다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
Safety and health at work : SH@W, v.9 no.3, 2018년, pp.296 - 307
Shirali, Gholamabbas (Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences) , Shekari, Mohammad (Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences) , Angali, Kambiz Ahmadi (Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences)
AI-Helper
Background: Safety culture, acting as the oil necessary in an efficient safety management system, has its own weaknesses in the current conceptualization and utilization in practice. As a new approach, resilience safety culture (RSC) has been proposed to reduce these weaknesses and improve safety cu...
1 Akselsson R. Koornneef F. Stewart S. Ward M. Resilience Safety Culture in Aviation Organisations 17th World Congress on Ergonomics 2009 IEA Beijing, China
2 Reiman T. Rollenhagen C. Does the concept of safety culture help or hinder systems thinking in safety? Accid Anal Prev 68 2014 5 15 24275532
3 International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safety culture in nuclear installations. Guidance for Use in the Enhancement of Safety Culture 2002 IAEA Vienna (Austria) 3 23
4 Clarke S. Perceptions of organizational safety: implications for the development of safety culture J Organ Behav 20 1999 185 198
5 Hopkins A. Safety, culture and risk. The organisational causes of disaster 2005 CCH Australia Sydney (Australia)
6 Richter A. Koch C. Integration, differentiation and ambiguity in safety cultures Saf Sci 42 2004 703 722
7 Pidgeon N.F. Safety culture and risk management in organizations J Cross Cult Psychol 22 1991 129 140
8 Cooper M.D. Towards a model of safety culture Saf Sci 36 2000 111 136
9 Gadd S. Collins A.M. Safety Culture: A literature review 2002 Harpur Hill (UK): Health and Safety Laboratory
10 Guldenmund F.W. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research Saf Sci 34 2000 215 257
11 Guldenmund F.W. The use of questionnaires in safety culture research–an evaluation Saf Sci 45 2007 723 743
12 Pidgeon N. Safety culture: key theoretical issues Work Stress 12 1998 202 216
13 Zhu J. Data envelopment analysis vs. principal component analysis: An illustrative study of economic performance of Chinese cities Eur J Oper Res 111 1998 50 61
14 Kines P. Lappalainen J. Mikkelsen K.L. Olsen E. Pousette A. Tharaldsen J. Tómasson K. Törner M. Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): A new tool for diagnosing occupational safety climate Int J Ind Ergon 41 2011 634 646
15 Rall M. Dieckmann P. Safety culture and crisis resource management in airway management: general principles to enhance patient safety in critical airway situations Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 19 2005 539 557 16408533
16 Antonsen S. Safety culture and the issue of power Saf Sci 47 2009 183 191
17 Díaz-Cabrera D. Hernandez-Fernaud E. Isla-Díaz R. An evaluation of a new instrument to measure organisational safety culture values and practices Accid Anal Prev 39 2007 1202 1211 17920844
18 Hopkins A. Andrew H. Lessons from Longford: the Esso gas plant explosion 2000 CCH Australia Limited Sydney (Australia)
19 De Carvalho P.V. The use of Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) in a mid-air collision to understand some characteristics of the air traffic management system resilience Reliab Eng Syst Safe 96 2011 1482 1498
20 Dekker S. Hollnagel E. Woods D. Cook R. Resilience Engineering: New directions for measuring and maintaining safety in complex systems 2008 Lund University School of Aviation Lund (Sweden)
21 Nævestad T.O. Mapping research on culture and safety in High-Risk organizations: Arguments for a sociotechnical understanding of safety culture J Contingencies Crisis Manage 17 2009 126 136
22 Weick K.E. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster Admin Sci Q 1993 628 652
23 International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) IAEA, safety culture. Report 75-INSAG-4 International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group of the International Atomic Energy Agency 1991 IAEA Vienna (Austria)
24 National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Report Volume 1 August 2003 from the Columbia accident investigation board 2003 NASA Houston (TX)
25 Britain G. Hidden A. Investigation into the Clapham Junction railway accident 1989 HM Stationery Office London (UK)
26 Kletz T.A. Learning from accidents 3rd ed. 2001 Routledge London (UK)
27 Shirali G. Ebrahipour V. Proactive risk assessment to identify emergent risks using functional resonance analysis method (FRAM): A case study in an oil process unit Iran Occupational Health 10 2013 33 46
28 Wang R. Zheng W. Research and application of the BFM-STAMP hazard analysis method Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT), 2013 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, Philadelphia (PA); 2013
29 Hollnagel E. Barriers and accident prevention 2016 Ashgate Aldershot (UK)
30 Checkland P. Systems thinking, systems practice 1981 John Wiley & Sons New York
31 Leveson NG. System safety engineering: Back to the future [Internet]. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2002 [cited 2017 Jan 31]. Available from http://sunnyday.mit.edu/book2.pdf .
32 Skyttner L. General systems theory: problems, perspectives, practice 2005 World scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd Singapore
33 Shirali G.A. Shekari M. Angali K. Quantitative assessment of resilience safety culture using principal components analysis and numerical taxonomy: A case study in a petrochemical plant J Loss Prev Process Ind 40 2016 277 284
34 Woods D.D. Leveson N. Hollnagel E. Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts 2007 Ashgate Publishing, Ltd Aldershot (UK)
35 Kao C.S. Lai W.H. Chuang T.F. Lee J.C. Safety culture factors, group differences, and risk perception in five petrochemical plants Process Saf Prog 27 2008 145 152
36 Shirali G.A. Mohammadfam I. Ebrahimipour V. A new method for quantitative assessment of resilience engineering by PCA and NT approach: A case study in a process industry Reliab Eng Syst Safe 119 2013 88 94
37 Shirali G.H. Mohammadfam I. Motamedzade M. Ebrahimipour V. Moghimbeigi A. Assessing resilience engineering based on safety culture and managerial factors Process Saf Prog 31 2012 17 18
38 Reason J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents Vol. 6 1997 Ashgate Aldershot (UK)
39 Saurin T.A. Júnior G.C. Evaluation and improvement of a method for assessing HSMS from the resilience engineering perspective: a case study of an electricity distributor Saf Sci 49 2011 355 368
40 Re A. Macchi L. From cognitive reliability to competence? An evolving approach to human factors and safety Cogn Technol Work 12 2010 79 85
41 Lynn M.R. Determination and quantification of content validity Nurs Res 35 1986 382 386 3640358
42 American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), Standards for educational and psychological tests 1974 American Psychological Association Washington (WA)
43 Lawshe C.H. A quantitative approach to content validity1 Pers Psychol 28 1975 563 575
44 Johnson R.A. Wichern D.W. Applied multivariate statistical analysis 2014 Prentice-Hall New Jersey
45 Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS 2009 Sage Publications Thousand Oaks (CA)
46 Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 2015 Guilford Publications New York (US)
47 Jackson D.L. Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N: q hypothesis Struct Equ Modeling 10 2003 128 141
48 Shah R. Goldstein S.M. Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward J Oper Manag 24 2006 148 169
49 Kline P. A handbook of test construction: introduction to psychometric design 1986 Methuen & Co. Ltd London (UK)
50 Nunnally J.C. Bernstein I. The assessment of reliability Psychometric Theory 3 1994 248 292
51 Segall D.O. The reliability of linearly equated tests Psychometrika 59 1994 361 375
52 Charter R.A. Sample size requirements for precise estimates of reliability, generalizability, and validity coefficients J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 21 1999 559 566 10550813
53 Davis L. Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts Appl Nurs Res 5 1992 194 197
54 Polit D.F. Beck C.T. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations Res Nurs Health 29 2006 489 497 16977646
55 Rubio D.M. Berg-Weger M. Tebb S.S. Lee E.S. Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research Soc Work Res 27 2003 94 104
56 Vieira A.L. Winklhofer H. Ennew C.T. Relationship quality: a literature review and research agenda J Cust Behav 7 2008 269 291
57 Marsh H.W. Hau K.T. Wen Z. In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings Struct Equ Modeling 11 2004 320 341
58 Gomes J.O. Woods D.D. Carvalho P.V. Huber G.J. Borges M.R. Resilience and brittleness in the offshore helicopter transportation system: the identification of constraints and sacrifice decisions in pilots’ work Reliab Eng Syst Safe 94 2009 311 319
59 Shirali G.A. Motamedzade M. Mohammadfam I. Ebrahimipour V. Moghimbeigi A. Assessment of resilience engineering factors based on system properties in a process industry Cogn Technol Work 18 2016 19 31
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.