$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

가치 연구의 동향 분석: 수학적 가치와 수학 교육적 가치를 중심으로
An analysis of the trends of value research : Focused on mathematical values and mathematics educational values 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series A. The Mathematical Education, v.58 no.4, 2019년, pp.609 - 625  

방정숙 (한국교원대학교) ,  김승민 (서울금북초등학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

최근 국제 수학교육에서 가치(values)를 다루는 프로젝트나 연구물이 증가하고 있으나 우리나라에서는 소개된 것이 많지 않다. 본 연구에서는 Bishop(1996)의 '수학적 가치'와 '수학 교육적 가치'를 중심으로 체계적인 문헌 검토를 통하여 최종 66편의 논문을 선정하였고 연구시기, 프로젝트, 분석 대상, 연구 방법을 기준으로 연구 동향을 제시하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

While research projects and reports on values in mathematics education increased in the international community over the years, little has been known about the topic and research findings in South Korea. The purpose of this study was to analyze the trends of value research in mathematics education f...

주제어

표/그림 (8)

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

문제 정의

  • 이처럼 수학교육에서 가치에 대한 연구가 새롭게 부각되는 반면에 그동안 우리나라에서는 별반 소개되지 않았다. 이에 본 논문에서는 수학교육에서 가치와 관련된 국외 연구를 체계적으로 분석하여 우리나라에서 향후 가치연구의 배경 및 토대를 마련하고자 한다. 특히 Bishop이 제시한 가치의 영역 중 ‘수학적 가치’와 ‘수학 교육적 가치’를 다룬 문헌을 메타분석하여 수학교육에서 가치 연구에 대한 전반적인 동향을 면밀히 살펴보고자 한다.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
지금까지 수학교육에서의 가치가 가지는 문제점은? 다만, 지금까지 수학교육에서의 가치는 ‘무엇이 가지는 중요성으로서의 가치’에 집중하는 경향이 있었지만, 이와 더불어 ‘실제 무엇을 중요하게 다루는지에 관한 가치’에 관심을 기울이면서 진단이나 변화를 위한 조정의 기반을 마련할 필요가 있다. 또한 각 나라에서 수학 교육적 가치를 규명하는 것 자체도 의미가 있지만, 그러한 가치가 형성된 사회문화적 요인을 국제적 관점에서 보다 면밀히설명하려는 노력이 필요하다.
Krathwohl, Bloom, Masia가 말하는 가치의 발달 단계는 ? 가치에 관한 연구들은 초기부터 가치를 규정하기 위해 다양한 관점에서 논의되었다. 예를 들어, Krathwohl, Bloom, Masia는 가치를 설명하기 위하여 가치의 발달 단계를 ‘받아들이기(receiving) - 반응하기(responding) - 가치를 두기(valuing) - 조직(organization) - 특성화(characterization)’로 언급하였다(as cited in Seah & Bishop, 2000). Raths, Harmin, Simon(1987)은 가치 지표(value indicators)라는 아이디어를 도입하여 무엇인가 중요하게 다룰 때 필수과정이 있음을 설명하였다.
수학적 가치와 수학 교육적 가치를 다룬 논문 분석은 carr의 분석 방법을 참조하여 어떻게 진행됐는가? 본 연구의 분석은 Carr(2019)의 분석 방법을 참조하여 5단계로 진행하였다. 먼저 문헌을 검토하는데 포함시켜야할 연구를 무엇으로 할 것인지를 결정하였다. 다음으로 검색을 통해 관련된 문헌을 확인하였으며, 연구 목적과 관련이 없는 내용을 구분하고 분석에 필요한 연구물을 추출한 후, 연구 내용을 검토하였고, 최종적으로 결과를 분석하였다.
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (67)

  1. Atweh, B. & Seah, W. T. (2008). Theorizing values and their study in mathematics education. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Fremantle, Australia. 

  2. Barkatsas, T., Law, H. Y., Wong, N. Y., & Seah, W. T. (2018). Valuing from student's perspectives as a lens to understand mathematics learning: The case of Hong Kong. In B. Rott, G. Torner, J. Peters-Dasdemir, A. Moller, & Safrudiannur (Eds.), Views and beliefs in mathematics education: The role of beliefs in the classroom (pp. 43-53). Cham: Springer. 

  3. Barkatsas, T. & Seah, W. (2015). Learners' preferred mathematical task types: The values perspective. In A. Bishop, H. Tan, & T. Barkatsas (Eds.), Diversity in mathematics education (pp. 63-79). Cham: Springer. 

  4. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

  5. Bishop, A. J. (1996). How should mathematics teaching in modern societies relate to cultural values-Some preliminary questions. In D. Nguyen, T. Pham, C. Comiti, D. R. Green, E. Southwell, & J. Izard (Eds.), Proceedings of 7th Southeast Asian conference on Mathematics Education, Hanoi, Vietnam. 

  6. Bishop, A. 1. (1998). Culture, values and assessment in mathematics. In H. S. Park, Y. H. Choe, H. Shin, & S. H. Kim (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI-East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 27-37). Seoul, Korea: Korea Society of Mathematical Education. 

  7. Bishop, A. J. (2014). Values in Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 633-636). Dordrecht: Springer. 

  8. Bishop, A. J. (2016). What would the mathematics curriculum look like if instead of concepts and techniques, values were the focus? In B. Larvor (Ed.), Mathematical cultures (pp. 181-188). Switzerland: Springer. 

  9. Bishop, A. J., Clarke, B. A., Corrigan, D. J., & Gunstone, R. F. (2005). Teachers' preferences and practices regarding values in teaching mathematics and science. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: Research, theory and practice. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 153-160). Sydney: MERGA. 

  10. Bishop, A. J., Seah, W. T., & Chin, C. (2003). Values in mathematics teaching-The hidden persuaders? In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 717-765). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. 

  11. Cao, Z., Seah, W., & Bishop, A. (2006). A comparison of mathematical values conveyed in mathematics textbooks in China and Australia. In K. S. L. Frederick, D. G. Klaus, & J. L. Francis (Eds.), Mathematics Education in Different Cultural Tradition: A Comparative Study of East Asia and the West. The 13th ICMI Study (pp. 483-493). New York: Springer. 

  12. Carr M. E. (2019). Student and/or teacher valuing in mathematics classrooms: Where are we now, and where should we go? In P. Clarkson, W. Seah, & J. Pang (Eds.), Values and valuing in mathematics education (pp. 25-52). Cham: Springer. 

  13. Chan, Y. C. & Wong, N. Y. (2019). Methodological issues in the investigation of values in mathematics. In P. Clarkson, W. Seah, & J. Pang (Eds.), Values and valuing in mathematics education (pp. 197-208). Cham: Springer. 

  14. Chin, C. & Lin, F. L. (1999). One mathematics teacher's pedagogical values: Intended, implemented, and self phases. In F. L. Lin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Mathematics Teacher Education (Vol. I, pp. 315-324). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University. 

  15. Chin, C. & Lin, F. L. (2000). Values and values statement emerged in students' preferences on test items: A case study from mathematical induction. Paper presented at the History and Pedagogy of Mathematics 2000 Conference, Taipei, Taiwan. 

  16. Clarkson, P. C., Bishop, A. J., FitzSimons, G. E., & Seah, W. T. (2000). Challenges and constraints in researching values. In J. Bana, & A. Chapman (Eds.), Mathematics education beyond 2000. Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 188-195). Perth: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. 

  17. Clarkson, P. C., Bishop, A., FitzSimons, G. E., & Seah, W. T. (2001). Lifelong learning and values: An undervalued legacy of mathematics education? In G. E. FitzSimons, J. O'Donoghue, & D. Coben (Eds.), Adult and lifelong education in mathematics: Papers from the Working Group for Action (WGA) 6, 9th International Congress on Mathematics Education (ICME9) (pp. 37-46). Melbourne: Adults Learing Mathematics and Language Australia 

  18. Clarkson P., Bishop A., & Seah W. T. (2010). Mathematics education and student values: The cultivation of mathematical wellbeing. In T. Lovat, R. Toomey, & N. Clement (Eds.), International Research Handbook on Values Education and Student Wellbeing. Dordrecht: Springer. 

  19. Clarkson, P., Seah, W. T., & Pang, J. (Eds.). (2019). Values and valuing in mathematics education scanning and scoping the territory. ICME-13 Monographs. Cham: Springer. 

  20. Corey, D. L. & Ninomiya, H. (2019). Values of the Japanese mathematics teacher community. In P. Clarkson, W. Seah, & J. Pang (Eds.), Values and valuing in mathematics education (pp. 53-67). Cham: Springer. 

  21. Dede, Y. (2006a). Mathematics educational values of college students towards function concept. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(1), 82-102. 

  22. Dede, Y. (2006b). Mathematical values conveyed by high school mathematics textbooks. Educational Science: Theory & Practice, 6(1), 118-132. 

  23. Dede, Y. (2006c). Values in Turkish middle school mathematics textbooks. Quality and Quantity, 40(3), 331-359. 

  24. Dede, Y. (2011). Mathematics education values questionnaire for Turkish preservice mathematics teachers: Design, validation, and results. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 603-626. 

  25. Dede, Y. (2012). Why is mathematics valuable? A comparison of Turkish and German mathematics teachers. Mathematics Education Bulletin-BOLEMA, 26(44), 1171-1206. 

  26. Dede, Y. (2013). The effect of German and Turkish mathematics teachers' teaching experience on mathematics education values: A cross-comparative study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(2), 232-252. 

  27. Dede, Y. (2014). A comparison of Turkish and German mathematics teachers' values: A gender perspective. Education and Science, 39(171), 180-198. 

  28. Dede, Y. (2015). Comparing primary and secondary mathematics teachers' preferences regarding values about mathematics teaching in Turkey and Germany. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education., 13(1), 227-255. 

  29. Dede, Y. (2019). Why mathematics is valuable for Turkish, Turkish immigrant and German students? A cross-cultural study. In P. Clarkson, W. Seah, & J. Pang (Eds.), Values and valuing in mathematics education (pp. 143-156). Cham: Springer. 

  30. Dollah, M. & Widjaja, W. (2018). Comparing the inculcation of the value of rationalism from the Australia and Malaysia mathematics textbooks. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 9, 261-268. 

  31. Durmus, S. & Bicak, B. (2006). A scale for mathematics and mathematical values of pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics (ICTM 3), Istanbul, Turkey. 

  32. FitzSimons, G., Seah, W. T., Bishop, A. J., & Clarkson, P. (2000). Conceptions of values and mathematics education held by Australian primary teachers: Preliminary findings from VAMP. In W. S. Horng, & F. L. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of the HPM 2000 International Conference on History in Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 163-171). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University. 

  33. FitzSimons, G., Seah, W., Bishop, A. J., & Clarkson, P. (2001). Beyond numeracy: Values in the mathematics classroom. 24th Annual MERGA Conference, Sydney, Australia. 

  34. Grootenboer, P. & Marshman, M. (2016). The affective domain, mathematics, and mathematics education. In P. Grootenboer, & M. Marshman (Eds.), Mathematics, affect and learning (pp. 13-33). Singapore: Springer. 

  35. Hannula, M. S. (2012). Looking at the third wave from the West: Framing values within a broader scope of affective traits. ZDM, 44(1), 83-90. 

  36. Jacobs, G. J. & Jacobs, M. (2016). Values that private school learners associate with mathematics learning. Proceedings of the 2016 ISTE International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 259-269). Limpopo, South Africa. 

  37. Jacobs, G. J. & van Reenen, W. (2016). Values that first year engineering students associate with mathematics learning. Proceedings of the 2016 ISTE International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 248-258). Limpopo, South Africa. 

  38. Jo, H. J. & Kim, I. S. (2016). Analyzing research trend of affective aspects in mathematics in Korea. Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(1), 67-83. 

  39. Kadroon, T. & Inprasitha, M. (2013). Professional development of mathematics teachers with lesson study and open approach: The process for changing teachers values about teaching mathematics. Psychology, 4(2), 101-105. 

  40. Kang, M. S. & Lee, C. H. (2016). An analysis of recognition in mathematics learning value of elementary school students and parent. School Mathematics, 18(3), 667-689. 

  41. Lee, H. F. & Seah, W. T. (2015). "Math is not for us, not an indigenous thing, you know": Empowering Taiwanese indigenous learners of mathematics through the values approach. In B. Greer (Ed.), Proceedings of the meeting of the Eight International Mathematics Education and Society Conference, Portland, OR. 

  42. Leu, Y. C. & Wu, C. J. (2005). Investigation on an elementary teacher's mathematics pedagogical values through her approach to students' errors. In H. L. Chick, & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 249-256). Melbourne: PME. 

  43. Lim, C. S. (2010). Using NVivo 8 to explore photo-voice. In J. Lim (Ed.), Proceedings of the international workshop on computer aided qualitative research Asia (pp. 48-59). The Netherlands: Merlien Institute. 

  44. Liman, M. A., Salleh, M. J., & Abdullahi, M. (2013). Sociological and mathematics educational values: An intersection of need for effective mathematics instructional contents delivery. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(2), 192-203. 

  45. Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson. 

  46. Osterling, L. & Andersson, A. (2013). Measuring immeasurable values. In A. Lindmeier, & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the meeting of the 37th Conference of the International Group for Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 17-24). Kiel: PME. 

  47. Pang. J., Cho. S., & Seah, W. T. (2016). An investigation of what Korean students valued with regards to mathematics and mathematics Learning: A study with sixth and ninth graders. The Mathematical Education, 55(4), 467-484. 

  48. Peng, A. & Nyroos, M. (2012). Values in effective mathematics lessons in Sweden: What do they tell us? The Mathematics Enthusiast, 9(3), 409-430. 

  49. Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers' beliefs and affect. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257-315). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 

  50. Raths, L. E., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. B. (1987). Selections from values and teaching. In P. F. Carbone (Ed.), Value theory and education (pp. 198-214). Malabar, FL: Kreiger. 

  51. Seah, W. T. (2002). The perception of, and interaction with, value differences by immigrant teachers of mathematics in two Australian secondary classrooms. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23(2), 189-210. 

  52. Seah, W. T. (2011). Effective mathematics learning in two Australian primary classes: Exploring the underlying values. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 129-136). Ankara: PME. 

  53. Seah, W. T. (2019). Values in mathematics education: Its conative nature, and how it can be developed. Research in Mathematical Education, 22(2), 99-121. 

  54. Seah, W. T. & Andersson, A. (2015). Valuing diversity in mathematics pedagogy through the volitional nature and alignment of values. In A. Bishop, T. Barkatsas, & H. Tan (Eds.), Diversity in mathematics education: Towards inclusive practices (pp. 187-183). Switzerland: Springer. 

  55. Seah, W. T., Baba, T., & Zhang, Q. P. (2017). The WIFI study: Students' valuing of mathematics learning in Hong Kong and Japan. In J. W. Son, T. Watanabe, & J. J. Lo (Eds.), What matters? Research trends in international comparative studies in mathematics education (pp. 333-354). Cham: Springer. 

  56. Seah, W. T. & Bishop, A. J. (2000). Values in mathematics textbooks: A view through two Australasian regions. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. 

  57. Seah, W. T., Davis, K. E., & Carr, E. M. (2017). School mathematics education through the eyes of students in Ghana: Extrinsic and intrinsic valuing. Paper Presented at CERME10, Dublin, Ireland. 

  58. Seah, W. T. & Peng, A. (2012). What students outside Asia value in effective mathematics lessons: A scoping study. ZDM, 44(1), 71-82. 

  59. Seah, W. T. & Wong, N. Y. (2012). What students value in effective mathematics learning: A 'third wave project' research study. ZDM, 44(1), 33-43. 

  60. Seah, W. T., Zhang, Q., Barkatsas, T., Law, H. Y., & Leu, Y. C. (2014). Mathematics learning in mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan: The values perspective. In C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, P. Liljedahl, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 5, pp. 145-152). Vancouver: PME. 

  61. Sfard, A., Forman, E., & Kieran, C. (2001). Guest editorial learning discourse: Sociocultural approaches to research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1/3), 1-11. 

  62. Shinno, Y., Kinone, C., & Baba, T. (2014). Exploring 'what Japanese students find important in mathematics learning' based on the third wave project. In C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, P. Liljedahl, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 5, pp. 169-176). Vancouver: PME. 

  63. Song, S. H., Pang, J. S., Lim, J. H., Kang, O. G, Kang, H. Y., Kwon, N. Y., ..., Choi, J. Y. (2013). A method of mathematical education research. The Korea society of educational studies in mathematics yearbook 2013. Seoul: Kyungmoonsa. 

  64. Swadener, M. & Soedjadi, R. (1988). Values, mathematics education and the task of developing pupils' personalities: An Indonesian perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(2), 193-208. 

  65. Tan-Sisman, G. & Kirez, B. (2017). The mathematical values in the Turkish Middle School Mathematics Applications Course Curriculum. Paper Presented at CERME 10. Dublin, Ireland. 

  66. Yazici, E., Peker, M., Ertekin, E., & Dilmac, B. (2011). Is there a relationship between pre-service teachers' mathematical values and their teaching anxieties in mathematics? Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(1), 263-282. 

  67. Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 113-121. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로