41. Wenglinsky, H., 2000, How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. (A Policy Information Center Report). Princeton, NJ: ETS. 

  42. Wright, A.P., Horn, S.P., and Sanders, W.L., 1997, Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67. 

  43. Yoon, H.G., Kim, M., Kim. B.S., Joung, Y.J., and Park, Y.S., 2013, Preservice teachers' view of inquiry teaching and their responses to teacher educators' feedback on teaching practice, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics. Science & Technology Education, 9(4), 273-286. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

LOADING...
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로