$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

업사이클링 패션제품에 대한 지각된 소비가치, 환경친화적 신념, 태도, 온라인 구전의도 및 구매의도에 관한 연구
Perceived Consumption Value, Pro-Environmental Belief, Attitude, eWOM, and Purchase Intention Toward Upcycling Fashion Products 원문보기

Fashion & textile research journal = 한국의류산업학회지, v.20 no.2, 2018년, pp.177 - 190  

전은하 (연세대학교 의류환경학과) ,  강미 (연세대학교 의류환경학과) ,  유지혜 (연세대학교 의류환경학과) ,  고은주 (연세대학교 의류환경학과)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Fashion industry constantly produces and consumes, which leads to huge waste piles of perfectly usable textiles in landfills, as well as other negative effects of an exploitative and excessively rapid fashion process. Pollution created by making and dyeing clothes has pitted fashion industry and env...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

문제 정의

  • (1991)의 선행연구를 바탕으로 연구의 목적을 설정하였다. 따라서 본 연구의 목적은 업사이클링 패션제품에 대한 지각된 소비가치, 환경친화적 신념, 태도, 온라인 구전의도, 구매의도 간의 영향관계를 알아보고, 업사이클링 제품의 인지도와 구매경험 유무에 따른 지각된 소비가치의 차이를 규명하는 것이다. 본 연구는 업사이클링 패션제품과 브랜드에 대한 긍정적인 태도, 온라인 구전의도 및 구매의도 형성에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 소비가치를 파악하여 업사이클링에 대한 긍정적인 가치인식을 유도하고, 관련된 상품의 기획 및 마케팅 전략수립에 기여할 수 있을 것이다.

가설 설정

  • H1: 업사이클링 패션제품에 대한 지각된 소비가치(사회적 가치[H1-1], 감정적 가치[H1-2], 기능적 가치[H1-3], 경제적 가치 [H1-4], 에코 가치[H1-5])는 환경친화적 신념에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이다.
  • H2: 환경친화적 신념은 업사이클링 태도(브랜드태도[H2-1], 제품태도[H2-2])에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이다.
  • H3: 업사이클링에 대한 태도(브랜드태도[H3-1], 제품태도[H3-2])는 온라인 구전의도에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이다.
  • H4: 업사이클링에 대한 태도(브랜드태도[H4-1], 제품태도[H4-2])는 구매의도에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이다.
  • H5: 온라인 구전의도는 구매의도에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이다.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
한국의 업사이클링 산업 규모의 성장세는 어떠한가? 독일, 스위스, 영국 등지의 유럽 국가에서는 ‘지구를 살리는 친환경적 생산과 윤리적 소비양식’으로 각광받고 있다. 업사이클링 제품은 혁신적인 디자인에 희소성까지 더해져 기존의 재활용 제품에 비해 매력적으로 소비자들의 관심을 끌게 되었고, 한국의 업사이클링 산업 규모도 2013년 100억 원대에서 3년 만에 두배 규모의 성장세에 있다(Kim, 2017).
섬유 폐기물의 매립 처리는 여러 문제를 일으키는데, 합성섬유와 합성소재는 어떤 문제를 일으키는가? 섬유 폐기물의 매립 처리는 여러 문제들을 일으킨다. 합성섬유는 분해되지 않고, 천연소재나 식물성 합성소재는 분해되는 과정에서 지구온난화의 주범인 메탄을 발생시킨다. 2000년 이래 폭발적으로 팽창해온 패스트 패션 브랜드들은 새로운 스타일의 빠른 회전을 통해 의류제품의 소비를 증가시켜 왔다.
업사이클링의 정의는 무엇인가? 저품질과 저수요라는 재활용 제품에 대한 선입견으로 인해 재활용 과정의 많은 수작업과 운송 비용 등에도 저가에 판매되고, 자금과 기술 투자의 부족으로 저급한 재활용품이 다시 생산되는 악순환의 고리에 놓여 있었다. 환경오염과 유한한 자원 소비에 대한 자각으로 관심을 받고 있는 업사이클링(Upcycling) 은 “버려지는 제품을 재조합하여 새로운 가치를 창조하는 것” 으로 정의되고, 재활용을 의미하는 리사이클링(Recycling)보다 더 발전된 개념으로 인식되고 있다(Park & Choo, 2015). 독일, 스위스, 영국 등지의 유럽 국가에서는 ‘지구를 살리는 친환경적 생산과 윤리적 소비양식’으로 각광받고 있다.
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (90)

  1. Arvola, A., Vassallo, M., Dean, M., Lampila, P., Saba, A., Lahteenmaki, L., & Shepherd, R. (2008). Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite, 50(2), 443-454. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.010 

  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 

  3. Bass, F. M., & Talarzyk, W. W. (1972). An attitude model for the study of brand preference. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(1), 93-96. doi:10.2307/3149618 

  4. Bu, M. S., & Kim, J. S. (2006). Disposal behaviors of college students in recycling resources. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 44(4), 145-157. 

  5. Chan, T. Y., & Wong, C. W. Y. (2012). The consumption side of sustainable fashion supply chain: Understanding fashion consumer eco-fashion consumption decision. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 16(2), 193-215. doi:10.1108/13612021211222824 

  6. Cheung, R., Lau, M. M., & Lam, A. Y. (2015). Factors affecting consumer attitude towards organic food: An empirical study in Hong Kong. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 25(3), 216-231. doi:10.1080/21639159.2015.1041782 

  7. Cheung, R., Lam, A. Y., & Lau, M. M. (2015). Drivers of green product adoption: The role of green perceived value, green trust and perceived quality. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 25(3), 232-245. doi:10.1080/21639159.2015.1041781 

  8. Chi, T. (2015). Consumer perceived value of environmentally friendly apparel: An empirical study of Chinese consumers. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 106(10), 1038-105. doi:10.1080/00405000.2014.985879 

  9. Chiou, J. S., & Cheng, C. (2003). Should a company have message boards on its web sites?. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(3), 50-61. doi:10.1002/dir.10059 

  10. Cho, C. H. (2004). Effects of banner clicking and attitude toward the linked target ads on brand-attitude and purchase-intention changes. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 14(1), 1-16. doi:10.1080/12297119.2004.9707219. 

  11. Cho, E. A., & Kim, M. S. (2004). Adolescents' attitude toward and purchasing behavior for the imported luxuries and the famous brand clothing as determined by conspicuous consumption. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 28(1), 76-87. 

  12. Cho, E. J. (2015). A study on the moderating effect of knowledge on the environment in the relationship between consumption value of ecological fashion products of students and purchase intention. Journal Korea Society of Visual Design Forum, 49, 41-54. doi:10.5805/SFTI.2013.15.1.057 

  13. Cho, S. M. (2016). Thrown away like this, glamorous past is too pity. Segye.com. Retrieved October 31, 2016, from http://www.segye.com/newsView/20160902002636.html 

  14. Choi, H. Y. (2017). Reasonable transformation of garbage, 'Up-Cycling Fashion'. Retrieved August 22, 2017, from http://cm.asiae.co.kr/view.htm?no2017071908343883748.html 

  15. Choo, T. G., & Park, H. H. (2013). The effect of consumption value on attitude and repurchase intention of secondhand fashion goods: The moderating role of self-confidence in fashion coordination. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 37(4), 618-630. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2013.37.4.618 

  16. Chung, M. S., & Kim, H. J. (2009). The effects of social-face sensitivity, conspicuous consumption and preference of fashion luxury goods on purchasing behavior of fashion counterfeits. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 17(2), 189-202. 

  17. Chung, W. G. (2009). The main spindle will be 30s' the middle class who are college graduate. The Hankyoreh. Retrieved December 20, 2016, from http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/PRINT/341284.html 

  18. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 

  19. Dens, N., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2010). Consumer response to different advertising appeals for new products: The moderating influence of branding strategy and product category involvement. Journal of Brand Management, 18(1), 50-65. doi:10.1057/bm.2010.22 

  20. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. 

  21. Follows, S. B., & Jobber, D. (2000). Environmentally responsible purchase behavior: A test of a consumer model. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5/6), 723-746. doi:10.1108/03090560010322009 

  22. Gallarza, M. G., Gil?Saura, I., & Holbrook, M. B. (2011). The value of value: Further excursions on the meaning and role of customer value. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(4), 179-191. doi:10.1002/cb.328 

  23. Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(3), 335-362. doi:10.1177/0013916502034003004 

  24. Gatignon, H., & Robertson, T. S. (1985). A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 849-867. doi:10.1086/209021 

  25. Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski, A. J. (2006). eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 449-456. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.10.004 

  26. Ha, S. N., & Lee, J. K. (2013). A study on company cases of upcycling design activation. Journal of Korean Society of Design Science, 26(3), 305-325. doi:10.15187/adr.2013.08.26.3.305 

  27. Ha, S. Y., & Park, J. O. (2010). Analysis of values and design elements in eco-friendly fashion using an in-depth interview. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 34(10), 1754-1766. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2010.34.10.1754 

  28. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. 

  29. Han, D. Y., & Choi, S. Y. (2006). A study on the relationship between the factors influencing purchase intention of green products. Korean Corporation Management Review, 13(2), 99-112. 

  30. Hartmann, P., Apaolaza Ibanez, V., & Forcada Sainz, F. J. (2005). Green branding effects on attitude: Functional versus emotional positioning strategies. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 23(1), 9-29. doi:10.1108/02634500510577447 

  31. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52. doi:10.1002/dir.10073 

  32. Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2011). Exploring consumer adoption of a high involvement eco-innovation using value-beliefnorm theory. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(1), 51-60. doi:10.1002/cb.346 

  33. Jeong, E., & Jang, S. S. (2011). Restaurant experiences triggering positive electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) motivations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(2), 356-366. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.08.005 

  34. Jung, H. J., Kim, H., & Oh, K. W. (2016). Green leather for ethical consumers in China and Korea: Facilitating ethical consumption with value-belief-attitude logic. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 483-502. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2475-2 

  35. Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28(1), 111-133. doi:10.1177/0013916596281006 

  36. Kang, J. G., & Lee, J. H. (2011). A study on relation among perceived value, attitude, and behavior intention according to yes or no recognition of native local foods' storytelling. The Korea Academic Society of Tourism and Leisure, 23(1), 317-334. 

  37. Khan, S. N., & Mohsin, M. (2017). The power of emotional value: Exploring the effects of values on green product consumer choice behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 65-74. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.187 

  38. Kilbourne, W., & Pickett, G. (2008). How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Business Research, 61(9), 885-893. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.09.016 

  39. Kim, C., Ko, E., & Koh, J. (2016). Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions toward fashion counterfeits: Moderating the effects of types of counterfeit goods and consumer characteristics. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 7(1), 15-29. doi:10.1080/20932685.2015.1105109 

  40. Kim, H. J. (2014b). A study of high value-added upcycled handbag designs for the Dubai luxury fashion market. Journal of the Korean Society of Fashion Design, 14(1), 173-188. 

  41. Kim, H. S., & Ma, M. (2014). Influence of parent brand attitude and self-brand congruity on consumer response to green brand extensions for apparel products. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 5(2), 165-181. doi:10.1080/20932685.2014.881586 

  42. Kim, J. E., Kim, J. E., & Johnson, K. K. (2010). The customersalesperson relationship and sales effectiveness in luxury fashion stores: The role of self monitoring. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 1(4), 230-239. doi:10.1080/20932685.2010.10593074 

  43. Kim, M. S. (2017). Salvage as a luxury…'up-cycling' trend in fashion. Hankookilbo. Retrieved September 02, 2017, from http://hankookilbo.com/v/07f8db66e304460cbf0bd251be00c495.html. 

  44. Kim, S. A. (2014a). A study on business creation through the upcycling design: A case study on the "The nanugi" project. Bulletin of Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 15(2), 13-23. 

  45. Kim, S. Y. (2012). A study on the up-cycling trend in fashion for environment-friendly design. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 36(3), 297-310. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2012.36.3.297 

  46. Kim, Y. (2011). Understanding green purchase: The influence of collectivism, personal values and environmental attitudes, and the moderating effect of perceived consumer effectiveness. Seoul Journal of Business, 17(1), 65-92. 

  47. Kim, Y. H. (2015). Recycle? Up-cycle! (Infographic). Visual Dive. Retrieved September 22, 2016, from http://www.visualdive.com/2015/06/%EB%A6%AC%EC%82%AC%EC%9D%B4%ED%81%B4-%EC%97%85%EC%82%AC%EC%9D%B4%ED%81%B4-%EC%9D%B8%ED%8F%AC%EA%B7%B8%EB%9E%98%ED%94%BD/.Html. 

  48. Kim, Y. H., Oh, K. W., & Jung, H. J. (2015). Determinants of ecofriendly outdoor wear products purchase intention: Exploring value-belief-norm theory. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 17(6), 965-977. doi:10.5805/SFTI.2015.17.6.965 

  49. Ko, E., & Fashion Marketing Research Lab. (2015). Sustainable fashion brand marketing. Seoul: Kyomunsa. 

  50. Kong, H. M., Ko, E., Chae, H., & Mattila, P. (2016). Understanding fashion consumers' attitude and behavioral intention toward sustainable fashion products: Focus on sustainable knowledge sources and knowledge types. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 7(2), 103-119. doi:10.1080/20932685.2015.1131435 

  51. Koo, D. M. (2000). The effects of personality variables and values on pro-environmental product purchase and recycling behaviors. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 5(1), 171-204. doi:10.1080/12297119.2000.9707473 

  52. Krech, D., Crutchfield, R. S., & Ballachey, E. L. (1962). Individual in society: A textbook of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill. 

  53. Kwan, J. S. (2012). Based on the perspective of sustainability, the characteristics of upcycle fashion design. Journal of the Korean Society for Clothing Industry, 14(1), 13-23. doi:10.5805/KSCI.2012.14.1.013 

  54. Lee, J. I., & Song, K. S. (2007). Improvement plans of waste statistics survey. Suwon: Gyeonggi Research Institute. 

  55. Lee, S. (2011). Consumers' value, environmental consciousness, and willingness to pay more toward green-apparel products. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 2(3), 161-169. doi:10.1080/20932685.2011.10593094 

  56. Lemke, F., Clark, M., & Wilson, H. (2011). Customer experience quality: An exploration in business and consumer contexts using repertory grid technique. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(6), 846-869. doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0219-0 

  57. Ling, K. C., Chai, L. T., & Piew, T. H. (2010). The effects of shopping orientations, online trust and prior online purchase experience toward customers' online purchase intention. International Business Research, 3(3), 63-76. doi:10.5539/ibr.v3n3p63 

  58. Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-ofmouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458-468. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011 

  59. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the Ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48-65. doi:10.2307/1251413 

  60. Meyer, C., & Schwager, A. (2007). Understanding customer experience. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 116-126. 

  61. McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2006). Sustainability: Consumer perceptions and marketing strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(3), 157-170. doi:10.1002/bse.524 

  62. Montoro Rios, F. J., Luque Martinez, T., Fuentes Moreno, F., & Canadas Soriano, P. (2006). Improving attitudes toward brands with environmental associations: An experimental approach. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(1), 26-33. doi:10.1108/07363760610641136 

  63. Nam, K. H., & Yeo, J. S. (2007). A study on the co-orientation of the perception of corporate social responsibility: Centered on the employees and the consumers at the age of twenties and thirties. Journal of Consumer Studies, 18(3), 43-61. 

  64. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). Servqual. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40. 

  65. Park, H. H. (2015a). Perceived value dimensions of up-cycling fashion goods and the relationship with attitude and purchase intention-The moderating effect of fashion innovativeness. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 39(2), 257-270. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2015.39.2.257 

  66. Park, H. H. (2015b). The influence of LOHAS consumption tendency and perceived consumer effectiveness on trust and purchase intention regarding upcycling fashion goods. International Journal of Human Ecology, 16(1), 37-47. doi:10.6115/ijhe.2015.16.1.37 

  67. Park, H. H., & Choo, T. G. (2015). The influence of perceived risk of up-cycling fashion product on trust, purchase intention and recommendation intention. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 17(2), 216-226. doi:10.5805/SFTI.2015.17.2.216 

  68. Park, J. M., & Shin, H. W. (2014). Environmental consciousness, clothing recycling behavior and interest in fashion by awareness of upcycling and purchasing behavior for upcycled fashion products of middle & high school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 26(2), 89-99. 

  69. Park, M. S., Lee, B. J., & Ham, S. (2014). Comparison of consumer's perceptions of quality certified agricultural products by consumer's health-concern and environmental concern. Journal of Food Service Management Society of Korea, 17(5), 107-132. 

  70. Park, S. H., & Oh, K. W. (2014). Environmental knowledge, ecofriendly attitude and purchase intention about eco-friendly fashion products of fashion consumers. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 16(1), 91-100. doi:10.5805/SFTI.2014.16.1.91 

  71. Pieters, R., Bijmolt, T., Van Raaij, F., & de Kruijk, M. (1998). Consumers' attributions of pro environmental behavior, motivation, and ability to self and others. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 215-225. 

  72. Ryou, E. J. (2002). A study on the effect of clothing consumption value on service quality of internet apparel shopping mall. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 52(3), 161-169. 

  73. Sattler, H., Volckner, F., Riediger, C., & Ringle, C. M. (2010). The impact of brand extension success drivers on brand extension price premiums. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(4), 319-328. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.08.005 

  74. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8 

  75. Song, J. J. (2010). SPSS/AMOS method of statistical analysis. Paju, Korea: 21C book. 

  76. Song, S., & Ko, E. (2017). Perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors toward sustainable fashion: Application of Q and Q-R methodologies. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(3), 264-273. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12335 

  77. Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 

  78. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81-97. 

  79. Stern, P. C., Kalof, L., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(18), 1611-1636. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02636.x 

  80. Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0 

  81. Szmigin, I., Carrigan, M., & McEachern, M. G. (2009). The conscious consumer: Taking a flexible approach to ethical behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 224-231. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00750.x 

  82. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176. doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 

  83. The Boston Consulting Group and Global Fashion Agenda. (2017). Pulse of the fashion industry report. Retrieved September 1, 2017, from https://www.copenhagenfashionsummit.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Pulse-of-the-Fashion-Industry_2017.pdf 

  84. '2016 Transparency ROI Study'. (2016, July 01). Label insight. Retrieved May 27, 2017, from https://www.labelinsight.com/transparency-roi-study 

  85. Van Lange, P. A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.) (2011). Handbook of theories of social psychology: Vol. 2. London: Sage Publications. 

  86. Wilkie, W. L. (1990). Consumer behavior. New York: John Wile & Sons. 

  87. Wu, D. G., & Chalip, L. (2014). Effects of co-branding on consumers' purchase intention and evaluation of apparel attributes. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 24(1), 1-20. doi:10.1080/21639159.2013.852910 

  88. Yang, J. J., Kim, S., Ham, G., & Lee, Y. (2013). Impacts of environmental value, belief, and personal norm on pro-environmental behavior using VBN theory. Environmental Policy, 21(3), 53-80. doi:10.15301/jepa.2013.09.21.3.53 

  89. Yim, E. Y. (2014). Analysis on upcycling design cases. Bulletin of Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 15(2), 11-19. 

  90. Yoo, C. W., Kim, Y. J., Moon, J., & Choe, Y. C. (2008). The effect of herding behavior and perceived usefulness on intention to purchase e-learning content: Comparison analysis by purchase experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 18(4), 105-130. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

LOADING...
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로