The arbitration procedure, which is a private trial, does not have a separate enforcement agency. Therefore, unless a party consents to the arbitration award and voluntarily fulfills the award, its execution is accomplished through the implementation of the national court. In particular, the decisio...
The arbitration procedure, which is a private trial, does not have a separate enforcement agency. Therefore, unless a party consents to the arbitration award and voluntarily fulfills the award, its execution is accomplished through the implementation of the national court. In particular, the decision in the foreign arbitration procedure will be refused or rejected for the arbitration award in case the proceedings of the law and procedure on which the judgment is based are caused by inconsistency with the domestic law or procedural defect. However, all foreign arbitration awards generally do not have to go through the approval process, and it will come into force with the arbitration award. In the case of Germany in the revision of the German Civil Procedure Act of 1996, the main provisions of the New York Convention concerning the ratification and enforcement of arbitration proceedings are reflected. Germany provides for the arbitration procedures in the arbitration proceedings of Book 10 of the Civil Procedure Act. Particularly, with Article 1061 in Book 10 Section 8 below, the approval and enforcement of foreign arbitrators shall be governed. Article 1061 has been referred to as "The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Jurisdictions," Article 5 (1). The main reasons for approval and enforcement rejection are: (1) Reason for the acceptance or refusal of enforcement by request of the parties: Reason for failure of subjective arbitration ability, invalidation of arbitration agreement, collapse of attack or defense method, dispute not included in arbitration agreement, (2) Reasons for the approval and enforcement of arbitration considered by the competent authority of the arbitrator: violation of objective arbitration ability, violation of public order, but not based on the default of German statute.
The arbitration procedure, which is a private trial, does not have a separate enforcement agency. Therefore, unless a party consents to the arbitration award and voluntarily fulfills the award, its execution is accomplished through the implementation of the national court. In particular, the decision in the foreign arbitration procedure will be refused or rejected for the arbitration award in case the proceedings of the law and procedure on which the judgment is based are caused by inconsistency with the domestic law or procedural defect. However, all foreign arbitration awards generally do not have to go through the approval process, and it will come into force with the arbitration award. In the case of Germany in the revision of the German Civil Procedure Act of 1996, the main provisions of the New York Convention concerning the ratification and enforcement of arbitration proceedings are reflected. Germany provides for the arbitration procedures in the arbitration proceedings of Book 10 of the Civil Procedure Act. Particularly, with Article 1061 in Book 10 Section 8 below, the approval and enforcement of foreign arbitrators shall be governed. Article 1061 has been referred to as "The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Jurisdictions," Article 5 (1). The main reasons for approval and enforcement rejection are: (1) Reason for the acceptance or refusal of enforcement by request of the parties: Reason for failure of subjective arbitration ability, invalidation of arbitration agreement, collapse of attack or defense method, dispute not included in arbitration agreement, (2) Reasons for the approval and enforcement of arbitration considered by the competent authority of the arbitrator: violation of objective arbitration ability, violation of public order, but not based on the default of German statute.
독일은 중재절차에 관한 사항을 민사소송법 제10권 중재절차(Schiedsrichterliches Verfahren)에 규정하고 있다. 특히 중재판정의 승인 및 집행에 관해서는 제10권 제8절 중재판정의 승인 및 집행요건(Voraussetzungen der Anerkennung und Vollstreckung von Schiedssprüchen) 이하의 제1060조는 국내중재판정(Inländische Schiedssprüche)의 승인 및 집행에 관한 사항을 제1061조3)는 외국중재판정(Ausländische Schiedssprüche)의 승인 및 집행에 관해 규율 한다.
중재판정이 승인 집행되기 위해 필요한 조건은?
중재판정이 승인·집행되기 위해서는 당해 중재합의가 유효하여야 한다. 이때 중재합의의 유효성에 관해서는 당사자가 선택한 준거법과 중재지의 법에 따른 분쟁해결규정에 의해 결정한다.
절차위반과 관련하여 최사한의 절차법적기준과 뉴욕협약 제5조 제2항 b호에 따른 절차적공서와 중복되는 것이 미치는 영향은?
중재판정에 있어 중대한 절차위반과 관련하여 최소한의 절차법적기준과 뉴욕협약 제5조 제1항 b호의 적용을 제한하는 이유는 당해규정이 뉴욕협약 제5조 제2항 b호73)에 따른‘절차적공서(verfahrensrechtlichen ordre public)’와 중복되기 때문이다.74) 이러한 중복은 뉴욕협약 제5조 제2항 b호가 주장이 없더라도 직권으로 심사되고 위반여부가 고려될 수 있기 때문에, 청구상대방에게 유리한 영향을 미칠 수 있다.75)
이 논문을 인용한 문헌
활용도 분석정보
상세보기
다운로드
내보내기
활용도 Top5 논문
해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다. 더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.