서울시에서는 주택건설기준 등에 관한 규정 제 2조와 55조에 따라 아파트 단지 개발 시 경로당, 어린이집, 작은 도서관 등의 주민공동시설을 설치해야 한다. 이러한 기준은 해당 조항이 지역 사회의 필요를 충족시키는 지에 대한 충분히 고려 없이 각 공동 주택의 가구 수에 따라 주민공동시설을 요구해왔다. 본 연구는 현재 주민공동시설의 설치 현황과 주민들의 선호도에 대한 일치 여부를 밝혀내는 것을 목표로 한다. 연구 대상지는 서울에 위치한 아파트 단지 중 층화임의 선정한 10개이며, 각각의 아파트 주민들을 대상으로 설문 조사를 수행하였다. 주민공동시설에 대한 선호도를 분석적 계층화 방법(AHP)을 사용하여 분석하고, 설문 조사 결과를 복합 단지의 현재 시설 현황과 비교하였다. 연구 결과, 거주자들의 선호와 조항 사이에 불일치가 나타났다. 주민운동시설, 어린이집 및 작은 도서관이 강하게 선호되었지만, 연구 내 일부 아파트 단지에서는 제공되지 않으나, 경로당과 같은 선호도가 낮은 시설은 모든 단지에 제공되었다. 따라서 아파트 단지의 거주자 선호도를 반영하여 서울 아파트 단지의 주민공동시설 제공에 관한 현행 기준을 변경해야 할 것이다.
서울시에서는 주택건설기준 등에 관한 규정 제 2조와 55조에 따라 아파트 단지 개발 시 경로당, 어린이집, 작은 도서관 등의 주민공동시설을 설치해야 한다. 이러한 기준은 해당 조항이 지역 사회의 필요를 충족시키는 지에 대한 충분히 고려 없이 각 공동 주택의 가구 수에 따라 주민공동시설을 요구해왔다. 본 연구는 현재 주민공동시설의 설치 현황과 주민들의 선호도에 대한 일치 여부를 밝혀내는 것을 목표로 한다. 연구 대상지는 서울에 위치한 아파트 단지 중 층화임의 선정한 10개이며, 각각의 아파트 주민들을 대상으로 설문 조사를 수행하였다. 주민공동시설에 대한 선호도를 분석적 계층화 방법(AHP)을 사용하여 분석하고, 설문 조사 결과를 복합 단지의 현재 시설 현황과 비교하였다. 연구 결과, 거주자들의 선호와 조항 사이에 불일치가 나타났다. 주민운동시설, 어린이집 및 작은 도서관이 강하게 선호되었지만, 연구 내 일부 아파트 단지에서는 제공되지 않으나, 경로당과 같은 선호도가 낮은 시설은 모든 단지에 제공되었다. 따라서 아파트 단지의 거주자 선호도를 반영하여 서울 아파트 단지의 주민공동시설 제공에 관한 현행 기준을 변경해야 할 것이다.
In Seoul, the capital of South Korea, developers of apartment complexes are responsible for including community facilities - senior citizen centers, child care centers, small libraries, and so forth - according to the current Regulations on the Housing Construction Standard Article 2 and 55. These s...
In Seoul, the capital of South Korea, developers of apartment complexes are responsible for including community facilities - senior citizen centers, child care centers, small libraries, and so forth - according to the current Regulations on the Housing Construction Standard Article 2 and 55. These standards have long required certain community facilities, depending on the number of households in each apartment complex, without fully considering whether such provisions meet that community's needs. In this study, we aimed to reveal whether the current provision of community facilities responds to local preference. We conducted surveys of residents in randomly selected ten apartment complexes in Seoul to determine residents' preferences on community facilities using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). We then compared the survey results with these complexes' current facilities. Our findings showed mismatches between residents' preferences and provisions: outdoor sports facilities, child care centers, and small libraries were found to be strongly preferred, but not provided in some apartment complexes within the study, whereas less-preferred facilities such as senior citizen centers were provided in all complexes. Through this study, we could conclude that current standards regarding the provision of community facilities in Seoul's apartment complexes should be altered to reflect the preferences of residents in apartment complexes.
In Seoul, the capital of South Korea, developers of apartment complexes are responsible for including community facilities - senior citizen centers, child care centers, small libraries, and so forth - according to the current Regulations on the Housing Construction Standard Article 2 and 55. These standards have long required certain community facilities, depending on the number of households in each apartment complex, without fully considering whether such provisions meet that community's needs. In this study, we aimed to reveal whether the current provision of community facilities responds to local preference. We conducted surveys of residents in randomly selected ten apartment complexes in Seoul to determine residents' preferences on community facilities using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). We then compared the survey results with these complexes' current facilities. Our findings showed mismatches between residents' preferences and provisions: outdoor sports facilities, child care centers, and small libraries were found to be strongly preferred, but not provided in some apartment complexes within the study, whereas less-preferred facilities such as senior citizen centers were provided in all complexes. Through this study, we could conclude that current standards regarding the provision of community facilities in Seoul's apartment complexes should be altered to reflect the preferences of residents in apartment complexes.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
Recently, the value of community facilities has been considered as important factors to both residents and developers in the real estate market. In this backdrop, the purpose of this study is to assess whether the provision of community facilities provided by apartment complexes are consistent with the needs and preferences of residents. In this study, we first identify which types of community facilities are preferred by residents, then investigate whether those specific facilities were included in those residents’ apartment complexes.
가설 설정
First, we created a decision hierarchy structure to classify decision-making criteria. In the evaluation criteria, we classified the facilities into indoor and outdoor facilities. For alternatives, we listed the seven major community facility types: Senior citizen center, senior citizen center garden, child care center, small library, playground, indoor sports facility, and outdoor sports facility.
In this study, we first identify which types of community facilities are preferred by residents, then investigate whether those specific facilities were included in those residents’ apartment complexes.
제안 방법
In this study, we first identify which types of community facilities are preferred by residents, then investigate whether those specific facilities were included in those residents’ apartment complexes. For the first line of the inquiry, we survey preferences on the six major community facilities listed above to apartment complex residents randomly sampled in Seoul, via a questionnaire, and analyze the results using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Then, for the second line of inquiry, we compare the result with the actual provision of such facilities through investigating the sites and construction documents of apartment complexes.
The main questions are (a) whether the respondents recognize the existence of community facilities in their apartment complex, and (b) which facilities they consider more important than others. For the second set of questions, we used the AHP question format to examine the importance/preference (weights) via a bilateral comparison of the seven community facilities. Additionally, as background information, we asked for gender, age, family composition, housing unit size, and annual household income of the respondents.
In this study, we examined residents’ preferences on community facilities in apartment complexes across Seoul, containing more than 500 households and built after 2000, and compared the result with the current provisions to infer whether the supply meets the demand.
The face-to-face survey was conducted on site between 1 p.m. and 5 p.m., weekdays and weekends from May 1 to June 6, 2015. There were 150 total participants, 15 in each site.
For the first line of the inquiry, we survey preferences on the six major community facilities listed above to apartment complex residents randomly sampled in Seoul, via a questionnaire, and analyze the results using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Then, for the second line of inquiry, we compare the result with the actual provision of such facilities through investigating the sites and construction documents of apartment complexes.
대상 데이터
Our study sites comprise ten apartment complexes, a stratified random sample from population apartments in Seoul built after 2000 and containing more than 500 households in each. We selected relatively newer and larger apartment complexes, as they would have been built after the Housing Construction Standards that required the provision of the six aforementioned community facilities.
, weekdays and weekends from May 1 to June 6, 2015. There were 150 total participants, 15 in each site. In the questionnaire survey, we asked the respondents to evaluate the preferences of the facilities, as if their apartment complex has all of the seven community facilities.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.