참고문헌 (39)

1. Aho, A. V. ,2011, Computation and computational thinking. Ubiquity, an ACM Press, 2011(1), 1-8 p. DOI: 10.1145/1895419.1922682 

2. 10.1145/1929887.1929905 Barr, V. and Stephenson, C. ,2011, Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54 p. 

   상세보기

3. Coyle, P. ,2010, Computational thinking and STEM education. Retrieved from https://peadarcoyle.com/2010/09/05/computational-thinking/ 

4. Cummins, K. ,2015, Five reasons why computational thinking is an essential tool for teachers and students. Retrieved from edgalaxy.com (cool stuff for nerdy teachers) https://www.edgalaxy.com/journal/2016/5/25/five-reasons-why-computational-thinking-is-an-essentialtool-for-teachers-and-students 

5. 10.1145/2998438 Denning, P. J. ,2017, Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 33-39 p. 

   상세보기

6. 10.2991/ict4s-14.2014.28 Easterbrook, S. ,2014, From computational thinking to systems thinking: A conceptual toolkit for sustainability computing. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ict4s-14/13446 

   

7. 10.1038/440419a Foster, I. ,2006, 2020 computing: a two-way street to science’s future. Nature, 440(7083), 419 p. 

   상세보기

8. 10.5467/JKESS.2018.39.3.275 Han, N. and Nam, Y. ,2018, The change of elementary science gifted students’ perception about engineers and engineering practices through science and engineering integrated (SEI) lessons, Journal of Korean Earth Science and Society, 39(3), 275-290 p. 

   원문보기 상세보기

9. Hannasari, R. , Harahap, M. , and Sinulingga, K. ,2017, Effect of scientific inquiry learning model using scientific concepts map and attitudes to skills process science students. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(21), 48-52 p. 

10. Hwang, K. ,2019, Exploring elementary teachers’ perception about computational thinking included science program during professional development program. Master thesis at Chosun University. 

11. Jones, E. ,2011, The trouble with computational thinking. Retrieved from http://www.csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/JonesCTOnePager.pdf 

12. Kong, S. C. , Abelson, H. , Sheldon, J. , Lao, A. , Tissenbaum, M. , Lai, M. , Lang, K. , and Lao, N. ,2017, Curriculum activities to foster primary school students’ computational practices in block-based programming environments. In S. C. Kong, J. Sheldon & K. Y. Li (Eds.), Conference Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education 2017 (pp. 84-89). Hong Kong: The Education University of Hong Kong. 

13. 10.1177/016146818608700404 Kuhn, D. ,1986, Education for thinking. Teachers college Record, 87, 495-511 p. 

    상세보기

14. 10.1002/sce.3730770306 Kuhn, D. ,1993, Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337 p. 

    상세보기

15. 10.33524/cjar.v13i2.37 MacDonald, C. ,2012, Understanding participatory action research: A qualitative research methodology option. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 13(2), 34-50 p. 

    

16. 10.2991/ict4s-14.2014.15 Mann, S. , Costello, K. , Lopez, M. , Lopez, D. , and Smith, N. ,2014, An ethical basis for sustainability in the worldviews of first year students, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S’2014). Atlantis Press. 

    

17. Margolis, J. , Estrella, R. , Goode, J. , Jellison Home, J. , and Nao, K. ,2008, Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press. 

18. Margolis J. , and Fisher A. ,2003, Unlocking the clubhouse: women in computing. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press. 

19. Ministry of Education, 2015, The 2015 revised information curriculum. 

20. 10.1145/3231587 Nardelli, E. ,2019, Do we really need computational thinking?. Communications of the ACM, 62(02), 32-35p. 

    상세보기

21. National Research Council,2012, A framework for K-12 Science education, Washington. D.C: The National Academies Press. 

22. National Research Council,2000, Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press. 

23. NGSS Lead States,2013, Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press. 

24. 10.1126/science.1183944 Osborne, J. ,2010, Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science (New York, N.Y.). 328. 463-466. 10.1126/science.1183944. 

    상세보기

25. Park, Y-S. ,2006, Theoretical study on the opportunity of scientific argumentation for implementing authentic scientific inquiry. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 27(4), 401-415 p. 

26. 10.5467/JKESS.2010.31.7.798 Park, Y-S. ,2010, Secondary beginning teachers’ views of scientific inquiry: With the view of hands-on, minds-on, and hearts-on. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 31(7), 798-812 p. 

    원문보기 상세보기

27. Park, Y-S. ,2013, STEAM project Climate Change, program book funded by KOFAC (Korean Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity). 

28. Park, Y-S. , and Hwang, J. ,2017, The preliminary study of developing computational thinking practice analysis tool and its implication, Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 10(2), 140-160 p. 

29. Park, Y-S. , May,2018, The study of elementary science program with computational thinking practices and its understandings by elementary teachers, The 1st Korean Geoscience Union conference 2018, Hong-Cheon, Kangwon-Do, Korea. 

30. 10.5467/JKESS.2018.39.4.388 Park, Y-S. and Park, M. ,2018, Exploring students’ competencies to be creative problem solvers with computational thinking practices. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 39(4), 388-400 p. 

    원문보기 상세보기

31. 10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0709 Sim, J. , Lee, Y. , and Kim. H-K, 2015, Understanding STEM, STEAM education, and addressing the issues facing STEAM in the Korean context, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 709-723 p. 

    원문보기 상세보기

32. The International Society for Technology in Education,2011, Computational Thinking; teacher resoucres second edition. 

33. 10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5 Weintrop, D. , Beheshti, E. , Horn, M. , Orton, K. , Jona, K. , Trouille, L. , and Wilensky, U. ,2016, Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127-147 p. 

    상세보기

34. 10.1145/1118178.1118215 Wing, J. M. ,2006, Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-36 p. 

    상세보기

35. 10.1098/rsta.2008.0118 Wing, J. M. ,2008, Computational Tinking and Thinking About Computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 366, 3717-3725 p. 

    상세보기

36. Wing, J. M. ,2010, Computational thinking: What and why?. Retrieved from https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf 

37. 10.1016/0732-3123(95)90010-1 Wilensky, U. ,1995, Paradox, programming, and learning probability: a case study in a connected mathematics framework. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14(2), 253-280 p. 

    상세보기

38. 10.1207/s1532690xci2402_1 Wilensky, U. , and Reisman K ,2006, Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories-an embodied modeling approach. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 171-209 p. 

    상세보기

39. 10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7 Yadva, A. , Hong, H. , and Stephenson, C. ,2016, Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565-568 p. 

    상세보기